Abortion, Art, Copyright, Linda Greenhouse, New York Times, Non-Sequiturs

Non-Sequiturs: 10.18.06

By  
on

* Who’d have thunk it? Objectivity is subjective. And how much do you want to bet that any article or blog entry referring to this controversy will be titled the “Greenhouse Effect”? [PrawfsBlawg]
* Shi–ite! That’s scary. But the op-ed is a good primer for lay idiots like me. [New york Times via AMERICAblog]
* Forget the Shiites and Sunnis. Someone needs to write “Abortion for Dummies,” and give it to Mr. O’Reilly pronto. [Media Matters]
* “Working for food” just doesn’t seem legal in this context. Isn’t there a Models Union or something? [OnMilwaukee.com]
* Lichtenstein would no doubt describe the noise of this head-on collision between copyright and fair use with a POW! “Sampling” doesn’t look so bad now, does it? [Boston Globe]

Sponsored

Topics