Add RSS RSS

More About Shanetta Y. Cutlar

Shanetta Cutlar heads the Special Litigation Section of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. After we named her our DOJ Diva of the Day, a number of you asked for more information about her.

Who is Shanetta Cutlar? How long has she been at the Civil Rights Division? Where did she go to law school? And what’s the origin of her distinctive first name?

We did a little research. Accessing PDF files can be a pain — they take forever to launch, they slow down your machine, etc. — but we’ll do anything for our readers. So we opened up this PDF bio:

Shanetta Y. Cutlar is the Chief of the Special Litigation Section, U.S. Department of Justice. Ms. Cutlar has worked in the Civil Rights Division since 1993. She served for over 2 years as a Special Counsel prior to becoming Chief. As Special Counsel, Mr. Cutlar led the team of attorneys and professionals handling the investigations of the Cincinnati, Detroit and Prince George’s police departments.

In March 2003, Ms. Cutlar was appointed to the Chief position where she is responsible for supervising and overseeing the work of Section, involving health care facilities, prisons and jails, juvenile detention facilities and police misconduct. She is the first African-American woman to serve as a chief in 25 years, and the second in the history of the Civil Rights Division.

Ms. Cutlar is a graduate of California State University, Hayward and University of California at Los Angeles, Law School. She is a member of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority.

Ah, Shanetta’s a sorority girl. No wonder she’s so good at (allegedly) cultivating “an atmosphere of fear and paranoia.” Those sorority girls are VICIOUS.

(A Google image search for Shanetta Cutlar comes up empty. But if you have pictures of Ms. Cutlar, or know where on the internet we can find some, please contact us.)

Shanetta Y. Cutlar bio (PDF) [U.S. Department of Justice]

Earlier: DOJ Diva of the Day: Shanetta Y. Cutlar

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by G | Permalink Thursday, January 11, 2007 10:46 AM

Um, this post is crap. Where are the Shanetta-licious documents you promised? Feed me Lat boy!

avatar
2 Posted by Punks | Permalink Friday, January 12, 2007 12:29 AM

Why do I get the sense that people are afraid of asking if she's black?

avatar
3 Posted by LadyB | Permalink Tuesday, January 16, 2007 2:33 AM

OK, is Shanetta black? I'm black and I can't tell...hmmm. Damn my "blackdar" i.e. black radar (similar to gaydar) isn't working! Shanetta, Shanetta, California, Alpha Kappa. Who knows? Who cares???

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 16, 2007 6:46 AM

LadyB: Second paragraph of the block quote: "She is the first African-American woman to serve as a chief in 25 years, and the second in the history of the Civil Rights Division."

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, January 16, 2007 8:20 AM

LadyB, you didn't invent the "blackdar"
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/34052

avatar
6 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:21 PM

That was a dumb article in the Onion and an even dumber set of questions about whether the lady is black. What difference does it make? Methinks the point has been made about this lady being a bitch (if this is not a one-side axe grind) so why is the author of the blog carrying on with this anyway? Puzzled.

avatar
7 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:24 PM

That was a dumb article in the Onion and an even dumber set of questions about whether the lady is black. What difference does it make? Methinks the point has been made about this lady being a bitch (if this is not a one-side axe grind) so why is the author of the blog carrying on with this anyway? Puzzled.

avatar
8 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:30 PM

That was a dumb article in the Onion and an even dumber set of questions about whether the lady is black. What difference does it make? Methinks the point has been made about this lady being a bitch (if this is not a one-side axe grind) so why is the author of the blog carrying on with this anyway? Puzzled.

Post Your Comment