Add RSS RSS

Skaddenfreude: Hogan & Hartson Loves New York

100 dollar bill Above the Law Above the Law law firm salary legal blog legal tabloid Above the Law.JPGFrom the D.C.-based Legal Times:

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom said Wednesday it would increase its first-year associate salaries [in Washington] to $160,000, following in the footsteps of New York-based Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.

Skadden is the first law firm with a major D.C. presence to up the ante for associate pay in Washington. The firm has 263 lawyers in the District.

D.C.-based Hogan & Hartson has also announced it is moving associate salaries in its New York office to $160,000, but it doesn’t plan to do the same in Washington as of yet.

So in New York, it looks like all the biggies will be following suit. But expect a divide to open up in D.C. between the “national” firms and the local shops:

[M]ost D.C. firms are staying quiet about whether or not they’ll follow. Karl Racine, managing partner of Venable’s Washington office, which pays first-year associates $135,000, says he “expects that to remain.”

You can read the rest of Nate Carlile and Anna Palmer’s article here.

Skadden Raises Associate Pay [Legal Times]

Earlier: Previous announcements of law firm associate salary increases (scroll down through “Skaddenfreude” archives)

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:14 AM

Karl Racine says he doesn't expect to raise above $135,000 because he doesn't want to. Watch the talent flee from his firm...

avatar
2 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:16 AM

Any chance a firm like DPW or CSM will come over the top to 170k?

avatar
3 Posted by David Lat | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:16 AM

Yes, I see the typo ("Yu" instead of "You")... Would fix if I could....

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:17 AM

What talent?

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:20 AM

What talent?

avatar
6 Posted by playing chicken | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:22 AM

...so the DC firms are telling each other through the press that they don't want to raise pay, huh? I don't know if anyone really expects DC firms to bump first-year associate pay up to $160, but when a fourth year at Hogan is making $175,000 w/ a discretionary bonus, and a first year at any NY firm is taking home $160,000 in base plus $30,000 in guaranteed bonus, there is something deeply wrong, and the quality of legal work out of DC will eventually drop because of it.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:22 AM

There should be a delineation between "national" firms not based in NY like Latham, Kirkland, etc., and other regional ones. That said, I don't think those firms are going to pay higher salaries in the smaller markets if they don't have to do so.

avatar
8 Posted by Last Chance | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:25 AM

Anyone know if there was a Hogan memo or if associates told verbally? Also, anyone know what time W&C memo went out officially? Hoping that puts some pressure on CC.

avatar
9 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:25 AM

Completely agree, for example, Latham's largest office is now in NY, committees are spread out and LA is by no means the home base. They consider themselves to be a national player competing with every other major firm in NY with a substantial national presence, but will they pay as a top 10 firm nationally or be content to be a regional firm with an outpost in NYC.

avatar
10 Posted by cold and hungry in big DC condo | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:31 AM

There are at least 15 NY based firms paying their DC associates $25K more than Hogan, Covington, Wilmer, Akin, Arnold Porter. It can't last. Predict Hogan leads DC market with adjustment to $150K.

avatar
11 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:34 AM

What about Wachtell ? $170,000 ?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:37 AM

cold and hungry, ITA. Who gives up first in this chicken game?

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:40 AM

cold and hungry, ITA. Who gives up first in this chicken game?

avatar
14 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:44 AM

Any thoughts on Tx based firms going up too?

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:47 AM

what are other ny firms waiting for? its clear that every firm in the v20 must now match or be banished from T10 OCI. are v50 firms waiting to see if there will be a 145 tier remaining for them to be a part of?

avatar
16 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:50 AM

Perhaps they are waiting for partnership meetings to discuss the issue. I would imagine that this could take some time for a lot of firms.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:54 AM

This is worse than a book with no pictures. Every time I load this site, at the top is the word "Skaddenfreude" and a picture of a $100 bill. More Shanetta, please. Or Elect, or icky state court judges, or blurry photos of bloggers and lawyers, or lawyer-on-lawyer matrimonial action, or bench-slappery, or something, please.

avatar
18 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:54 AM

Weil's memo stated it was raising for ALL U.S. Associates, which would include D.C.

avatar
19 Posted by I'm Rich | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:59 AM

11:45:

It appears that Weil matched for their Texas associates. That's a lot of money to make in Texas. I'm not sure how many Texas firms will follow suit.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:13 PM

I'd like somebody who is bashing the CA & DC associates who would like more money to explain to me how Texas warrants $160,000? As it is, many TX firms were already above DC at $140,000 starting...

avatar
21 Posted by Details please | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:24 PM

Hey David: can we have a recap at the end of the day today with firms that upped just in New York and those that did it elsewhere as well? I'm at Dewey and I know Dewey did it for all US and UK associates, and I assume most of the other NY firms did as well...

avatar
22 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:34 PM

I'm Rich:

But the down side is that you have to live in a republican sh!thole known as TX

avatar
23 Posted by Dissed in DC | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:42 PM

Everyone at Hogan in DC should be outraged at this blatant attempt to discourage other DC firms from raising salaries. Hogan attempts to compete as a top 20 firm, but being the leader in resisting pay increases rather than unquestionably paying top dollar clearly places Hogan in a second tier.

The message is loud an clear for all law students and laterals considering the DC market: WORK FOR A NYC-BASED FIRM OR RECEIVE SECOND TIER PAY!

For the amount of money on the table, the decision should be easy for any recruit with an offer on the table from a DC-based shop and a NYC-based shop.

avatar
24 Posted by Dissed in DC | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:44 PM

Everyone at Hogan in DC should be outraged at this blatant attempt to discourage other DC firms from raising salaries. Hogan attempts to compete as a top 20 firm, but being the leader in resisting pay increases rather than unquestionably paying top dollar clearly places Hogan in a second tier.

The message is loud an clear for all law students and laterals considering the DC market: WORK FOR A NYC-BASED FIRM OR RECEIVE SECOND TIER PAY!

For the amount of money on the table, the decision should be easy for any recruit with an offer on the table from a DC-based shop and a NYC-based shop.

avatar
25 Posted by Dissed in DC | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:47 PM

Everyone at Hogan in DC should be outraged at this blatant attempt to discourage other DC firms from raising salaries. Hogan attempts to compete as a top 20 firm, but being the leader in resisting pay increases rather than unquestionably paying top dollar clearly places Hogan in a second tier.

The message is loud an clear for all law students and laterals considering the DC market: WORK FOR A NYC-BASED FIRM OR RECEIVE SECOND TIER PAY!

For the amount of money on the table, the decision should be easy for any recruit with an offer on the table from a DC-based shop and a NYC-based shop.

avatar
26 Posted by Dissed in DC | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:53 PM

Everyone at Hogan in DC should be outraged at this blatant attempt to discourage other DC firms from raising salaries. Hogan attempts to compete as a top 20 firm, but being the leader in resisting pay increases rather than unquestionably paying top dollar clearly places Hogan in a second tier.

The message is loud an clear for all law students and laterals considering the DC market: WORK FOR A NYC-BASED FIRM OR RECEIVE SECOND TIER PAY!

For the amount of money on the table, the decision should be easy for any recruit with an offer on the table from a DC-based shop and a NYC-based shop.

Prediction: mass exodus

avatar
27 Posted by Dissed in DC | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:55 PM

Everyone at Hogan in DC should be outraged at this blatant attempt to discourage other DC firms from raising salaries. Hogan attempts to compete as a top 20 firm, but being the leader in resisting pay increases rather than unquestionably paying top dollar clearly places Hogan in a second tier.

The message is loud an clear for all law students and laterals considering the DC market: WORK FOR A NYC-BASED FIRM OR RECEIVE SECOND TIER PAY!

For the amount of money on the table, the decision should be easy for any recruit with an offer on the table from a DC-based shop and a NYC-based shop.

Prediction: mass exodus

avatar
28 Posted by Dissed in DC | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:01 PM

Everyone at Hogan in DC should be outraged at this blatant attempt to discourage other DC firms from raising salaries. Hogan attempts to compete as a top 20 firm, but being the leader in resisting pay increases rather than unquestionably paying top dollar clearly places Hogan in a second tier.

The message is loud an clear for all law students and laterals considering the DC market: WORK FOR A NYC-BASED FIRM OR RECEIVE SECOND TIER PAY!

For the amount of money on the table, the decision should be easy for any recruit with an offer on the table from a DC-based shop and a NYC-based shop.

Prediction: mass exodus

A firm's failure to jump on board with salary increases would be easier to swallow if pay scales were adjusted annually for cost of living. Since they aren't, and since salary increases like this only come around every few years on average (with these back to back increases making up for years without change), it's outrageous that firms don't match.

avatar
29 Posted by Happy with 145 | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:04 PM

Dissed in DC: Simmer down. Presumably if you're working at Hogan DC, you've got choices. Vote with your feet and quit bitching about it.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:04 PM

Dissed in DC:

I couldn't agree more. Hogan may have single-handedly screwed many DC associates. They can't truly consider themselves a top-tier, A-list firm if they don't match salaries or atleast bring them to 150k. I think the new Vault rankings will reflect the salary gap and I believe that firms that don't step up will be dismayed by their precipitous drop in the rankings. Does anyone really believe that the big DC firms don't have the resources to do this? I think an exodus to DC offices of NY-based firms is on the horizon.

avatar
31 Posted by Dissed in DC | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:06 PM

Everyone at Hogan in DC should be outraged at this blatant attempt to discourage other DC firms from raising salaries. Hogan attempts to compete as a top 20 firm, but being the leader in resisting pay increases rather than unquestionably paying top dollar clearly places Hogan in a second tier.

The message is loud an clear for all law students and laterals considering the DC market: WORK FOR A NYC-BASED FIRM OR RECEIVE SECOND TIER PAY!

For the amount of money on the table, the decision should be easy for any recruit with an offer on the table from a DC-based shop and a NYC-based shop.

Prediction: mass exodus

A firm's failure to jump on board with salary increases would be easier to swallow if pay scales were adjusted annually for cost of living. Since they aren't, and since salary increases like this only come around every few years on average (with these back to back increases making up for years without change), it's outrageous that firms don't match.

avatar
32 Posted by Dissed in DC | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:08 PM

Everyone at Hogan in DC should be outraged at this blatant attempt to discourage other DC firms from raising salaries. Hogan attempts to compete as a top 20 firm, but being the leader in resisting pay increases rather than unquestionably paying top dollar clearly places Hogan in a second tier.

The message is loud an clear for all law students and laterals considering the DC market: WORK FOR A NYC-BASED FIRM OR RECEIVE SECOND TIER PAY!

For the amount of money on the table, the decision should be easy for any recruit with an offer on the table from a DC-based shop and a NYC-based shop.

Prediction: mass exodus

A firm's failure to jump on board with salary increases would be easier to swallow if pay scales were adjusted annually for cost of living. Since they aren't, and since salary increases like this only come around every few years on average (with these back to back increases making up for years without change), it's outrageous that firms don't match.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:12 PM

I will be summering at a big DC firm that has not announced yet. If the firm doesn't match, I am inclined to go to another DC office upon graduation. There is no reason why I should be paid less than classmates of mine who haven't done as well, but have the good fortune of working at less presigious DC firms who have decided to step up.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:22 PM

Dissed in DC --

If you want to work NY hours for an NY-based firm for an NY salary, go ahead and switch firms. Regardless of the pay differential, many would choose DC hours at a DC-based firm for a DC salary.

To me, it would take a lot of money to make up for the personal cost of leaving the office at 9-10pm instead of 7-8pm each night. I know I'm not alone in that view.

avatar
35 Posted by please David Lat... | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:25 PM

Have a post that summarizes all the firms in DC that are now paying $160k. Legal Times is wrong -- there are more large offices than Skadden DC paying $160k now. Call out Hogan on its lie that they do not need to raise the 135k salary to remain competitive.

I fear many DC firms will have horrible attrition problems from the upcoming summer classes if they are not realistic about the need to bump up salaries.

avatar
36 Posted by Equal work, equal pay | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:45 PM

To hell with that, 25 thousand is more than enough to make me work 1-2 more hours per day. Might be my military training, but if I am in at work at 8AM (not tht unreasonable) I can put in 12 hours (10 of which would be billable) and be home in time to watch the Terps pounce another ACC team.

I don't know about you, but I know the price of my soul.... its 160K

avatar
37 Posted by Fried Frank | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:02 PM

Fried Frank matched for all NY and DC associates across the board. The FF memo posted includes DC associates.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:12 PM

Can someone post all of the DC firms at 160?

avatar
39 Posted by Disspointed in DC | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 7:57 PM

When I chose between going to a NY firm or to Hogan, I didn't mind the smaller salary differential because I preferred the work in DC. But to have my friends making 25K more - when the hours are not that much better, the bonuses in DC are smaller, and the cost of living is still high -- well, it is disspointed. Plus, it feels like Hogan is sending a message to the other firms not to raise pay so that they have cover. Hogan is a national firm and certainly A list in DC. But, after this, the rankings will go down and for better or worse, 2Ls will hear about it and go elsewhere. I am dissapointed. Especially since it was rising in the rankings with respect to associate satisfaction, etc. Poor managerial choice.

Post Your Comment