Add RSS RSS

Skaddenfreude: The Latest Developments

100 dollar bill Above the Law Above the Law law firm salary legal blog legal tabloid Above the Law.JPGAmazing! Our uncooperative servers are allowing us to post something (or so it seems). Allah be praised.

On the associate pay raise front, here’s what we’ve heard most recently:

1. O’Melveny & Myers: They did it by voicemail, presumably to prevent forwarding of emails or cutting and pasting of text. Cute, guys.

Here’s what a tipster tells us:

You’re not going to get a memo, but we (NY, DC, LA) just got a voicemail left for us basically saying we’re matching in NY the recent raises and LA and DC are getting bumps too. I didn’t write down the numbers, but the LA and DC base salaries are not the same as for NY.

Another tipster confirms the LA and DC raises, with more detail: “O’Melveny is bumping first years from $135K to $145K in DC.”

2. Simpson Thacher (summer associate addendum). This isn’t exactly a surprise. But for the record:

The wave of postings and comments in response to Simpson’s announcement to raise associate salaries has left some of you wondering what the application will be to the summer class. I wanted to confirm that summer associates will be paid the same salary as first year associates, prorated on a weekly basis, which is $3080 per week. A copy of our Chairman’s memo appears below.

We’re all looking forward to seeing you soon.

All the best, Dee

Dee Pifer

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

We’re working on a few other confirmations. Please continue to send us memos and other info. Thanks!

Earlier: Previous announcements of law firm associate salary increases (scroll down through “Skaddenfreude” archives)

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:23 PM

Can anybody at OMM's California offices report on the reaction there? People must be bummed out.

avatar
2 Posted by Weily Coyote | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:23 PM

Weil Memo:

To: US Associates

From: Stephen J. Dannhauser

As announced at today's Town Hall Meeting, effective January 1, 2007, annual U.S. associate base salaries have been increased, as set forth below. You will receive a retroactive adjustment reflecting this increase in your paycheck or direct deposit on February 9th. Bonuses will be paid this Friday, January 26th. As we have previously told you, it is our intention to pay our associates commensurately with our peer firms.

The firm has enjoyed a very good year, and we recognize that your dedication and hard work have contributed, and will continue to contribute, to our success.

Class Year 2007 Salary

2006 $160,000

2005 $170,000

2004 $185,000

2003 $210,000

2002 $230,000

2001 $250,000

2000 $265,000

1999 $280,000

Base salaries for associates in the class of 1998 and more senior will be determined on an individual basis.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:29 PM

At 160K in New York:

Simpson
Cadwalader
Paul Weiss
S&C
Milbank
Cleary
Greenberg
Shearman
Willkie
Quinn
Dewey
Fried Frank
Skadden
Weil
O'Melveny

That's 15. Anyone else confirmed?

avatar
4 Posted by lw | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:31 PM

where is latham? this is depressing

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:32 PM

Wilmer confirmed match in NYC?

avatar
6 Posted by HW | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:32 PM

I doubt Hunton will join, but any sense of whether they will at least bump up as a reaction to the latest raises?

avatar
7 Posted by peyton manning | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:33 PM

what about gibson???

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:33 PM

What about DC? Looks like Weill is at 160K as are some others. Is O'Melveny the only one at 145K?

avatar
9 Posted by Ugh | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:37 PM

Anyone have a list of who matched in their DC offices (and who in DC has $145K starting)?

avatar
10 Posted by O'Melveny SUCKS... | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:38 PM

O'Melveny bites. If they raised DC salaries to the previous NY level, they're clearly signaling that they are a second tier firm. But who cares about their reputation: I'm just ticked b/c my firm may follow their footsteps now.

avatar
11 Posted by OMM Reaction | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:38 PM

People are not bummed, they're angry at OMM. Partners, prepare for insurrection.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:38 PM

wilmer is always slow

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:38 PM

What about White & Case in NYC? Anyone heard anything?

avatar
14 Posted by Weily Coyote | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:39 PM

Weil Memo:

To: US Associates

From: Stephen J. Dannhauser

As announced at today's Town Hall Meeting, effective January 1, 2007, annual U.S. associate base salaries have been increased, as set forth below. You will receive a retroactive adjustment reflecting this increase in your paycheck or direct deposit on February 9th. Bonuses will be paid this Friday, January 26th. As we have previously told you, it is our intention to pay our associates commensurately with our peer firms.

The firm has enjoyed a very good year, and we recognize that your dedication and hard work have contributed, and will continue to contribute, to our success.

Class Year 2007 Salary

2006 $160,000

2005 $170,000

2004 $185,000

2003 $210,000

2002 $230,000

2001 $250,000

2000 $265,000

1999 $280,000

Base salaries for associates in the class of 1998 and more senior will be determined on an individual basis.

avatar
15 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:40 PM

When did Skadden match today and is that confirmed? I'm assuming they matched not only in NYC but across the board.

Also, when did O'Melveny officially declare this? Hopefully one of the other Big 3 (GDC or Latham) will go to current NY levels.

avatar
16 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:41 PM

Ugh. I 'm guessing the OMM approach will be the one the other big CA firms take, matching in NY and raising in CA, rather than matching NY everywhere (like Quinn). Dammit.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:43 PM

"People are not bummed, they're angry at OMM. Partners, prepare for insurrection."

The exodus already started. There's a 3L on Greedy Associates already attempting to see if he can switch from OMM to Quinn.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:43 PM

Any firm worth its weight in salt should raise like all the other firms are raising in all offices - otherwise, it sends a real message. This will have a polarizing effect. All the major talent will go to the higher paying firms.

avatar
19 Posted by Antitrust | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:46 PM

Re: the Big 3 in LA

Collusion anyone? Why would the other 2 go to nyc levels when they don't have to?

avatar
20 Posted by SDNY Clerk | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:47 PM

I'm only going to a 160k firm when I'm done. For sure.

avatar
21 Posted by Clerk | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:48 PM

I'm only going to a 160k firm when I'm done. For sure.

avatar
22 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:48 PM

Any firm worth its weight in salt should raise like all the other firms are raising in all offices - otherwise, it sends a real message. This will have a polarizing effect. All the major talent will go to the higher paying firms.

avatar
23 Posted by Weily Coyote | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:49 PM

Weil Memo:

To: US Associates

From: Stephen J. Dannhauser

As announced at today's Town Hall Meeting, effective January 1, 2007, annual U.S. associate base salaries have been increased, as set forth below. You will receive a retroactive adjustment reflecting this increase in your paycheck or direct deposit on February 9th. Bonuses will be paid this Friday, January 26th. As we have previously told you, it is our intention to pay our associates commensurately with our peer firms.

The firm has enjoyed a very good year, and we recognize that your dedication and hard work have contributed, and will continue to contribute, to our success.

Class Year 2007 Salary

2006 $160,000

2005 $170,000

2004 $185,000

2003 $210,000

2002 $230,000

2001 $250,000

2000 $265,000

1999 $280,000

Base salaries for associates in the class of 1998 and more senior will be determined on an individual basis.

avatar
24 Posted by Associates With Attitudes | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:51 PM

"All the major talent will go to the higher paying firms."

As it should. It's ridiculous some firms are trying to get by on the cheap. Commence the exodus.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:51 PM

DC Increases:

Simpson
Paul Weiss (I think it's all offices)
Cadwalader
Sull Crom
Milbank
Cleary
Shearman
Willkie
Quinn Emanuel
Fried Frank
Weil
Dewey (unclear, but I think DC too)
Skadden

OMM bumped to 145

And that's it. None of these are DC based firms.

avatar
26 Posted by CGK | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:51 PM

It's not collusion, it's the result of a market with near-perfect information.

Still waiting for my raise...

avatar
27 Posted by DC assoc | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:53 PM

(visions of a new tv rapidly reducing to visions of adding simple digital cable onto the old tv...)

avatar
28 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:55 PM

RE: 5:51

Quinn doesn't even have a DC office.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:56 PM

Any news on White & Case NYC?

avatar
30 Posted by person who did DC list | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:56 PM

sorry about that - point was that those were either all office increases or NY and DC increases (or some other complicated variation that included DC)

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:57 PM

Any news on White & Case NYC?

avatar
32 Posted by other big3 | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:59 PM

If I were the other big3, I would match and leave OMM in my wake!

avatar
33 Posted by Latham | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:59 PM

Latham will probably find out on Friday. That is when we are expecting our bonus news, so it makes sense to do them at the same time.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:02 PM

Latham matched NY raises only for NY office; in LA they matched the OMM raises and they did it by voicemail which all the LA associates (at least) received.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:02 PM

The only bad thing is if they announced bonuses on the same day that people find out they aren't getting the bigger raise, that'll damage their goodwill from the bonuses.

avatar
36 Posted by Latham - do it... | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:02 PM

PLEEEEAAAASE Latham match in all offices. You're a better firm than Fried Frank and Dewey. Show 'em who's boss.

avatar
37 Posted by LA Riot | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:03 PM

What time did the O'Melveny voice mails go out? Anyone know? I'm holding out hope one of the other Big 3 will step up and force a change.

avatar
38 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:04 PM

6:02 - what? LA LW associates have received VMs announcing?

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:05 PM

Anonymous' post at 6:02 regarding Latham is false. It appears he is confusing O'Melveny & Latham.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:06 PM

thank you, Weil. Now i guess i should get some work done....

avatar
41 Posted by Latham | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:06 PM

btw, Latham has not announced, so someone is full of it.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:07 PM

OMM voicemails went out about 1:10 PST

avatar
43 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:11 PM

So who in Tx has increased?

avatar
44 Posted by footdragging dc firm | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:20 PM

does anyone know what time today shearman officially announced? normally i wouldn't care but i'm shackled to my desk for at least the next six hours and would like to at least think about the hope for a raise...

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:22 PM

It's on the original Shearman email that was posted here - 11:29 AM I think.

avatar
46 Posted by Everybody Cool Out | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:10 PM

It doesn't make any sense whatsoever for O'Melveny to pay their LA and DC associates less than their NY associates when there are major players in both the DC and LA markets (LA- Quinn, Manatt; DC- Skadden, Dewey) who have already stepped up to the 160K plate. Guaranteed 160K for the Big 3 in LA and most of DC by nightfall on Friday.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, January 26, 2007 11:16 AM

I have a summer offer at a LA firm in its DC office. I don't understand how it can raise to 145 and expect me or the other summers to work there after graduating when we can make 160 at another firm in DC. What are they thinking???

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, January 26, 2007 11:16 AM

I have a summer offer at a LA firm in its DC office. I don't understand how it can raise to 145 and expect me or the other summers to work there after graduating when we can make 160 at another firm in DC. What are they thinking???

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, January 26, 2007 11:27 AM

11:16 --

They think you are not good enough to get a job at one of those firms. And judging by the lack of logic exhibited by your post, I'm guessing they are correct.

Post Your Comment