Add RSS RSS

Charney v. Sullivan & Cromwell: Case Nickname Vote, Take Two

Yesterday we opened a reader poll, asking for your help in picking a nickname for the ongoing litigation between megafirm Sullivan & Cromwell land its gay ex-associate, Aaron Charney. Upon further review of the options offered and the interim results, we've decided to run a second poll.

It's a pseudo-runoff, in that it includes two of the top three vote-getters from the last poll. But we've added two other options that weren't included in the original poll, but may enjoy substantial support.

Here's the new -- and, we promise, the final and binding -- Charney v. S&C nickname poll:

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by Loyola 2L | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 10:32 AM

I noticed you didn't include my suggestion in the poll. Why would you, though, I'm just a lowly tier 2 law student who could never get a job at S&C.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 10:39 AM

Loyola 2L:

You need therapy. I guess the ATL board is the therapy.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 10:43 AM

Fruity v. The Beast was by far the best. The new additions are weak.

avatar
4 Posted by Loyola 2L | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 10:44 AM

If only I had gotten into the University of Missouri - Columbia, maybe I would have a summer position. They're ranked five spots ahead of us!

avatar
5 Posted by Anonny | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 10:44 AM

Loyola 2L:

Get over yourself, and stop whining. Look at the ranks of any of the fine Sweat Shops...they have plenty of Tier 2 alumni/alumnae.

avatar
6 Posted by Loyola 2L | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 10:47 AM

Maybe if you attended a lowly Tier 2 like myself, you would understand the pressure I'm under. I'm losing it. Ahhhhh!!!

avatar
7 Posted by Loyola 2L | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 10:54 AM

None of those posts are mine. Someone is making fun of me. Please stop, my fragile ego already is beaten down as a result of my lowly station in life.

avatar
8 Posted by Snarkalicious | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 11:05 AM

David,

Where is the fashion report from yesterday's hearing? The naming poll and Skaddenfreude are getting old.

avatar
9 Posted by David Lat | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 11:12 AM

Be patient -- we're getting there. Some posts take longer than others. Poll and Skaddenfreude posts are easy and quick to put up. Fashion write-ups take a while. So do photo posts.

Except for Billy Merck, B Clerker, and Stella Q, who have defined duties (MD and NS), ATL is a one-man operation. No secretaries, no paralegals; we do everything personally. So please, cut us some slack.

Yesterday we were up at 3:30 AM, to take a 5AM train. We ran around the city all day, and we didn't get back to DC again until almost 1 AM last night. We're still recovering.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 11:40 AM

You're getting paid for this, David! Stop whining -- it's your job! There are multitudes of bloggers who do it for free in their spare time and post longer and more frequently (and with better pictures) than you do. C'mon, we know you have it in you!

avatar
11 Posted by anonymous TTT | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 11:41 AM

Hey, Fruity & the beast was good and was running a close second. Repect the popular vote! Who do you think you are, the Supreme Court?

avatar
12 Posted by David Lat | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 11:53 AM

11:40 AM: Then go off and read those blogs that "post longer and more frequently (and with better pictures)." Have fun.

11:41 AM: Yes. With respect to all matters ATL, we are the Supreme Court. And Congress and the White House, too.

We have discovered our inner diva. We are tired of all your complaints. From now on, we're going to be (1) less sensitive to your criticisms and (2) more snarky.

If you don't like ATL, then don't read it. If you don't like what we've written about you, then sue us.

Synopsis Prepared by the Reporter of Decisions: BITE US.

avatar
13 Posted by alex! | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 11:55 AM

Brokeback Lawfirm would have been funnier if this case had broken last year either prior or around the release of that movie. At this point, it's a terrible joke that not even Jay Leno would touch with his enormous chin.

My vote still goes to Sullying Cromwell.

avatar
14 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 12:09 PM

Fruity and the Beast was by far the best one. What happened? LeGAL call you?

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 12:15 PM

What happened to Fruity and the Beast? That one was definitely the BEST and in the top two of the original poll.

I voted for Brokeback Lawfirm this time, but that one is just OK compared to Fruity and the Beast!!!

avatar
16 Posted by Loyola 2L | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 12:16 PM

I DIDN'T POST THE FIRST MESSAGE! Or the other messages until now. People are posting with my name.

But I do agree that the suggestions of a tier 2 would likely be ignored.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 12:31 PM

If "Brokeback Lawfirm" wins, I'm done with this site.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 12:31 PM

VOTE FOR WHITE SHOE DIARIES.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 12:36 PM

White Shoe Diaries is the only one that is amusing in more than a "ooh, look, homos!" way. It's not like this site can do worse than Skaddenfreude, though, but at least when we explain what White Shoe Diaries means it's going to make sense.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 12:37 PM

another write-in vote for "Fruity & the Beast"

avatar
21 Posted by Lavi Soloway | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 12:38 PM

David,
I can't wait to read your fashion report (especially to see if I agree with your observations). I hope my tie gets an honorable mention!
Back to what you might call "hard news": This morning Gay City News (NY) came out with a pathetic article re Charney and LeGal, specifically glossing over the Board's handling of the Jack Scheich debacle, skipping almost all the relevant details contained in Scheich's now widely circulated, non-curative emails, and avoiding examination of the LeGal Board's apparent ignorance of the issues (until it was too late). Anyway, I thought folks might want to know that the 'Jack Scheich as Collateral Damage' story lives on. (GCN's use of that simile is laughable considering how little the article reveals... if anything LeGal was hurt more.) I blogged about it earlier (obviously I'm still working on my report from yesterday's hearing: "it's all about the Hard Drive" ---not).

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 12:38 PM

"Brokeback Lawfirm" would be appropriate only if Charney had a steamy, secret affair with another young associate. "Fruity and The Beast" should win.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 12:49 PM

We love you, David. Don't cut us off.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 12:50 PM

12:38, your "Brokeback Lawfirm" hypo is what Charney says S&C insinuated was going on between him and Grinberg. Thus, it's more appropriate than I'd thought.

Even so, I voted for Sullying Cromwell

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 12:51 PM

12:38, your "Brokeback Lawfirm" hypo is what Charney says S&C insinuated was going on between him and Grinberg. Thus, it's more appropriate than I'd thought.

Even so, I voted for Sullying Cromwell

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 12:52 PM

I'm glad we've added some remotely clever non-homo-joke names. It seems kind of ironically inappropriate to make the nickname for a sexual orientation harrassment case, a gay joke.

Not that I'm saying that ever stops anyone. Just pointing out how fucking immature it is.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 1:26 PM

It's also immature to use swear words to make a point.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 1:27 PM

The smart vote is clearly split between "Sullying Cromwell" and "White Shoe Diaries," allowing the puerile "Brokeback Lawfirm" to snatch the leading position. Is there a polling tool with IRV?

See http://www.instantrunoff.com/.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 1:36 PM

I can't believe people are voting for the brokeback name!

The name manages to be both incredibly stupid and incredibly dated.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 1:38 PM

1:26, actually, it's kinda childish to be put off by swear words. But I apologize -- your mommy probably told you "fuck" was a bad word, huh?

avatar
31 Posted by dwalker | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 1:48 PM

David,

We, the readers of ATL, in order to form a more perfect nickname for the Charney v. S&C fiasco, establish a high bar for snark, insure continued good will to all readers, provide for the common guffaw, promote the generous deployment of wit, and secure the blessings of distractions from work to ourselves and our posterity, do make this Appeal:

Please provide for Instant Runoff Voting in this matter -- or, in the alternative, exercise your editorial discretion and select “White Shoe Diaries” as the title for the Charney mess posts. It is truly the only possible nickname that is not mindless and dull, nor offensive to many readers.

Respectfully,

David Walker

avatar
32 Posted by Loyola 2L is gay hahaha | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 2:12 PM

david walker / 1:48 pm-

F&tB PWnZ shoe!!!

Fruity >>>>>>> other choices.

All your snark are belonging to us.
FRUITY

avatar
33 Posted by Loyola 2L | Permalink Friday, February 9, 2007 3:34 PM

I'm not gay, just curious.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, February 11, 2007 2:53 PM

White Shoe Diaries or Sullying Cromwell, please.

Brokeback Lawfirm couldn't be more terrible. It isn't timely, isn't clever, and is so obvious that its popularity is not surprising.

uggh.

avatar
35 Posted by Brokeback Lawfirm supporter | Permalink Monday, February 12, 2007 11:56 AM

I'm one of the many who voted for Brokeback Lawfirm. Snarky gossip is, by nature, puerile and slightly inappropriate. There is nothing mature or dignified or proper about snarky gossip... which is why we all like to read snarky gossip and chuckle to ourselves.

White Shoe Diaries does not make me chuckle... it's too erudite, serious and non-inappropriate. Brokeback Lawfirm makes me chuckle. Thus, my vote.

Post Your Comment