Shanetta please hire more tier 2 grads. We appreciate the opportunity to work at DOJ. We're hard working and loyal. Next recruiting season throw away every top school resume and give us a chance!

Shanetta, please hire Loyola 2L. It would be perfect comeuppance.

"which is how we view in fact them"

Great syntax.

Ms. Cutler kind of resembles Sherry Palmer on the t.v. show "24"

The picture is dated. Sherry Palmer would have to gain 50 pounds and get some gray streaks in her hair.

How about a "hottest Shanetta Cutlar look-alike" contest?

Maybe this was her brilliant plan all along. Rule with an iron fist and alienate/scare subordinates in order to secure a promotion to the front office.

Crazy? Like a FOX!

Shanetta is a very strong woman. Whatever her fate, rest assured that she will still be able to command six figures and maintain a dignified position within the Justice Department.

You unhappy miserable souls should work on improving your own lives instead of trying to destroy the life of another. As I have suggested before, maybe jumping off a bridge is the only solution for your dementia.

Shanetta's not in trouble cause she's a bitch, she's in trouble cause she vindicatively fired the whistleblower on her bitchy ways.

Rest assured that a current "Front Office" position is NO promotion for a Section Chief, unless the Chief were to become the AAG. Most would say that it is better to run a high level litigation program than to sit without portfolio among temporarily employed political dilettantes with little prior experience in the area.

But it is true that transfer to a "Front Office" position is a common attempt at face-saving when a Chief is removed.

7:05 - One can only speculate as whether this so-called whistleblower was fired because Shanetta wanted to be vindictive. Clevenger stated in his own publication that he received a prior reprimand from her for not producing satisfactory work. This reprimand occurred prior to his whistleblowing complaint and dismissal.

One could argue that in fact, Clevenger knew that he was on his way out the door and wanted to create an appearance of a retaliatory discharge, so he immediately filed his whistle-blower complaint to detract from the reprimand and still be able to create a lawsuit (clever junior lawyer). Moreover, it is unclear as to what admonishment Clevenger received in the initial reprimand and why he only waited until after he was reprimanded to make a complaint about what he considered an abusive and hostile workplace environment. The facts are quite unclear. Until all the facts are brought to light, let us not rush to judgment. As lawyers, we must try to be fair and impartial.

"Life" - I first reported Shanetta's misconduct on January 4, 2006 -- ten months before I was fired, and seven months before Shanetta accused me of unsatisfactory performance. I have a string of e-mails to corroborate my reports of her misconduct (which have been provided to the Office of Special Counsel). Moreover, numerous other Shanetta victims besides me have reported that Shanetta makes up false accusations against people whom she does not like.

Life - you're back? I thought you gave up because we were all immature? I thought you took your marbles & went home? I think you should. Why are you the lone voice defending her? Why is it that this blog is not filled with other horror stories of DOJ managers? You wanna know why, because she is in a class by herself, completely over the top. She is abusive and vindictive. You are blinded.

Life - Shanetta should have thought about what she was doing to people's lives before she was on the hot seat for her behavior. She has ruined careers and has enjoyed doing so. All the time, money & effort it takes to become a lawyer, its an injustice that these bright young lawyers came to the Department of Justice only to have a mean spirited, mentally unstable, drunk with her own power bitch destroy their careers for her whim. She deserves a taste of her own medicine. The Department of Justice is not to be used for her personal gratification or to satisfy some twisted notion of professionalism she seems to have. If she acted like every other manager at DOJ she wouldn't be in this posture, with you having to defend her honor by desperating seeking her detractors to jump off bridges to silence them. Drink some more kool-aid Chris.

Shanetta has run amok and it is about time she be reigned in. I don't care what color she is or what her problem may be, she is wasting my tax dollars on her own agenda. Enough.

11:39p.m. - Have you ever tried to be objective? It is possible that although these young lawyers were bright, they simply could not handle the caseload. Also, I am sure that there are other factors to be considered as to why Mrs. Cutlar felt a need to adopt such a rigid managerial style.

However, let me make it clear that I am in no way defending inappropriate behavior. However, I find it quite offensive that lawyers would attempt to defame someone's character the way you all have done here (albeit a public person), without giving her an opportunity to be heard.

Also, there have been other young and bright lawyers who have had their hopes and dreams shattered by other DOJ managers (no excuse for the current alleged injustice) and the powers that be stood by and condoned this inappropriate behavior. Unfortunately, this type of behavior seems to be the CULTURE of the DOJ. We are all products of our environment.

Nonetheless, perhaps the only resolution is to have all persons stand up to the executives in charge at the DOJ. We must tell them that enough is enough and there must be profound changes made within the Justice Department to prevent a waste of tax dollars and to foster a healthy environment.

On that note, I bid you a farewell.

Hey Life,

Do you ever work? Where exactly is it that you moved on to after SPL? Or were you fired by Shanetta too and spend your time kissing her a** to get your job back?

6:05 - Life has a trust fund. Also, there was no kissing of Shanetta's a** once Life left SPL. However, your whistleblower may need to kiss someone's ass to try and get his job back.

FYI Lovely - the whistleblower has no shortage of job offers. Could the same be said for Shanetta if she were fired?

If there isn't a shortage of job offers, perhaps the most prudent course of action is to let go and move on with "Life."

Life, Lovely, Let Go - you are all the same blinded fool sticking up for Shanetta. You don't fool us. You are scared because YOUR behavior is no better than Shanetta's for defending it. For people who don't care, you all seem glued to this blog!

Interesting course of events here. 2/15 -11:39PM drops a hint that "Life's" identity is known. (Given that there are only three other known SYC lackeys, i.e. Tammie Gregg, JYJ, and so-called "Thailour Preston", there's a small pool of contenders). "Life" ignores the allusion to his identity and purports to bid farewell (for the second time). The heretofore unknown "Lovely" pipes in at 10:37PM on 2/16 and somehow knows exactly who "Life" is, that he has (allegedly) left DOJ, and he (allegedly) has a trust fund.

All too convenient. Sounds like "Life" got his cover blown and he posted under new identities to cover his rear end. In any event, you SYC minions have to be careful. There are four of you at most, and it's not hard to identify you by process of elimination (witness "Thailour Preston"). You don't have to worry about SYC firing you, but you know your DOJ colleagues will despise you even more if they learn that you've been taking up for your master.

"(Given that there are only three other known SYC lackeys, i.e. Tammie Gregg, JYJ, and so-called "Thailour Preston", there's a small pool of contenders)."

...

Don't forget Renfield!

I have to admit, this resemblance of charade has become quite amusing. However, you fools have once again failed to uncover my identity. I guess you all are not as smart as you think.
The sooner these fatuous articles about Mrs. Cutlar disappear, the less time I'll need to spend on this inept website making a mockery of your nonsensical comments.

Please note, Shanetta does not know who I am and neither do the other so-called lackeys. In time, and only in my time, will I reveal my identity. Guess Who?

I have no idea who any of these people are, and frankly I didn't care. But I work in BigLaw, and to think that anyone outside of the six figure kingdom I live in actually puts up with such a horrible person amazes me. This many people don't despise someone without it being at least partially true. How does this woman still have a job? How on Earth do they find anyone of quality to work under her? And why would anyone stick up for someone who has negatively affected so many people? If she's really that bad, the only support for her that should exist are the hands underneath her throwing her fat butt out.

9: 54 asks why does someone put up with this outside BigLaw?

There are a number of answers to this question.

First: most people apply to Civil Rights, not to SPL, al least from the Honors Program. You don't know where you will be assigned until after you commit to the Division. The best sections take only a few honors people, if that. SPL is the absolute booby prize, at least since Ms. Cutlar has been in charge.

It takes a lot to make someone give up their lifelong dream of doing civil rights work in what, at least prior to this Administration, was perhaps the best Division in the Department. The ability to do this important work is at least as important to some as a big paycheck is to others.

Also, there is something of a sense of disbelief that this has been allowed to happen, and a sense that it cannot go on forever. If nothing else, the next Administration may care a little bit about a totally ineffective, abusive Section.

Finally, many do not put up with Ms. Cutlar. I bet there aren't many under her thumb that are not interested in other opportunities.

Otherwise, I agree with your sentiments.

Hey "Life," "Lovely," "Let Go," "Guess Who," etc., I've put my name out there and taken my lumps. What are you so scared of?

First, I have no direct involvement in this debate/issue, but I have come across this site and found the issue interesting. Second, I feel like at this point the only sentiments that are being "accepted" on this blog are anti-Shanetta so "Life" and others who may want to add something to this debate are not being allowed to be heard. Third, the person involved in litigation cannot be objective at all at this point so he should stick to pressing his case in the courts and growing his new practice. Finally, if no one has any new facts, then what is new to learn here? Enough is enough.

As lawyers, let's try to be a little more objective - be willing to listen to both sides, stop moaning and groaning so much and present new facts if you have some. The rest of this is nonsense.

Ty Clevenger - You are baiting me to reveal my identity, but you are not that smart. Your aggressiveness comes across loud and clear on this website. I can just image the challenges that Mrs. Cutlar faced trying to work with you. However, I have no intention on debating this issue with you. As 1:18 stated, "there is no way that you can be objective in this matter." Therefore, try to show some dignity for yourself and do not pick a fight with people who can and will be objective.

Mrs. Cutlar is a very dear person to me and whether you want to believe it, there are a lot of people waiting to defend her honor. They don't need to comment on this website. You have offended a lot of people in the legal community with the tactics that you have chosen in trying to seek justice. As I stated previously, several other attorneys have experienced your plight in other Sections. If you choose to defend yourself in the court of law, as you should, do it in a more dinified manner. Several top executives from other Divisions have learned of your tactics and think that you are too arrogant.

You had your friend David Lat start this website to lambaste Mrs. Cutlar. However, you did not stop to think how foolish this would look and how many people you would offend. You cannot silence me and will never stop me from defending someone that I care for deeply.

The choice is yours, stop with the shenanigans and pursue your case quietly, if you will, or continue lambasting Mrs. Cutlar on this website and you will soon see that a lot of other people will join me in supporting her. As 1:18 stated, "enough is enough." I would suggest that you move on with your "Life."

Obviously "Life," "Lovely," "Let Go," etc. are all the same dumbass who thinks his or her posts won't go up unless he/she puts a website (AOL) in the URL field.

Kind of hard to hide your identity when you post the SAME LINK EVERY TIME YOU POST.

"You had your friend David Lat start this website to lambaste Mrs. Cutlar."

OMG!!!! Insane much? Somewhere, Life is shaving his/her head in a Tarzana shopping mall as s/he posts.

WE LOVE YOU SHANETTA - STAND STRONG ON FAITH!!

again, the whole aol link thing isn't helping.

That AOL website thing is great!

I guess either it is one person trying to defend Shanetta-- or else the multitudes make the same dumb mistake in exactly the same idiosyncratic way!!!!

Life - or whatever you are calling yourself this time - Any of the several top executives from other Divisions that you refer to are simply glad its not their Division, and all are horrified at Shanetta's management style and what -- or what doesn't -- go on at SPL. Exactly what are its lastest accomplishments? Perhaps the fact that only now is she pulling back and acting like a human being to her staff now that her act is public vindicates Clevenger and her retractors. Why is she suddenly being "good"? If she hadn't acted like this, or if one of the top executives had done their job and reigned her in sooner, we wouldn't be reading about all this.

How do you solve it? Remove her from her position and put someone in who gets the job done without kicking their staff around for pleasure!! If its so well known around the Department, shame on all those who could have done something about it. Shame on you because you are not only hurting your employees, but all the people who depend on SPL to protect them. Shame on you all.

You move on Life.

Howard University.. just a note. There has not been one black law intern in the Section since Mrs. Cutlar became Chief and there is only only one black deputy which happens to be her girlfriend. So I'm not sure why you love her so much. The students that we have that happen to be black make photo copies all day.

Point well taken!!

From; Richard j Pollak fersur@sbcglobal.net 4541 C.R.138A Alvin Texas 77511

Sued Mortgage holder Washington Mutual for Bank One N.A. lost Principal Payment and Homeside Lending lost Escrow, Homeside Lending Testified for Washington Mutual that Curtailments are "Common Practice" now undefended advised to Motion Appeal Roguish Judgment Ignorant of "RULE" Guidelines that beyond Constitution or Civil Rights Precedents International Commerce of Credit for Check Payments Transferred!

In 2008 Judge Ruled $1,000.00 Judgment Awarded in 2006 to be Paid, without help, from no fault of mine, I stand to lose my 15 Year Fixed 6.5 % First only Mortgaged Home, Second or Refinanced was Blocked, Bankruptcy was forced, Judgment with 24 Months Interest of $200.00 demanded {refused $1,000.00 plus half Interest of $100.00 Settlement} again Lender wasting Court Time.
Likely losing home follows, from Forced Bankruptcy, Five Year battle, now Days.
Understanding Real-estate School's geared for Teaching not Defending, and Bar Reviews without License Removal.
I'm just a People unprotected from longstanding power abusers bordering Criminal by toying Duty. Laws usefulness challenge to School culprit by default Teaching, Houston Defenders Cower Merits allowing Judicial Supremacy to trump International Commerce!

CLERK OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT Case # 02-44178-H3-13
Case closed then Reopened only to allow overcharges return, Twice.

The B.B.B. Reduced Washington Mutual Rating from Officer to Insufficient for Three Years from Failure to Supply RESPA Loan History requested two 1/2 Years Ago, Pretrial.
Also; Judgment Awarded $1,000.00 for Failure to Supply RESPA Section 6' Loan History requested, called "qualified written request" Line-item coveted Today!

Entire Trial was Predetermined {Protected under Judge "SEAL"} Defendant was revised to Former Corporate entity, Change of Venue or Jury Trial formally requested!

After Bankruptcy release of STAY Washington Mutual Released Loan History, Proof of Damage became COMPLAINT SEEKING DAMAGE IN CORE ADVERSARY PROCEEDING AND CLAIM OBJECTION or Appellant {Me} Suing Lender!

Protected under Judge "SEAL" original Appellee Homeside Lending, became Washington Mutual Witnessing Homeside Lending!
Washington Mutual Admitted Fault Pretrial.
Lender Witnessing Lender Defended Principal and Escrow Abuse Testified as "Common Practice" Supported by Judgment absence, $1,565.14 reported Lost on Credit Report's and it's Taxable to IRS!
Judge failed to Arbitrate.
Appellate Judge failed to reopen.
FIFTH CIRCUIT failed to reopen.
Appellate Attorney failed to Verse Merits or Supply Case to Printer for U.S.SUPREME COURT review.

Now Washington Mutual has returned Core Mortgage Arrearages that Forced Bankruptcy filing, in essence reversing Judgment, repeating admittance, skirting Damage's!

Many DISPUTES resolved with refunds, the following Remain!
DISPUTE = Trustee Overcharges $6,612.67 Due.
DISPUTE = IRS Form 1098/Homeside Lending $383.88 Due.
DISPUTE = Washington Mutual $1,155.01 Due
Total Due = $8,151.56.
DISPUTE = Washington Mutual 6 1/2 Years Day-Rate Damage to be determined!
DISPUTE = Trial requesting change of Venue or Jury!

1. $383.88 = Homeside Lending Form 1098 @2
2. $2,085.00 = $885.00 + $1,200.00 Attorney Fee's @3B
3. $1,878.36 = San Antonio Federal Credit Union revised Payment Book @3C
4. $2.649.31 = San Antonio False Charge @3E
5. $200.00 = Washington Mutual Unpaid Interest on Judgment Posted $1,000.00 times 24 Months @4A
6. $955.01 = Washington Mutual Returned Core Bankruptcy Arrearages 1/2 Interest remains Due. @4B
7. Bank One Payments Misdirected 6 1/2 Years Damages for Misapplications of $1,565.14? @5B Accounting Interest, Action and Results Damage's!

Every one of these Seven have been Disputed without resolve, Interest of 10% Paid to Trustee relates Damages acquired.

Homeside Lending, Reported Form 1098 $383.88 @2
Trustee's Due - Original Attorney $2,085.00 @3B
Trustee/San Antonio Due @3C $1,878.36 + @3E $2.649.31 = $4,527.67 Due.
Total Trustee @3B, @3C, @3E = $6,612.67 Due.
Washington Mutual Due @4A $200.00 + @4B $955.01 = $1,155.01
Total Due $8,151.56 Plus Day Rate Damages from September, 2001 to Date, from Washington Mutual Due.

@1A. Judge saw fit to State on Judgment, assertion assumption of My being Predisposed for Bankruptcy.

B. Judge Cropped "DEED OF TRUST" Contract by Edit, Lenders "General Terms and Conditions" was Breached Testified Escrow Mismanagement's "common practice" Defense!

C. Judgment Quoted partial Paragraph omitting Substance to revise intent, done without Publication to formulate "Case Law" dispute as Colluded!

D, Colluded Pretrial, Protected under "Seal," Defendant change from Washington Mutual to Homeside Lending, a Preexisting Corporate Lender that held Note Prior, blanketed under Washington Mutual Support, Loan Originator Damages was Muted Pretrial in the Eye of the Judge, by the Judge, {the foremost primary Substance of Case.} "Seal" Hobbled my defense be it Judge and Lender, or Judge and Lender and My Attorney.

E. Judge changed Defendant of Record from Homeside Lending to Washington Mutual allowing Washington Mutual Attorney to Defend and Place Homeside Lending on Stand to Testify, My Case was Proved by Lender Admittance Pretrial, Judge failed to award Damages for Lender Admittance's.

F. Same Judge Confirmed Bankruptcy and Core Adversary Hearings and Over-Ruled Personal Order, Commanding My Attorney at Recorded Bankruptcy Conformation Hearing {to File "Proof of Claim" on My behalf} then failed to recall, {minutes under "Seal"} relating time expired fault, in Judgment.

G. Judge failed to admit into Evidence Letter Drafted with Attorney, Sent by My Attorney "Certified Mail" requesting Loan Payment History, REQUIRED DISCLOSURE RESPA Section 6 called "qualified written request." lacks Response or Resolve to Date.

H. Judge Posted US Mail 100 Days following Trial, Judgment backdated Two Days by administration, and Ignored "RULE" Bankruptcy's Guideline, that extended Appeal Days for clarification.
To explain; Six Days Received, Eight Days Used, Twelve Days expired, Ten Days Allowed? {Excusable Neglect Argued} Five additional Days Bankruptcy "RULE" Precedent Ignored by Judge.

I. Second Appellate Judge reviewed My Case Docketed first directly following the Main ENRON Trial as seated Judge in the same Court House, for to allow My Case on Merits Required Judge Reprimanding for all the above, @1A, @1B, @1C, @1D, @1E, @1F, @1G.

J. Repeat Scenario by New Orleans FIFTH CIRCUIT Courts, Merits required Reprimanding. @1I, @1H.

K. Appellate Attorney failed to supply Case to Printer for U.S.A. Supreme Court Review, actual Merits were unexplored and not perfected only Excusable Neglect.

@2. Bank One Received all Payments in 2001, Loan Transferred to Homeside Lending November, 2001 receiving "0" Funds in 2001, reported on I.R.S. Mortgage Interest Statement $383.88 Form 1098, $383.88 Due.

@3A. Original Attorney Ignored Order from Judge to File My "Proof Of Claim" before additional allocated set-back Time expired.
Bankruptcy Conformation was Suspended for Six Weeks allowing, failing his Duty he Quit, but Trustee rewarded!
Dispute First Compensation, Reported Quit Case after 10 Months. $885.00 Due.
Dispute $1,200.00 Second Compensation, Recorded to Courts he Quit Case after 14 Months. $1,200.00

B. Trustee Statements Detailed Original Attorney Received $1,200.00 after Courts 90 Day Dispute Time-frame had expired, Today's Trustee Account Summary fails to detail @3A document covets disbursement.
Dispute = @3A $885.00 + $1,200.00 = $2,085.00 Due

C. Attorney Re'termed San Antonio Federal Credit Union, Auto Loan Principal by extension of Months Financed, Posting new Coupon Book that added Three Months, Timed with Quiting Case, Loan was Current. $1,878.36 Due

D. San Antonio Federal Credit Union denied it Re'termed with Letterhead Coupon Book at hand, but also Re'termed Loan Principal by extension of Months Financed adding Two Months, found by researching @3C, received requested amortize payoff, Loan was Current, Germaine to Repossession, Payments halted for surrender.

Timed with @1F being Ignored, RESPA ACT SECTION 6, Requiring written Acknowledgment within 20 Days, written clarification within 90 Days, equating Judgment Award, To Date Ignored even through Discovery Pretrial Questions.

E. Trustee charged Non-Mortgage Arrearage of $2,504.48 + $1.44.83 Interest Crediting San Antonio Federal Credit Union, Loan was Current, Timed with Attorney Quiting Case. $2,649.31 Due.

Total - @3B $2.085.00 + @3C $1,878.36 + @3E $2,649.31 = $6,621.67

@4A. Washington Mutual Attorney Questioned in Testimony at Appeal Hearing, my accounts accreditation of $660.00 Judgment, Disrespecting $1,000.00 Judgment with Question.
I Testified not $660.00, and the Judgment amount was unpaid, Just now Posted to Pay, without 24 Months Interest, from Judgment to Date. about $200.00 Due.

B. Washington Mutual Returned November, 2007 Core Mortgage Arrearages, in essence reversing Judgment, half of related Interest $955.01 Due.

C. Loan Originated Bank One N.A. / Loan Transferred to Homeside Lending / Homeside Lending F.A. was Bought/Acquired by Washington Mutual N.A. Washington Mutual Attorney Witnessed, Homeside Lending Manager/Lender/Supervisor at Trial.

LOAN HISTORY
Bank One receives payment and Statement Bills following Month with a single detachable coupon. All Bank One payment's including December, 2001 current with coupon, first Three Homeside Lending Payments were current, Twelve current payments with Year old Loan resulted in Escrow Shortage demand of over $100.00 a Month. Bank One Loan History refused, with Homeside Lending Coveting Transferred first 20-so Days History, until release of Stay Day's History surrender, that proved both Lenders misapplication Breaches of Trust.

First; Bank One Credited December, 2001 Payment. Contract defines Misapplication Damages, so sought.

Second; Bank One Suspended the Funds from Principal and Escrow.

Third; Bank One Placed Suspended Funds into Loans Principal reducing 180 Month Terms, Homeside Lending first discovered after Release of Stay December 15, 2006.

Forth; Bank One Posted, Final Account Report, Stating Payments had been and are $100.00 more than actuality.

Fifth; Bank One Transferred Loan to Homeside Lending.
Washington Mutual called-it December 2001 was Curtailed by Bank One. Documented and Evidenced, but argued in Court that it was a Concealed Prepayment {a Misnomer} not as Stated by Lenders Posted Report Evidenced, a "Principal Curtailment" {unauthorized concealed.}

Sixth; Washington Mutual called November 2001 Escrow Mismanagement by Homeside Lending, Admitted, Documented and Evidenced, but argued in Court that it was a Concealed Prepayment {a Misnomer} not what I call "Escrow Curtailment," using their word back at Lender.

Seventh; Homeside Lending requested November Payment, informed December was Paid in Full, Homeside Lending reported Account was being Investigated.

Eight; Homeside Lending Requested/Received Check Payment Front and Back Photocopy.

Ninth; Homeside Lending Reduced Escrow and Applied Funds to Principal and credited Escrow Paid in November for November.
{Washington Mutual claims in November for December.} real time Loan Statements support November, 2001

Tenth; Homeside Lending Paid Loans Years Taxes Putting Escrow into Arrears then Returned Escrow Surplus Increasing Arrears.

Eleventh; Loan Statements and Twice Requested Loan History all "Blank" of December Payment, not owed/due/paid, resulting in False Credit Reports and 1098 Form Tax on Interest Report, Refinance was Blocked.

Twelfth; All Loan History Reports before and through Bankruptcy omitted Homeside Lending Payment History detailing first 28 Days, protecting Escrow Reduction Misapplication, including all Bank One Loan History Request.

Thirteenth; Washington Mutual Released Bankruptcy Stay then Loan Payment History on same Day, receiving Bank One and coveted Homeside Lending first 28 Days Proof of Principal and Escrow Misapplications admittance response Trial resulted.

Fourteenth; Misapplication admittance was excluded by "Common Practice" Defense by Homeside Lending, from the Stand in Testimony.

Fifteenth; Judge refused Appeal Ignoring Bankruptcy "RULE" claiming time expired, ENRON Judge Supported, FIFTH CIRCUIT Supported ENRON Judge.

ATTORNEYS
One; All the First Attorney actions stand abusive.

Two; Second Attorney benefited by assuming first Attorney's Caseload bulk timed with our Contract.

Third; Attorney Immediately Drafted Loan History Request using REQUIRED DISCLOSURE PER RESPA ACT Section 6 "qualified written request" no reply, ever, Sent "Certified Mail" not allowed admitted into evidence, to Date Substance Ignored.

Forth; I Drafted from Attorney's "qualified written request" revised "Qualified Written Request" sent "Certified Mail" admitted into Evidence, allowing $1,000.00 Damage Award for being Ignored, only, Merit of Substance of Questions Unanswered today.

Fifth; Attorney received Damage award, through Appeal Washington Mutual Suspended Payment, Attorney remained Attorney of record awaiting Award Payment only.

Sixth; Judge ruled Award Payments, 2008, I Demand 24 Months Interest from Judgment to Date, and awaiting.

Seventh; Appellate Attorney only argued "Excusable Neglect" assuming Two Days expired for Appeal, when Prescient setting Bankruptcy "RULE" extends time guideline, Ten Days were not received.

Eight; Case never was presented to printer for U.S. SUPREME COURT Revue, I stand Unrepresented, Squatting, with suggestion of filing Motion, Houston Bar Association Fails, Security Exchange Commission Fails, Judgment Fails, Comptroller of the Currency Fails, U.S Attorney General Fails, the indiscretion relates to Credit for Payments Made, Governed by International Substance permitting Commerce, beyond Civil Rights or Constitutionality.

JUDGE'S
Houston Core Adversary Judge {Famed} Ruled over Case that was by far the largest Bankruptcy Worldwide ever {Russia Oilfield Equipment.} My excused $1,565.14 Lost Payments, have never been return requested, Forced Bankruptcy Day-Rate Damages Are.
Time to Appeal was denied, Extended Appeal Time was excused overruling Bankruptcy "RULE."

Appellate Judge {Famed} Concluded ENRON Case just prior to My Appeal review, allowing My Appeal would Highlight flawed U.S. Attorney General Oversight of U.S. Bankruptcies and Trustee's.

FIFTH CIRCUIT was Appealed to Overrule ENRON Judge.

@5A. San Antonio Federal Credit Union Payment Book received revised with extended Terms relating, Additional Payment Amount Increased $1,878.36, Sent by Original Attorney as he exited Case, return required $1,878.36 Due. @3B
B. San Antonio Federal Credit Union Unsecured Claim of $2,504.48 + $144.83 Interest = $2,649.31 Due.

Total = @3B $1,878.36 + @3B $2,649.31 = $4,527.67 Due.

@6. Both' Bank One Payments, Admitted in Testimony Misdirect by Escrow Misapplications {Judge fails to Publish relative "Case Law" allowing "common practice" as defended to stand.} $1,633.44 - $68.28 the P.M.I. insurance = $1,565.14 + Interest from September, 2001 to Date, with forced Bankruptcy Damages at whatever Day rate Damages equates $1,565.14 and Day-Rate Damages Due.

@7A. First Attorney Accepted Case and Prevision of providing Loan History Payment Assistance Credit, accepting and retaining original Loan Documents, from Day one.

B. Original Bankruptcy Attorney was not Board Certified, he Stated that he Quit My Case, after additional Pre'Conformation Time Judge Suspended expired, Four Months Prior to Notice that he was Quiting all Houston, TX. Caseload, assumed San Antonio, TX. Move.

C. Letter received recommended Second Attorney Board Certified, that assumed bulk-load of Originals Attorneys Cases, followed recommendation.

D. Second Attorney's first Action was Drafting RESPA SECTION 6 "qualified written request" Dated February 12, 2001 Sent by Attorney "Certified Mail."

E. Receiving no response, Payments were halted for Court Appearance, {Release of Stay} Attorney's first no-show.

F. I Drafted and sent "Qualified Written Request" Trustee, All Lenders, Texas Bar Association, Comptroller of the Currency, Bush, U.S. Attorney General, B.B.B. and many more, requesting assistance with Ignored RESPA Request.

G. My RESPA Request was admitted into evidence but line Item response. Germain Questions remain coveted, now Protected as Judged.

H. Stay was released, equating My being a Squatter, I called Washington Mutual Requesting for the up-tee-nth-time Loan History, Received and both Lenders Misapplications Highlighted, Lender admitted Error's, Attorney backdated hearing request, with the Courts assistance.

I. Core Adversary Pretrial Hearing, Attorney no-show, assistant Attorney {never meet} stated acceptance of Case, Paperwork was not ready, Judge told Me about to dismiss, out of hand.

J. About 105 Days following Trial Judgment received by U.S. Mail,
Appeal required new Attorney and understandable arguments for Attorney to accept. Days later Attorney called stating Time was of up-most Importance for appeal, Less than Week was never expected.

K. Appellate Attorney Stuck with Excusable Neglect as Defense through the FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT, many Attorney Hours spent requesting Merit Defense on Phone, and In Office, final days for U.S. SUPREME COURT and Argument-ing the Unpaid RESPA Damage Award was Not-awarded presented as Case Summery, Case was without Case Merit review, Printer Time, Case Expired.

L. Washington Mutual Returned all Funds and half the Interest that forced Bankruptcy, but still Protects Insurance Lapses and backdated Loan Summery disputing Real time Loan Statements Received, Evidenced, Argued without Damage Award.

M. I Demand Credit Report revision/notation of Lender's Arrears returned, Bankruptcy cannot be reversed but Credit Report can Direct faults blame.