Add RSS RSS

Skaddenfreude: ‘W’ Firms, and Morning Open Thread

100 dollar bill Above the Law Above the Law law firm salary legal blog legal tabloid Above the Law.JPGWe don’t have memos, but we can confirm associate pay raises at two large law firms:

(1) D.C. powerhouse Wiley Rein & Fielding, former home of the new White House counsel, Fred Fielding; and

(2) Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, home of Silicon Valley legal god Larry Sonsini (although a god who, in the past year or so, has shown signs of being fallible).

More details, plus your comments, after the jump.

WILEY REIN

Yesterday someone posted this comment:

Wiley Rein raised to $145K for first years on the 1950 [billable hours] track, and $125K for first years on the 1800 track. They basically followed Hogan’s salary structure, with one or two slight differences in upper-levels.

We have confirmed this with a source at the firm. There’s no memo because the news was conveyed orally, at an “all associates” meeting held yesterday. The numbers were projected on a screen for everyone to view.

We have also confirmed that the Wiley Rein scale is consistent with Hogan & Hartson’s for the first five years: 145 / 155 / 170 / 190 / 210.

(In case you’re curious, “Wiley Rein & Fielding” became “Wiley Rein” effective February 1, 2007. Press release here.)

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

After seeing a few of your comments, we headed over to Infirmation / Greedy SF / SV, where we found this post:

Scale is below, parantheses indicates rate for high performance rating, which something like 2/3 of eligible associates receive - note that this is retroactive only to Feb 1, not Jan 1 like everyone else (sigh, shake head).

Everywhere but NY:
145
155
170
190
210
215 (225)
225 (240)
240 (250)
250 (260)

New York
160
170
185
210
230
240 (250)
250 (265)
265 (280)
280 (290)

We have independently verified this information with a source at the firm, so you can consider it accurate.

Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of associate pay raises (scroll down)

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 9:39 AM

Now if only Wropes and Gray would confirm.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:06 AM

They are going to 145.5K

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:10 AM

Ropes was confirmed on Monday with higher non-NYC salaries than others starting with third year. Still not sure why Lat hasn't bothered to headline this.

http://www.infirmation.com/bboard/clubs-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=0036nk

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:11 AM

Now if only Wirkland & Ellis would raise.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:18 AM

I'm getting bored with this.

avatar
6 Posted by ? | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:22 AM

Lat can you please get to the bottom of the conflicting Chadbourne rumors?

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:23 AM

10:10 -- Mr. Roper could be the actual Mr. Roper.

avatar
8 Posted by joes | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:36 AM

What about Foley? Anyone hear anything about them?

avatar
9 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:45 AM

what are the conflicting chadbourne rumors?

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:47 AM

Lat, you seem to know people in many of the firms can you get some more info on Arnold & Porter?

avatar
11 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:50 AM

I can confirm that on Feb 1 and retroactive to Jan 1 Chadbourne NY matched Simpson for all classes including class of 1998 and Chadbourne DC's salary scale went to:
Class Annual Salary

2006 $160k
2005 $165k
2004 $175k
2003 $195k
2002 $215k
2001 $230k
2000 $245k
1999 $250k
1998 $260k

avatar
12 Posted by duh | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:52 AM

10:10 - that is not ATL-approved confirmation. That is some random person posting numbers. Until someone actually confirms with Lat, it's not "official" for ATL purposes.

There have been hoaxes you dolt!

avatar
13 Posted by Texas? Texas? | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:55 AM

Still waiting on Texas. Any clue when or if to expect anything from the Texas firms?

avatar
14 Posted by doubleplus good | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 10:59 AM

What about the rest of Wiley's scale? Can anyone weigh in on that?

avatar
15 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 11:04 AM

We're waiting on Texas too. What's anyone heard?

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 11:06 AM

10:52....same goes for Ropes. No Lat confirm...no confirm at all!

avatar
17 Posted by eagle | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 11:27 AM

re: 10:50 "confirmation" - even assuming it is legitimate, that is not a "match" of the new Simpson scale. It is a raise above prior salary scale, but only matched at the more junior levels.

avatar
18 Posted by eagle | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 11:29 AM

re: 10:50 "confirmation" - even assuming it is legitimate, that is not a "match" of the new Simpson scale. It is a raise above prior salary scale, but only matched at the more junior levels.

avatar
19 Posted by curious george | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 11:29 AM

Can someone confirm the K&L Gates NY numbers - like post the announcement?

Is it retro to Jan 1st?

avatar
20 Posted by BB GA | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 11:33 AM

Re: Texas. Any V&E or A&K associates out their? Any talk at your firms about raises?

avatar
21 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 11:42 AM

Eagle - what do you mean? I'm at Chadbourne and I can assure you that Chadbourne NY matched Simpson's NY scale at all levels up to class of 1998. Happened last Thursday.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 11:47 AM

boring. wake me up when the next round of raises come out this fall...... I'm going to go bill some hours so I don't have to feel guilty about my "bump"

avatar
23 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 12:09 PM

11:27/11:29-- the chart posted above was for DC only

avatar
24 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 12:14 PM

11:42 at Chadbourne: Can you email Lat with your official confirmation of that (email him privately with your full name) so he can post it and confirm officially?

avatar
25 Posted by At Chadbourne | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 12:38 PM

Can't access private email at Chadbourne due to firewalls, so not possible to email Lat until later. Absolutely confirm NY and DC raises though. NY matching Simpson NY and DC starting at $160,000 as posted in chart above.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 12:43 PM

I believe Chadbourne did not (yet) raise, as per my sources.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 1:37 PM

Neal Gerber in Chicago raised - $145.

avatar
28 Posted by !!! | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 1:50 PM

Interesting with the conflicting Chadbourne info-- At Chadbourne 12:38, please email Lat later on, thanks a lot. Anonymous 12:43 are you at Chadbourne as well?

avatar
29 Posted by !!! | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 1:53 PM

Interesting with the conflicting Chadbourne info-- At Chadbourne 12:38, please email Lat later on, thanks a lot. Anonymous 12:43 are you at Chadbourne as well?

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 1:56 PM

11:29 #2--when did K&L Gates say anything?

avatar
31 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 2:11 PM

1:56 -- The K&L Gates NY information is on their website.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 2:11 PM

Chicago firms at $145:

McDermott
Sidley
Jenner
Mayer Brown
Sonnenschein
Schiff Hardin
Latham
DLA Piper
Neal Gerber

Firms in Chicago at $160:
Skadden

Chicago firms that remain silent:

Jones Day
Winston & Strawn
Kirkland
Foley & Lardner
Katten Muchin
McGuirewoods
Bryan Cave
Baker & McKenzie
Sachnoff Weaver
Chapman Cutler
Bell Boyd & Lloyd
Vedder Price
Wildman Harrold
Holland and Knight


others???

Key Firms we're still waiting on = Kirkland, W&S, Jones Day, B&M

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 2:14 PM

Chicago firms at $145:

McDermott
Sidley
Jenner
Mayer Brown
Sonnenschein
Schiff Hardin
Latham
DLA Piper
Neal Gerber

Firms in Chicago at $160:
Skadden

Chicago firms that remain silent:

Jones Day
Winston & Strawn
Kirkland
Foley & Lardner
Katten Muchin
McGuirewoods
Bryan Cave
Baker & McKenzie
Sachnoff Weaver
Chapman Cutler
Bell Boyd & Lloyd
Vedder Price
Wildman Harrold
Holland and Knight


others???

Key Firms we're still waiting on = Kirkland, W&S, Jones Day, B&M

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 2:19 PM

Chicago firms at $145:

McDermott
Sidley
Jenner
Mayer Brown
Sonnenschein
Schiff Hardin
Latham
DLA Piper
Neal Gerber
Katten Muchin

Firms in Chicago at $160:
Skadden

Chicago firms that remain silent:

Jones Day
Winston & Strawn
Kirkland
Foley & Lardner
McGuirewoods
Bryan Cave
Baker & McKenzie
Sachnoff Weaver
Chapman Cutler
Bell Boyd & Lloyd
Vedder Price
Wildman Harrold
Holland and Knight


others???

Key Firms we're still waiting on = Kirkland, W&S, Jones Day, B&M

avatar
35 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 2:31 PM

kl gates is effecti 3/1

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 2:35 PM

Bracewell & Giuliani has matched in NY.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 3:37 PM

Kirkland has announced with some interesting differences amongst offices:


KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

MEMORANDUM

TO: Firmwide Associates and Non-Share Partners


CC: Firmwide Share Partners


FROM: Thomas D. Yannucci, P.C.
Chair, Firm Committee

DATE: February 7, 2007


RE: Associate and Non-Share Partner
Compensation
________________________________________________________________________


The Firm has always been committed to paying our
associates and non-share partners compensation at the
top of each market in which we practice. In light of
recent moves by some firms with regard to base salary
for associates, the Firm Committee has approved
increases to our associate base salaries, retroactive
to January 1, 2007, as set forth below:

Class|New York|California|Chicago/D.C.
2006 |$160,000|$160,000 |$145,000
2005 |$170,000|$170,000 |$155,000 2004 |$185,000|$180,000 |$170,000
2003 |$210,000|$190,000 |$190,000
2002 |$230,000|$210,000 |$210,000 2001 |$250,000|$225,000 $225,000

These increases will be reflected in the February 28
payroll.

Appropriate adjustments are also being made to
non-share partner draws, effective February 1, 2007.
Each non-share partner will be notified of his or her
increased draw amount shortly. Increased non-share
partner draws will be reflected in the March draw
payments.


Thank you again for all of your hard work and
dedication.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, February 7, 2007 3:41 PM

Since that last post re Kirkland came out formatted weird, the essential numbers are:

Class|New York|California|Chicago/D.C.

2006 |$160,000|$160,000 |$145,000

2005 |$170,000|$170,000 |$155,000

2004 |$185,000|$180,000 |$170,000

2003 |$210,000|$190,000 |$190,000

2002 |$230,000|$210,000 |$210,000

2001 |$250,000|$225,000 $225,000

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, February 11, 2007 6:22 PM

Does anyone have confirmation of the rumor that Finnegan Henderson has gone to 160 in DC?

http://www.infirmation.com/bboard/clubs-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=0036y9

2006-160
2005-170
2004-185
2003-200
2002-215
2001-230
2000-250
1999-270

5% bonus per 100 hours over 2000 up to 2400 up to 20% merit bonus

Post Your Comment