Add RSS RSS

Kyle Sampson: Inside the Lions’ Den (Part 2)

(We were a little distracted by a technical glitch with the site that some commenters pointed out. But we think it has been fixed now, so we’re back to blogging on the hearings.)

Since our last post, there have been some exciting developments. Sen. Pat Leahy’s questioning was pretty boring; he walked Sampson through a bunch of emails, deposition-style.

But things got more interesting when Sen. Arlen Specter took over. Playing his role as Senate moderate, he asked some questions that could be viewed as friendly, and some as hostile. Senator Specter got Sampson to admit that some of Alberto Gonzales’s prior testimony was not consistent with Sampson’s recollection.

Things got even hotter during Sen. Chuck Schumer’s questioning. In a “yes or no,” Perry Mason-esque line of cross-examination, Senator Schumer got Sampson to admit — under oath, and with apparent reluctance — that several of AG Gonzales’s prior statements were “not accurate,” or at least not consistent with Sampson’s recollection. Ruh-roh…

You could tell that Senator Schumer was scoring points because Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), a smart and savvy former prosecutor and judge, piped up in the middle of Schumer’s questioning. Senator Cornyn angrily protested that Sen. Schumer was being unfair in not allowing Kyle Sampson, a witness testifying under oath, to answer questions fully. Exciting stuff!

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD) is trying too hard. It seems like he is looking for something to be upset about.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) sounds like Alec Baldwin with a lisp. He is vaguely ridiculous.

Okay, it’s lunchtime. In recess until 1:45 PM.

Earlier: Kyle Sampson Inside the Lions’ Den

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by AntonK | Permalink Thursday, March 29, 2007 1:12 PM

"Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) sounds like Alec Baldwin with a lisp. He is vaguely ridiculous."

Democrats are normally fantastically ridiculous. At least Sen. Whitehouse is only being "vaguely" ridiculous.

avatar
2 Posted by Spare Me | Permalink Thursday, March 29, 2007 1:53 PM

Sweet, we're having one of those "David Lat Thinks He's Instapundit" days, complete with retarded commentary about favored senators (first time ever that Cornyn has been called "smart" or "savvy").

Leave this stuff to the pros. What's new with Charney and Shanetta?

avatar
3 Posted by nojoke | Permalink Thursday, March 29, 2007 2:14 PM

Lat, don't be a partisan hack. When did Cornyn become smart? I bet that's the first time you've ever touted a St. Mary's School of law grad.... TIER FOUR LAT!!!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 29, 2007 2:30 PM

A state judge.

avatar
5 Posted by Peter Harvey | Permalink Thursday, March 29, 2007 2:35 PM

Is this guy Rove's mini-me???

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/29/fired.attorneys/index.html

avatar
6 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, March 29, 2007 3:16 PM

Schumer's questioning is ridiculous. Sampson has conceded that he made some poor suggestions...no doubt Schumer made some bad decisions in his life. How Schumer ever got to where he is now boggles my mind.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 30, 2007 8:39 AM

Harvard College, Harvard Law. Schumer may be annoying, but the guy is smart.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 30, 2007 11:22 AM

Listening to Schumer talk during confirmation hearings, I always assumed that he wasn't a lawyer.

He was probably a legacy or something.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 30, 2007 11:33 AM

That's exactly how I feel about Biden, who sounds like a moron at confirmation hearings. But apparently he teaches Constitutional Law!

Post Your Comment