Add RSS RSS

Brokeback Lawfirm: How Long Will This Spectacle Go On?

Aaron Charney headshot Aaron B Charney Aaron Brett Charney.JPGThings have been quiet lately on the Aaron Charney v. Sullivan & Cromwell front, but this week brings an exciting event. This Thursday, April 12, in New York Supreme Court, Justice Bernard Fried will preside over the Mother of All Hearings: an omnibus hearing at which the parties' various motions and cross-motions will be argued.

Happily, we will be up in New York on Thursday. We will attend the hearing and report on the proceedings.

So it's full speed ahead in Charney v. S&C. Contrary to what some predicted -- including ourselves, at various points in time -- this case doesn't look like it will be settling anytime soon. This raises the question:

How long will this litigation be dragged out?

(Which raises another question: How is Aaron Charney supporting himself in the meantime? We're guessing he has ample savings, from his years at S&C, and perhaps some support from his family. But if you have more specific knowledge, please drop us a line.)

One of you suggested a poll, and we like the idea. Please cast your vote:

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by grammarnazi | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 10:49 AM

Things have been quite lately? Well, let's hope they don't get more lately too soon.

avatar
2 Posted by grammarnazi | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 10:50 AM

Things have been quite lately? Well, let's hope they don't get more lately too soon.

avatar
3 Posted by definition nazi | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 10:53 AM

That's not grammar; it's a typographical error, or a spelling error at worse. Your definition of grammar is overbroad.

avatar
4 Posted by precision nazi | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 10:59 AM

Definition Nazi, that doesn't mean the poster isn't a grammar nazi in addition to a spelling nazi; no rule says your name has to refer directly to the content of your post (all evidence from Loyola2L to the contrary).

avatar
5 Posted by Gallion | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 11:20 AM

Who thinks "all appeals" can be resolved withing six months? Do people on this board actually practice law???? They'll be lucky if the trial starts in six months. See, there's a little thing called discovery. Appeals alone take 6-12 months minimum.

What a bunch of fools on this board.

Gallion OUT!

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 11:24 AM

I think people expect a settlement within 6 months, G. Cool off.

avatar
7 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 11:30 AM

11:24 is right: "including all appeals IF IT DOESN'T SETTLE." If a settlement is reached, obviously there won't be any appeals. Do people on this board actually practice law?

(I don't think there will be a settlement, but that's just my opinion. Judging from the poll results so far, it looks like many people disagree.)

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 12:35 PM

Lat, what makes you think Charney would have "ample savings" from working a few years as an associate at S&C? It's a law firm, not an I-bank. In NYC or SF, once you pay rent and feed yourself, there's not much paycheck left.

avatar
9 Posted by crazy | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 1:55 PM

you can save easily $100K per year as a midlevel at a NYC law firm. more if you're single.

just don't spend like an idiot.

avatar
10 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 1:59 PM

He must come from a well-off family given his educational background.

avatar
11 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 3:18 PM

Charney might have misplayed this one. By publicly dragging S&C through the mud he removed much of their incentive to settle.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 3:54 PM

Everyone assumes Charney is after the $ but maybe he's just still really feeling betrayed and angry adn wants to keep this thing going? Who knows

avatar
13 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 3:58 PM

3:54 - Is that's worth throwing your life away for?

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 4:45 PM

Maybe Charney feels like he's already lost everything so why not just see it through?

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 5:01 PM

maybe charney is psycho..

avatar
16 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 5:07 PM

4:45 He lost everything because someone told him there was poop on a piece of paper? He should have never complained.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 5:07 PM

maybe charney is psycho? He's obviously psycho.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 5:57 PM

His Complaint mentioned doctored reviews thouhg. that could derail anyone who held out a glimmer of hope of making partner at BogLaw.

avatar
19 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 6:08 PM

So because you don't make biglaw partner your life is over? The vast majority of associates don't make biglaw partner.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 6:30 PM

Right. But if he bought into that whole BigLaw world (which he apparently did) he could have figured his "life was over." Not saying it is right... just that there are a lot of pathetic creatures out there making the grades and going to the right schools and so on with that goal.

avatar
21 Posted by WeHo professional | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 7:53 PM

Forget how long it will take to settle:

Is Charney single? I'd hit it. Especially if boyfriend is about to get a big paycheck from a homophobic white shoe law firm. Tres sexy.

All joking aside, he is cute in a take-home-to-mom sort of way, and I feel bad for the kid. Especially since the dickwad homophobic partners whose douchebaggery started this whole mess are gonna get off with a slap on the wrists.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 8:23 PM

I'm hungry. Anyone want a cheeseburger?

avatar
23 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 8:26 PM

When he's sitting at home for four years during litigation, he'll realize the meaning of "your life being over."

avatar
24 Posted by Random Unaccredited Law School in California 2L | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 8:41 PM

I go to a 7th-tier law school. My life is over.

avatar
25 Posted by RULSC2L | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 9:03 PM

Dude,

You not lovin' it a Peoples' College of Law? Villaraigosa and other LA luminaries are grads! I'd say you had a leg up on all Loyola 2Ls!

Tier 1/ Biglaw

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 10, 2007 9:05 PM

Well, I'm gonna go get a cheeseburger. Anyone wants one, just let me know.

avatar
27 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, April 11, 2007 3:08 AM

Great, now we have a cheeseburger troll.

avatar
28 Posted by Amused | Permalink Wednesday, April 11, 2007 4:44 PM

Gallion: "Who thinks "all appeals" can be resolved withing six months? Do people on this board actually practice law???? They'll be lucky if the trial starts in six months."

Folks forget that after you file the Note of Issue, you have to wait on line to get a trial date, and in New York County, to my knowledge, that ALONE takes longer than 6 months. I don't think there is a special track for big law firms and celebrities.

avatar
29 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, April 12, 2007 1:50 AM

There is no chance in hell there will be a trial in 6 months. You won't even finish half of discovery by then. NY isn't a rocket docket state.

avatar
30 Posted by Huh? | Permalink Thursday, April 12, 2007 2:45 PM

You can save $100k as a mid-level? Maybe if you're at Wachtell. But if your base salary is $210k, and you get $50k in bonus, after taxes, etc., you are only taking home $130k. So if you can manage to live in Manhattan for $30k for the year, maybe.

In reality, saving about $50k is do-able in NYC as a mid-level.

avatar
31 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, April 12, 2007 2:50 PM

Whatever Charney saved probably went for the down payment of his $900k (and tiny) condo.

avatar
32 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Friday, April 13, 2007 11:12 AM

Is he really throwing his life away? I think he's DOING something great with his life, and helping all of us. It's that kind of mentality (conform or ruin your life) that prevents us associates from doing anything about the abuse (and discrimination) we suffer.

Post Your Comment