Add RSS RSS

Coming Soon to a Courtroom Near You: Fox v. Vote for the Worst?

We don’t write much about American Idol. We leave that subject to the experts, like Ann Althouse.

(You can read Professor Althouse’s take on last night’s show over here. Also, she shares our admiration for Sanjaya Malakar. Read her persuasive defense of Malakar over here.)

Today, however, we have a legal angle for writing about Idol. We have a video clip to pass along.

It’s already been nicely summarized by Vote For the Worst, a website that urges its readers to vote for the Idol that the website creators view as the least talented. So we’ll just quote from their blurb:

This is hysterical. On The O’Reilly Factor, civil litigator Danielle Aidala makes incredibly stupid arguments about how she could sue this website. The arguments are actually even stupider than the rationale from the 12 year olds who write to us, so it’s a pretty funny way to waste five minutes if you’re bored.

And here’s the video. It’s also up on YouTube, where it’s described as follows: “Danielle Aidala is a babe.”

(We agree with that sentiment — which may explain how Aidala wound up on Fox News. Fox seems to specialize in giving airtime to attractive female commentators with, umm, provocative or contrarian views.)

P.S. Danielle Aidala, in case you’re wondering, went to NYU for undergrad and Fordham for law school. Here’s her New York Times wedding announcement. She is not to be confused with Dianna Abdala, of “bla bla bla” fame.

Idiot Lawyer Danielle Aidala Thinks VFTW/Stern Can Be Successfully Sued [VoteForTheWorst.com]
Howard Stern / shock jocks helping Sanjaya stay on the show [YouTube]
“American Idol” — the final 9 [Althouse]
“Malakar is the rare male performer who relies so utterly on styling.” [Althouse]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by Carl | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 12:27 PM

Wow. She is awful. "This is equivalent to libel and slander" WHAT?

Tried to martindale her, nothing to be found. Found this though: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F04E3D91038F937A35754C0A9629C8B63.

Apparently she went to NYU. How embarrassing.

avatar
2 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 12:31 PM

I kind of like Sanjaya's voice.

avatar
3 Posted by MLaw 2L | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 12:31 PM

WOW! That woman's argument is laughable. I'd like to see her prove damages. She probably just wants to get paid for bringing a class action. This might be the only time I've ever agreed with Bill O'Reilly.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 12:32 PM

Encouraging people to vote for the worst Idol candidate is "like libel or slander?" I hate Stern, but I'd rep him pro bono just so I could file the Rule 11 motion on that BS.

avatar
5 Posted by Loyola 2L | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 12:33 PM

All she said was that Fox could sue. Of course they could sue. She never said they're certain to win, or how much they would win.

avatar
6 Posted by Gurl | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 12:34 PM

And Sanjaya is very very pretty. That hair! Those eyes! Sigh...

avatar
7 Posted by NYU 08 | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 12:44 PM

I read it to mean that she went to NYU undergrad and Fordham law.

avatar
8 Posted by Gordon Gekko | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 12:44 PM

Listening to her voice makes me want to fall on a rusty knife

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 12:51 PM

who cares what she says; she's hot!

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 1:00 PM

Right on, 12:32. This cries out for a Rule 11 benchslapping if a suit gets filed.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 1:09 PM

Wow. She's very attractive.

Also... wow, her argument is awful and she manages to make O'Reilly look intelligent and reasonable.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 1:12 PM

Wow, she wants to bring a class action suit on behalf of 11 contestants? You can't do that - or for that matter bring a class action on behalf of the american public against Howard Stern

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 1:26 PM

Yet another idiotic NYU grad. I told you peoples Columbia is the real deal. NYU is an overrated poser.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 1:27 PM

this woman is an idiot.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 1:53 PM

what an idiot. Perfect match for O'Reilly

avatar
16 Posted by Fordham Law Grad | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 1:57 PM

They're gonna pull us right out of the T25 for this.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 2:37 PM

What a dopey bunny

avatar
18 Posted by brooklyner | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 2:47 PM

Her husband is a Court Street regular. And an O'Reilly presence as well.

http://www.aidalalaw.com/html/manhattan-criminal-defense-attorneys.html

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 3:13 PM

The tepid reaction here to such a horrific legal analysis, and the corresponding focus on her looks, reminds me of the judge's assessment of Haley Scarnato last night. They couldn't even summon the will the to criticize her, she was so bad. So they offered, instead, a transparently backhanded compliment: "Well, you have nice legs." Poor Danielle. Can she be reported to the bar for this?

avatar
20 Posted by . | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 3:21 PM

O'Reilly probably had her on just to make himself look good. What a moron. "But Judge so-and-so, we should recover, because, because... it's just not fair!" dum-dum.

avatar
21 Posted by brooklyner | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 3:38 PM

med mal associate, in over her head:

http://www.hpmb.com/bio/print_bio.php?atr_id=132

avatar
22 Posted by Lucifer | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 4:04 PM

She was playing devil's advocate. You could tell she didn't believe her own argument. Someone put her up to it and hey, it was free publicity. I probably would have done the same thing. But then again, I am the Prince of Darkness...

avatar
23 Posted by P.T. Barnum | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 5:11 PM

The husband's web site is great, www.aidalalaw.com is truly Gallion-esque. I like the references to Mr. Aidala as "the Counselor."

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 6:20 PM

Even better is the bio of his colleague, Mr. Baratta, who is called "the councelor."

If you look at the video appearances, there's also a great switcheroo between 12/06 and 1/07.

And in the second one, he refers to a case about handing over exculpatory evidence called "United State v. Brady." Maybe that's too nitpicky.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 6:30 PM

wow she is terrible

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 6:51 PM

Haha, wow, her husband's site is hilarious!

And yea, she's a moron.

avatar
27 Posted by anonymoys | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 7:03 PM

hahaha -- wow an office in "Italy, EU"! Aidala's brooklyn-based criminal practice definitely must have some "connections."

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 7:24 PM

7:03 -- u mean "gunnections"

avatar
29 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 7:56 PM

libel or slander????? what the????? she didn't even sound like a real lawyer. is she really a lawyer? does anyone know if she really went to law school???

avatar
30 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 8:52 PM

It's time to do what we did to gallion and spielvogel to this new website

avatar
31 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, April 4, 2007 8:54 PM

The Law Offices of Arthur L. Aidala & Associates P.C. is a prestigious, full-service civil law and criminal defense law firm, covering a broad practice area. Our firm's New York City law offices are located in Manhattan and Brooklyn, with an associated office in Milan, Italy. Our lawyers represent individuals, corporations, and privately owned companies. The Law Offices of Arthur L. Aidala & Associates criminal defense practice includes all types of misdemeanor and felony criminal charges such as grand larceny, murder, rape, assault, drugs, narcotics, DUI, DWI, theft, auto accidents, mail, wire, stock fraud and other white collar crimes. The firm's civil practice is equally diverse, encompassing real estate law, real estate litigation, estate planning, wills and probates, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) compliance, registration and private placement, personal and workplace injury, slip and fall accidents, medical malpractice, nursing home negligence, product liability, commercial and civil litigation, class action suits, arbitration and mediation dispute resolution, and employment issues, such as sexual harassment and discrimination.

avatar
32 Posted by Richie Cunningham | Permalink Thursday, April 5, 2007 8:47 AM

PAINFUL.

avatar
33 Posted by Richie C. | Permalink Thursday, April 5, 2007 8:48 AM

Dirty tricks, antitrust laws?

avatar
34 Posted by NYU Law | Permalink Thursday, April 5, 2007 9:51 AM

Please note that she went to NYU for undergrad. NYU Law is at a completely different level than all the other schools at the university. She is not to be related in any way to NYU Law.... if you're doing that, you're just a fucking retard that does not understand that admissions standards for different schools and faculties within a university may vary widely (Just look at Yale Law and Yale Business School).

avatar
35 Posted by not your friend | Permalink Thursday, April 5, 2007 2:43 PM

As a friend of the Aidala's, I just want to say in their defense ... Oh wait, nvm. They're total idiots.

avatar
36 Posted by Tommo | Permalink Friday, April 6, 2007 2:19 PM

Arthur Aidala is a fucking idiot. What a pompous ass. Hope he fucking dies.

avatar
37 Posted by c. rude humpertits | Permalink Wednesday, May 2, 2007 2:56 PM

i'd let her blow me and laugh at that video clip while she's sucking me off.

Post Your Comment