Add RSS RSS

More About the Virginia Tech Shootings

Virginia Tech shooting VT Above the Law blog.JPGWe’ve learned more about the tragic killings at Virginia Tech since our brief post from yesterday. We’re guessing you’re following the case as closely as we are. But in case you’re not, here are some new facts:

1. The final death toll — at the time of our last post, it was over 20 — is now 33 (including the shooter, who killed himself).

2. We now know the identity of the killer. “He is Cho Seung-Hui, a 23-year-old resident alien of the United States, as first reported by ABC News.”

Feel free to discuss further in the comments.

Virginia Tech Killer Identified [ABC News]
Virginia Gunman Identified as a Student [New York Times]
D.C. Area Man Was Va. Tech Shooter [Washington Post]

Earlier: Breaking: Gunman Kills At Least 20 at Virginia Tech

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:08 PM

Wasn't the U. Penn. shooter an Asian male in his 20s also?

avatar
2 Posted by jonb | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:27 PM

I knew there was a good reason I don't like asians...

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:28 PM

So after the DC sniper, the U. Penn shooting, and now this, can the stereotype of the typical nutjob lone shooter as a white male be put to rest?

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:31 PM

did the shooter complete his compulsory military service in South Korea?

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:32 PM

u penn shooter was also korean.

who gave these people visas and green cards?

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:35 PM

Oh shut up about race for goodness sakes. The stereotype of the typical nutjob lone shooter took a blow with the DC Snipers, who were both African-American. And I don't have the numbers, but I read a study that said somewhere around 99% of serial rapists and killers were white males. So don't even try to start the race finger-pointing.

I should have known better than to come to the comments section. But I wanted to point out that the news articles, while using the shooter's last name correctly in the articles themselves, get it wrong when they first state the name. Cho is is his last name, so the name should be stated as "Seung-Hui Cho."

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:36 PM

Oh shut up about race for goodness sakes. The stereotype of the typical nutjob lone shooter took a blow with the DC Snipers, who were both African-American. And I don't have the numbers, but I read a study that said somewhere around 99% of serial rapists and killers are white males. So don't even try to start the race finger-pointing.

I should have known better than to come to the comments section. But I wanted to point out that the news articles, while using the shooter's last name correctly in the articles themselves, get it wrong when they first state the name. Cho is is his last name, so the name should be stated as "Seung-Hui Cho."

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:36 PM

UPenn Shooter also had the same last name as this guy.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:37 PM

The U. Penn shooter was also named Cho, I think.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:41 PM

12:35/6-

I think 12:28's point was that we shouldn't talk about race in this context. 12:28 was trying "to start the race finger-pointing"; 12:28 was trying to stop it. But now you've started.

avatar
11 Posted by Clarify | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:44 PM

Yeah. Koreans have like ten last names. Kim, Park, Lee, Chung, ...wait, maybe five. And all those other English derivations of those names are just different English spellings of the same Korean last name. (i.e. - Park = Pak = Bak. And Cho=Jo=Choi).

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:46 PM

So what if they had the same last name? I'm pretty sure there have been multiple killers named Smith.

avatar
13 Posted by Disagree | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:48 PM

I completely disagree with your characterization of 12:28's comment.

avatar
14 Posted by wawaweewah | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:49 PM

south koreans are completely inhuman and lack souls.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:56 PM

thank you, wawaweewah, you've enriched all of our lives

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 1:07 PM

He studied karate at Kyung Yee University.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 1:18 PM

12:49 you are so racist damn.. and 12:44 don't be so ignorant Koreans have way more than 10 last names. Just don't think you can write anything because you are protected by the anonymity of the internet.

avatar
18 Posted by Korean Dude | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 1:21 PM

I need to clarify Clarify's comment (April 17, 2007 12:44 PM). Actually Cho and Choi are not the same surname. And there are more than five surnames. Lastly, this shooter kid was just plain psychotic. I didn't hear anyone blaming "all them crazy white folk" after the Columbine shootings, so let's stop with the blanket comments.

avatar
19 Posted by insight | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 1:24 PM

what an insightful group of comments. How many died in Iraq yesterday? Oh, right, we dont care about them dying, they are just a bunch of poor children from the ghetto. 33 rich kids dead? lets all spend the next five years postponing testimony and making guesses at what happened...

avatar
20 Posted by Joe | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 1:38 PM

insight, you're an idiot. Most of the soldiers (assuming you're referring to them and not Iraqi civilians) who have died in Iraq are poor rural white kids from the south. In fact, blacks are underrepresented in combat zones (8% vs. 12% of population).

avatar
21 Posted by It helps if you know something about the topic | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 1:42 PM

I served in Iraq, and I thought I was from a middle-class family on Long Island. I guess I'm black and from the ghetto. Who knew?

I was a company commander and at least 60% of my company was white and from middle-class and/or rural families.

I understand it's easier on your tiny brain to believe that only poor dumb ghetto kids get tricked into joining the military, but it's just not the case.

avatar
22 Posted by Hokie | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:07 PM

Also, 12:49 - you stupid asshole - this isn't 33 dead rich kids. VT is a big ole state university and there's a lot of poor people who go there and people who are certainly not rich. I know this cause I grew up poor and I went there, like a whole boatload of my classmates.

Re: race - Who gives a crap. He's a nut, plain and simple. It's too bad he killed himself, it would have been awesome to see him strapped in the electric chair.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:15 PM

I agree that the race stuff is fucked-up, but I do have to point out that the shooters in these situations are always dudes. What is going on with that?

avatar
24 Posted by seriously? | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:19 PM

i don't think "insight" was talking about the service members. and, although i agree with the comments in response to "insight" that point out his/her palpable insensitivity regarding the 33 lives that were lost at VT (query how "insight" even knows the nationality/race/class of the victims--not all of the names have been released), i think that "insight" makes an important point: at the lowest estimate, over 60,000 people (service members plus Iraqi civilians) have died over the course of the war. while it is a bit too easy to immediately compare two such horrible but vastly different events (and i don't purport to), i do get a certain twinge in my stomach when i see the headline in 50 pt font re the VT shootings, and, after ferreting through the website, find that nearly that many were yet again killed in iraq yesterday. is the loss for the parent of the soldier that died yesterday less real or important a student who died yesterday? i don't mean to lessen the importance of the VT shootings--it is indeed a tragedy in every sense and needs to be mourned. but i can't also help but think about another area of the world in which loss of life is also occurring....

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:38 PM

1. Not that many US servicemembers die each day. 3300 over the past 4 years.

2. Maybe that many Iraqis died, but they're Iraqis, not our own people.

I hope you see the difference, if from no other viewpoint than as a human interest story.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:55 PM

Which upenn shooting are you people talking about? Esp. the part about that shooter being Korean too. Link to a story, please.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:01 PM

Also, as far as servicemen and women are concerned... they have volunteered to risk their lives in a combat zone. All the VT kids did was pursue something that all of us attorneys have... an undergraduate degree. How many of you, in deciding whether or not to go to college, thought it necessary to consider being killed while at school? Probably none... and if you did, you are either paranoid or went to Penn. Being shot is not a risk assumed when you pack up the station wagon and head of to school but it is when you enlist.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:10 PM

i honestly don't think there is any value in comparing the two situations - people have died and we should mourn all of them.

avatar
29 Posted by Follow up to 3:10 | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:24 PM

I realize that this is a gossip blog and that ATL is not necessarily known for deep thoughts, but it's no wonder that people perceive lawyers to be self-absorbed assholes when people can't even refrain from turning this thread into an opportunity to start petty arguments and insult others.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:27 PM

Apples and oranges. The casualties in Iraq are arguably for a greater cause and, at the very least, expected. You expect the military to take casualties in war and you expect innocent civilians to die in war. In the VT Tech massacre, these were lives senselessly and unexpectedly lost because of one deranged man's low sense of self-worth. It doesn't mean the lives at VT Tech are any more valuable than innocent Iraqi lives or American soldiers, only that the sudden loss at VT is more unexpected, more senseless and more shocking. No greater good can come from this loss.

avatar
31 Posted by some math | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:28 PM

3300 over the past four years.

365 days x 4 = 1460 days

3300 soldiers' lives / 1460 days = 2.26 lives/day

33 VT students / 2.26 = 14.6

Therefore, every 14.6 days, or every two weeks for the past four years, as many service people die in iraq as did in VT yesterday.

and 2:38, i ask you this: when it comes to the value of human life, IS there a difference between an iraqi CIVILIAN and a US one?

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:45 PM

"i ask you this: when it comes to the value of human life, IS there a difference between an iraqi CIVILIAN and a US one?"

-- Certainly not in my religion.

avatar
33 Posted by Calculus | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:50 PM

Some math,

When it comes to the value of human life, IS there a difference between an iraqi civilian and someone dying of starvation in north korea, or aids in south Africa, etc? So why bother talking about Iraq...

avatar
34 Posted by some math | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 4:13 PM

calculus,

cute name. and a good point. absolutely not. iraq is merely an example. but just because it is one of a long list of mass losses of life (n. korea, aids epidemic, darfur, etc.), doesn't mean it is not worth bothering to talk about.

avatar
35 Posted by AntonK | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 4:35 PM

While comparing deaths in Iraq vs. VT, etc.... isn't anyone concerned about the carnage caused by the consumption of alcohol? It certainly dwarfs, on an annual basis, either murders, war casualties, etc...

I'm calling for the return of Prohibition!

avatar
36 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 6:52 PM

Prohibition ... a ban on alcohol ... what a waste ... I call for a ban on Heart Disease!!!

avatar
37 Posted by how bizarre | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 7:55 PM

It really is an interesting commentary on how racist we as a society can be when this kid's ethnicity comes into play AT ALL in discussing this.

I mean, of all the spree killers you can think of in U.S. history, they have almost ALL been white guys. Save that Native kid last year.

And yet people care that this one kid happened to be Asian? Would it matter if he was Irish, German, Italian, etc?

I am glad I'm not a minority in this country. When people cut me off in traffic, they just think, "that asshole." It's never "that black asshole" or "that Asian asshole."

avatar
38 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 9:17 PM

CLOSE THE BORDERS

avatar
39 Posted by margaret cho's interesting comment from her blog | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 10:08 PM

"Here is where I can really envy white people because when white people do something that is inexplicably awful, so brutally and horribly wrong, nobody says – “do you think it is because he is white?” There are no headlines calling him the “White shooter." There is no mention of race because there is no thought in anyone's mind that his race had anything to do with his crime."

avatar
40 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 10:29 PM

this guy wasn't a citizen

so obviously race is a factor

avatar
41 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 10:49 PM

True, this guy wasn't a citizen. But that's because he and his family came to this country in the hope of achieving the American Dream. Which is precisely what your ancestors did.

avatar
42 Posted by Sad | Permalink Tuesday, April 17, 2007 10:52 PM

KOREAN NEWS REPORT THAT THE KILLER'S PARENTS HAVE COMMITTED SUICIDE. Father slit his wrist; mother drank poison

avatar
43 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:09 AM

ninemsn reports that parents have not attempted suicide, but were hospitalized "with shock"

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=261805

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 18, 2007 7:29 AM

10:29 wins.

avatar
45 Posted by word*star | Permalink Wednesday, April 18, 2007 9:34 AM

This place has become a toilet. Lat, why don't you moderate comments?

avatar
46 Posted by what's good for the goose... | Permalink Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:40 AM

korean culture is very racist. when hines ward first went to korea about 15 years ago, people would spit on him in the street because they were so disgusted by mixed race children. even today many koreans are still very racist and look down on other races, especially blacks, with contempt. you damn well better believe that if this shooter had been black every korean person you know would have been talking about how black people are so violent/crazy/insane.

case in point: recently two US soldiers in korea (both black) were convicted of raping a korean female police officer. the ensuing press coverage was vicious and painted a picture of all black people as being potential rapists.

now that doesn't make it right for us to blame all korean people for what happened at virginia tech. but, at the same time, it's hard for me to listen to korean people complain about racism against koreans, when they never seem to complain about racism by koreans.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 18, 2007 11:10 AM

The question is not whether Koreans are racist or Americans are racist. In any majority/minority environment, the majority will tend to associate the actions of minority individuals to the minority group at large. Thus, majority Koreans in Korea will tend to associate the actions of minority American soldiers to all people who look like those particular soldiers (whether black or white), and majority white Americans here will tend to associate the actions of a minority Korean to all Koreans, or even East Asians.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 18, 2007 11:17 AM

Obviously this was not a hate crime directed towards a certain race. Of the victims, there are actually 2 Korean Americans, 2 Indians, several Hispanics and an African American person. Given this, why do we care that the killer was Korean? He was just a crazy guy who just killed anybody he could. The American Media and people like you breed racism by focusing on the wrong aspects of the crime.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 18, 2007 11:51 AM

no one is saying this was a hate crime. they're just saying that when koreans complain about racism, that's a little like the pot calling the kettle black.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 18, 2007 12:09 PM

11:51: then you might as well say that whenever anyone complains about racism, it's the pot calling the kettle black. Any race which at some point in time has had majority status in some part of the world has at one point or another been racist toward those of minority status in that particular part of the world in those particular times. Pointing out that Koreans constitute one of these races doesn't advance the ball.

Post Your Comment