Musical Chairs: Congrats to Matt Waxman
As previously discussed, Matthew Waxman — a member of the Elect (OT 2000/Souter), and a law school classmate of ours — is headed for academia. He recently accepted an offer to join the faculty of Columbia Law School. Congratulations, Matt!
But in the meantime, Waxman is pretty busy over at the State Department. Steve Clemons of the Washington Note writes:
Policy Planning Director Stephen Krasner has now officially departed for Stanford — and “Acting Director Matthew Waxman” is in place.Waxman is an ideas entrepreneur with character (he is one of the real insider heroes who while at DoD fought against the erosion of the Geneva Conventions on torture). He also gets strategy and knows that water wars, transnational disease transmission, environmental challenges posed by climate change dynamics, massive refugee crises, and other non-traditional problems must be dealt with as well as thinking through how a superpower manages its interests in a world where other superpowers — and even not so super powers — aren’t the overriding security challenge.
Clemons shares our high opinion of Waxman — and thinks that his appointment as Policy Planning Director should be made permanent:
[P]erhaps State should remove the “acting” from Matthew Waxman’s title and roll the dice on someone who appears to many to be a 21st century “young Yoda.” Waxman, who I have met on occasion, reminds me of a hybrid of strategic wunderkind Paul Nitze and Eisenhower acolyte Andy Goodpaster.One senior State Department official believes that Condi Rice “wants a name” heading Policy Planning — someone “with more stature.” But this is a pivotal time in American history and foreign policy. Not a lot of what we did yesterday will be that helpful in thinking through what we need to do tomorrow. Everything needs to be rethought.
Condi: Let’s not forget that Waxman is a former Supreme Court clerk. Isn’t that enough “stature” for you?
(We realize that a SCOTUS clerkship is a legal credential, and that Waxman’s current position is a policy post. But genius does not recognize such small-minded, jurisdictional limitations. Three cheers for Supreme Court clerks!)
Getting John Bolton Off of Bush’s Payroll Correlates with Improved US Foreign Policy Gains [The Washington Note]
Matthew Waxman bio [U.S. Department of State]
Earlier: Some Weekend Odds and Ends




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
Any idea what he'll be teaching at CLS?
too bad CLS is a festering TTT in decline.
Chachi Rodriguez lives!
why do we care about this?
Lat - please don't use this blog to advertise your buddies, this isn't myspace - I thought you were more objective than that
no one cares about supreme court clerks
11:07, Waxman may be a "budd[y]" of Lat, but he is also a prominent figure in the war on terror.
Waxman has been featured in many New York Times and New Yorker articles about the treatment of enemy combatants. He crossed swords with David Addington, Cheney's lawyer -- which is what led to his (Waxman's) move from Defense to State.
Now Waxman is going to teach at Columbia Law School. That is at least as noteworthy as the random law firm partner moves that get written up here. Waxman's hiring was covered in the mainstream media:
http://www.nysun.com/article/52929
You need to get a broader sense of what's newsworthy. There are things in life other than associate pay raises.
This is more of an obit, really. Giving up a great future like his to teach? Lame. Enjoy the Hamilton deli.
Why do you always use "OT" when describing when and for whom someone clerked on the Supreme Court?
And yes, I know "OT" stands for October Term. So if you just reply that OT means October Term, without explaining why it is necessary you are not helpful, just eager to show off how smart you are. Over/under on how many of these reply.
Is there another term?
OT = October Term
It's just custom or practice. It's less confusing to say "OT 1991" instead of "1991" because the latter could actually relate to the 1990-91 Term.
It's no different than saying "FY 1991" to refer to fiscal year 1991. It's just for the sake of clarity.
Just another member of Lat's so-called "elect" - that self-important logic loop of mutual masturbation - proving that they can't hack in the actual practice of law. It’s further reinforcement of the old adage, “those who can, do; those who can’t, teach”.
And those who can't teach, teach gym.
Does anyone know, as unlikely as it might seem, if he is related to Seth Waxman, the Clinton SG?
11:49 - pwnd. "OT= October Term. I will now go back to correcting someone's bluebooking, because I am not helpful, just anal."
OT = October Term. HTH.