Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Pay Raise Watch: What's Up With Baker & McKenzie?

Over in the D.C. office of Baker & McKenzie, the natives are getting restless. They've prepared this cute little bar graph (thumbnail image; click to enlarge):

Baker McKenzie small 2 first year associate salaries Abovethelaw Above the Law blog.JPG

The graphic above also reflects that Williams & Connolly now pays starting salaries of $165,000. We hadn't heard (or written) about that news, but it's official.

Does anyone have a memo and/or more information about what Williams & Connolly pays beyond the first year? If so, please email us. Thanks.

Update / Correction: Whoops, we forgot that W&C raised salaries back in March. What we were thinking, and meant to write, is that Williams & Connolly hasn't raised associate salaries in response to the latest round of nationwide pay hikes (as kicked off by Orrick).

Remember that W&C traditionally doesn't pay year-end bonuses, but pays an above-market base to make up for it. Their current scale -- 165, 180, 195, etc. -- is still above-market, but not by as much as usual.

Further Update / Correction: Apparently Greenberg Traurig is still at $145K in Washington. We've revised the graph accordingly.

Earlier: Nationwide Pay Raise Watch: What's Up With Williams & Connolly?

Comments
avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 3:53 PM

ah.... ah..... ah....... FIRST!!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 3:54 PM

NY to $190!

avatar
Posted by WGWAG | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 3:55 PM

White Girls With Asian Guys

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 3:57 PM

Now if only somebody would do the same in Chicago...

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 3:57 PM

Williams & Connolly cementing its dominance over Covington.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 3:57 PM

If you ever needed clear evidence that biglaw practice is little more than a d**k-measuring contest, here it is.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 3:57 PM

White guys leaving Asian girls with limps and smiles because lil Asian rice dicks can't satisfy them.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 3:59 PM

WTF Lat - your earlier post on Williams & connolly mentioned the $165. Do you not re-read/remember your own posts before making a statement like this?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:00 PM

WTF Lat - your earlier post on Williams & connolly mentioned the $165. Do you not re-read/remember your own posts before making a statement like this?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:03 PM

Williams & Connolly has been at 165 since the nationwide bump to 145 awhile back. 165 is actually well below market insofar as they do not pay year-end bonuses.

avatar
Posted by Understatement wins | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:06 PM

Associates at Baker deserve to make less because they can't make a point without making it red, bold, and with a double label.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:07 PM

oh the poor babies! they are so underpaid for their monkey work

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:08 PM

Baker has issued a memo and will be raising to market on Aug. 1

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:13 PM

4:08 is wrong, they are raising to 170 in DC (they want to leave W&C behind).

avatar
Posted by Gelimer | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:17 PM

Why do I get a feeling that all of this pay raises is just a race to the top and there's going to be a crash?

avatar
Posted by Dr. Evil | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:23 PM

Simpson Thacher to one HUNDRED dollars!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:25 PM

You can take Fulbright & Jaworski's D.C. office off the list of shame. They raised last week, effective July 1, as follows:

Class / Base / 1900 / 2150 / 2300 / 2500 / total
'06 / $160,000 / none / none / none / none / $160,000
'05 / $165,000 / $5,000 / $5,000 / $5,000 / $5,000 / $185,000
'04 / $170,000 / $15,000 / $7,500 / $12,500 / $12,500 / $217,500
'03 / $185,000 / $25,000 / $10,000 / $12,500 / $12,500 / $245,000
'02 / $200,000 / $30,000 / $12,500 / $17,500 / $17,500 / $277,500
'01 / $210,000 / $35,000 / $12,500 / $17,500 / $17,500 / $292,500
'00 / $220,000 / $40,000 / $15,000 / $17,500 / $17,500 / $310,000
'99 / $230,000 / $40,000 / $15,000 / $22,500 / $22,500 / $330,000
'98 / $240,000 / $40,000 / $15,000 / $22,500 / $22,500 / $340,000
'97 / $245,000 / $40,000 / $15,000 / $22,500 / $22,500 / $345,000
'96 / $250,000 / $40,000 / $15,000 / $22,500 / $22,500 / $350,000

Up to 150 pro bono and other qualifying hours count towards the 2150, 2300, and 2500 hour bonuses.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:26 PM

Funny how those who made the graph left off one of B&M's biggest global competitors: DLA Piper. They also one-up B&M by paying $160k all over the place (not just NY and DC).

avatar
Posted by YYAAALLLL | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:27 PM

Know pretty much for a fact that my V25 (NY office) is raising to $175K come September.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:28 PM

any word on Fulbright's other offices?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:31 PM

any memo for the fulbright raise?? This would be huge for the two other Texas firms in DC (Baker Botts and V&E).

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:34 PM

I call BS on 4:27.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:35 PM

4:13 --- show us the goods.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:36 PM

where's hunton at?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:39 PM

No memo on Fulbright, nor are we expecting one - all the info was handed down orally at a meeting of all the associates last week.

No word on their other offices either.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:40 PM

Lat -- WTF..???

W&C raised back in March

http://www.abovethelaw.com/2007/03/skaddenfreude_williams_connoll.php

W&C is currently below market when bonuses are factored in. They have not responded to the latest raises to $160

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:41 PM

I love that the graph starts at 135K and has 5K increments. It makes the disparity look HUGE!
NY to 190K!

avatar
Posted by YYAAALLL | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:41 PM

4:34 -I have no reason to BS. Its def going to be $175K for first years, the only thing I am unsure of is when. September may be off. Not sure how the rest of the scale is going to be which sucks since I am not a first year.

avatar
Posted by I.J. Reilly | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:43 PM

Lat -

Try to confirm the Fulbright raise. Obviously, it's important to your ATL readers in Unhappy, Texas.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:56 PM

while you're talking about these huge salaries, look at this craigslist post i came across. unbelievable.

Small regional litigation firm seeks full time attorney admitted to practice in both Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

We are looking for an attorney with 0-3 years experience that will prepare discovery requests and discovery responses, perform research and writing, create and meet deadlines, draft pleadings and motions, attend depositions and arbitrations. Court appearances will be in both New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

Please submit resume with telephone number, law school transcript and writing sample (minimum 5 pages, maximum 10 pages).

Location: Cherry Hill
Compensation: $35,000 - $40,000
Principals only. Recruiters, please don't contact this job poster.
Please, no phone calls about this job!
Please do not contact job poster about other services, products or commercial interests.
http://southjersey.craigslist.org/lgl/375821807.html

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:58 PM

Lat-
Although you are (by your own account) way behind on W&C salary info, you may not have heard something else: there is a rumor going round that W&C bumped its clerkship bonus from $25k to $35k.

avatar
Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 5:03 PM

Since when is Cravath a "D.C. firm"

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 5:04 PM

4:56, "small regional litigation firm" translates to "captive insurance defense counsel/drone for huge insurance company."

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 5:08 PM

remember, W&C never ever pays any bonus (and their associates routinely bill over 2400 hours), so all things considered remains below market

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 5:10 PM

Yummmm . . . that is the WGWAG I like

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 5:22 PM

3:59, 4:40 - See the update/correction just added.

avatar
Posted by Van Morrison | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 5:25 PM

TB SHEETS!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 5:31 PM

Hey, if my firm had partnership prospects for associates like W&C then I'd work for no bonus too. The bonus would come in the form of a seven-figure partnership paycheck.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 5:37 PM

Since when does Irell have an office in DC?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 5:55 PM

Atlanta to $145k.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 6:06 PM

TALLAHASSEE TO $60K!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 6:18 PM

The chart's author must've been crunched for space at the end of the chard, because it leaves off Wilmer Hale and Wiley Rein, two firms with big DC presence.

NY to $190K!!!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 6:33 PM

Lat - Please put your ear to the rail and figure out if there will be movement in NYC anytime soon. I have to decide on NYC before my clerkship term is up.

avatar
Posted by slowpoke | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 7:30 PM

First!

avatar
Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 7:32 PM

Lat, is there any truth to the Fulbright rumor in DC? What about their other offices? Especially Texas?

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:43 PM

GREENBERG TRAURG'S DC OFFICE SALARY IS 145k, NOT 160k. PLEASE ADD TO LIST WITH BAKER.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:59 PM

Why is a firm like Greenberg still at $145k in DC?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 10:28 PM

The Fulbright may be indeed be true. The partner in charge of our compensation committee admitted as much this evening in front of four associates.

Someone joked about Electrical Engineers getting a bump over everyone else. He said it sent shockwaves through the IP partners.

He said that raises "likely are not done for the year" and that things are "very fluid."

He made some half-hearted assertion about being careful of getting what you want, but given that most people had worked through the weekend and to get the work done that was lost.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 10:33 PM

NY to $190!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:03 PM

NY to $190!

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 12:06 AM

Ask a firm like Greenberg that question. I'm sure it does wonders for their recruitment.

avatar
Posted by jetsettinglawyer | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 12:06 AM

Ask a firm like Greenberg that question. I'm sure it does wonders for their recruitment.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 12:08 AM

NY to $190!

avatar
Posted by Richie Cunningham | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 7:58 AM

When you take a step back and think about it, you realize that $160,000 a year is a fucking unbelievable amount of money.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 8:00 AM

Where the hell is Bingham McCutchen on there? Don't they have a pretty sizable DC office?

avatar
Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:29 AM

Other firms with sizable DC offices left off the list:

Sidley Austin

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:40 AM

Quinn DC? Yeah right. Remind me not to send referrals to Baker.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:49 AM

Goodwin Procter is also at 160 in DC with a pretty sizable DC office

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 10:41 AM

how exactly does a "DC firm" like Cravath or QE make a chart but a DC powerhouse like Wilmer, Cutler is missing?
[They are, I believe, at 145k.]

avatar
Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 10:43 AM

Isn't Venable still at 145? They're a rather large DC firm.

avatar
Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 10:45 AM

Isn't Venable still at 145? They're a rather large DC firm.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 10:59 AM

I think the only office of Greenberg Traurig at $160k is NY. None of their other offices have announced raises.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:07 AM

seyfarth shaw's dc office (and all others except NYC) are also at 145k.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:41 AM

According to NALP, Nixon Peabody's 107-lawyer office in DC is also at $145 (it appears only the NYC office is at $160).

avatar
Posted by move on | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 1:13 PM

If you have the time to make a f'n bar graph of all top DC firms compensation, don't you think its time to get another job?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 18, 2007 2:44 PM

Actually their graph is short Townsend at 160. They just opened up a D.C. office.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 8:02 AM

Even if not paying 160k in other locales, Greenberg appears to be at market in those other offices. Except DC. Where is Wilmer on that chart?!

Post Your Comment