Add RSS RSS

Nina Totenberg Wants A Bagel, Lightly Toasted, Lowfat Veggie Cream Cheese on the Side - Stat!

Nina Totenberg NPR Georgetown Abovethelaw Above the Law blog.jpgOur series of posts on that delicious legal diva, Nina Totenberg of NPR, has made the pages of the Washington Post:

A blog that labels itself a "legal tabloid" has been soliciting juicy anecdotes about NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg's on-the-job behavior, but Totenberg says she's just doing her job.

In a post on Above the Law authored by the blog's editor in chief, David Lat, one anecdote describes the correspondent entering the Supreme Court's press section moments before a morning session begins -- and asking someone sitting in the front row to surrender the seat.

Totenberg gets her way, it says, "because nobody says no to Nina."

But not so fast: Totenberg says that since she happens to be the dean of the Supreme Court press corps, she actually has an assigned seat -- that nice one, right up front.

Who knew the Supreme Court press gallery was just like a high school cafeteria? On first Mondays we wear pink!

Totenberg's complete comment, and our reaction, after the jump.

Here's what Nina Totenberg told the Post:

"I'm flattered that I have reached the stage in my career that my taking my assigned seat has become an event big enough to inspire such embellished storytelling," Totenberg said in an interview yesterday. "If I had known asking someone to vacate my seat was such a big deal, I would have also asked him to bring me a Starbucks and a bagel."

Fantabulous! We love the snarky grandiosity of Ms. Nina's response, which only reinforces her reputation as alpha female of the SCOTUS press gaggle.

We also adore La Totenberg's use of synecdoche, in referring to coffee as "a Starbucks." This locution is a favorite of caffeinated divas everywhere.

For example, it's employed by Miranda Priestly (Meryl Streep) in the movie version of The Devil Wears Prada. Miranda tells Andrea Sachs (Anne Hathaway) that she's stepping out for a meeting, but by the time she returns, she wants the unpublished Harry Potter manuscript on her desk -- along with "my Starbucks."

Nina Totenberg, Anna Wintour Miranda Priestly ain't got nothing on you. We'll fetch you "a Starbucks and a bagel" -- and bring it to you in the front row of the press section, Supreme Court marshals be damned -- any day of the week!

Update: As a commenter reminds us, Thomas Goldstein -- the young superstar of the Supreme Court bar and founder of SCOTUSblog -- was Nina Totenberg's intern, back in the day. So this legal genius was presumably tasked with fetching Ms. Nina "her Starbucks" (although maybe this was before the rise of Starbucks to coffee hegemony).

If Tom Goldstein was the Andy Sachs to Nina Totenberg's Miranda Priestly, presumably he owes some of his current professional success to his powerful mentor. Is an internship with La Totenberg the legal-journalism version of working as Anna Wintour's assistant: a completely hellacious highly challenging experience, offering great rewards to those who survive it?

Names & Faces: Totenberg's Courtside Seat [Washington Post]

Earlier: Why Is Nina Totenberg Like Judy Miller?
Prior ATL coverage of Nina Totenberg (scroll down)

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by The first troll was beaten today | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 10:18 AM

so there

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 10:54 AM

Divaliscious!!!!!!

avatar
3 Posted by Gtown | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 11:21 AM

Can we also comment on how ridiculous she looks in that picture? What outrageous coiffage.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 12:16 PM

has there been nothing on her history with tom goldstein? he was an intern of hers years ago.

avatar
5 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 12:28 PM

Ahhhh - legal gossip again. Goes down like a mint julep on a hot summer's day.

avatar
6 Posted by anon | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 12:56 PM

Who assigns seats to the press corps? Is there any way of checking Totenberg's story? At least one reporter hadn't heard it before. The picture is funny. Where's Annie Leibowitz when we really need her?

avatar
7 Posted by anon | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 1:13 PM

Does anybody else think that maybe Nina got confused by people referring to her as the "dean" and thought it was a real title? It isn't really her fault if nobody else will let her know it's not an actual position. Maybe somebody should let her know that those aren't real degrees. Not me.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 1:25 PM

To all the commenters who have asked "who cares?" on every Nina Totenberg post:

Evidently, the Washington Post.

So stop yer complaining, just 'cause you're too ignorant to know who Nina Totenberg is.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 1:50 PM

12:56 - Good point. Maybe Lat can investigate further?

Are these official assignments, e.g., by Kathy Arberg or Pam Talkin?

Or is it just an informal understanding about where people regularly sit -- like on a school bus?

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 2:39 PM

Why on earth is there a "dean of the Supreme Court press corps?"

I can't imagine what purpose it could have, other than allowing Dean Totenberg an excuse to administer corporal punishments to young reporters who violate court decorum (by doing things such as sitting in her precious seat or forgetting her Starbucks).

avatar
11 Posted by i really do | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 2:55 PM

i like cheese

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 3:54 PM

Laurie Lin is better than Lat. Less Federalist Society hidden agenda, for one.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 4:36 PM

There arent really assigned seats, are there?

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 6:15 PM

Slow news day at the Post, it seems.

avatar
15 Posted by First | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 6:26 PM

First, motherfuckers!

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 6:28 PM

3:54 - I think Laurie's great too. But WTF does this post have to do with the Federalist Society?

avatar
17 Posted by cute erogenous zones | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 6:57 PM

I wish she would have commented on her GULC graduation speech in the WaPo article. Something to the effect of:

"I admit it - I panicked. It was 10am on graduation day and I had no speech prepared, so I found a random word generator online and had it spit out about 1,000 words. Then I matched up the rhyming ones as best I could during the invocation. Finally, I read the thing, but I thought it was too short so I repeated it and changed the nouns' gender in the second iteration. There, I said it."

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 6:57 PM

Who uses "a Starbucks" to mean coffee? Geez.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 7:26 PM

6:57 -

It's "acute" erogenous zones.

avatar
20 Posted by and crackers too | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 7:47 PM

i like cheese

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 8:09 PM

I recall an article about Goldstein from a year or so ago. If I remember correctly, it mentioned his internship with Totenberg and that Totenberg "got him" (or words to that effect) his clerkship. Not to be too "tierist," but I'd bet Goldstein is one of very, very few American Univ. grads to clerk on the D.C. Cir. Stands to reason that Totenberg was instrumental in getting him in the door.

For what it’s worth, I also know a fairly recent Totenberg intern who has nothing but praise for her.

avatar
22 Posted by WGWAG | Permalink Saturday, July 14, 2007 9:30 PM

White Girls With Asian Guys!

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 12:12 AM

"Not to be too "tierist," but I'd bet Goldstein is one of very, very few American Univ. grads to clerk on the D.C. Cir. Stands to reason that Totenberg was instrumental in getting him in the door."


Goldstein was first in his class, and D.C. law school faculty members usually know other people in D.C. I doubt he needed much help.

avatar
24 Posted by Nasty, Brutish and Short | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 12:15 AM

Prob is, Tom Goldstein looks nothing like Anne Hathaway. Hence, the metaphor falls apart. Meryl could totally play Nina though. I give you that.

Also: I would love to hear Alan Simpson (former Sen. from Wyoming) anecdotes about Nina, if anyone's got em. There was that whole Clarence Thomas thing with Alan and Nina.

avatar
25 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 3:28 AM

"But WTF does this post have to do with the Federalist Society?"

This is Lat's blog and he can do what he wants with it, but Lat tends to write posts that are far more sympathetic to conservative figures and that lambast liberal figures.

Look what he writes about Jan Crawford Greenberg (ABC's conservative Supreme Court correspondent) in this post: "This scrumptious SCOTUS scoop was delivered courtesy of Jan Crawford Greenburg, one of our favorite Supreme Court correspondents. And our affection for her has only grown after we attended an event with her last week, at the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) in Washington."

This is a description of Ms. Greenberg from Lat: "We admired her summery ensemble: a pantsuit in dark brown, as opposed to the more formal skirt suit she wore to her Georgetown talk, paired with a cream-colored blouse and expertly accessorized with a coral necklace. Her reddish-brown hair also looked lighter than in the past."

Contrast this to how he describes Nina Totenberg (who is known to be as liberal as Greenberg is conservative): "We love the snarky grandiosity of Ms. Nina's response, which only reinforces her reputation as alpha female of the SCOTUS press gaggle."

I think that it's clear that Lat loves to mock liberal public figures while sympathetically covering conservative figures. He's like the Fox News of the blogosphere. Again, it's his blog so he's free to be as biased as he wants.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 7:54 AM

So 12:12, you think American sends its top grad to the DC Cir (or 2d/9th Cir, for that matter) every year?

I'm not taking anything away from Goldstein. If it's tough to make your name as a top-SCOTUS litigator from Hah-vahd or Yale, it's nearly impossible to do it from American (can you name another?). Even a guy as sharp as Goldstein would need some help.

Anyway, here it is:

"Totenberg helped him get a clerkship with D.C. Circuit Appeals Court judge Patricia Wald...."

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0407.mauro.html

avatar
27 Posted by ? | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 8:00 AM

Ummm....if Tom Goldstein is so great and had such a "powerful" clerkship, then why does he sit at home writing a blog in his undies? Sounds a little loserish to me.

avatar
28 Posted by ? | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 8:02 AM

oops. nevermind.

(love, loyale 2L?)

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 10:28 AM

8:00/8:02 - Yeah, "oops" is right. TCG is a partner at Akin Gump and a top Supreme Court advocate, as well as one of those so-called "loserish" blogger-types (that you waste your time reading, making you an even bigger loser).

avatar
30 Posted by ? | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 12:13 PM

10:28:

lol....and who are you? the defender of socially retarded blogger shut-ins everywhere? get a life, and keep your acerbic comebacks to yourself, unless your name is dave lat.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 2:10 PM

Hey Lat --

What's your take on Lindsay Lohan's friend suing Perez Hilton for libel?
http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2007/07/15/2007-07-15_lohan_buddy_sues_2_blogs_claiming_libel-1.html

avatar
32 Posted by ? | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 3:04 PM

Wow. That was um, mature. This page looks more and moe like autoadmit daily. Your job sucks, Lat. Go back to biglaw.

avatar
33 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 3:45 PM

Wow, that's awful. Someone needs to delete those posts and ban than IP address.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 4:07 PM

Lat: If the "n-word" poster is actually at GULC, you can report him or her to the university authorities.

Find out the commenter's IP address, then file an abuse report by email:

abuse at georgetown dot edu

avatar
35 Posted by thanks | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 4:20 PM

Lat, thanks for erasing that offensive post. Weird/irrelevant posts are one thing, but that one went way overboard.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 4:33 PM

I forgot - the NAACP buried the N-word last week, so officially it doesn't exist anymore. That means we can use it as much as we want now, amirite?

avatar
37 Posted by also thanks | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 4:45 PM

Lat -- please don't let this place turn into autoadmit. thanks for your attention.

avatar
38 Posted by Fed Soc | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 9:16 PM

3:28 a.m.: I laughed out loud reading your comment. You really do have a completely distorted view of where everyone stands on the political spectrum.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, July 15, 2007 10:41 PM

Isn't it metonymy rather than synecdoche? Starbucks isn't a part of coffee; it's a type. Wow, I should just study for the bar and not be such a nerd.

avatar
40 Posted by SCOTUSJ | Permalink Monday, July 16, 2007 12:04 PM

As someone who covers SCOTUS frequently, but is not a member of the SCOTUS press corps, I can tell you that usually non-SCOTUS press corps types are not permitted to sit in the "assigned" seats near the bench. That is where the usuals--the AP, Totenberg, Greenhouse, Biscupic, etc.--sit and others are allowed there only if the regulars aren't in attendance. Everyone else sits on folding chairs in back of the cushioned seats.

Usually, the SCOTUS guards monitor fairly closely where you sit, so I am surprised the Starbucks fetcher actually ended up in Nina's seat.

As high school as it sounds, remember that the White House press corps has similar seating rules.

avatar
41 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Monday, July 16, 2007 9:49 PM

Alas, Nina was insufficiently over the top and thus left herself open to attack. Next time she should say "bring me a Starbucks and a bagel...[pause for laughter]....you see, I am portraying a diva insofar as I snapped at this person to bring me a coffee and insofar as I referred to the coffee as a 'Starbucks'.....[pause for laughter]....you see, divas think that everyone is there to serve them and so it is natural for a diva to snap orders to anyone within earshot on the assumption that the person wouldn't be there except to do her bidding...[pause for laughter]....you see, Starbucks is a fairly expensive type of chain coffee that divas drink...."

Post Your Comment