Add RSS RSS

The Bar Exam: Wow That Kinda Sucked

Studying frantically for the bar exam next week? Don’t have enough to worry about already?

We’re here to help. From Eric Turkewitz, over at the New York Personal Injury Law Blog:

screwed bar exam Abovethelaw Above the Law blog.jpgMy bar exam [responses] were lost. Not all of them, mind you, just the 200 multi-state multiple choices answers I scored on that computer sheet with a pencil….

I was one of 500+ people who got the bad news a few weeks afterward. The answer sheets just disappeared. As in gone. Vanished. The crime (or act of negligence) was never solved. The answer sheets [were] never recovered from the Hudson River or local garbage dump, wherever it is they went.

WOW. Imagine if that happened to you, after all those weeks of studying…

I was given four choices:

1. Take the whole exam again in February 1986;
2. Take just the multi-state again in February 1986;
3. Take a special make-up exam in September 1985; or
4. Cancel the whole thing.

But don’t take an anxiety-induced crapinyourpants — at least not yet. Wait until day 2 of the bar exam.

As it turns out, Eric Turkewitz’s story has a quasi-happy ending. Read the rest, over here.

Your Bar Exam Answer Sheet Is Gone — Now What? [New York Personal Injury Law Blog]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:16 AM

first

avatar
2 Posted by First | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:16 AM

FiRsT ! ! !

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:16 AM

CAN WE PLEASE GET BACK TO TALKING ABOUT MEN LOOKING AT OTHER MEN'S JOHNSON'S IN THE BATHROOM?

avatar
4 Posted by NYU5L | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:17 AM

Couldn't they just scale your score from the New York essay portion of the bar exam - say, map it by percentile? I mean, if it's their fault, that's really kind of dick.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:18 AM

First, you weren't first.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:20 AM

The answer sheets never recovered from the Hudson River or local garbage dump, wherever it is they went.

Either he's missing a verb (e.g., "were") or these inanimate objects must have gone out drinking hard with their fellow test-takers and took a wrong turn going home that evening.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:21 AM

NYU5L: I see your point, but the multistate is, well, multistate, and you need the score if you are thinking about practicing anywhere else and getting your info transferred (DC, CA, etc.). Also, the NY essay portion is too easy to actually serve as a true indicator. I mean, it's not the CA bar, after all.

Let the CA vs. NY bar battle begin...

avatar
8 Posted by WTF? | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:23 AM

That story doesn't make a lick of sense. You took the bar in 1985 and didn't pass until 2006? If you took the bar in July 2005, then what's all this stuff about 1985 and 22 years ago?

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:24 AM

Also, even the missing "were" doesn't cure the atrocity of a mixed passive voice / active voice sentence with the same "subject" (i.e., the answer sheets).

avatar
10 Posted by so so | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:26 AM

i knows it only middle morning, but can i has an ass-crush now?

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:26 AM

Yeah i don't understand the timing of this. he took it in '85, was told to take the exam 22 yrs later? What the hell was he doing in the meantime?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:30 AM

Some of the readers are not smart.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:32 AM

I still don't understand what "ass-crushing" is

avatar
14 Posted by Eric Turkewitz | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:39 AM

Tough crowd. The exam was 1985. The 2006 was an error that I just fixed. The verb has been put in. I'll take a look at the passive/active voice thingy, but hey, it's a blog, not the NYT.

--ET

avatar
15 Posted by to 11:23, 11:26 | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:40 AM

Pretty sure that 1985 was 22 years ago. And pretty sure he just wrote this, and meant to say that he was given the option of retaking the exam in February 1986.

Just a hunch.

avatar
16 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:49 AM

As Eric Turkewitz's experience shows, John Pieper is the man!! Barbri is a mind numbing experience. Go Pieper.

avatar
17 Posted by NY Bar Candidate | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:49 AM

Why are you trying to freak us out more than we already are?

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:53 AM

So is the moral of the story:

Record your multiple-choice answers not just on the official answer sheet, but in your booklet too?

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:53 AM

@ 11:49

Chillax, dude. At least yesterday's steam explosion didn't happen while you were taking the bar exam.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:54 AM

11:21: You can waive into DC without showing them your MBE score if you're a member of the NY Bar, and CA doesn't accept MBE scores taken in other jurisdictions (and is not unique in this respect).

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:57 AM

Obviously, the guy is writing about is bar exam horror story in 1985.

And this comment:

"Also, even the missing "were" doesn't cure the atrocity of a mixed passive voice / active voice sentence with the same "subject" (i.e., the answer sheets)." Good lord!

Its that nit-picking lost in the minutiae mind set that makes (some of you) excellent proofreaders but, as a practical matter, worthless as tits on a boar hog when it comes down to practicing law, i.e. actually accomplishing anything.

Good proofreaders are a dime a dozen. To succeed in law—not to mention pass the bar exam--you need to separate the wheat from the chaff.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:59 AM

@11:49

It's an amusing "things could be worse" anecdote, not a "this could be you."

Of course, you might not be freaked out if you were studying your materials instead of reading blogs less than a week before the bar exam.

avatar
23 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 12:16 PM

I think I read a story somewhere online (maybe here?) about a problem with the 1985 multistate. The story I read said that one of the test-takers freaked out, grabbed all the answer sheets and took off. He was eventually caught, but because he left the building and the answer sheets were out of the bar examiners' hands for a sizable amount of time, they refused to grade any of them. Anyone whose multistate was in that pile had to retake. Either this is the reason the test was "lost" or this is another story. Or just an internet hoax to flip out those of us studying right now...

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 12:30 PM

Relax. Little weird things happen all the time in the bar exam. Short of a terrorist attack or hostage situation, or the unexplained loss of answer sheets, everything will be fine.

avatar
25 Posted by angry | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:01 PM

Why not sue em for losing exam!

avatar
26 Posted by Old Guy | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:07 PM

I'm not coming to this site a month before I take the bar. I'm old already, I don't need a heart attack!

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:49 PM

California takes MBE scores from other states if the scores meet California's minimum to pass that section. If your MBE score is lower than what California requires, you have to take the MBE again.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 2:11 PM

yeah, 11:21, they DO accept MBEs from other states. They only have to show up for TWO of the THREE day saga that is the CA bar. I had one next to me at the bar, so during the MBEs, I was all sprawled out and up in his area and what not. It was the best thing ever.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 2:12 PM

Couldn't he have reported the examiners to the State Bar. Doesn't losing hundreds of bar exam answer sheets constitute a character and fitness issue?

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 19, 2007 5:09 PM

I read this site more than I study. I've even got friends who never read it before on it.

avatar
31 Posted by lex | Permalink Friday, August 3, 2007 10:58 AM

t is your responsibility to be familiar with the software and your laptop, as technical support will not be provided before, during or after the examination.

·The New York State Board of Law Examiners does not warrant or guarantee the software program, and the Board assumes no liability in the event there is a hardware or software malfunction or in the event of a power failure. In order to participate in the Laptop Program, you will required to sign an acknowledgement agreeing to and understanding that in the event of a malfunction with your computer, the software, or other technical difficulties including, but not limited to, the loss of electrical power at the examination center, you will have to begin and/or continue with the examination by handwriting your essay answers. (A copy of the acknowledgement that you will be required to sign on the day of the exam before you commence work on your laptop is set forth below.)

Post Your Comment