Add RSS RSS

Ever Heard of the Term 'Blue(book) Balls'?

We understand there are various websites -- websites that we won't mention by name or link to here -- in which people seeking hook-ups or other sexual encounters can meet similarly minded individuals. Site visitors typically post pictures or images of certain body parts, in order to entice other visitors into arranging an encounter.

Anyway, by clicking on the box below, you can see a funny photograph that was posted on one such site. We're inferring that the individual depicted is (1) horny and (2) a law student (maybe even a law review editor).

Please note that this image is NOT completely safe for work. Although it probably won't set off automated porn filters, since it's not a link to a pornography site, you do NOT want your co-workers to be around when you access it. Be sure to do so in the privacy of your own office. If you're in a cubicle, wait until nobody else is around.

Also, please note that this image was sent to us by a reader. We did NOT find it on our own, and we do NOT visit the website from which it was taken. Thank you. [FN1]

bluebook balls small Above the Law blog.JPG

[FN1] Yes, we fully expect this to be received with skepticism by the peanut gallery of commenters. That's okay; serving as a piñata for anonymous commenters is part of our job description.

Update: In response to this comment, yes, the usual rules apply: please don't identify this individual in the comments (if, for some disturbing reason, you actually recognize him).

Comments
avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:38 PM

yes.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:39 PM

Saving everyone the time of posting "first" -- STOP!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:43 PM

freaking hilarious. just awesome.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:43 PM

Jesus Christ I'm scarred for life...

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:43 PM

If I ever become THAT hairy, I'll wax myself.

avatar
Posted by Elitist Pig | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:45 PM

Lat, you should have let Merck take the blame for this one. Even redacted, that image makes me violently ill.

avatar
Posted by scotch and guns | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:48 PM

I'm assuming this was posted in the breeder section of whatever website this came from?

avatar
Posted by Horrace | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:52 PM

This more than meets my standards for whacking material. Thx.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:53 PM

well at least I hid my Emmanuel's Torts outline when I took the picture.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:02 PM

fn1 should have read "not that there's anything wrong with that".

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:09 PM

L2L has to pay his rent somehow.

avatar
Posted by ink blot | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:10 PM

Does anyone else's mind rush to fill in the censored blocks with the most horrific, diseased images conceivable?

avatar
Posted by anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:12 PM

Lat writes: "Please note that this image is NOT completely safe for work." So basically, the bluebook part of the image is safe for work, but the guy's hairy ass and balls are probably not?

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:17 PM

lol@4:09

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:18 PM

PETITION FOR LAT TO DESCRIBE THE FIRST TIME HE HAD SEX.

avatar
Posted by grumpkin | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:24 PM

Taint. Redacted.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:40 PM

Dear Chewbacca:

You are one hairy Mother F*****.

Please consider electrolysis, laser, or some other form of hair removal before posting any further pictures on or near the internet. Really, I haven’t mowed my lawn in 3 months, and you have more growth.

Thank you.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:43 PM

Is anyone else bothered by how closely the tipster was examining this picture?

It would also be interesting to know what text accompanied this picture.

avatar
Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:45 PM

Isn't that the Vanimal?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:46 PM

Do the usual rules apply as to identifying this guy in the comments?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:46 PM

No, the Vanimal has been bikini waxed.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:53 PM

Grundle. Redacted.

avatar
Posted by tipster | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:59 PM

4:43: I "examined" the picture, all right...

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 5:57 PM

You know, in nerdier days we had a term for this. GOATSE'D!

If you do not know what that is, consider yourself lucky.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 6:09 PM

5:57 you are old...

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 7:35 PM

I am more amused by the "Post in" links:

"Anal Sex / Butt Sex , Gay , Law Reviews , Law Schools , Nude Dancing , Pornography , Sex "

I was somewhat (and not pleasantly)surprised to find that there are at least 5 other articles that fall under the "Anal Sex / Butt Sex" category.

Wow.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 8:44 PM

hey 4:46 - could you actually identify the guy? or just the profile name?

avatar
Posted by GOD ALMIGHTY | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:00 PM

And what type of date exactly was this tipster trolling for?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:25 PM

*fap fap fap*

avatar
Posted by UofC Boy | Permalink Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:28 AM

Well, it can't be a Maroon book, because he's not currently pleasuring himself.

avatar
Posted by Pedantic Librarian | Permalink Thursday, August 23, 2007 8:58 AM

Lat, you should be ashamed of yourself. That bluebook is obviously the 17th edition, not the 18th; the 18th edition has a white label on the front indicating that it is distributed by Claitor Books.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:47 PM

8:58 - my 18th ed has no while label (bluebook envy)

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 23, 2007 1:11 PM

In addition to all that hair, it looks like this guy might have the beginning of an acne outbreak on his right ass cheek.

Post Your Comment