Add RSS RSS

Fall Recruiting Open Thread: Vault 31-35

Paul Hastings Tower 2 Abovethelaw Above the Law blog.JPGWe've now covered over a third of the Vault 100 law firms in open threads. But that means we still have two-thirds to go (assuming we follow through to the end).

The next five firms are colorful. They include one firm that was featured in the Transformers movie, and another that used to employ a high-priced escort.

For your consideration (in Vault 100 order, prestige scores in parentheses):

31. Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker (6.545)
32. Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP (6.352)
33. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP (6.343)
34. Winston & Strawn LLP (6.316)
35. Dewey Ballantine LLP (6.313)

Please gossip away in the comments. Thanks.

The Vault Top 100 Law Firms [Vault]

Earlier: Vault 1-5; Vault 6-10; Vault 11-15; Vault 16-20; Vault 21-25; Vault 26-30

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:19 PM

Winston & Strawn DC--selective?

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:21 PM

How is Akin Gump's appellate and Supreme Court practice going, now that they have Tom Goldstein?

avatar
3 Posted by idle curiosity | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:23 PM

So what exactly does Mario Cuomo do for Willkie?

avatar
4 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:24 PM

anyone have any info on Paul Hastings new Chicago office?

avatar
5 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:33 PM

How to PHJW (NY) compare with Dewey (NY) in terms of M&A work, prestige, etc.?

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:39 PM

PHJW New York is full of miserable people (though I guess the same can be said for most of NY Biglaw).

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:39 PM

Dewey still exists?

avatar
8 Posted by Big Pimpin | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:39 PM

What firm has the hottest bitches?

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:41 PM

5:33 - I'd give Dewey the nod for M&A. Do be aware though that a lot of their M&A work is representing the financial advisors (UBS, Credit Suisse, etc.), which may sound sexy but in actuality is very repetitive and boring (in my opinion). Paul Hastings seems ok though I don’t know too much about their M&A practice. Full disclosure: I work at neither firm.

avatar
10 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:51 PM

Where's Loyola 2L? We're getting far enough down the list that these firms might actually grant him an interview

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:51 PM

5:39, do you mean actually hot, or "law firm hot"?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:53 PM

The most important part of this post is the Transformers reference.

avatar
13 Posted by anonymous clerk | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:56 PM

So someone can whine and moan about clerkship bonuses being discussed, I will point out that four of these five firms pay the $50K bonus. We are looking at you Winston.

avatar
14 Posted by 5:39 | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:00 PM

Law firm hot will do.

avatar
15 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:06 PM

How many of these firms will raise to 190?

avatar
16 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:07 PM

The national rankings done by Chambers puts Akin's appellate practice reasonably high, and it will probably only get better.

avatar
17 Posted by Hungry Law Student | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:09 PM

What about 160K and a ham sandwhich?

avatar
18 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:13 PM

No firm that pays 160k starting will be interviewing L2L, or any other LLS grad not in the top 20% or on law review.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:20 PM

As someone who used to work at one of the firms listed above, I would say L2L would need to be in the top 5-10% of her class AND need to be on law review to be considered.

avatar
20 Posted by 6:13 | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:23 PM

P.S. P.H. sucks my ass. Worst work environment ever.

avatar
21 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:26 PM

Anyone know about Akin in DC? NYC?

avatar
22 Posted by a | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:33 PM

6:13--can you provide reasons why PH sucks?

avatar
23 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:34 PM

How's Winston DC's appellate practice? Is it actually a distinct group (in terms of assignments), or do their appellate people have to do all sorts of litigation work?

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:39 PM

I know Willkie is known for their corporate work, especially business restructuring. Any thoughts on their litigation practice?

avatar
25 Posted by 6:13 | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:54 PM

P.H. is more concerned with appearances than getting any work done. You are constantly being watch by big brother at all times. There are plenty of assholes to go around and egos get in the way of any meaningful social interaction. Everyone there is miserable, which just makes the work atmosphere depressing. It basically fulfills every big firm negative stereotype you have heard of, but worse. I found no redeeming quality to speak of, other than having a big name on your resume, which is appropriate since they are the only law firm in downtown with their name on the building.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:01 PM

6:13 is in LA. The environment is much better in the NY office.

avatar
27 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:06 PM

What have bonuses been like at PH? Are they firm-wide, or do they vary by office?

Also, any word on the bar stipend? What are some of their perks that may distinguish them from any other firm?

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:07 PM

Willkie D.C. is a great place to work and the hours are totally reasonable--there is no official number and the bonuses and salaries are lockstep. Interesting stuff and really nice people. I do telecom regulatory work but a of people work on FCPA matters.

avatar
29 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:08 PM

I can't speak to PH's other offices, but PH SF doesn't seem to suffer the same problems (I assume 6:13 is about LA given the building reference?). I've never felt like I was being watched or that I lacked for meaningful social interaction.

avatar
30 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:09 PM

Agree with 7:01. I work at PH-NY.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:09 PM

Willkie is the only one of these firms that pays NY market bonuses (to both their New York AND DC offices) without any kind of hours requirement.

avatar
32 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:13 PM

I disagree strongly with 6:13's comments. I haven't seen any of the things he/she describes and I've been here quite a while.

avatar
33 Posted by 6:13 | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:17 PM

Yes, I was referring to the LA office, and I am no longer with PH. I am sure there are plenty of people who like it there, and which group you are in also makes a big difference. I have heard much better things about the NY and OC PH offices.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:17 PM

I used to work at PH in DC. I found 4 out of 5 partners to be miserable people. I understand it's also gotten quite a bit worse. I can't think of any associate in my class or two years on either side who's still there.

In its (meager) defense, the firm does have a decent bonus structure.

avatar
35 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:23 PM

I agree with 6:13 that the group and office make a difference in level of happiness.

To respond to 7:06, PH is not known for being and will never be a market leader in terms of bonuses. That being said, the firm usually follows what it considers its competitors (LW, OMM, GD). PH pays bonuses late - usually around March so it really can watch what other firms do. Different departments handle bonuses differently. Some departments give most people the baseline bonus and one or two people a multiplier of 1.5-2 times the bonus. Other depts reward superstars with really high bonuses and totally screw the other associates.

avatar
36 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:41 PM

6:13 says "Everyone there is miserable" and then "I am sure there are plenty of people who like it there." Well, which is it?

Really, these are the ramblings of a bitter person making stuff up, or greatly exaggerating a negative, localized situation.

Compared to law school classmates at other firms, I have had much more responsibility. And I haven't found any of the partners in my dept to be assholes. They may be demanding, but that is not always a bad thing. I'm really not a cheerleader-type, but I generally like going to work. That is more than most biglaw associates can say.

avatar
37 Posted by 6:13 | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:50 PM

Obviously I was exaggerating to get my point across when I used the term "everyone." Anyone with any common sense would have known that. This is an entertaining message board, not a court of law. 7:41 is exactly the type of nitpicky person I was talking about that made the work environment nasty. I am also obviously bitter if I hated it there and left.

Did we just have an earthquake, or was it just my building shaking??

avatar
38 Posted by anon. | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:55 PM

Paul Hastened Jacking Off and Walked Away

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:55 PM

I spent a summer at Winston and it seemed like everyone there was far more happy than your average big-firm lawyer. The work is pretty top-notch, especially if you want to do litigation. Associates were generally cool enough that I wouldn't mind hanging out with them in non-work settings. And they seemed pretty happy with most of the partners. The general sentiment seemed to be that Winston is no huge exception to the things that suck about being a lawyer, but the people are cool enough and nice enough that it's way more tolerable/enjoyable.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:56 PM

The atmosphere of PH, as I would imagine is true for all nation-wide firms, varies greatly by office and by department. LIT, ELD and RE in SF seem relatively happy for cogs. CORP in SF seems to bleed associates, and the partners there have regularly screwed people around bonus time.

In most SF groups, there is no facetime requirement. The bonuses are on par with CA firms. The base salary is the same as NYC firms. There is a $15k bar stipend, which is characterized as a loan, so you get the whole enchilada and don't pay tax on it until you're an associate. We get fresh fruit, free sodas and bottled water, $145/mo transportation allowance, subsidized gym memberships, free dinners and cab rides (after 8:00). Free coffee, which is terrible, but there is a Peet's and Starbucks within one block. They give us a good booze budget for happy hours. Unscheduled events with a handful of associates are regularly reimbursed by the firm. We do an office-wide associate retreat every year, often wine country, but we've done Vegas and Tahoe too.

Outside of corporate, there are very few screamers in the SF office. The people are nice and tend not to be the Harvard/Yale clerk, robo-nerd types. That is changing as the firm climbs the ratings and can become more "selective."

Everyone I know in the NYC office is miserable, but everyone I know in NYC is fairly miserable, so I wouldn't pin that on PH. The people in the OC and SD offices seem fairly content. The GA people complain about the comp differences, but seem to like the work and are happy to make as much as they do in Atlanta.

I've heard so many horror stories about the mothership in LA that I would never transfer there.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 7:56 PM

I interviewed at PH in NY and 3 out of my 4 interviewers told me that they hated their jobs.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 8:00 PM

Winston Strawn has been advertising a mid-level lateral position in SF for about eight months. Can anyone give me the scoop on this place? I've heard that they have a weird comp system that pays below market for the year and then does a "true up" at the end of the year if you make hours. Any truth to that?

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 8:13 PM

The Lego guy on the Colbert Report last night worked at Winston & Strawn. I'm just saying.

avatar
44 Posted by WOW | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 8:23 PM

I do telecom regulatory work but a of people work on FCPA matters.

Fucking compelling!

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 8:44 PM

6:34: Winston's appellate people, in all offices, do general lit as well as appeals. The general lit work tends towards major motions (e.g., motions to dismiss) and making sure everything is in place for appeals (e.g., motions in limine).

8:00: That is not true. It's all forward-looking. You get a bonus at the end of the year for exceeding hours, and technically are subject to getting less than a full raise for the next year for missing the minimum.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 8:48 PM

8:44 - Does Winston pay NYC rates and what are the bonuses like? The recruiter wouldn't tell me, which makes me think they can't be great or they be advertising it.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 8:54 PM

I work at PHJW-NY in Corporate and it's great. Down to earth coworkers, interesting, challenging work, great perks. I've yet to come across anyone who is "miserable", not even close.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 9:15 PM

PH LA is filled with pretentious assholes who attempt (but fail) to emulate GDC, OMM, LW, etc. Maybe someone should tell them that having one's name on a tower doesn't build prestige.

(PS: I am not 6:13.)

avatar
49 Posted by 8:44 | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 9:27 PM

Winston does pay NYC rates, including the standard bonus scale at some point -- not sure how many hours it takes to hit that though. I'd guess 2100, but could be wrong.

avatar
50 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 10:48 PM

I hear that partners don't wear pants at Akin NY.

avatar
51 Posted by hollaback to 6:13 | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 11:06 PM

Someone asked for emprical support to 6:13's insinuations.

I knew someone who worked at the Deathstar/PH-LA, and he worked seven of the first eight weekends in a row and averaged over 200 hours each month.

That probably doesn't sound too crazy.

...

He was a summer associate.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 11:51 PM

DeweyOrrick LLP,
The firm, 'twas never meant to be.
Dewey's debt, too much to lug.
So Chairman Baxter pulled the plug.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 21, 2007 11:51 PM

DeweyOrrick LLP,
The firm, 'twas never meant to be.
Dewey's debts, too much to lug.
So Chairman Baxter pulled the plug.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:22 AM

Again!

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:25 AM

Any idea what grades for Winston-Chi office, from HLS?

avatar
56 Posted by Anonymighty | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:04 AM

I love how someone has been willing to say that 'associates at firm x seem happier than the average biglaw associate' for virtually every firm that has been discussed so far.

Hello recruiters! I'm imagining how hot all of you are right now.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:33 AM

I thought that Dewey's M&A practice got badly damaged after the failed merger attempt with Orrick. Didn't several of their top partners leave around that time?

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 8:37 AM

So who is Dewey going to try merging with next?

avatar
59 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 8:44 AM

756:

I'm glad that you separated happiness by practice area. It seems that should always be done... but why would you attribute the differences? Hours? Personality?

Anyone want to chime in on happiness based on practice area at PH?

avatar
60 Posted by Anonny Winston | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 8:49 AM

Re W&S Comp in San Francisco and other offices - it is standard lockstep across the board years 1-5 and then gets a little squishy after that, with the grid listing highest possible pay an associate could receive (per the previous ATL memo posted). It is the same in all offices, but bonuses vary.

Re W&S Chicago office and grades, maybe a B average from HLS, and it would probably matter less if you are a big firm lateral.

avatar
61 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:01 AM

I've heard that this year junior associates at Dewey are all going to bill 2400+ having done nothing but document review.

avatar
62 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:06 AM

When I first started at PH-DC, it was a wonderful office -- no major egos, people were encouraged to have outside lives (some even had kids!), and the firm seemed to be run more like a business than a law firm. However, the firm was infiltrated by ex-JonesDayers who took over firm-wide mgmt and turned it into a traditional law firm sweatshop. Turnover rates rose sharply. That said, the managing partner of the Chicago office is a transplant from DC -- part of the Old Guard who probably runs his office the way it was in the old days. Knowing him, I would guess that Chicago is a pleasant office.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:09 AM

8:49: I don't think anybody at harvard has below a B average. Or is that your point?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:14 AM

My friends summering at Dewey NY HATED it and are reinterviewing (and this is multiple people).

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:19 AM

I agree completely with 9:06 am regarding PH-DC. The culture has completely changed (at least in the litigation department). Almost all of the nice people have left, either to other firms or to government. Every time I talk to someone who still works there, there's news about another associate leaving.

avatar
66 Posted by apples and oranges | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:27 AM

For what it's worth, while you make a good point about separating happiness by practice group, you need to then only compare those practice groups ...

For example, if you say "only the Cap Mkts people at Hunton are miserable" then you have to also say "are they more or less miserable than the Cap Mkts people at Dewey" ... see how that works ...

Yes, I'm sure the litigation people at so and so are really happy, and not nearly as miserable as the securitization folks, but seriously, unless you forego the "ego factor" and go to a "second tier BigLaw firm" I don't know that anyone is actually happy ...

My recommendation would be to take the job that pays market but allows you to work the absolute minimum amount of hours. Same money for less work sounds great to me ...

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:41 AM

can anyone make some distinctions between Winston Strawn DC and PaulHastings DC??

avatar
68 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:53 AM

Can someone please tell me about Akin?

avatar
69 Posted by anon. | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:56 AM

I heard he's gay.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:03 AM

The billables requirement for a market bonus in the NY office of Winston is 1900.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:16 AM

PHJE in NY is a complete clusterfuck. People are complete assholes and the firm gives ZERO attention to training junior associates. I started there with 8 other new associates in my department, and they were all gone within 1.5 years of starting!

avatar
72 Posted by Happy Lateral | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:30 AM

I made a lateral move to PH DC. Compared to my old firm (also BigLaw), this firm isn't too bad. The hours are manageable and most of the associates are nice. I'm in a niche practice and really like the partner I work for. All in all, not a bad deal, but maybe my old firm was so terrible, I'm not seeing the bad here.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:32 AM

10:16 - Which department?

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:40 AM

Does anyone have any insight on the Chicago office of PHJW?

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:45 AM

What about Akin? Great political connections in DC, and the best office location of any firm in the District.

NY is very selective, on par with lower v10 firms, given the smaller size (~180 attys). They'll be moving to the new 1 Bryant Park building when it's finished, so they'll have the most high-tech office in the city.

DC is getting much more competitive now that everyone wants to go there to work on SCOTUS stuff. Summer classes will be less Gtown/GW and more Harvard and Stanford from now on. Unfortunately, this may negatively affect the firm culture, which is generally very laid-back. There are a few infamous assholes among the partnership, but 95% of them are great. Tom G. . . well, I won't touch that one.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:56 AM

The Chicago office of PHJW was opened by and headed by Jon Geier, who is an Employment partner. He is a very cool, laid-back, friendly and genuine person, which bodes well for the culture of the Chicago office (which is still brand new).

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:58 AM

10:32 - Real Estate

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 11:02 AM

Dewey's a good place to work. They have been ranked as the number 1 underwriter's counsel in M & A deals. That means you aren't working with companies that may or may not go out of business, they are working with well established banks such as Goldman and Lehman. In terms of exit options, the best place to work anywhere south of v15. Also, as a junior associate I've found most of the people I work with to be cool, down to earth and all around good people. Nerds won't fit in here.

avatar
79 Posted by Blahblah | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 11:03 AM

About Akin NY- good place to work, interesting cases, nice partners, generally very friendly atmosphere. But, trying to grow like crazy and becoming more of a traditional NY firm (i.e., you will bill 2400+ hours a year and do a lot of doc review).

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 11:22 AM

All the people from my LS that went to Dewey are 1) stupid and 2) complete assholes. Nerds may not fit in, but borderline-retarded douchebags apparently do.

avatar
81 Posted by jane doe | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 11:33 AM

PHJW-DC is not a good place. I agree with the comments that it use to be a good place to work; but then lots of laterals were brought in and completely changed in work environment. The management of the firm generally is okay but out completely to be number one. The management of the DC office takes direction from national management and are really not nice. Jones Day partners came into run litigation and turned it into a sweat shop. Various laterals in the corporate department have made it a male-dominated chauvinistic nightmare. Work is uneven throughout the firm. In recent months, some partners have been deequitized and more senior attorneys are being asked to leave or pushed out. Bonuses for associates are paid later than other firms and counsel were not given any bonuses this year. Partners are extremely protective of their work and do not share business development opportunities with each other or with other counsel/senior associates/associates. As a junior associates, one could likely be happy there (associates are friendly, free sodas and somewhat of an attempt to socialize); however, once one figures out that there is no hope of partnership and what really goes on behind the scenes, it is not a pretty picture.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 11:36 AM

11:03 - According to the new Vault guide, Akin NY has staff attorneys to do most of the doc review. True?

avatar
83 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 11:44 AM

Re: Akin - Avoid the Enviro/Energy practice at all costs. It is sortof a backwater of the firm and is not well-thought-of by folks in the other groups. They have very little work and what work they have is pretty low end stuff.

avatar
84 Posted by Blahblah | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 11:48 AM

11:36- It's true in that they've hired staff attorneys. But, I think it's more a signal that the partners care and are trying to make associate lives better, as opposed to something that will substantially improve young associate work. There's still plenty of documents to go around and it means you spend a lot of time supervising doc review (and re-reviewing).

avatar
85 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 11:56 AM

After summering at Dewey, I can tell you it's true that nearly everyone hated their summer. And many are reinterviewing. Most of us worked longer hours than any other summers we knew about at other firms and then the firm called a meeting and insulted all of us by telling us we weren't working hard enough. As for nerds not fitting in, I guess it depends on your frame of reference.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 11:56 AM

11:22 Having a personality has alot to do with your success as a lawyer. You probably don't have one. Good luck pushing papers for 8 years only to be told that you have no chance at partnership. Where do you work again? Jacoby & Meyers?

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:11 PM

I summered at Dewey this summer and had a blast. The people were cool and the assignments were great. The amount of work that you did depended on how many and what type of assignments you took on. The assigning partners did a good job of letting people know the time commitments of the assignment before they took it on. 11:56 the fact that you worked longer hours than your friends was your own fault. Actually, most of my friends at other firms worked about twice as hard/long as me. Most of the summers loved the experience and most of them will come back. Further, the meeting was called to clear up any confusion on how the assignment process worked. I guess you fit into the NERD category. People like you will never be happy, no matter where they go. Good luck being miserable!

avatar
88 Posted by Yup | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:27 PM

The posts between 11:56 (1) and 12:11 pretty much convince me that Dewey must be miserable. My firm (one of the other 5 listed above) has had excellent summer classes and I can't imagine anyone in our recent summer class being as bitchy as 12:11 was to one of his own summer colleagues.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:33 PM

Akin DC - 'Only' pays $30 K for clerkship bonuses...the $50 K is only at the NYC office. Otherwise, best office location in DC, great atmosphere compared to most firms (although WS is unusually quality as well), etc. The firm is definitely growing and accepting more and more Harvard-types as summers, which might negatively affect the culture. The appellate practice and political-ties are pretty top-notch, etc. Also, as for law firm hotties, there are a few here and there...many, of course, behind the front and recruitment desks.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:44 PM

Don't know where 11:44 gets their info, but Energy is one of the top practices at Akin. Several of the overseas offices (Dubai, Moscow, Houston) exist solely to serve the Energy practice. The Enviro practice isn't one of the top in the field, by any stretch, but they are always pretty busy, and they do a lot of cross-practice work with bankruptcy and project finance.

avatar
91 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:49 PM

The person posting about Akin doc review is probably not in NY. Smaller office = fewer mega-doc cases that require dozens of associates to do heavy doc review. Because work is growing faster than associate hiring, firm is reserving associates to do more difficult work like writing/research/depositions/trial work (esp. in bankruptcy cases)/witness interviews. The more commodity doc reviews are being done by and large by staff/contract attorneys. Akin NY has very positive reputation as friendly place, and reputation for high quality is significantly improving.

avatar
92 Posted by Happy Lateral | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:53 PM

I challenge Jane Doe to name a BigLaw firm in DC where there is "hope for partnership." I don't know of any.

avatar
93 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:54 PM

Don't be fooled by Akin NY. Sure, they have staff attorneys to fo doc review. But none of the partners trust the staff attorneys and insist the associates re-review or 'supervise' the review so closely in might as well be a re-review. The juicy substantive work is given only to a chosen few. And there are screamers too, just like everywhere. It's Biglaw, not day care.

avatar
94 Posted by Happy Lateral | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:54 PM

I challenge Jane Doe to name a BigLaw firm in DC where there is "hope for partnership" because I don't know of any.

avatar
95 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:00 PM

11:33 A small correction. At least some of the counsel at PH DC got bonuses, although small compared to associates, and not paid until July.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:02 PM

What are the reputations of the different practice areas at Dewey? Are some more of a sweatshop than others?

avatar
97 Posted by 12:49 is wrong | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:06 PM

Are you kidding? Akin NY has a TON of "mega-doc" review cases. It's Skadden without the prestige.

avatar
98 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:29 PM

6:39 -

The Willkie DC litigation department is really good. I was a summer associate there and I found three of the cases I was working on in the NYT over the summer. The partners are so laid back that I kept waiting for the other shoe to drop, but it never did. And the three or four times I did have to stay late ("late" in D.C. is after 7:00), it was really easy to get comped dinner and a car home. I knew lots of people at other firms who said that the firm bragged about comping people dinner and rides home, but they had to fight tooth and nail for it when it came time for the firm to pony up. Not a problem at WFG DC.

avatar
99 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:38 PM

Skadden without the prestige? How? Skadden probably has more people staffed on some cases than Akin has in the entire office in litigation. There is no way for AKin to take on mega mass tort type cases with millions of docs to review.

The person who complains that the "choice" assignements at Akin are given to a chosen few sounds like a typical whiner that exists at every firm. There are always people who think that someone else is getting special treatment or better assignments. They are usually just unhappy people that don't work well with others and rub others the wrong way. Those people tend to gripe a lot, but not contribute much. I would discount that person's comments. Akin is a very desirable place to work.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:38 PM

Paul Hastings in Palo Alto... what's the scoop there?

avatar
101 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:42 PM

1:38 - is that you Steve?

avatar
102 Posted by Anonymous Comment | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:23 PM

Sounds like 1:42 has exposed 1:38. I love when people get busted for posting by someone else in same the building. Steve 1:38 - you gotta watch out if you have a telltale writing style. Can we get some full names and/or pictures now that the name is out there?

Btw. - a lot of Akin NY comments on this thread for an office with like 10 people.

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:30 PM

1:38 - PH Palo Alto is great. It's a new office so the support staff is not where it needs to be, but the associates are good and the partners are great. It's very small, with only about 30 attorneys. If you want experience early, that's the place to go. They don't have enough people to over staff cases. They are expanding, but for now you get the resources of a 1200 attorney firm while working in a 30 attorney office.

Of course, the down side is you have to work in Palo Alto.

avatar
104 Posted by Blahblah | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:05 PM

No ... the person posting about Akin doc review is in NY and recently spent about 4 months doing little but doc review (beacuse the firm is trying to take on mega doc cases b/c they pay better). I point it out only because the office used to bill itself as a smaller "lifestyle" alternative (better work, fewers hours, etc.). It's a good place to work, it's just not so different from many other NY firms. And, sorry Steve, it is less prestigous.

avatar
105 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:27 PM

12:27: You're a tard and your logic is ridiculous. I can assure you that people at Dewey are not miserable.

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:56 PM

3:27 -- you are not helping your cause.

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:57 PM

3:27 -- you are not helping your cause.

avatar
108 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:59 PM

PH-LA lit and some corp groups have pretty nice people; don't know enough about the other ones. generic bashing of the firm seems popular for whatever reason. though the firm may be a step behind omm/lw/gdc, the firm is doing pretty well (e.g. 20+% PPP increase last yr), esp. the foreign offices. not sure about bonus structure, but have heard that the new structure instituted a range of $30K to $90K (for top performers). if this is true, that doesn't sound too bad to me.

PH-Chicago seems to be bringing in strong lateral partners (e.g. William Kirsch from KE for PE work)

avatar
109 Posted by annon | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:00 PM

723--PH may consider itself to be in the same league as OMM/GD/LW, but we sure don't.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:43 PM

12:27 you probably summered at Winston, where you sat around a fireplace, held hands and sang folk music... What a bonding experience. haha

avatar
111 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:44 PM

Ha! 4:00 - I think 7:23 must have been referring to PH's LA office because PH's NY office most certainly considers itself to be of a higher league than GD and OMM.

avatar
112 Posted by Dewey07Summer | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 5:25 PM

Couldn't have had a better experience at Dewey. Worked on matters in every group I was interested in. I know of only a few people reinterviewing, mainly based on NY v. hometown. Those who were unhappy were like most other law students--losers.

avatar
113 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 6:06 PM

4:00 - I don't disagree. I just know that PH makes bonus and other compensation decisions based on what LW, GD, and OMM do.

avatar
114 Posted by Columbia 2L | Permalink Wednesday, August 22, 2007 11:52 PM

Akin 3:05 - how many hours do you bill in an average month? What is your approx. high/low for the year? How much pro bono have you done? Thanks in advance.

avatar
115 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:05 AM

Dewey is not a sweatshop. My roommate summered there this year. Neither he, his summer classmates, nor the attorneys there stayed late as a matter of practice. He did say the jr associates all got a lot of doc review, though.

avatar
116 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 23, 2007 9:57 AM

How are the associate offices at Akin DC?

Is the remodeled gym finished?

Do associates get free membership to some local (DuPont Circle) gym? If not, how much does Akin cover the membership?

Are the weekly happy hours largely attended by associates?

What do the annual bonuses look like?

In litigation, is it relatively easy to get work, or are you "pounding the pavement" begging partners and counsel for something to do?

Doc review in the DC office, and if yes, is it largely over at least by third and fourth year?

Thanks for any info you might have!

avatar
117 Posted by Blahblah | Permalink Thursday, August 23, 2007 10:28 AM

11:52- just over 200/month is average, high would probably be around 270, low probably 150. What's also useful to know is that AG NY circulates everyone's hours each month, so I can tell you what I do is in line with others. I have not done much pro bono, but that's probably just me ...

avatar
118 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:10 PM

3:59 - Correction - PH did not bring in Kirsch from K&E. Kirsch left Conseco and PH tapped him to start their Chi office in hopes of leveraging his former client list at K&E, which hasn't materialized. Have also heard grumblings that the man is pretty awful to work with, which might explain why they have few corporate associates in the Chi office. Real estate, on the other hand, is a bunch of ex-K&E people and seems to be doing well.

avatar
119 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:52 PM

Akin 10:28: I heard Akin used to circulate hours but stopped at the start of this year. Is that true (or did you leave before this)? If they did stop, how do you know what others have been doing lately?

NALP has lower numbers for average hours.

avatar
120 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, August 23, 2007 9:02 PM

The AG DC offices are fine - they all have windows, they're decent size with a large L-shaped desk, file cabinet, two visitor chairs, and a bookcase.

The remodeled gym is not yet finished. There is a reduced discount at various local gyms, I'm not sure how much it amounts to.

There's a core group of associates that attend the happy hours. Many don't. It's neither an event where you have to show up, nor something incredibly lame where you don't won't to show up. A few partners show up every now and then.

You don't need to pound the pavement to get assignments, there's an assignment process. Sometimes things are busier than others, which may mean you need to ask for work if things are slow.

Document Review: Most first years do some, but nobody exclusively does document review. I doubt anyone spends more than 25% of their time with doc review. You'll likely spend more time doing various research projects, drafting pleadings, etc. as a first year.

Bonuses: $15-30k.

avatar
121 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 24, 2007 6:13 PM

For someone interested in corporate work, any thoughts on PH SF vs. Wilson Sonsini PA?

avatar
122 Posted by anonymous dewey '07 summer | Permalink Monday, August 27, 2007 10:41 AM

i summered at dewey ny this summer. i found the work interesting and, with few exceptions, the people excellent. i do not think you will get a crazy party summer there, but the work was certainly not as backbreaking as one of the previous posters indicated. i will be accepting my offer there. i do not think i fall into the idiot or the retard category, and i am slightly offended for myself and my fellow summers. that having been said, i would warn potential interviewers that the firm is definitely in flux, having gone through one failed merger and the subsequent attorney attrition, and now we will have to wait and see what happens with this next merger. if it goes as poorly as the ill-fated d'orrick debacle, it is possible that there will be more good lawyers leaving to other firms. all things considered, however, i enjoyed my summer and would encourage interviewers to consider the firm.

avatar
123 Posted by a nony mouse | Permalink Monday, August 27, 2007 10:08 PM

PH LA wasn't terrible for summers at least, although the prestige of this year's class was pretty shitacular. Lots of 1Ls.

avatar
124 Posted by Anon | Permalink Sunday, September 2, 2007 2:23 PM

I summered at AG Dallas this summer. They are great people and fun to work with. Also very collegial. They are all passionate about what they do and are doing very well at it. Litigation and Corporate are definitely their strongest. But the funds group is also very well known in the field. I already accepted there and am excited about it.

avatar
125 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 9:59 AM

steel cage death match, PH-NY v. JD-NY... who gets carried out?

avatar
126 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 28, 2007 12:26 AM

can anyone tell me about akin la?

avatar
127 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 16, 2007 11:17 AM

it is unfortunate that these posts tend to be battlegrounds instead of threads of useful material to help law students and laterals make insightful choices. We should all be on the same team -- if we just spoke about our own work environments and attempted to give an accurate portrayal of the inside of a firm all of our lives would be better off.

avatar
128 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 16, 2007 11:18 AM

it is unfortunate that these posts tend to be battlegrounds instead of