The Brocade Verdict: A Report from the Trenches
We run ATL on a shoestring budget, so we can’t exactly afford to send reporters across the country. Taking the train up to New York, to cover a hearing in L’Affaire Charney, is already a big deal for us.
So we’re delighted when tipsters give us eyewitness reports on breaking news. Today we had a correspondent in the courtroom when the jury returned with its verdict in the stock options backdating prosecution of Gregory Reyes, the former CEO of Brocade Communications.
Our source filed this report:
Jury verdict: Guilty on all counts. Not really a scoop, since it’s all over the media. But we were there and wanted to share.
Courtroom was two rows of press, armed with laptops and blackberries, and three rows of N.D. Cal. externs, armed with nothing else to do during the last week of their externships. And miscellaneous district court clerks, hangers-on, and family.
Reyes’s family was sobbing when the deputy read off the verdict. It was pretty rough. Then a couple of jurors broke out in tears too. Can’t say I envy them.
Or, for that matter, Gregory Reyes. The former member of the Forbes 400 — which he first appeared on at age 37, with a net worth of $1 billion — is presumably headed for federal prison.
Update: ATL’s San Francisco correspondent had this to add:
Judge Breyer [Charles R. Breyer, li’l brother of Justice Breyer] gave the defense one week to file a motion for new trial, partly because he wants to be able to rule on it while the case is fresh in his mind, but also because he’s confident that both sides will be able to staff it on that schedule, or something to that effect. I love it when judges basically tell big firms, “You’ve got enough manpower to throw at this.”Sentencing is set for November 21. Reyes gets to remain free until then.
Jury Finds Brocade Ex-CEO Guilty on Backdating Charges [WSJ Law Blog]
Ex-Brocade Chief Convicted in Backdating Case [Associated Press]

Jury verdict: Guilty on all counts. Not really a scoop, since it’s all over 


Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
What? Richard Marmaro isn't supposed to lose!
shouldn't this be marked with "skaddenfreude" as well? they did represent him. skadden.
I'm all for civil liability on this and disgorgement of profits, but criminal prosecution and jail time (let's see what he gets) is a little surprising.
Yeah white collar criminals don't hurt anyone. Don't give them jail time.
Silly jury. Rich white people don't go to jail.
First to say "first"
I hope to Allah he goes to to FPMITAP and not some club fed.
Are there conjugal visits in this FPMITAP?
Talk about a legal powerhouse family! (To be fair, guess the Ginsburgs and the Roberts are also legal powerhouse families . . . .)
What crap. Do California juries shed tears when darker-skinned defendants are found guilty? I think not.
7:18: You mean Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Columbia law prof Jane Ginsburg, right? (Judge Douglas Ginsburg is apparently no relation.)
Who are you referring to wrt the Robertses? Just JGR and Jane Sullivan Roberts? It's not uncommon for high-powered lawyers to marry one another.
10:59: Justice Ginsburg and Professor Jane Ginsburg are not related to Judge Douglas Ginsburg, but they are related to Professor Martin Ginsburg, a legal powerhouse in his own right:
http://www.ffhsj.com/bios/ginsbma.htm