Add RSS RSS

An Update on the Managhan Law Firm (aka 'My Wife Is Sleeping Around and That's Why We're No Longer Law Partners')

Managhan Kortum Managhan Law Firm Above the Law blog.jpgIn case you missed this story from last week, here's a recap. Earlier this month, a plaintiffs' lawyer in Montana by the name of William Managhan sent out the following email, to the entire Montana Trial Lawyers Association:

From: William L. Managhan
To: Montana Trial Lawyers
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 6:32 PM
Subject: [mtla_members_all] Firm Name Change

Managhan & Kortum-Managhan Law Firm will no longer be known as such. The name is returning to Managhan Law Firm as Santana Kortum-Managhan is leaving the firm. Turns out that she was having sex with Tim McKeon of Anaconda while attending MMLP hearings in Helena.

Call me silly but I no longer fill [sic] comfortable with her as my law partner or wife. Some will think this is an inappropriate announcement, but considering the small legal community in our state, I might as well preempt the roomer mill [sic]. Please address communication to William L. Managhan through Managhan Law Firm.

More discussion, including accounts of our telephone conversations with Bobbi Bonnington and Tim of Anaconda, after the jump.

We called the Managhans last week to see if they might have any comment. A staffer at the firm, Bobbi Bonnington, said she'd look into the authenticity of the email and get back to us. She never did, so we called her again yesterday. She stated that the firm had no comment (but did not deny the email's authenticity).

Since nobody at the Managhan firm was willing to talk to us, we called Timothy McKeon -- the alleged "other man." Neither Tim nor his Anaconda seemed happy to hear from us. After we described the email to him, he said, "I've heard there was something. I haven't read it. So I don't have comment on it."

Our speculation is that Mr. Managhan had a meltdown, sent out that insane email, but then calmed down. It appears that Santana Kortum-Managhan remains at the firm, whose website and answering machine still identify it as the "Managhan & Kortum-Managhan Law Firm" (although we note that the lawyer profiles are gone).

We've passed along Managhan's email rant for your edification. Since it went out to a state-wide group of lawyers, and has been endlessly forwarded on the internet, the cat is out of the bag. We received it from multiple sources.

But we won't be too hard on Bill Managhan. Everybody goes crazy sometimes, right?

Earlier: Best Reason for a Law Firm Name Change Ever

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 18, 2007 7:41 PM

I hope it was sent out during a meltdown...not because of the professional implications, but because of the spelling errors! "Roomer mill?" Spell check still works during a meltdown, right?

avatar
2 Posted by Dennis Franz, Esq. | Permalink Tuesday, September 18, 2007 7:50 PM

Roomer is a word; that's why spellcheck missed it. Ditto on "fill comfortable."

Other than the inexcusable proofreading errors (if ever triple-checking was necessary this was it), this is great. Good for him. Tim McKeon is a real doosh-baiig-uh.

avatar
3 Posted by Tim McKeon | Permalink Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:02 PM

My anaconda don't want none unless you got buns, hon!

avatar
4 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:05 PM

I wonder if Lat ever imagined, while working late at night at one of the nation's premier law firms (Wachtell), that he would one day make a living calling up half-literate lawyers in Montana to ask them to comment on a redneck love affair in which they (or their spouse) were engaged.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:10 PM

Picture available here:

http://managhanlaw.com/contactinformation/

He's better off.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:20 PM

I wonder if Lat ever imagined, while working late at night while wearing a tiny noose around his neck and drinking his fifth espresso of the day, that he would one day make a living sleeping late and sitting at home in his pajamas.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:21 PM

Lat, I think you should get a Pulitzer for your ace reporting of this story.

avatar
9 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:22 PM

nice 8:05

avatar
10 Posted by Norman Bates | Permalink Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:26 PM

We all go a little mad sometimes.

avatar
11 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:33 PM

Automatic spell check came up during the meltdown and he had originally spelled them wrong. In haste he clicked change to whatever outlook's first choice was, thus the right spellings and wrong usages. Sound plausible?

avatar
12 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:38 PM

8:05 - It seems like investigating a salacious love triangle involving redneck attorneys would be infinitely more fun than kissing the butts of literate partners all day.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 18, 2007 10:26 PM

I can tell you, 8:20, that never in law school did I imagine that while working late one night, having recently finished my third grande coffee of the day with my firm-provided dinner buffet and the noose around my neck feeling particularly tight, I would take a sanity break by reading about a sordid redneck legal love triangle. It makes me feel just a little bit better.

Well, that, and tonight was Chinese food night, and the orange peel beef was pretty good.

avatar
14 Posted by Tim McDaddy | Permalink Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:05 AM

Don't taze me bro.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 19, 2007 8:17 AM

The "Anaconda" makes this story.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 19, 2007 9:00 AM

Roomer is not a word.

avatar
17 Posted by 10803 | Permalink Wednesday, September 19, 2007 9:09 AM

Check a dictionary before you chime in, 9:00

Main Entry: room·er
Pronunciation: 'rü-m&r, 'ru-
Function: noun
: one who occupies a rented room in another's house

avatar
18 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, September 19, 2007 9:30 AM

I heard a roomer that being tased is painful.

avatar
19 Posted by downtowner | Permalink Wednesday, September 19, 2007 10:10 AM

Why is everyone so hard on Lat? He gives us hours of entertainment everyday and yet there are lines of people ready to shoot him down. If you don't like Lat (and Lat, I thank you every day for your existence and providing a legal gossip blog), then go back to work and let Lat be.

avatar
20 Posted by Marc J. Randazza | Permalink Wednesday, September 19, 2007 10:21 AM

Heh heh, you said "hard on."

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 19, 2007 10:53 AM

I fill this is just a roomer.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 19, 2007 11:14 AM

10:10: Because the asshole quotient among the commenters here is very high (in case you hadn't noticed).

They don't seem to bother Lat, who just keeps on doing his thing. Good for him.

avatar
23 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:07 PM

Any chance that "roomer" was a clever pun meaning "sloot"?

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:39 PM

to 10:10,

its all these idiotic AutoAdmit people. they are the people making idiotic comments and complaints. that place is a garbage bin overflowing into the streets of the legal world.

avatar
25 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, September 19, 2007 6:23 PM

ditto 12:39

avatar
26 Posted by sobad | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 7:59 PM

12:39

what's an AutoAdmit

avatar
27 Posted by sarah | Permalink Saturday, September 29, 2007 8:58 PM

Dennis Franz, didn't anyone tell you that using "esq." after your name makes you look like a dork? No wonder there are so many lawyer jokes out there!

avatar
28 Posted by John | Permalink Sunday, January 20, 2008 12:11 AM

Well,
I took McKeon to task with the office of Disciplinary Counsel, after he 'botched' child support and parenting plan work, he told me that 4 hours per year visitation with my son was what I got for 'not keeping my dick in my pants' - funny, he wasn't keeping his dick in his pants!
I am laughing so hard right now, so hard!
John

avatar
29 Posted by Msb | Permalink Saturday, March 22, 2008 7:55 PM

Reply to John. If the court protected your son from you for the rest of his life, it would be a blessing for him. I had you for a teacher and you were BAD! If you remove your comment, I'll remove mine.

Post Your Comment