Add RSS RSS

Law Firm Merger Mania: White & Case to Acquire Moore & Van Allen?

White Case LLP Above the Law blog.JPGHere's some law firm merger scuttlebutt that's making the rounds:

Rumor is that White & Case is acquiring Moore & Van Allen, a native Charlotte firm with a national syndicated finance practice. Any truth to this?

We reached out to both firms for comment. A White & Case spokesperson issued this statement:

"We do not respond to inquiries of this kind."

Should we take that as a "yes"?

If we hear back from Moore & Van Allen, we'll let you know. If you have any info, please email us. Thanks.

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by first | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 1:46 PM

primero

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 1:47 PM

seventy-fifth!

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 1:55 PM

If W&C is looking to acquire them for their syndicated finance practice, they may be in for rude awakening.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:00 PM

1:55,

Why is that?

avatar
5 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:03 PM

Because of the credit crunch! Duuuuhhhhhh!

avatar
6 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:06 PM

moore & van who?

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:07 PM

Oh yeah! (Duh) Because finance is dead forever! I am so stupid...

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:10 PM

2:03: Darn, I was hoping for something firm-specific and salacious.

Like "She's a man, man!"

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:24 PM

Moore Van Allen has a great reputation in the South and they are widely respected in regard to their corporate practice.

avatar
10 Posted by White & Case | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:25 PM

I do not comment on threads of this kind.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:33 PM

2:25 - Classic.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:35 PM

2:06: http://www.loanpricing.com/analytics/league_table_legal.htm

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 3:05 PM

So does anybody know anything? I thought the tipster would at least provide more substantive information than this (league tables and ... well, nothing).

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 3:21 PM

Apparently, this "rumor" has gone around before and has always turned out to be, well, a rumor.

avatar
15 Posted by wtf | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 3:41 PM

What did the White & Case spokesbitch mean by "inquires of this kind?" Inquiries from pinko liberal bloggers? What a bitch.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 3:47 PM

From what I heard, MVA didn't make offers to several summers who were in groups other than finance. This seems to indicate either that those groups are struggling or that the firm needs to reevaluate it recruiting process. Assuming the former, and considering the flow national firms into Charlotte (MB, Dewey, K&S, Dechert, Cadwalader, A&B, Hunton (others?)), it seems likely that someone is going to pluck off MVA's finance group, gutting the firm's revenues and leaving the less profitable practices behind. Whether that someone is W&C remains to be seen.

avatar
17 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 4:04 PM

The WC/MVA rumor is completely untrue.

MVA's practice is booming. It made 26 offers to a summer class of 28. Of those, 20 were in practice areas other than finance.

You are either lying, or incredibly misinformed.

Most negative recruiting is a little more subtle. Why don't you work on your approach and come back later.

avatar
18 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 4:05 PM

The WC/MVA rumor is completely untrue.

MVA's practice is booming. It made 26 offers to a summer class of 28. Of those, 20 were in practice areas other than finance.

You are either lying or incredibly misinformed.

Most negative recruiting is a little more subtle. Why don't you work on your approach and come back later.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 4:14 PM

The WC/MVA rumor was the WC/KC rumor a few weeks ago. I would guess WC put a couple of feelers out there and nothing else. I'm not at MVA but I am in Charlotte and I haven't heard anything to indicate MVA is in any kind of trouble.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 4:18 PM

MVA doesn't need to be in any trouble to want to hook up with WC.

avatar
21 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 4:34 PM

The 26 offers dont mean much. Historically only 1/3 accept.

avatar
22 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 4:46 PM

1. You're are wrong on your historical numbers.

2. More than half of the responses to last summer's offers so far have been acceptances.

3. What firm are you with? Why don't you try posting something positive about it rather than making up something negative about another firm. In my experience, badmouthing competition is a real sign of weakness.

avatar
23 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 4:59 PM

Why are MVA people always so touchy?

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 5:40 PM

4:46 - lolz! "More than half of the responses to last summer's offers so far..." I have news for you, genius. It's the people who know they are going to accept who respond early. The people who wait to respond are far, far more likely to decline, because the reason for their delay is likely that they have been reinterviewing in hopes of getting away from the rancid TTT that they summered at.

avatar
25 Posted by Wampum | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 5:53 PM

MVA is an interesting case. It's undeniable that they have absolutely mopped the floor with their homegrown competiton (KC, HMW, et al) in terms of garnerning high end work. But it's much less clear that they'll continue to be able to hold their own against the lengthening list of national firms coming to town. I guess we'll see.

avatar
26 Posted by WY wants to know | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:23 PM

Is there any truth to the roomer?

avatar
27 Posted by pondering | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 7:13 PM

absolutely no truth to the rumour.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 7:19 PM

What 347 said is true. MVA is notorious for no-offers. Their non-finance groups are not strong at all. Plain and simple, they're a finance firm.

All is not as it seems at that place.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 8:02 PM

MVA has hired 37 laterals this year. Only 16 of which have been to the finance group. I'd say all practice areas are fine.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 8:03 PM

I don't get the impression that MVA is struggling.

However, it is worth noting in response to the MVA troll (4:05, 4:46), that because MVA makes offers through specific practice groups, the fact that the firm gave 26 out of 28 offers means little without knowing how many of those offers were from practice groups the summers wanted to be a part of.

That is to say: no offer to first choice group = cold offer. And MVA is known for doing that.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 9:54 PM

Could there be an MVA attorney trolling these comments...????

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 10:13 PM

There were 2 no offers, and few (maybe 3) "cold offers". I don't see how that is particularly relevant here, though. Anyone have substance to add to the acquisition rumor?

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 10:23 PM

Yeah, it's not true. There are always rumors about MVA because of how well they do, particularly in Charlotte. But this rumor is false.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 10:45 PM

Firms not giving out offers can be a sign of many things, most not good. MVA purports to be a top-tier firm; how many other top-tier firms no-offered or cold-offered that many people?

avatar
35 Posted by Anon | Permalink Friday, September 21, 2007 8:47 AM

Funny, one of the two "cold" offers already accepted. The other is still outstanding.

By top tier, do you mean firms paying at least $145K to start? Do you mean ranked in the AmLaw 200? How do you define it?

avatar
36 Posted by wampum | Permalink Friday, September 21, 2007 8:55 AM

Forget the MVA rumors, KC has lost at least 18 lawyers to Atlanta-based firms in the past couple of months. Is that a phenomenon that is limited to them, or is it a sign of things to come for all Charlotte-based firm.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 21, 2007 11:59 AM

The issue, particularly as highlited by the KC defections, is that they have talented associates/partners, who are sick of being held down by the lack of "infrastructure" offered by local firms. It is well known to the associates in Charlotte that by moving from KC to A&B, most associates got fat signing bonuses and also received salaries that averaged $20,000 more than what they made at KC. It's logical for the more talented groups/individuals to seek firms that reward them for their skills and that also provide them with a proper platform to expand their practices. As for the MVA rumors, it's possible that a faction within the firm is looking to later out (much like the KC group). I have heard W&C, btu I have also heard other national names mentioned.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 25, 2007 11:32 AM

Lat,

Did Moore & Van Allen ever answer?

Post Your Comment