Add RSS RSS

Legal Eagle Wedding Watch 9.16.07 and 9.23.07

LEWW logo.jpgSo LEWW was at a wedding the other weekend, and who should plunk down next to us but a reporter for the NYT Vows section! It was a deeply emotional, humbling experience -- like being face-to-face with Gandhi, or Bono -- but after we recovered, we waved our ATL press credentials and had a nice chat with the correspondent.

Turns out it was her first Vows column, so we briefed her on the most basic rules of Vows column writing: Make sure you refer to the bride, groom, or both as "honest," "courageous," "spirited," or "down-to-earth," etc., and definitely include at least one forced simile ("as white as a sun-bleached seashell" is good; "as grounded and unshakable as a redwood" is a two-fer!).

We can't wait to read about that wedding in this coming weekend's NYT, but in the meantime, we have two weeks worth of LEWW to catch you up on. Here are our featured couples:

1.) Kate Edmonds and Alex Donner

2.) Denise Delgado and Keith Kerman

3.) Fell Ogden and Charles Gray Jr.

4.) Daisy Wademan and Luc Dowling

5.) Deecy Gray and Douglas Ginsburg

6.) Aielleen Fajardo and Stefan Schick

More about these couples, after the jump.

Edmonds-Donner.jpg

1.) Kate Edmonds and Alex Donner
(Buy them a vacuum cleaner.)

The Case:
- She's a wedding planner; he's a singer and bandleader. Sounds like the marriage of a couple of bad movies, but there's no denying the career compatibility here.
- Alex went to Princeton and has a law degree from Fordham. Kate is from England, so she's got a cheeky accent to match the hairdo.
- "Alex was a notorious bachelor," so Kate didn't take his flirtations nonsense seriously. But one night, after an event:

[T]hey found themselves alone in an elevator. "I nudged her against a wall, and I said, "Kate this is a date." And then he kissed her.

Day-um, fetch us an iced beverage! Really, NYT -- if we want to get aroused over the Sunday paper, we usually just read William Safire.

The Case Against:
- As a bandleader and seducer of wedding planners, Alex is undoubtedly having more fun than a Fordham Law grad is entitled to.


2.) Denise Delgado and Keith Kerman
(Buy them a peppermill.)

The Case:
- Keith is the chief of operations for the New York City Parks and Recreation Department. That sounds kind of like "janitor" to our ears, but Keith went to Harvard, so we can deduce that his job is in fact hugely prestigious.
- They met in 2006 at a Harvard college reunion.
- Keith's attorney parents were partners at Kerman & Kerman in Massachusetts. Cute.

The Case Against:
- Denise is a staff lawyer at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett. The last half of that sentence is more prestigious than the first half (although she did graduate from Harvard and get her JD from Columbia).


3.) Fell Ogden and Charles Gray Jr.
(Buy them a salad spinner.)

The Case:
- The write-up is short, but there are whiffs of major blue-blood prestige on the bride's side: "summer home in Stonington," "investment banking for Prudential Securities," "director of philanthropy," "Nature Conservancy." Fell -- that's WASP for "Mary Fell Perkins Ogden" -- works at a marketing agency and graduated from Yale.
- The groom was magna at Harvard and cum laude at HLS. He's now a staff lawyer at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

The Case Against:
- This is one of those couples you're on the fence about until you see a picture, when it becomes immediately clear whether they're enviable or loathsome. Unfortunately, there's no photo, so on the fence we must remain.


Wademan-Dowling.jpg

4.) Daisy Wademan and Luc Dowling
(Buy them a wok.)

The Case:
- Daisy, who went to Brown and has a MBA from Harvard, is a vice president for blah-blah at Lehman Brothers and the author of Remember Who You Are: Life Stories That Inspire the Heart and Mind.
- Luc was magna at Brown and has both a JD and an MBA from Penn. He works at a hedge fund.
- "The bride is a descendant of Miles Standish and of John Alden and Priscilla Mullins." Wikipedia entries possibly written by Daisy herself inform us that these three early Americans formed a naughty pilgrim love triangle that inspired Henry Wadsworth Longfellow's 1858 poem The Courtship of Miles Standish.

The Case Against:
- There's a long, not-that-exciting story about how they got together. We recommend reading it only if you think "discounted cash flow" = pillow talk.


5.) Deecy Gray and Douglas Ginsburg
(Buy them a can opener.)

The Case:
- The bride is the director of Frontiers of Freedom, a nonpartisan public policy institute. As for the groom, you may have heard of him: He's the chief judge of the DC Circuit!
- Doug and Deecy's officiant was the very crown prince of Article III royalty: Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. And wait -- there's more glittering judicial resplendence! The ceremony actually took place inside that sacred temple of our profession, the Supreme Court building. (Don't look down, LEWW readers -- these heights are dizzying.)
- How cool does Judge Ginsburg look now, twenty years after his nomination to the Supreme Court was withdrawn? Pot-smoking is pretty much a non-issue these days unless you've toked up with naked Congressional pages. And unlike Robert Bork, Ginsburg didn't leave the bench in a huff and launch a career of bitter, gloom-mongering sourpussery. A class act, LEWW thinks.

The Case Against:
- Deecy and Doug's friends must be some stingy bastards, because nothing has been purchased from the couple's Crate & Barrel registry. LEWW calls upon ATL readers to help stock the newlyweds' cupboards! (Yes, 42 champagne flutes is arguably overkill. But at at 4 bucks each, they're almost disposable.)


Fajardo-Schick.jpg

6.) Aielleen Fajardo and Stefan Schick
(Buy them a muffin pan.)

The Case:
- Nice educational cred in this lawyer-lawyer duo. The bride is Yale/UCLA, and the groom is Brown/Columbia.
- He's an associate in the Manhattan office of Loeb & Loeb; she works for the Bank of New York Mellon, specializing in Patriot Act compliance.
- With its high vowel-to-consonant ratio, Aielleen's name indicates there's a good chance she's a stunner. And the picture does not disappoint! The groom performs with Chicago City Limits, an improv comedy group, so he's not a loser either.

The Case Against:
- They're cute and fun. But they're no Doug and Deecy, and we all know where this column is headed.


The Verdict:
Not even close. The nuptials of Team Gray-Ginsburg may be the LEWW wedding of the year. Congratulations!

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:42 PM

first!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:49 PM

"Yes, 42 champagne flutes is arguably overkill. But at at 4 bucks each, they're almost disposable."

I love LEWW. Welcome back Laurie, we missed you!

avatar
3 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:54 PM

What's the difference, if any, between a staff lawyer and an associate??

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:58 PM

Stupidest. Posts. Ever. Despite the existence of 2-3 people who spam the comments in support of this absurd feature, I really think you should put it to a vote. Seriously, there's enough going on in the legal world -- you don't need this lame filler.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:01 PM

"a vice president for blah-blah" = brillant

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:03 PM

4:54 - difference is the staff attorney has a career with a future and will still be employed in three years.

avatar
7 Posted by anon86 | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:12 PM

"What's the difference, if any, between a staff lawyer and an associate??"

Go away. This blog is not for you.

And yes, we love you Laurie...

avatar
8 Posted by anon86 | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:13 PM

"What's the difference, if any, between a staff lawyer and an associate??"

Go away. This blog is not for you.

And yes, we love you Laurie...

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:23 PM

there needs to be an age cap. do marriages even count after 40?

avatar
10 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:26 PM

staff attorneys are glorified paralegals...

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:30 PM

teeth

avatar
12 Posted by A lady reader | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:32 PM

I wish all of the commitment-phobe male readers of ATL would stop clicking on the LEWW solely to trash the column. Best thing on ATL!

avatar
13 Posted by a male reader | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:45 PM

LEWW is the most consistently enjoyable feature on this blog. (Sorry Lat.)

P.S. Who gets married on Yom Kippur?

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:56 PM

CCL=short form, aka, the contract attorneys of improv.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 6:05 PM

WTF is with the 60-year-olds and their registry? The point of a registry is to help out young couples who don't already have stuff and lots of $$$. They should be embarassed.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 6:07 PM

LEWW is great. I actually only got into them since the last one, which put me on the fence. This one sealed the deal. Nice job Laurie.

avatar
17 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 6:50 PM

"4:54 - difference is the staff attorney has a career with a future and will still be employed in three years."

What the F does that mean? A staff attorney is generally a non-partner track hack who the firm feels bad about firing because they're "nice."

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 6:50 PM

I love LEWW! I was so excited when I saw the new post!

avatar
19 Posted by Youth in Asia | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 7:29 PM

What time does an Asian head to the dentist?

Tooth-hurty.

I'm here all week.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 7:33 PM

AGWWG?

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 7:42 PM

Once again, the white guy gets the hot Asian girl. WGWAG that, Asian men losers!

avatar
22 Posted by Hmm | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 8:07 PM

I couldn't find an age for Deecy. Could this be a May-December pairing? How sweet!

avatar
23 Posted by registries | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 8:16 PM

6:05, but under that rationale, why do young two-lawyer couples or really most couples who end up in the NYT need to register? I actually agree with your comment but after I have been hit up to buy wedding gifts and baby shower gifts for all of my affluent friends for years, I'm registering for my wedding even if I'm 80 when I get married!!

avatar
24 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:03 PM

Team Fajardo-Schick should have won.

I'll bet she looks good in person.

avatar
25 Posted by Laurie's Fan | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 10:35 PM

Daisy Wademan looks a little bit like Ivanka Trump.

avatar
26 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, September 27, 2007 10:53 PM

6:50, lol I know what you are saying; I was already excited when I first saw LEWW and then I became triply excited when I noticed one second later that there are actually SIX couples featured this week. Awesome.

avatar
27 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, September 28, 2007 5:49 AM

Laurie, I love you and LEWW, but you should really know how to spell "Gandhi".

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 28, 2007 7:01 AM

I vote for lawyer/lawyer pairings only. Sorry, Laurie.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 28, 2007 10:30 AM

Okay how did Deecy Gray manage to keep her age out of the NYT?

For ther record, my guess is that she is in her late 40s/early 50s. I'd say she's at least 10 years younger than Judge Ginsburg.

Laurie, you should investigate!

avatar
30 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Friday, September 28, 2007 11:17 AM

It's too bad there's not a picture of Charles and Fell, because they are by far the best looking couple featured.

avatar
31 Posted by Went to law school to sound important at cocktail parties | Permalink Friday, September 28, 2007 12:17 PM

Only Yale grads (Lin and Lat) could possibly conceive of a weekly post rating the prestige of a mariage. It's pretty disgusting actually.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 28, 2007 12:35 PM

It's good-natured fun. Gawker has a similar feature. And LEWW simply says out loud what everyone is thinking about certain marriages.

Post Your Comment