Add RSS RSS

Non-Sequiturs: 09.26.07

* Crazy pro se lawsuit against Google, seeking $5 billion in damages, touches upon the war on terror and a Burton snowboard. And no, it wasn’t filed by Jonathan Lee Riches. [TechDirt]

* A misdemeanor count of cruelty to animals? Guess he wasn’t that good. [Denver Channel]

* Law professors get their academic gowns in a wad over the gender divide in faculty hiring. [TaxProf Blog]

* Dewey LeBoeuf? Already done it. [WSJ Law Blog]

* Debevoise & Plimpton lords it over the competition. [Times of London]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 26, 2007 5:55 PM

i can't believe Lat was out all day and we got no B Clerker action. WTF?

B Clerker PWNS!

avatar
2 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, September 26, 2007 6:01 PM

Hey Lat --

In the London Times article there's a quote from Lord Goldsmith noting that even as an equity partner at D&P, he would not earn as much as if he had returned to the "Bar."

Having worked with some barristers, I've always been curious how much they make, especially the QC's. I believe they still bill on a "services rendered" basis rather than hourly, and judging by the cars lined up outside chambers around Lincoln's Inn Field, they're doing alright.

So how about a post on barrister compensation?

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 26, 2007 7:27 PM

What's the diff between barristers and solicitors?

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 26, 2007 7:43 PM

In a nutshell, barristers can appear in court while solicitors cannot. That's not entirely true in every court throughout the UK, but I believe still holds true for the main civil and criminal courts.

I'm usually hesitant to cite wikipedia for anything, but it actually describes the English system fairly well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrister

Post Your Comment