Add RSS RSS

An S&C Bonsai Beauty Pageant!

small bonsai 2 bonsai tree plant Sullivan Cromwell S&C Above the Law blog.jpgAfter the jump, you'll see six photographs of Sullivan & Cromwell bonsai trees. Some of these pics have been previously featured in these pages, and some are new. Based on subtle differences between the plants, it appears that S&C may be using different florists around the country to disseminate these gifts to its offerees.

We will now hold a bonsai beauty contest, allowing you to vote for your favorite example of S&C bonsai porn. The differences in the photos are interesting. Just like real pornography, some bonsai porn aims to titillate, some aspires to art, and some just looks fuzzy and low-budget.

Check out the bonsai pics, and cast your vote, after the jump.

BONSAI ONE

Sullivan Cromwell bonsai tree plant Above the Law blog.jpg

BONSAI TWO

bonsai 2 bonsai tree plant Sullivan Cromwell S&C Above the Law blog.jpg

BONSAI THREE

bonsai 1 bonsai tree plant Sullivan Cromwell S&C Above the Law blog.jpg

BONSAI FOUR

bonsai 1 Sullivan Cromwell bonsai tree plant Above the Law blog.jpg

BONSAI FIVE

bonsai 2 Sullivan Cromwell bonsai tree plant Above the Law blog.jpg

BONSAI SIX

bonsai 3 Sullivan Cromwell bonsai tree plant Above the Law blog.jpg

Earlier: Sullivan & Cromwell to Bonsai Trees!
The S&C Bonsai Tree: Ready for Its Close-Up
A Monday Morning Pick Me Up: S&C Bonsai Porn

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:03 PM

First?

avatar
2 Posted by Firstiddy Firstens | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:03 PM

When I say "Fi" you say "rst"

FI...

avatar
3 Posted by i heart bonsais | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:05 PM

represent dub-v!!!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:07 PM

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

avatar
5 Posted by annoyed | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:08 PM

Lat, I thought someone was going to delete these annoying "first" people. There was a period that it was getting controlled, but they've come back.

Lat, please make them go away.

avatar
6 Posted by Dan | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:10 PM

Number 6 is a hottie.

avatar
7 Posted by Im not FIRRRRRRRRRRRRRSTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTt | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:15 PM

this one is for you 1:08 - FIIIIIIIIIIRSSSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:18 PM

Aren't these really only 3 plants?

avatar
9 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:19 PM

6 >>>> 2. Come on, people.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:22 PM

Last!

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:27 PM

How many of us would even know what a Bonsai tree was if it weren't for the Karate Kid?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqKmHlXoDU8

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:29 PM

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004-2498
United States
Phone +1-212-558-4000
Fax +1-212-558-3588

INVOICE

For one (1) bonsai tree gift, including assorted snacks and other trinkets; procurement thereof; pruning, watering, and feeding; and delivery of same.......................................$9,000,000.00

avatar
13 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:36 PM

How many bonsai posts is Lat going to make?

Lat, there are stories out there. There are interviews out there. Get on it dood!

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:36 PM

2 and 3 are the same plant as are 4-6.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:39 PM

4,5,6 are all the same, no? Maybe that's the idea: reflect the billing policy in the gifts to associates. Indoctrinate the young'uns ASAP.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:41 PM

This is truly scraping the bottom of the barrel. PLEASE do us a favor and write about something interesting. This is not worth a second of anyone's time.

avatar
17 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:44 PM

Lat, can you delete these annoying posts asking you to delete the annoying "first" posts? Thanks.

avatar
18 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:45 PM

"This is truly scraping the bottom of the barrel. PLEASE do us a favor and write about something interesting. This is not worth a second of anyone's time."

Lat's life is potential unrealized. Here he has eyes, and a forum. Rather than doing good stories, complete with interviews (there are tons of good stories out there), he does bonsai posts.

The only hard working thing on his site is the Loyola 2L shtick.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:50 PM

Slow news day, I see....

avatar
20 Posted by Mastercard | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:51 PM

First year Salary at Wachtell: 160K+ enormous bonus.
Money earned from Abovethelaw: Far less.
Thinking about the fact that I left powerhouse Wachtell to post about Bonsai's: Priceless.

avatar
21 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:54 PM

Lat, can you delete these annoying posts asking you to delete these annoying posts asking you to delete the annoying "first" posts? Thanks.

avatar
22 Posted by Firsty McFirsterson | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:55 PM

1:08 --> Why do you care whether someone post "first"? Maybe b/c you are never first? Eat one big man

avatar
23 Posted by Fist Fanatic | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:58 PM

Can you do a post about people who comment "First" to a post. It would be neat to see what kind of demographic these people come from.

I am guessing TTT law students, but it is probably BigLaw partners who like to read Gossip Blogs.

avatar
24 Posted by First Fanatic | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 1:58 PM

Can you do a post about people who comment "First" to a post. It would be neat to see what kind of demographic these people come from.

I am guessing TTT law students, but it is probably BigLaw partners who like to read Gossip Blogs.

avatar
25 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:00 PM

The lighting for Number two makes it classy, and yet ever so slightly risque. it gets my vote hands down

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:00 PM

Enough with this filler - can we get the promised K&E update?

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:00 PM

I think we can do away with the Bonsai trees. The last four pictures don't even show any S&C indicia. How do we know they are even sent by S&C, Lat?

If you're going to make such a meaningless post, while pushing the information about K&E to the back-burner, you should least be able to verify that all S&C Bonsai tree contest participants are eligible to compete.

avatar
28 Posted by Classic | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:00 PM

Did Bonsai 1 have its offer recinded as well? I mean, it was the one who slapped Bonsai 3.

WHY ISN'T ANYONE TALKING ABOUT THIS?

ps--Thanks for the memories 1:27.
pps---"First" posts rule.
ppps--Don't taze me bro.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:10 PM

Come on Lat, you're better than this.

avatar
30 Posted by S&C lateral from Kelley Drye | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:13 PM

Parker Posy Florists
145 East 72nd Street
New York, NY


Dear Ms. Posy:

We specifically ordered DARK green bonsai trees for our offerees, designed to precisely match the shade of money. That is what you promised us. But the ones you delivered are a MEDIUM shade of green. That is simply unacceptable and has completely ruined the messge we wished to convey.

You owe us $9,000,000 in actual damages, plus another $400,000,000 in punitives.

Elana

PS: We express our thanks to our associate David Lat, who tirelessly collected photographs documenting your imcompetence.

avatar
31 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:20 PM

1:36 is correct about 4-6 at least. The same freaking plant.

avatar
32 Posted by Still classic | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:20 PM

Classic @ 2:00 -- You don't get it. Bonsais One and Three are THE SAME BONSAI tree, just shot from different angles!!! They couldnt have slapped each other.

And Five and Six aren't even S&C bonsais at all - just some random bonsais from other law firms. Or maybe not even from any law firm at all - did anyone consider that??

The people are so clueless! Laaaaaaaattt!!!

avatar
33 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:23 PM

Dale & Thomas popcorn? Crap I want some of that!

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:23 PM

Worst. Post. Ever.

avatar
35 Posted by buck rogers | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:24 PM

Before the internet, what did people do when they were overcome by the urge to look at photos of other people's plants? I know that whenever that bug bites me (several times a day), my first reaction is to fire up a web browser and hit the law blogs.

Seriously, wtf?

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:24 PM

This post was Merck's idea, wasn't it?

avatar
37 Posted by Proud Owner | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:25 PM

Clarifying:

Two and three are the same tree. NOT one and three.

Vote for 2!

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:34 PM

1:29 = Elana Glatt

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:49 PM

White Guys With Bonsai Trees?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:54 PM

This is completely idiotic. That said, I love it.

Also: Lat never said they were all different trees. They are different photos.

avatar
41 Posted by Zach Morris | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 3:45 PM

Hey 1:27...I would have won a trip to Hawaii if I had remembered that Belding loves Bonsai trees.

avatar
42 Posted by Mathematical Ass | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 4:01 PM

"Just like real pornography, some bonsai porn aims to titillate, some aspires to art, and some just looks fuzzy and low-budget." - ATL makes me the happiest man this side of the mason-dixon.

avatar
43 Posted by tekel | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 6:00 PM

2 ftw.

avatar
44 Posted by aaron charney | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:21 PM

the S&C inserts look like tombstones.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:57 PM

Bonsai Contestant 2 is a pageant patty: the garish lighting, the big contestant badge, the pose. Bonsai Contestant 6 is fresh, unscripted, and beautiful, and therefore gets my vote.

(Also, who gets to live on a lake when at law school? Totally unfair.)

avatar
46 Posted by JamesT | Permalink Thursday, October 18, 2007 8:34 AM

They all suck. You cannot just stick a juniper seedling in a fancy pot and call it "bonsai." You would think a firm as big as S&C could spring for something a little better then mail order gift catalog "bonsai."

avatar
47 Posted by dont know nothin bout football | Permalink Friday, October 19, 2007 4:13 PM

The garish lighting makes it. So stark, so ironic. Number two (the existential bonsai) has it all the way.

Post Your Comment