Add RSS RSS

Associate Bonus Watch: Debevoise & Plimpton!!!

associate bonus watch 2007 law firm Above the Law blog.jpgWe've been having technical difficulties, perhaps due to heavy site traffic. We are going to lunch.

But before we leave, here's the bonus announcement of Debevoise & Plimpton. Its authenticity has been confirmed by multiple sources.

In a nutshell, the firm has adopted Cravath's bifurcated bonus model, with year-end and "special" bonuses. The numbers are the same as Cravath's, except for the most senior associates, who get $5K more at Debevoise.

You can check out the D&P memo after the jump.

Update: The WSJ Law Blog had the news first. See here.

DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP -- 2007 ASSOCIATE BONUS MEMO

From: "Evans, Martin Frederic"
Date: October 31, 2007 2:21:59 PM EDT
To: "Associates--Domestic"
Cc: "Partners--All"
Subject: 2007 Bonus Announcement

We are pleased to announce for U.S.-based associates both year-end bonuses and special bonuses for 2007. Bonuses will be paid to associates in good standing and will be subject to the usual pro-rations for part-time programs and lengths of service of less than the entire year. The special bonuses will be paid November 20 and the year-end bonuses will be paid in December. The bonus amounts for 2007 are as follows:

Class of 2007: Year-end bonus of $35,000 (pro-rated); no special bonus
Class of 2006: Year-end bonus of $35,000; special bonus of $10,000
Class of 2005: Year-end bonus of $40,000; special bonus of $15,000
Class of 2004: Year-end bonus of $45,000, special bonus of $20,000
Class of 2003: Year-end bonus of $50,000; special bonus of $30,000
Class of 2002: Year-end bonus of $55,000; special bonus of $40,000
Class of 2001: Year-end bonus of $60,000; special bonus of $50,000
Class of 2000 (and prior years): Year-end bonus of $65,000; special bonus of $50,000

This year has seen some of the largest, most complex and demanding projects our firm has ever undertaken, and your efforts have been instrumental to the delivery of superior service and advice to our clients throughout the year and to the success of the firm. We know that work loads continue at high levels for very many of you, and you have our sincere thanks and appreciation.

Rick Evans
For All Partners

Breaking: Debevoise Announces Year-End Bonuses [WSJ Law Blog]

Earlier: Associate Bonus Watch 2007 archives (scroll down)

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by FIRST | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:45 PM

SHOW ME THE FIRST

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:46 PM

Debevoise gives higher bonuses than Cravath? Who saw that coming?

avatar
3 Posted by FIRST | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:46 PM

SHOW ME THE FIRST

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:47 PM

Up on ATL in under half an hour. Nice work Lat.

avatar
5 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:49 PM

...and still beat by WSJ.

avatar
6 Posted by anony | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:52 PM

2:46 - not really: class of 2000 for cravath is up for partnership. not so at debevoise so they need to provide more carrots to entice them to stay longer

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:53 PM

Now the question who is not going to match the special bonus.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:56 PM

2:52 Don't be ridiculous. Very very very few ppl in Cravath's 2000 class will make partner. Long run income, you're better off going to a firm who makes more partners, but pays lower bonuses.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:58 PM

YES!

Thank you, D&P.

Now all firms that consider themselves among the elite MUST match or concede they are second tier.

God Bless America. I'm buying a Porche.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:59 PM

"I'm buying a Por[s]che."

----

Me too.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:00 PM

im learning to spell porch. or did you mean porsche?

avatar
12 Posted by Pius XXX | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:02 PM

I am only getting a fractional bonus, so I am going enter into a swap which gives me synthetic long exposure on a Porsche

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:04 PM

This structure forces any firm that ties bonuses to hours to look very second tier. They may not even be motivated to match the total at year's end.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:04 PM

Stupid question, which I'm sure will evoke ridicule from the masses:

Does the "class" year typically correspond with year of law school graduation (e.g., an '05 grad who clerked for a year before going to the firm would get $40,000 even if s/he didn't start at the firm until 2006?)

avatar
15 Posted by Ralph Wiggum | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:06 PM

Me fail English? Than unpossible!!

avatar
16 Posted by Wu-Tang Financial | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:06 PM

@3:02

Diversify yo' bonds, n*gga.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:09 PM

3:04. That's correct. Your grad year = Your class year, regardless of when you started at the firm. Likewise, your salary at the firm will be tied to your grad year: People who are in their first year as a firm associate, but who spent the past year clerking, are considered and paid as second year attorneys.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:12 PM

jones day? bonuses? secret system?
whats up wit dat?

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:12 PM

3:04, generally yes, that generally corresponds with graduation year. As to clerkships, it could be case-by-case with each firm. When a firm hires you from a clerkship, it will tell you what year you are coming in at. I know people that clerked for 2 years that have only gotten credit for one year. So even though they graduated in 2005, they came in as second-years and got the 2006 class pay.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:13 PM

3:04, that's usually correct. If an attorney laterals into a firm, though, it's not uncommon for the firm to dock him or her a year in status as the price paid for joining a better firm and not coming up through the ranks.

avatar
21 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:14 PM

What about Simpson? Will Simpson match? Will they too pay the special bonus in November? Since 2 peer firms are paying the special bonus in November, it seems like STB needs to as well.

Any dirt on STB? Thanks!

avatar
22 Posted by Bob Spatt | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:17 PM

Hold your horses, guys. STB is coming soon.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:17 PM

Note that D&P is issuing these bonuses for the DC office in addition to NYC. Wow - big-time payday for DC folks. Questions as to whether DC-based firms will be able to match these numbers (in their DC hq, at least).

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:18 PM

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Ex-Commissioner-Sued.html

Fulbright & Jaworski sues Bernard Kerik for legal bills...

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:18 PM

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Ex-Commissioner-Sued.html

Fulbright & Jaworski sues Bernard Kerik for legal bills...

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:19 PM

Match, bitches.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:20 PM

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Ex-Commissioner-Sued.html

Fulbright & Jaworski sues Bernard Kerik for legal bills...

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:22 PM

Of course they're paying it for the D.C. associates. Debevoise has one of the purest lock-step systems around - up to and including at the partner level.

avatar
29 Posted by Chewie | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:22 PM

@3:17

Just wait until Skadden matches this across all their offices. Some 2nd-year associate in Wilmington, Del. is gonna bring a suitcase full of Benjamins to his house closing.

Straight cash, homie!

avatar
30 Posted by two posts = understandable mistake; three posts = you're a moron | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:22 PM

does anyone know whether fulbright will be suing bernard kerik for legal bills?

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:23 PM

What percentage goes to Charlie Rangel?

avatar
32 Posted by magliovelli | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:23 PM

My guess is that Simpson will match. I don't think they want to be viewed as 2nd to anyone in compensation (except, of course, Wachtell). Given how rich the bonuses are, I would guess that base salaries will also climb. Skadden is probably non-plused that they had to follow Simpon's last raise rather than leading it, which may also put upward pressure on salary.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:26 PM

3:13 is incorrect. It's highly uncommon for laterals to get docked - unless they switch practice groups.

avatar
34 Posted by magliovelli | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:27 PM

If anything, laterals get generous bonuses for switching firms as an inducement to jump ship.

avatar
35 Posted by IHaveABrain | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:29 PM

@3:23

In what world does your comment make sense? Don't get me wrong, it's not that I wouldn't like to believe that salaries will rise, I just don't see how high bonuses increase pressure to raise salaries. I'd say the opposite is true.

avatar
36 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:31 PM

for predicting who will match (westlaw cites).....

profits per partner- 6/2007 AMLAW 151

revenue per lawyer- 6/2007 AMLAW 147

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:32 PM

Laterals may get docked in class year for partnership, but not in pay.

avatar
38 Posted by re to 256 | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:32 PM

256: actually anyone at cravath who has lasted to class of 2000 probably has a good chance at partnership since hints are given along the way about their odds of making election

avatar
39 Posted by Rangel Boogeyman | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:33 PM

I WANT YOUR BOOOONNNUSSSSESSSS!!!!!

avatar
40 Posted by Hiphopanonymous | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:33 PM

The special bonus is clearly an alternative to raising salaries. Give 'em an extra $10k because we had a good year. But next year may be different because of the credit crunch / subprime mortgage market. It's a lot easier to change the bonus pay than base pay. In fact, firms don't reduce base pay, they lay people off.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:36 PM

Agree w/ 3:26.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:36 PM

So every associate for these years gets the exact same bonus, regardless of hours worked, etc.?

avatar
43 Posted by Simpson??? | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:37 PM

BUT WHEN WILL SIMPSON ANNOUNCE? LATER TODAY? TOMORROW??

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:38 PM

Not that it isn't fascinating to see which BigLaw firms pony up the big bonuses and in what order, and not that it isn't fascinating to hear about the small-penis-compensating car the associate receiving said big bonus will buy, but how about a thread that relates to (what I assume is) a larger portion of the legal community -- the bonuses that are typically given at smaller sized firms? I.e., it would be interesting to hear what the average bonus is for firms with 1-15 attorneys, 15-50 attorneys, 50-200 attorneys, etc. or whatever delineated group you want to choose.

avatar
45 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:38 PM

3:17: How soon will STB announce???? We need to know

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:39 PM

I wonder whether Kirkland's famous above market bonuses will top these recent announcements. Any thoughts?

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:40 PM

Now that Debevoise has match (and even topped for senior associates) every firm that does not want to be deemed second tier must do so as well. Skadden, STB, DPW, Cahill, Milbank, CWT, etc., all must all match. None of these firms want to been seen as inferior to Debevoise in terms of prestige or status. Even if if few of these firms, if pushed, would admit that they are not quite equal to Cravath, none will allow themselves to be seen as beneath Debevoise. That would be too embarassing.

P.S.: they must also match in their branch offices - as Debevoise did.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:41 PM

3:38 -- I can tell you what most 1-15 attorney firms will hand their associates as a bonus: a $20 gift certificate good at any Olive Garden location (excluding alcoholic beverages, of course.)

avatar
49 Posted by K&E Assoc | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:41 PM

Since I have been here (several years) I have been told, repeatedly, that the firm will always "do the right thing" when it comes to comp. So far, so good.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:42 PM

I officially bestow the title of TTT on any firm that does not match.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:45 PM

How many times will you people ask whether bonuses are linked to hours? Are you all under the same rock somewhere, or are there several rocks around the city? Just wondering.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:46 PM

What kind of bonuses do Lewis Hamilton-loving London firms pay their associates?

avatar
53 Posted by 338 | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:46 PM

341-
Is that what your firm gave you last year? Interesting. Perhaps if you spent more time working and less time blogging, the firm would have given you more. By the way, you should post which firm it is, so the rest of us know to avoid that firm if we look to lateral. Seriously though, I'd like to hear from people who have something meaningful to say. Your comment, not meaningful.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:46 PM

Weil just matched

avatar
55 Posted by 2007 Son | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:47 PM

@3:22

"Benjamins"?? "Homie"???

Hi, 1997 called - It wants it's slang back.

avatar
56 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:47 PM

What is taking Simpson so long? It just got showed up by Debevoise! Are you f'ing kidding me?

They need to announce TODAY.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:47 PM

What kind of bonuses do Lewis Hamilton-loving London firms pay their associates?

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:47 PM

What kind of bonuses do Lewis Hamilton-loving London firms pay their associates?

avatar
59 Posted by Lateral | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:48 PM

Pls clarify on the lateral bonus info--suppose you lateralled in August 2007, and the firm's fiscal year ends June 30. Would you be included in this bonus round prorated for Aug-Dec 2008 (like the stubs), or is it zilch until 2008?

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:49 PM

What kind of bonuses do Lewis Hamilton-loving London firms pay their associates?

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:50 PM

What kind of bonuses do Lewis Hamilton-loving London firms pay their associates?

avatar
62 Posted by 2007 Son | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:50 PM

@3:22

"Benjamins"?? "Homie"???

Hi, 1997 called - It wants it's slang back.

avatar
63 Posted by Lateral | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:52 PM

Sorry at 3:48 I meant prorated Aug-Dec 2007 (not 2008).

avatar
64 Posted by Simpson Announces | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:54 PM

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett llp

MEMORANDUM TO ALL ASSOCIATES AND COUNSEL


On behalf of the partners of the Firm, I am pleased to announce both a Special Bonus for 2007, as well as the year-end bonuses for associates and counsel. Associates in good standing will be paid as follows:

Year End Bonus
Special Bonus

Class of 2007 $35,000 (pro-rated) -
Class of 2006 $35,000 $10,000
Class of 2005 $40,000 $15,000
Class of 2004 $45,000 $20,000
Class of 2003 $50,000 $30,000
Class of 2002 $55,000 $40,000
Class of 2001 $60,000 $50,000
Class of 2000 $65,000 $50,000
Class of 1999 $65,000 $50,000

Bonuses for counsel and other attorneys will be determined on an individual basis and communicated separately. Special Bonuses will be paid on November 30, 2007 and the year-end bonus will be paid on December 28, 2007. Associates and counsel who were on leave or worked part-time during any part of this year will be eligible for a pro-rated bonus.
On behalf of the Firm, thank you for your continued dedication and professionalism. You have all contributed to the Firm's extraordinary success this year.
Pete Ruegger
October 31, 2007

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:54 PM

The jerk store called. They're running out of 2007 son.

avatar
66 Posted by Weil | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:54 PM

Weil has NOT matched.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:54 PM

3:50(2): You need to get out of the office more.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:54 PM

Simpson matched

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:56 PM

Shall we assume that 3:46(3)'s post is bogus?

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:56 PM

Simpson matched

avatar
71 Posted by Simpson Announces | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:57 PM

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett llp

MEMORANDUM TO ALL ASSOCIATES AND COUNSEL


On behalf of the partners of the Firm, I am pleased to announce both a Special Bonus for 2007, as well as the year-end bonuses for associates and counsel. Associates in good standing will be paid as follows:

Year End Bonus
Special Bonus

Class of 2007 $35,000 (pro-rated) -
Class of 2006 $35,000 $10,000
Class of 2005 $40,000 $15,000
Class of 2004 $45,000 $20,000
Class of 2003 $50,000 $30,000
Class of 2002 $55,000 $40,000
Class of 2001 $60,000 $50,000
Class of 2000 $65,000 $50,000
Class of 1999 $65,000 $50,000

Bonuses for counsel and other attorneys will be determined on an individual basis and communicated separately. Special Bonuses will be paid on November 30, 2007 and the year-end bonus will be paid on December 28, 2007. Associates and counsel who were on leave or worked part-time during any part of this year will be eligible for a pro-rated bonus.
On behalf of the Firm, thank you for your continued dedication and professionalism. You have all contributed to the Firm's extraordinary success this year.
Pete Ruegger
October 31, 2007

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:57 PM

stb just matched

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:57 PM

Franks & Beanz LLP just matched.

avatar
74 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:58 PM

Weil has matched.

avatar
75 Posted by Ace | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:58 PM

Stupid Debevoise. Now that they've matched, every firm in the V15 HAS to match; they have no choice. Kills all the suspense. Talk about your all time bone head play...

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:58 PM

Simpson just announced - matched Debevoise all the way.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:58 PM

stb just matched.

avatar
78 Posted by Simpson Announces | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:59 PM

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett llp

MEMORANDUM TO ALL ASSOCIATES AND COUNSEL


On behalf of the partners of the Firm, I am pleased to announce both a Special Bonus for 2007, as well as the year-end bonuses for associates and counsel. Associates in good standing will be paid as follows:

Year End Bonus
Special Bonus

Class of 2007 $35,000 (pro-rated) -
Class of 2006 $35,000 $10,000
Class of 2005 $40,000 $15,000
Class of 2004 $45,000 $20,000
Class of 2003 $50,000 $30,000
Class of 2002 $55,000 $40,000
Class of 2001 $60,000 $50,000
Class of 2000 $65,000 $50,000
Class of 1999 $65,000 $50,000

Bonuses for counsel and other attorneys will be determined on an individual basis and communicated separately. Special Bonuses will be paid on November 30, 2007 and the year-end bonus will be paid on December 28, 2007. Associates and counsel who were on leave or worked part-time during any part of this year will be eligible for a pro-rated bonus.
On behalf of the Firm, thank you for your continued dedication and professionalism. You have all contributed to the Firm's extraordinary success this year.
Pete Ruegger
October 31, 2007

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:59 PM

Simpson has matched.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:59 PM

Its just hilarous the way these firms shamelessly copy each other. Not only with the structure, but they couldn't think of anything else besides "special bonus"? How about "Premium Bonus" or "One-time Discretionary Bonus" or "Firm Citizenship Bonus" or they could just cut to the chase and call it the "Cravath Bonus"

avatar
81 Posted by Ace | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:00 PM

Stupid Debevoise. Now that they've matched, every firm in the V15 HAS to match; they have no choice. Kills all the suspense. Talk about your all time bone head play...

avatar
82 Posted by Earl Manigoat | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:00 PM

Simpson just matched!!!

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:00 PM

Hi, the jerk store called - They're running out of 2007 son.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:00 PM

3:38,

Regardless of the size of one's penis, it is impossible not to agree that a Porsche 911 is a beautiful machine. That is a simple, indisputable fact.

Your snippy little comment is likely the result of your sadness over the equally indisputable fact that you will never drive such a beautiful machine, and certainly never have the chance to own one.

Leave your address in the comments and I will make sure to send you a few pictures of my girlfriend driving me around in the black 911 I intend to purchase.

Enjoy your Hyundai.

avatar
85 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:00 PM

Weil has matched.

avatar
86 Posted by sad associate | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:01 PM

I work at a AMLAW 200 (not 100 firm) and I almost cried when I read this post. I'm a second year associate who only makes 135k a year. My bonus will MAYBE be around 15k tops. And the sad thing is I went to a top 14, but ended up at this TTT firm. I could be making 170k plus a 55k bonus if I had gone to NYC. Jesus, that is a 75k a year difference. Wow.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:01 PM

3:50(2): You need to get out of the office more.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:01 PM

3:38 - Go away. No one cares. Please go to an accounting blog and when people talk about PricewaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Ernst & Young, and
KPMG , you can be right there to ask questions about H&R Block and John Q. Accountant, CPA.

There's nothing wrong with midsize, small, or solo operations, but a) there are too many to talk about and b) they are not the ones that push the envelopes. When there's some trend worth talking about, you be sure to let us know. Why don't you quit your job and start a blog about it like Lat did after he left Wachtell/USA?

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:01 PM

I hear STB matched

avatar
90 Posted by STB | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:02 PM

Simpson matched at 3:53 eastern.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:03 PM

Simpson has matched.

avatar
92 Posted by 2001student | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:03 PM

don't forget that flyout week just happened for harvard and yale and those students are all thinking about which firm to go to right now and reading this stuff.....can't differentiate between top firms anyway, so this kind of stuff might make the difference. firms clearly know this and want to step up. would make sense for one place, like stb, to go above and beyond.

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:03 PM

simpson may have just matched

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:04 PM

3:38,

Regardless of the size of one's penis, it is impossible not to agree that a Porsche 911 is a beautiful machine. That is a simple, indisputable fact.

Your snippy little comment is likely the result of your sadness over the equally indisputable fact that you will never drive such a beautiful machine, and certainly never have the chance to own one.

Leave your address in the comments and I will make sure to send you a few pictures of my girlfriend driving me around in the black 911 I intend to purchase.

Also, enjoy your Hyundai.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:05 PM

simpson may have just matched

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:06 PM

simpson matches - see xoxo

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:06 PM

What kind of bonuses do London loving-Lewis Hamilton firms pay their associates?

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:06 PM

simpson matched

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:06 PM

Simpson Thacher just matched, memo: http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=709761&mc=1&forum_id=2

avatar
100 Posted by SIMPSON JUST MATCHED DEBEVOISE | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:07 PM

From: Ruegger, Pete
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:53 PM
To: Associates and Counsel
Subject: 2007 Bonuses

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett llp

MEMORANDUM TO ALL ASSOCIATES AND COUNSEL


On behalf of the partners of the Firm, I am pleased to announce both a Special Bonus for 2007, as well as the year-end bonuses for associates and counsel. Associates in good standing will be paid as follows:

Year End Bonus
Special Bonus

Class of 2007 $35,000 (pro-rated) -
Class of 2006 $35,000 $10,000
Class of 2005 $40,000 $15,000
Class of 2004 $45,000 $20,000
Class of 2003 $50,000 $30,000
Class of 2002 $55,000 $40,000
Class of 2001 $60,000 $50,000
Class of 2000 $65,000 $50,000
Class of 1999 $65,000 $50,000

Bonuses for counsel and other attorneys will be determined on an individual basis and communicated separately. Special Bonuses will be paid on November 30, 2007 and the year-end bonus will be paid on December 28, 2007. Associates and counsel who were on leave or worked part-time during any part of this year will be eligible for a pro-rated bonus.
On behalf of the Firm, thank you for your continued dedication and professionalism. You have all contributed to the Firm's extraordinary success this year.
Pete Ruegger
October 31, 2007

avatar
101 Posted by 3:22 | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:07 PM

@2007 Son

Yo, beeyatch, a semi-retarded African boy called. He wants his poor Internet skills back.

avatar
102 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:08 PM

Did Simpson match? Why won't anyone say??

avatar
103 Posted by SIMPSON JUST MATCHED DEBEVOISE | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:09 PM

From: Ruegger, Pete
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:53 PM
To: Associates and Counsel
Subject: 2007 Bonuses

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett llp

MEMORANDUM TO ALL ASSOCIATES AND COUNSEL


On behalf of the partners of the Firm, I am pleased to announce both a Special Bonus for 2007, as well as the year-end bonuses for associates and counsel. Associates in good standing will be paid as follows:

Year End Bonus
Special Bonus

Class of 2007 $35,000 (pro-rated) -
Class of 2006 $35,000 $10,000
Class of 2005 $40,000 $15,000
Class of 2004 $45,000 $20,000
Class of 2003 $50,000 $30,000
Class of 2002 $55,000 $40,000
Class of 2001 $60,000 $50,000
Class of 2000 $65,000 $50,000
Class of 1999 $65,000 $50,000

Bonuses for counsel and other attorneys will be determined on an individual basis and communicated separately. Special Bonuses will be paid on November 30, 2007 and the year-end bonus will be paid on December 28, 2007. Associates and counsel who were on leave or worked part-time during any part of this year will be eligible for a pro-rated bonus.
On behalf of the Firm, thank you for your continued dedication and professionalism. You have all contributed to the Firm's extraordinary success this year.
Pete Ruegger
October 31, 2007

avatar
104 Posted by First! | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:10 PM

FIRST!

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:11 PM

simpson matched

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:13 PM

Lat -

The site is screwed up. Double postings on the main page, missing pages, etc. do we all need to click an advertisement so you can get an upgrade?

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:14 PM

Has anyone heard whether Simpson matched?

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:19 PM

I heard Latham is matching soon

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:19 PM

What about Simpson? are they going to match?

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:20 PM

When is LW going to match?

avatar
111 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:22 PM

FILTER THESE COMMENTS PLEASE

avatar
112 Posted by Chewie | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:23 PM

I think Lat murdered the site on his way to the gay cruise. Terrible timing. What a mongoloidal move.

avatar
113 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:25 PM

I heard Simpson may be matching at some point in the next 3 months!

avatar
114 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:27 PM

Rumors of a Dewey & LeBoeuf match?

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:28 PM

I'm going to call the Chairman on my AmLaw 50 firm and tell him I want my special bonus paid in gold bars.

avatar
116 Posted by HH | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:28 PM

3:04, apparently not a dumb question at all, since there seems to be a lot of confusion on the matter. At most firms, "class year" refers to the class/level which firm considers an individual attorney, not that attorney's grad year. That said, some firms may not make a practice of hiring candidates who aren't on par with their YOG.

3:26, Laterals commonly get docked - both in salary and class year/partnership consideration - for a variety of reasons.

avatar
117 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:31 PM

Interesting - what do you think about the big names in DC matching? Covington? WilmerHale? WC?

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:31 PM

Rumors of a Dewey & LeBoeuf match?

avatar
119 Posted by Gootch | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:33 PM

One point I don't think anyone has touched upon:

All three firms are paying both bonuses prior to the end of 2007. Did they also pay their 2006 bonuses in calendar year 2006, or are associates getting all three boni within 12 months?

Will all firms match this as well? And what are the tax implications? God help me if I land in a higher bracket.

avatar
120 Posted by WHat? | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:33 PM

What is Debevoise ranked on PPP? This would be a better metric to determine who absolutely must match.

avatar
121 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:35 PM

21 Debevoise & Plimpton $1,805,000 7.8%

avatar
122 Posted by 338 | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:35 PM

400(#4)/404,
The Porsche is a very nice car (though I prefer the Lexus SC08), but I live in NYC, so I don't own any car at this point. I don't need a car, nor do I have a desire to compensate for other shortcomings by blowing $80 grand on one. And you can save the picture of your skank girlfriend. You'll need it to wack off to when she realizes why you bought the Porsche.

401(#3),
Why would I care about what is said on an accounting blog? I am a lawyer at a non-BigLaw firm. While I agree that there are too many small/mid-size firms to get a real representative sample, the discussion is still worth having. Here's why: (1) it will show those of you in BigLaw the options that are out there if you choose to leave for a small/mid-size firm. As this is a threat (promise?) that is repeated on these pages frequently, I would think you would want some sense of what the financial picture is at a smaller-sized firm. (2) The small firms do push the envelope - only its a slightly different envelope. Just like there is competition among the BigLaw firms for the best associates, there is competition among the small firms as well. When I took the job I accepted, I had other offers from similar size firms and I consulted with friends at firms of comparable size. I wanted to know whether the money was consistent with the small market. In essence, it's the same thing as someone in Atlanta, Seattle, or Tulsa having a thread for discussion.

I suppose the best way to find out if the discussion is worth having is for Lat to start a thread and see the response. Once you remove the idiots who cry "FIRST" and the denigrating comments from the BigLaw snobs, there might actually be some meaningful discussion. Or maybe not. Maybe no one from a small firm reads the blog, wants to post, or has the time. Only one way to find out.

avatar
123 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:37 PM

Franks & Beenz LLP just matched!

avatar
124 Posted by F other markets | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:38 PM

screw DC and every other market other than NY. There is no way other cities should be matching NY.

avatar
125 Posted by hiphopanonymous | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:38 PM

Thoughts on whether firms that tie bonuses to hours will match this compensation scheme? As most don't pay bonus until the next calendar year, maybe we can look forward to a President's Day "special" bonus!

avatar
126 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:39 PM

4:33-

do you know how the income tax works? if it bumps you into a higher tax bracket, that higher rate will apply only to the excess that bumped you into the higher bracket.

avatar
127 Posted by 338 | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:39 PM

400(#4)/404,
The Porsche is a very nice car (though I prefer the Lexus SC08), but I live in NYC, so I don't own any car at this point. I don't need a car, nor do I have a desire to compensate for other shortcomings by blowing $80 grand on one. And you can save the picture of your skank girlfriend. You'll need it to wack off to when she realizes why you bought the Porsche.

401(#3),
Why would I care about what is said on an accounting blog? I am a lawyer at a non-BigLaw firm. While I agree that there are too many small/mid-size firms to get a real representative sample, the discussion is still worth having. Here's why: (1) it will show those of you in BigLaw the options that are out there if you choose to leave for a small/mid-size firm. As this is a threat (promise?) that is repeated on these pages frequently, I would think you would want some sense of what the financial picture is at a smaller-sized firm. (2) The small firms do push the envelope - only its a slightly different envelope. Just like there is competition among the BigLaw firms for the best associates, there is competition among the small firms as well. When I took the job I accepted, I had other offers from similar size firms and I consulted with friends at firms of comparable size. I wanted to know whether the money was consistent with the small market. In essence, it's the same thing as someone in Atlanta, Seattle, or Tulsa having a thread for discussion.

I suppose the best way to find out if the discussion is worth having is for Lat to start a thread and see the response. Once you remove the idiots who cry "FIRST" and the denigrating comments from the BigLaw snobs, there might actually be some meaningful discussion. Or maybe not. Maybe no one from a small firm reads the blog, wants to post, or has the time. Only one way to find out.

avatar
128 Posted by Gootch | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:39 PM

One point I don't think anyone has touched upon:

All three firms are paying both bonuses prior to the end of 2007. Did they also pay their 2006 bonuses in calendar year 2006, or are associates getting all three boni within 12 months?

Will all firms match this as well? And what are the tax implications? God help me if I land in a higher bracket.

avatar
129 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:41 PM

Why would you ever let your girlfriend drive your new Porsche? That's an awful idea.

avatar
130 Posted by hiphopanonymous | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:42 PM

Thoughts on whether firms that tie bonuses to hours will match this compensation scheme? As most don't pay bonus until the next calendar year, maybe we can look forward to a President's Day "special" bonus!

avatar
131 Posted by former biglaw assoc | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:43 PM

does anyone know how the prorated bonuses for ppl who worked for part of the yr work? and im not talking about first yrs. i worked for the first 1/2 of this yr at a V10 nyc firm that HAS to match DP and STB but then left to clerk. will i get anything or do you have to be still assoc with the firm at yr end to get any piece of the bonus?

avatar
132 Posted by Bill Shatner, Esq. | Permalink Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:43 PM

LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTT!!!!

avatar
133