Add RSS RSS

Breaking: The Cadwalader Bed Bugs Are Baaack!

Cadwalader Wickersham Taft CWT bed bugs bedbugs Abovethelaw Above the Law legal tabloid blog.jpgSources in the New York office of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft have informed us that a bed bug has been found on the 20th floor. It is believed that said bedbug infiltrated the premises through a delivery or box shipment. Perhaps it was hidden in a document production from opposing counsel?

Attorneys were notified of this breach in CWT's bed bug security via email. We haven't seen the email message, which we understand was protected against forwarding, printing, or copying.

But if you have further details, please post them in the comments (or email us). Thanks!

Update: We like this commenter's speculation: "Cameron Diaz brought it!"

Earlier: Breaking: Cadwalader Overrun By Bed Bugs!!!
Cameron Diaz at Cadwalader!

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 3:03 PM

First!!!!!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 3:04 PM

first

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 3:05 PM

Bedbugs are next to impossible to get rid of. Knowing this, I wouldn't work at Cadwalader for $200K per year.

Most firms figuratively suck the blood of their attorneys. Cadwalader does so literally.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 3:07 PM

i want to know what was in the box of the employee that was found to be the cause and led to his/her firing.

it was probably a blanket and pillow and she was spending nights there.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 3:40 PM

Bed Bugs to 190

avatar
6 Posted by Cadwalader = bedbugs | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 3:43 PM

Cadwalader attorneys are like bed bugs...they sneak up into all of your private belongings while you sleep, sucking away and biting at everything to make sure you know they are there...but they are impossible to get rid of after repeated attempts at extermination.

avatar
7 Posted by grippy | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 3:46 PM

3.43 - you are an idiot. that doesn't even make sense.

avatar
8 Posted by to 3:43 | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 3:46 PM

or maybe that describes all lawyers in general....

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 3:49 PM

I hope Cadwalader bills its clients electronically lest they unintentionally mail them a bedbug. The last thing they need is a bedbug-related malpractice suit!

avatar
10 Posted by Cadwalader Partner | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 3:58 PM

Get these bedbugs some documents to review! I'll bill them out at $225 an hour.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 3:58 PM

Back off of CWT. Sorry you didn't get a call back. Or if you did, sorry you got a taste before CWT wished you a successful career somewhere else. But please wipe off the tears and move on.

Don't forget some of CWTs other 20th floor visitors (movie stars).

avatar
12 Posted by 3:05 | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 4:04 PM

3:58 -- I don't forget. I just think it is more likely I'd get bitten by a bedbug at CWT's offices than by Cameron Diaz.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 4:08 PM

3:58....shame on you....must be drinking too much of that CWT Flavia...

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 4:25 PM

Cameron Diaz brought it!

avatar
15 Posted by CWT Associate | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 5:03 PM

Cadwalader is a fantastic place to work. Lots of us enjoy working here. The hours (in most departments - Cap Markets being a notable exception) are not above the norm (2k/yr).

With respect to the bedbugs, it's nice to work at a place that, despite the obvious PR difficulties involved, lets us know about such issues as they arise, rather than ... sweeping them under the bed.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 5:15 PM

I wonder whether CWT associate bonuses will include a can of raid.

avatar
17 Posted by nicolle | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 5:18 PM

that was well played...one of the funniest posts on ATL in a while.

avatar
18 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 5:22 PM

5:15 is clearly not "in the know" ...

This year Cadwalader is giving you the option, you may have the can of Raid, should you choose to allow them to take $4.15 out of your paycheck (plus $1,000 for processing fees) so that it doesn't hurt the partners bottom lines. Additionally, if it takes you more than 17 seconds to use the bathroom, eat your lunch, and make this decision, you're fired.

Ps. If you read this message on a Cadwalader computer, you will be happy to notice when you check that "ding" on your outlook that you've been fired for not billing hours. Unless, you are still billing clients for work you're not doing for them, and then by all means, carry on...

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 5:39 PM

I heard that numerous cwt associates and several partners did not survive the last round of pest control.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 5:42 PM

5:22 -- Does this mean that CWT and Fried Frank have merged?

avatar
21 Posted by Warren Burger | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 6:17 PM

How'd they protect the email against forwarding, printing, or copying? I want to see an update on that.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 6:51 PM

You would have to be a drooling, mentally retarded mouth breather not to get a callback to CWT. They hire ANYONE.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 6:53 PM

CWT hire mediocre SUNY Buffalo law grads.....they literally hire anyone.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 6:56 PM

CWT will hire associates with less credentials than CWT's walls have art.

Anyone with options goes elsewhere.

avatar
25 Posted by Billy Gates | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 7:00 PM

ATTENTION CADWALADER ASSOCIATES:

To share this uncopyable unforwardable email, simply bring up the email, and press ALT+Print Screen. Then, open up MS-Paint and press CTRL-V or Paste. Use MS Paint to crop out your name and any details, and save it as a .bmp or .jpg, then the file is attachable and sendable.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 7:28 PM

Or just type it up and send it from your shady yahoo-account - can't be too long of a message.

avatar
27 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 7:34 PM

It's never that crucial Billy Gates.
On another note, that is silly to say CWT will hire anyone. Where/who does that info actually come from?

avatar
28 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 7:44 PM

6:51/6:53/6:56 (same person): since you clearly see yourself as too good to work at cwt, what about your life makes you feel so strongly against CWT that you would bother saying that? Who cares?

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 8:34 PM

ATTN Loyola 2L - please settle a bet for us. Apply to CWT and report back, mkay?

avatar
30 Posted by fred muggs | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 9:44 PM

This bedbug was found on the 20th floor, and the first batch were found on the 33rd. Apparently, spraying with "a combination of compounds, none of which have an odor, and all of which are entirely safe for use in an office environment" didn't do much to the bugs beyond inspiring wanderlust. Not sure why they thought spritzing the place with some benign "compounds" would take care of the problem; from what I've read about bedbugs, even a flamethrower may or may not have gotten rid of them.

avatar
31 Posted by Loyola 2L | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 10:04 PM

I work for the extermination company now.

avatar
32 Posted by CATS | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 10:33 PM

CADWALADER YOU HAVE NO CHANCE TO SURVIVE MAKE YOUR TIME

avatar
33 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, October 3, 2007 11:39 PM

why would you ever work at CWT...id flip my shit if i thought i could be bringing bedbugs back to my apt.

id rather have my firm infested with snakes!

jenna haze to 190k!

avatar
34 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 11:36 AM

someone "print screen" the memo.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 12:23 PM

your all bittar you couldnt get jobs at Cadwalder. your pathetic little lifes are sad since all your doing is sitting around bad mouthing CWT. Don't you have a better thing to do? No? I Didn't think so, couldn't get an callback interview could you? I'm sorry we're the most dynamic and fastest growing firm on Wall Street that is quickly passing firms like Davis Polk and Simpson and your gonna practice personal injury law in Trenton. Good luck with that, remember I like a high shine on my shoes.

avatar
36 Posted by begbug | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 1:16 PM

I'm in ur conference room bitin' ur d00dz

avatar
37 Posted by White guys with asian girls | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 1:54 PM

Whoever said "You would have to be a drooling, mentally retarded mouth breather not to get a callback to CWT" doesn't know what he is talking about.

CWT does hire plenty of drooling, mentally retarded mouth breathers. So there. Get your facts straight.

White guys with asian girls!

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 2:08 PM

12:23 -- You just demonstrated why I'd never entertain a call back interview to CWT. Are your pleadings and contracts as well drafted as your blog postings?

avatar
39 Posted by 3L w/ firm way better than CWT | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 2:09 PM

To 12:23:

Learn to spell first! You are such a loser 12:33 for defending your firm in this manner! Your post screams inferiority complex. This just proves to all of us what kind of lawyers work at CWT. Thanks for validating our ideas!

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 3:05 PM

People who are really happy where they are don't write jealous nonsense about other firms. Such comments could only come from someone who did not get the offer they wanted. I suspect the same person has posted more than once. A better name for 2:09 is probably, "3L w/ no job and no prospects after graduation" or maybe, "3L w/ no offer from CWT."

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 3:26 PM

3:05, I totally agree.

I'm willing to make the bet that all the people that have been postings on the message boards and blogs for the last 10 years about CWT are one or two guys who were not given offers to the TOP FIRM ON WALL STREET. I wonder how someone can keep a job after posting four thousend times about how bad CWT is. I BET they never even worked here or saw the inside of 100 Maiden or 1 World Financial. Just a bunch of jealous loosers.

Sorry your jealous loosers.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 4:14 PM

12:23 - Please submit your letter of resignation immediately. You have just done more to tarnish Cadwalader's reputation than any person, legal tabloid, bed bug, or anything else could ever do.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 4:26 PM

12:23 -- I hope to god that you're not an attorney. How could you be? I think that even at a shitty firm like CWT you'd have been fired by now if for no other reason that submitting timesheet entries along the line of:

"1 Huor: Resurch da requiriments fo' summarie judgement in fif circuit."

Also, does the TTT law school from under which you crawled require students to know the difference between "lose" and "loose"? Apparently not.

avatar
44 Posted by exparalegal | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 4:31 PM

chomp, chomp, chomp

avatar
45 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 5:20 PM

03:26-- What is a "looser"? Or did you mean *loser*? Ah, you must be from CWT.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 5:23 PM

12:23, 3:05, etc - its fake people, but is very subtle... As for the poster entitled "3L w/ firm way better than CWT" I hope this namesake is a joke also - surely "way, way better" or "way super better" is in order right?

avatar
47 Posted by 3L w/ firm way better than CWT | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 5:33 PM

3:05/3:26 -- Don't worry, you might move up here someday. Wait, I forgot you're from CWT, so no you won't.

I'm not even going to mention spelling again.

avatar
48 Posted by 3L w/ firm way better than CWT | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 5:35 PM

05:23 -- Yep ;)

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 5:42 PM

5:23 -- right on - come on people, no half-stepping now! If we do this right our influence will all but ensure CWT drops out of the Vault 20's (and then forget them ever reaching V14 territory...)

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 5:54 PM

You're firms must be humming with all that time you have to spellcheck blog posts and hate on CWT. Sorry you couldn't get an offer LOSERS. Can you understand that now?

Enjoy you're sweatshops. I'll enjoy the opportunities you get from working at the top cap markets firm on the street.

avatar
51 Posted by 3L w/ firm way better than CWT | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 6:06 PM

I don't "hate" CWT, I'm going to stop now. I feel bad.

avatar
52 Posted by grammar police | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 6:34 PM

"You're firms" and "you're sweatshops." Tee hee!

avatar
53 Posted by someone at a V20 firm | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 6:38 PM

"3L w/ firm way better than CWT" ... good luck to you. Please tell me how much you enjoy being a first year associate at that firm. Enjoy the prestige. Soak it up. High five officemate everyday. Because it is the only thing that you will have to make you feel good about yourself and your lifestyle.

I have yet to grasp why people care about rankings, reputation, etc. of firms other than their own. Are the posters all 3Ls who don't know any better? Are they refugees from autoadmit? "5:42": who gives a shit?

avatar
54 Posted by firm prestige | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 6:46 PM

I agree with 6:38. Doesn't Biglaw pretty much suck across the board? If you're getting paid as much money as the next guy, who really cares?

Also, when I fill out that Vault survey every year, I make sure to be as arbitrary as possible, by giving the lowest number I can to my old firm and the firms of various tools I have encountered over the years. Therefore, I don't take whether a firm is a V20 vs a V50 firm all that seriously . . .

avatar
55 Posted by someone at a V20 firm | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 6:58 PM

I just find this obsession with other firms very weird. I just don't understand why people don't focus on their own careers.

Does this happen in other professions? It's truly bizarre. That's the only thing I can say about it. I mean, the CWT bed bug thing is funny and perfect fodder for a legal tabloid like ATL, but it is just plain creepy when people use it as an opportunity to bash another firm. I've had friends who've worked at CWT. Some have liked it, others hated it. It's no different from other NYC biglaw shops. Get over yourselves.

And, I also have to say, I love how people rip into each other about typos in the fucking comments section of a BLOG!!! Who cares????

avatar
56 Posted by 3L w/ firm way better than CWT | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 7:17 PM

Can someone please explain to me what part of "3L w/ firm way better than CWT" implies that I am a current first year associate?

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 4, 2007 7:44 PM

The reason why people focus on the prestige of their and competing firms is because they derive intangible value from the rankings. Since all top firms pay the same and have similar working conditions, associates look to less relevant factors (i.e., prestige) to "one-up" their competition.

This arises directly from type-a personalities unable to rise above the level of other type-a s.

avatar
58 Posted by Anon @ cwt | Permalink Friday, October 5, 2007 2:11 PM

6:58 - I agree with you 100%
I will say that I understand when 2/3Ls are obsessed with rankings of firms because it mirrors their attitudes about law school ranking, plus they are in the process of making difficult decisions about which firm to go to. (I still don't see why they shout out their law firms and knock others when they haven't worked one day as an associate there but whatever....)

What I really don't understand, however, is when real associates at law firms insult other firms with such verocity. Personally when I see threads about non-CWT firms my first inclination is not to throw outrageous comments for which I have no basis. I'm happy where I'm at so it's no big deal.

The unsolicited advice I will offer, for what it's worth: when making decisions about firms don't focus so much on the rankings unless they will actually have on impact on your career aspirations. Rather, focus on what makes sense for your personal life and professional growth. You don't want to suffer through your career.
Oh yeah, and I'd also like to distance myself from the smug-ass comments made be one of the other CWT-ers. Yikes!

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, October 6, 2007 6:30 AM

I am a former CWT capital markets associate and believe that some of the bad publicity about CWT is warranted. The general thinking at the firm is that most associates with choices would not go to CWT. The firm takes students from lower ranked law schools or students from higher ranked law schools who have less than stellar grades. I went to a US News top-10 law school and have seen the recruiting stats of CWT compared to other NY law firms, and this holds true for my school. The stats broke down the number of callbacks, the number of offers and the number of acceptances by grade ranges. And CWT fared worse than other similarly ranked Amlaw firms.

Of course there are exceptions, but from what I saw CWT capital markets is called on by clients for transactions that have been done before by a more reputable law firm or that have become so commoditized that 2nd year associates can run the deals. As an associate in capital markets, you will work for one partner or for a small group of partners. That partner or partner group focuses on a particular type of capital markets transaction. So you would become an expert on one of CDOs, RMBS, CMBS, repos, CDS or equity derivatives. And because of the internal politics, as a general rule you are not allowed to work for other partners in the department. You essentially need your partner's sign off to work for another partner in the group, which is difficult to get - either the partner you work for will not sign off or you are already working until 2am on a regular basis and do an all-nighter once a week.

The cast of characters at the firm make for stories you want to hear about but not experience. In corporate, you have Dennis Block who is inaccessible and is known for throwing staplers at people - he's basically on his own island in corporate. In capital markets, you have a young partner who has developed a reputation for hazing new associates and screaming at associates and secretaries. One poor junior associate got the worst of his wrath - on one occasion, the associate entered his office without the correct answer and the partner screamed, "stop coming into my office with your dick in your hands!". On another occasion, he was so angry at this associate that he told him - "you make me so mad that I'm going to go home to beat my wife." He told me that he developed a sick nervous feeling every day he went to work. Needless to say, after a few months of weekly screamings this associate left the firm. I have heard of other horror stories, although in fairness none nearly as bad as these.

I think the hours are better now that the market has slowed down. However, the hours generally are so bad that associates take pride in how long they work. One associate in capital markets worked so hard one week that the firm put him up in a hotel across the street - he would go to the hotel to take 3 hr naps and come back to work. He went home (his home was in Manhattan) only a couple of times for fresh change of clothes. Another litigation associate worked so much that she literally made her office her home - she slept on the floor of her office every night for a month until the cleaning lady reported it. She was told by HR to stop that because it makes CWT look like a sweat shop.

As a capital markets associate, you make money for the firm during your first year. Here's how: the firm does not invest in training you (only the training you need to meet CLE requirements), the firm makes you specialize in a very narrow area of capital markets, the firm squeezes short term gains out of you at the expense of long term development. The result: there are a hoard of junior associates, several senior associates, counsel and partners but very few midlevels. The firm laterals mid levels from low ranked law firms and/or who went to mediocre law schools. And the firm loses good associates for other law firms that have better environments. All of my friends who left CWT are much happier with their new law firms.

Bottom line: law firms are different, despite a common belief of law school students that they are the same soulless environments with different labels. Go to CWT if that is your best option, but don't plan to make a career there. Do capital markets because that gives you the most exit opportunities. If you went to a decent law school, you can move up to a better NY law firm - such as Cleary or Simpson or Sullivan. If you went to a mediocre law school, you can work there a few years and go in house. If you have international ambitions, you can get a job in London, Hong Kong, Tokyo because capital markets is essentially the same in the financial centers and capital markets expertise - especially derivatives - is highly sought after.

avatar
60 Posted by LaDainian Tomlinson | Permalink Monday, October 8, 2007 2:36 PM

who cares whether you work at CWT or Smith & Jones personal injury associates; if you can't spell i have no respect for you and it makes me embarrassed to call you a coworker

Post Your Comment