Add RSS RSS

For DOJ Diva, Work Is a Day at the Beach

Susana Lorenzo Giguere 2 DOJ Justice Department Above the Law blog.jpgIf you're thinking of moving from private practice to government, you should be prepared to take a hit in perks as well as pay. Sure, your hours will be better -- just avoid the S.D.N.Y. -- and you might even get a free flu shot. But you won't have the fancy offices, the swanky lunches, or round-the-clock support staff. Sometimes you'll have to make your own photocopies.

It is not, however, all doom and gloom. In the past, Department of Justice employees got to enjoy four-dollar meatballs (plus $13,000 in brownies). And now we hear that for at least one DOJ diva, work was a day at the beach -- quite literally.

From Al Kamen of the Washington Post:

[T]he acting deputy director of the [voting rights] section, Susana Lorenzo-Giguere, has been accused of collecting a $64 per diem, including on weekends and the Fourth of July, while spending half of June and most of July and August with her husband and kids at their beach house on Cape Cod.

The allegation, made to the department inspector general apparently by someone linked to the Boston regional office, was that Lorenzo-Giguere made "multiple" government-paid trips to the Cape and that she improperly said that "her presence on Cape Cod was necessary pending litigation in Boston," which was in the courts over the summer....

The complaint also alleged that Lorenzo-Giguere "spent little time in Boston" this summer and did little work on the case. Also, what supervision and oversight she provided was done by phone to Boston while she "remained on the beach," and she would have been able to do this from her office in Washington.

C'mon, folks -- cut Susana some slack. Her kids needed her; building sandcastles is no easy task. And she probably looks great in a swimsuit, too.

More about Ms. Lorenzo-Giguere, after the jump.

Susana Lorenzo Giguere DOJ Justice Department Above the Law blog.jpgAdditional analysis from TPM Muckraker:

You can read the referenced complaint here, which is addressed to the Justice Department's inspector general. The most sensational accusation, to be sure, is not that Lorenzo-Giguere managed to get paid while staying at her beach house, but that the Department "files lawsuits not because of the merits of the underlying claims but because the venue of the targeted defendant allows Ms. Lorenzo-Giguere to compel taxpayer funding of her annual summer retreat to Cape Cod."

We heard from a few former DOJ employees about Ms. Lorenzo-Giguere, who is apparently quite diva-licious. One source wrote:

Susana Lorenzo-Giguere is a real piece of work. A friend in the Voting Section say she's as bad as Shanetta [Cutlar], maybe worse...

One female ex-Justice Department employee commented:

What is it about the women in power at DOJ? There must be a secret "Diva 101" training course, only offered to select DOJ employees. Alas, I was not part of that inner circle when I was doing my time...

If these allegations are true, how was Lorenzo-Giguere able to get away with this? Word on the street is that it was due in part to her exceedingly close relationship with the Section Chief, John Tanner.

Stay tuned...

That's Latin for 'Daily,' Not 'Occasionally' [Al Kamen / Washington Post]
Fighting Discrimination: It's A Day at The Beach [TPMmuckraker]
Complaint to Justice Department Inspector General about Susana Lorenzo-Giguere [Talking Points Memo Document Collection]
$13,000 for brownies and cookies at the Justice Dept. [Think Progress via Wonkette]

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by 9th | Permalink Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:57 PM

It's not just the DOJ women in power who are divas - most of the DOJ female attorneys are divas. At least Susana is good looking.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 25, 2007 5:04 PM

Why does everyone on this blog have such low standards in Women?
Lat's standards especially.

avatar
3 Posted by Random number generator | Permalink Thursday, October 25, 2007 5:04 PM

Some number.

What? Nothing on this:
http://volokh.com/posts/1193336634.shtml ? Shame!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 25, 2007 5:08 PM

very different pics, but I'd give her a flu shot on the beach for $64, if you know what I mean.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 25, 2007 5:15 PM

---What? Nothing on this:
http://volokh.com/posts/1193336634.shtml ? Shame!---

Seriously. I emailed the tips line and everything. You'd think Lat would be all over the attorney Wobbly-H action.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 25, 2007 5:27 PM

It's at the top of Non-Sequiturs today.

avatar
7 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, October 25, 2007 5:57 PM

5:05 - Lats standards are low for women because he likes "handsome" men

avatar
8 Posted by Al Groper | Permalink Thursday, October 25, 2007 6:06 PM

Damn, I am sure she looks HOT in a swimsuite.

You guessed it -- I'd grope her.

avatar
9 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, October 25, 2007 6:22 PM

On the beach is exactly where the Bush White House wants its voting rights attorneys. She should be collecting overtime while she's at it.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 25, 2007 6:25 PM

did the white house pay to have the top pic photoshopped so she looks more "ethnic" or are the bottom and top pics just before and after the beach?

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 25, 2007 7:06 PM

6:25 - one's in color and the other is in black-and-white, bobo.

avatar
12 Posted by Shanetta | Permalink Thursday, October 25, 2007 8:52 PM

I want to know Susana's thoughts on breast feeding.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 26, 2007 7:53 AM

Even just looking at the top pic, this one is NOT HOT. She's ok, no more than that.

avatar
14 Posted by keeping tabs | Permalink Friday, October 26, 2007 8:20 AM

Is DOJ hot better or worse than BigLaw hot?

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 26, 2007 8:29 AM

I submit that DOJ hot is worse than BigLaw hot (i.e., if she's a DOJ 8, maybe she's a BigLaw 7).

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 26, 2007 9:43 AM

I'll repeat what I've said in the past on this very blog: more gorgeous male lawyers criticizing female lawyers' appearance. Nice.

avatar
17 Posted by Anon | Permalink Friday, October 26, 2007 9:49 AM

Or maybe after years of training in a sexist and paternalistic society, all women in power are perceived "divas" even by women. I'm sure that the DOJ has plenty of asshole men, but they are considered "stern," not divas.

avatar
18 Posted by Anon | Permalink Friday, October 26, 2007 9:50 AM

Or maybe after years of training in a sexist and paternalistic society, all women in power are perceived "divas" even by women. I'm sure that the DOJ has plenty of asshole men, but they are considered "stern," not divas.

avatar
19 Posted by bobo | Permalink Friday, October 26, 2007 9:53 AM

I'm not that pale in b&w nor that colorful in color. BTW, I like the "bobo" thing and will be signing all posts as such going forward. Thanks

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 26, 2007 12:30 PM

9:49: They're not divas, they're "pricks" or "c**ksuckers."

Post Your Comment