Add RSS RSS

Lawsuit of the Day: ICR v. Fish & Richardson

troll treasure troll doll patent troll Above the Law blog.jpgWe're rather late on this, but better late than never. Some time ago, one of you sent us this tip:

Fish & Richardson has asserted ownership over patents secured by a former principal who, in addition to being an attorney, also is a prolific inventor (and alleged "patent troll").

Interestingly enough, Fish appears to have made its claims only after Google, one of its clients, was sued under a patent claiming a technology that Harris invented while at Fish. See Patently O, which has a copy of the Complaint.

What a mess. Anyway, we were reminded of the case yesterday, when it was picked up by Overlawyered:

Annals of creative patent lawyering: Highly placed attorney with intellectual-property specialists Fish & Richardson accumulates his own portfolio of patents, quits the firm, begins suing Fish & Richardson clients, things get messy fast (Patent Troll Tracker, Oct. 21).

We expect to be following this case for a while. If you have some inside info to share, please email us. Thanks.

Annals of creative patent lawyering [Overlawyered]
A Tangled Web of Patent Rights [Patently O: Patent Law Blog]
Fish & Richardson Strikes Back at Scott Harris [Patent Troll Tracker]
Patent Troll Sues Fish & Richardson [Patent Troll Tracker]

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by Oh yeah. | Permalink Wednesday, October 24, 2007 12:26 PM


That's nuts.
It's also nuts to be First.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 24, 2007 12:29 PM

Speaking of trolls . . .

That's really interesting. You'd think that if you handled patent prosecution for client that you'd be conflicted from competing with their patents/inventions.

avatar
3 Posted by Triple Tres | Permalink Wednesday, October 24, 2007 12:32 PM

Once, twice, three times a third poster.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 24, 2007 12:43 PM

Patent attorneys are HOT!

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 24, 2007 2:34 PM

no love here

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 24, 2007 3:15 PM

I find it rather reassuring that the ATL comment crowd has little interest in the patent world.

avatar
7 Posted by Techie | Permalink Wednesday, October 24, 2007 3:38 PM

Yeah, patent law is much too difficult for most ATL readers. If you can't hack it, ignore it.

avatar
8 Posted by No crowd | Permalink Wednesday, October 24, 2007 4:00 PM

I find it rather reassuring that the ATL comment crowd has little interest in the patent world.

I don't think any crowd except for the crowd consisting of patent dorks that drool on themselves at firm functions have an interest in patent law.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 24, 2007 4:42 PM

from my personal experience, chicks dig patent lawyers

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 24, 2007 6:33 PM

Patent litigation attorneys are too freaking busy to pay attention to this board.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, October 24, 2007 8:38 PM

tranny girlfriends of investment bankers to 190!

Post Your Comment