Add RSS RSS

Lawyers of the Day: The Qualcomm Gang of 19

Tomorrow is a very big day for almost 20 California lawyers. From Blogonaut:

Qualcomm Qualcom Above the Law blog.jpgA federal district court has ordered 14 California lawyers to explain why they should not be sanctioned for their "exceptional misconduct" on behalf of Qualcomm in a lawsuit that the San Diego wireless company lost. All of the lawyers subject to the order were from the Cupertino law firm of Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder or the Heller Ehrman law firm's offices in Menlo Park and San Diego, the San Diego Tribune is reporting.

Five additional lawyers have been drawn into the proceedings since the order was issued, so the fate of 19 attorneys rests on the outcome of an October 12, 2007, 9:30 a.m. hearing before U.S. Magistrate Barbara Major, the newspaper reports.

We previously wrote about the underlying discovery snafu over here.

Both Heller Ehrman and Day Casebeer have been the subject of gossip recently. Last month, Heller Ehrman was rumored to be carrying out staff layoffs in California (believed to affect up to 90 people). If you know anything about this, please email us.

Update: Oops, sorry, don't know how we missed this article from The Recorder, reporting on Heller axing 65 administrative staff positions nationwide. No attorneys were laid off.

As for Day Casebeer, rumor had it that they were rescinding offers to incoming associates. But it appears that this was inaccurate, as rumors sometimes are. When we contacted the firm, they had this comment:

We are delighted that eight new associates will join us this Fall and that two have already started work. It's a record class for us. Far from rescinding any offers, we remain very interested in resumes from others interested in joining our practice.

Especially if you're experienced in electronic data discovery.

Federal Court Brings Written Charges of "Exceptional Misconduct" Against 14 Lawyers [Blogonaut]
19 lawyers face sanction hearing [San Diego Union-Tribune]
Recovered Emails Bedevil Qualcomm in Court [Wall Street Journal]
Heller Says Slowdown Not Behind Layoffs [The Recorder via Law.com]

Earlier: Benchslap of the Day: The Qualcomm Debacle

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 11, 2007 4:13 PM

Poor associates having to explain themselves to the court for strategy they had nothing to do with.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 11, 2007 4:14 PM

Heh. "Casebeer".

avatar
3 Posted by L2L | Permalink Thursday, October 11, 2007 4:15 PM

I object!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 11, 2007 4:49 PM

I am glad to hear Day Casebeer is still getting new people on board. It's a very well-respected SV firm with a lot of talented attorneys, and it would be a shame to see the firm go kaput because of this mess.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 11, 2007 4:54 PM

Mess indeed. From the findings the DC made in the underlying matter, it would appear that some Qualcomm testifying excutives may face perjury charges.

And you know who they will trade for a deal if that happens--trial counsel.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 11, 2007 5:39 PM

Casebeer? That can't be real.

avatar
7 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, October 11, 2007 6:48 PM

What do you mean, 4:54?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 11, 2007 7:27 PM

I mean that the trial judge expressly found that "the Qualcomm engineers had “blatantly” lied while under oath", presumably in view of the mountain of (supressed) documentary evidence contradicting Qualcomm's case.

It would be logical to assume that perjury indictments may occur.

avatar
9 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Thursday, October 11, 2007 7:40 PM

What a mess.....I know some of the attorneys at DCMB and it seems like a great place to work, I think they will pull through this.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 11, 2007 10:11 PM

But they're going to have to let Lee Patch go.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 12, 2007 12:09 PM

Does anyone know the names of the 19?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, October 12, 2007 1:22 PM

12:09, the briefs are all publicly filed -- just check the docket (Case No. 3-05-cv-01958-B-BLM (S.D. Cal.)).

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, October 14, 2007 2:57 AM

"great place to work. . ." hahahahahahahaha

Post Your Comment