Add RSS RSS

An Eleventh Hour Request

The 2007 Weblog AwardsWe aren’t the only people with server problems. Earlier today, when we posted our last-minute plea for votes, the Weblogs Award site was also having difficulties.

As a result, we didn’t get the boost that we were hoping for. Eugene Volokh’s plug — which was better timed, coming after resolution of the server problems — was far more effective.

So let’s try this once more, with feeling. Please click here, and vote for your favorite law blog (hopefully ATL).

The contest is entering its home stretch, with the polls closing tomorrow at 5 PM, so we won’t bother you about this much more. Thanks!

Best Law Blog [2007 Weblog Awards]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 9:56 PM

Phirst

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 10:15 PM

Didn't get the boost you were hoping for? You picked up like 400 votes and sprang into the front-runner position as a result of that plug, Lat. You're getting desperate here-- Volokh is hardly campaigning (his "better timed" reminder came late because he was busy writing a bunch of substantive posts on the Phelps verdict and the First Amendment implications thereof, while you were doing... what, exactly?) and is still running almost even with you. He's also showing a good deal more class about it.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 10:17 PM

Hi volokh!

avatar
4 Posted by waiting for someone to call me volokh | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 10:29 PM

i don't really read volokh, and i voted for lat, but i'm impressed with volokh for doing this well despite lat's continual appeals. Does winning this really matter that much?

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 10:31 PM

1. Hi Volokh!

2. I think Lat did three appeals and Volokh did two. Not much of a difference there.

avatar
6 Posted by 10:15 (Not Volokh) | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 10:34 PM

Yeah, but none of Volokh's appeals say, "Hey, vote for me!" His latest one says: "Please vote for your favorite law blog -- whatever that might happen to be -- at this page; the rules allow you to vote once every 24 hours." Again, showing more class and less interest in this ultimately trivial contest, and still running almost even (though Lat's latest appeal seems to have resulted in a small ATL surge).

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 10:41 PM

Of course Volokh shows more class - he is a LAW PROFESSOR. Being dignified is his job.

In contrast, Lat is a gossip-monger and a tabloid journalist. Being shameless and self-promoting is HIS job.

Don't fault the leopard for having spots.

Also, if you don't like Lat, you don't have to visit his blog (and probably shouldn't, since you are just putting money in his pocket).

avatar
8 Posted by get over yourself | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 10:44 PM

Wow, good to see Volokh actually writing comments on ATL...Jesus guys, its a contest for Best Law Blog and Lat wants to win - what's wrong with that...I personally have voted a bunch of times for him b/c of all the infotainment he has provided me...GO LATTY BOY!

avatar
9 Posted by Serious Poster | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 10:50 PM

I have a serious question. Can a male be a catty, anal-retentive, snarky gossip-monger and not be a homosexual?

avatar
10 Posted by BWS | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 10:55 PM

Who the F cares whether Lat asked for votes or not. He's done more for the cogs than Volokh or anyone else for that matter.

Go Lat, go! I'd vote once an hour if I could.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 11:08 PM

lol@a discussion of "classiness" in the context of an online poll for best legal blog. how nerdy can you get?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 11:52 PM

You know, it would be possible to embed the poll on the front page.

Just sayin'.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 11:53 PM

Its classier than 10:50 p.m.

Buy the way, who gives a rat's ass about the theoretical interplay between the tort of emotional distress (guy seems at another in supermarket, holds up fetus pics or whatever) and free speech?

1. Its a bogus tort to begin with (booohooo) and

2. The abortion clinic people should be lined up and, if not shot, sent to bed without dinner.

Volokh is dry and boring. David Lat has a flair for writing that he does not often get to exercise here, because the ALT attention span is about 15 seconds or 50 words, whichever comes first.

By the way, the woman who was the founding owner of ATL and DealBreaker (through Dead Horse Media) also used to own Gawker media that has 3 blogs (Wonkette, Gawker, Jezebel), and industry experts estimated that she grossed $2 Million a year from Gawker Media alone. (Deadhorse is even more lucrative.)

If it was so easy to pick up $2 Million+ from the ground annually on expenses of almost nothing by successfully editing ALT (and DealBreaker) everyone would be doing it but they are not.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 11:57 PM

Does anyone know where I can find information about associate bonuses?

avatar
15 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 12:03 AM

11:57, if you work at Cadwalader, then no.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 12:21 AM

12:15 AM:

Maury, how are things at Strook + Strook?

avatar
17 Posted by Maury | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 12:22 AM

PS: Don't ask me for more information, you already have enough MOTHERFUCKING information.

avatar
18 Posted by i've been hauling ass along | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 2:41 AM

i've been sleeping all alone

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 7:06 AM

this blog is far better than the voltard site

that said:

best legal blog = special olympics gold

nowhitenoise

avatar
20 Posted by Disappointed in myself | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 7:53 AM

Why do I laugh everytime I see an SLJ "Snakes" post?

avatar
21 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 8:23 AM

Lat - Couple of thread ideas for today if news is slow, both suggested yesterday by other commenters:

(1) a series of bonus specific discussions for other markets. Just bonuses this time. Outside of the big NY firms, bonus structure tends to be more guarded in other markets.

(2) counsel salaries. In the CWT thread at least one counsel came forward. Counsel is becoming the Income Partnership for te big NY firms that haven't gone to the two-tier system.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 9:07 AM

Lat, I enjoy the formula of this blog:

1. Lat writes an article that is interesting to a certain degree to prurient junior associates and law students
2. six people comment to say they are first.
3. someone asks lat to stop the "firsters"
4. someone writes something faux paleo-conservative about women, minoriities, gays, etc.
5. WGWAG/Snakes on Plane says hi
6. someone retorts from a racous liberal perspective
7. someone chides lat for his choice of profession and/or denigrates the "level" of discourse on this board.

this blog deserves the award for entertainment value alone.

PS: Lat does have a lot of influence with firms as partners read this blog too

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 9:59 AM

server down again??

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 10:01 AM

Since when does a post 19 hours before the polls close count as an '11th hour request'?

avatar
25 Posted by Kent Brockman | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 10:08 AM

It's literally the 11th hour, 10 PM.

avatar
26 Posted by Volokh Spotter | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 10:11 AM

!0:01 a.m., Hi Volokh.

avatar
27 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 10:19 AM

Lat,

Award or not, you and ATL's fans have won! Evidence: the traffic from your readers shuts down the "weblog" site each time you ask for votes.

Thanks for all you have done to make compension more transparent!

avatar
28 Posted by 10:19 | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 10:20 AM

compensation!

avatar
29 Posted by LAT FAN | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 10:51 AM

Thanks for everything, LAT! I just voted for you again.

Lat up by 400 votes...hopefully the boring professor who does nothing for associates will not win. ATL above all others!

avatar
30 Posted by Lat for President | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 11:04 AM

ATL is up by 500-600 votes now.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 11:37 AM

Here is my question:

If people can vote once every day, and you know there are plenty of people here who have voted 4-6 times, are there really that few people on this blog? I mean there are probably only about 1,000 people who voted for ATL. How many people read this blog? Seems lower than I would have thought. I guess that is why the anonymous posting work so well. If you had to use a name, we would find out there are really only about 30 people posting at any one time.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 12:37 PM

ATL up by 400 now.

avatar
33 Posted by fred | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 1:51 PM

Seems like the lead may be slowly dwindling. Everyone, go vote again!!!

avatar
34 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 2:26 PM

who gives a fuck?

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 11:19 PM

me mommy

Post Your Comment