Add RSS RSS

Everyone Is Greener at Nixon Peabody

recycling environmental eco friendly law firms Above the Law blog.jpgAt least it's a better way to spend the firm's money than a theme song (mp3). From The Recorder:

Nixon Peabody has appointed a chief sustainability officer, hoping not only to reduce the firm's environmental impact, but to increase its impact on clients. Carolyn Kaplan, a counsel in the firm's energy and environmental practice, will spend at least a quarter of her time in the new position.

So what exactly will Ms. Kaplan do in this new gig? Send around annoying firm-wide emails telling people to recycle those reams of useless Westlaw print-outs? Tell associates to turn off the lights when they leave their offices (even if it will tip off the partners to their departures)?

Kaplan said the position has two aspects: looking internally at ways to reduce the firm's production of CO2, or its carbon footprint, and determining how attorneys can use the firm's experience to better understand clients dealing with environmental regulation and related issues. Both of those could make the firm greener in the financial sense, too, she said.

More after the jump.

Some rivals reacted skeptically when contacted by The Recorder:

"I don't think it hurts, but no client is going to go to a firm because they have a chief sustainability officer," said Randolph Visser, an environmental law partner at Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton.

But an environmentally-minded associate at another firm, who brought this item to our attention, supports NP's move:

Judging from the comments to your recent post on law office green policies, and of course your coverage of ThemeSongGate, this will open up Nixon Peabody to yet more snarking and criticism -- both from the plain old haters, and from the weird "screw the environment" crowd that seems to populate your readership.

Nonetheless, I applaud this move, and expect other firms will follow suit in the coming year or two.

Is having a "CSO" the wave of the future? Or is it just silly? Take our reader poll.

Update: We are firm believers in recycling here at ATL. The WSJ Law Blog previously posted on this news here.

Nixon Peabody Appoints Chief Sustainability Officer [The Recorder via Law.com]
Everyone’s an Eco-Warrior At Nixon Peabody! [WSJ Law Blog]

Earlier: Biglaw Perk Watch: How Green Was My Valley Law Firm

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:02 PM

Firstity first

avatar
2 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:03 PM

how much weirder will this firm get???

avatar
3 Posted by Damn | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:03 PM

I thought I'd get first for the first time. Never really got it until now.

avatar
4 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:05 PM

So, what, they pay someone $100K a year in order to reduce their energy bill by $25K a year? Effective!

avatar
5 Posted by alex! | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:06 PM

"Greenzo, the first nonjudgmental business-friendly environmental advocate!"

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:09 PM

install energy efficent bulbs. recycle. turn out the lights when you leave a room. save cases to disk instead of printing them out.

can i get paid now?

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:10 PM

I hate my co-workers, most of whom consider themselves liberal, progressive, democrat, environmentalist, etc. yet leave their office lights on when the leave. We are a "no face time requirement" firm and most partners will tell you to go home early and enjoy it while you can if you don't have any work to do.

Why the charade? Why the dishonesty? Why the hypocrisy? Turn your light off and go home.

avatar
8 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:11 PM

SteveHowe!

avatar
9 Posted by Liberal in 1977 | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:14 PM

I applaud Nixon Peabody for taking steps to help avoid the coming global cooling that will destroy civilization.

avatar
10 Posted by Change is Coming | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:19 PM

It's rather too late to worry about environmental offsets and carbon emissions. Global warming is a reality. Just look at the Antarctica -- it's melting faster than your mind can grasp. Why else do you think Nixon Peabody partners are going on Antarctic cruises now? They know that their children won't ever see penguins and the ice.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:23 PM

And how much will they reduce associate bonuses to waste money on yet another useless position?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:24 PM

David - can you do a post on the outlook for corporate associates (not in Structured finance). what will 2008 bring - more slowdown in corp work? another repeat of 2000? i know that m&a is hurting - but what about other aspects of corporate law?

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:25 PM

Waste of money.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:25 PM

I'm eco-friendly; when I print 200+ pages of case annotations, I print on both sides of the paper. The partners think it is annoying though. Maybe I should stop.

Seriously though, if you simply saved all those cases electronically instead of printing them and sticking them in the file (as required by your partner), you would save a lot of paper (and toner).

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:29 PM

That seals the deal; I'm looking to lateral to Nixon Peabody. This firm is going places.

avatar
16 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:36 PM

Average Surface Temperatures to 190!

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:42 PM

Jeezus people. What a crappy bunch of comments. Not a single person has yet pointed out that everybody, including Carolyn Kaplan, is a winner at Nixon Peabody.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:44 PM

They are also an awesome family!

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:48 PM

Lame...

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:51 PM

this firm is bizzare

avatar
21 Posted by I am an a$$ | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:54 PM

WHY O WHY AM I SO FIRSTY???

avatar
22 Posted by anon man | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:54 PM

In unrelated news, associates bonuses will be donated to the enviornmental defense fund. Its the least you can do...

avatar
23 Posted by Firstity First | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:59 PM

I am often first (no pun intended) in line to criticize dumbass "first" people. But I got it today and I have to say, there is something strangely compelling about it. Discuss amongst yourselves.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:00 PM

When I lived in the Virgin Islands we would only flush the toilet after #2 (water came from sistern) to conserve water. I am going to send Mrs. Kaplan a message about this practice.

avatar
25 Posted by FLAVIA | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:02 PM

I help ALL who drink me recycle... immediately! ;)

avatar
26 Posted by Gallion | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:02 PM

what a bunch of fools posting on here today - lame, lat, lame.

many fortune 500 companies are doing the same thing, and, indeed, some of them are demanding that their service firms follow suit. This is obviously good business sense and if it has the benefit of getting a few less self-entitled associate a-holes from printing thousands of wasted pages or needlessly burning power with absolutely no regard for anyone other than their prick selves, all the better. In 20 years, every company and firm will have a position like this. Kudos to Nixon Peabody for joining the growing number of companies that are ahead of the game.

Gallion OUT!

avatar
27 Posted by Sneaky McSneakerson | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:02 PM

My firm installed motion detectors on all the lights so they turn themselves off!

avatar
28 Posted by Boko | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:03 PM

This is such a sweet gig. Zero work (3:09 nails it) for BigLaw bucks. One could probably also arrange for lots of travel to conferences in exotic locales on the company dime. Too bad I have a conscience.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:06 PM

Sneaky: My firm has the same system. I simply release a pet mouse after I leave and close the door to keep the lights on.

avatar
30 Posted by FB | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:12 PM

Remember a couple months ago when the Gallion posts were funny in a total prick sort of way? Now the Gallion comments are all schoolmarmish douchebaggery. Is it the same guy(s)?

avatar
31 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:23 PM

To: Associates
From: Partners
Re: Reducing CO2

Message:

Dear Priceless Associates,

Per our new policy of reducing CO2 emissions, Nixon Peabody respectfully requests that you stop breathing. This should be very easy, considering you've been dead to your loved ones since you accepted a position here.

avatar
32 Posted by Gallion | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:28 PM

Hey idiot 4:03 - how does "up to a quarter" of her time amount to "zero work"? The other 75% of the time, she'll person will be doing the same mind-numbing Biglaw drivel as everyone else.

WOW one employee is going to dedicate a whole 1/4 of her time to making the firm more efficient and environmentally friendly. what a TERRIBLE THING!!!!

stupid, stupid posters. my god. this site used to be good. now it is just a haven for law student pricks, lat's fed soc kissassing, and other stupid sh!t no one cares about. too bad.

Gallion OUT!

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:31 PM

Gallion -- nobody is slamming the firm for being environmentally friendly. Yea the World!

The stupidity is having someone at a law firm in a position called "Chief Sustainability Officer" -- and then telling people about it in a press release. That is just plain strange. Of course, all those other firms without such a position will cease to exist soon (i.e., not be sustained).

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:40 PM

I wonder if the frequent derision aimed at NP on this website will eventually effect recruiting or business. I imagine there's a tipping point. I'm guessing one more silly move and the firm begins to feel it.

avatar
35 Posted by 2 pump chump | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:41 PM

my gf wishes i had a sustainability officer.

wait. what?

avatar
36 Posted by Gallion | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 5:24 PM

4:31 -- do some google searches and you will find plenty of coverage of many prominent companies naming people to similar positions, including, notably, law firms' big clients on wall street. It isn't stupid, it is increasingly common, and indeed some clients are demanding that firms clean up their act as part of those companies' overall environmental initiatives.

Sad to see people fight so hard against the inevitable and positive wave of the future. but i guess these trolls need something new to hate or derise every day to keep building themselves up in denial of their incredibly sh!tty Biglaw existence.

Gallion OUT!

avatar
37 Posted by 4 pump chump | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 5:28 PM

Dear 2 pump chump,

What a loser.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 5:31 PM

Gallion -- It is STUPID. Really really STUPID. STUPID, STUPID, STUPID. Yes, it is STUPID.

Tool.

avatar
39 Posted by Gallion Is Right | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 5:53 PM

5:31 is a troll. Of course Gallion is right. Have fun doing document review, BigLaw troll. Haha

avatar
40 Posted by good-looking girl | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 6:00 PM

Do you creeps have any idea how profoundly unattractive you sound? Life isn't about tearing down every single thing every person or firm does. I can only imagine how horrible most of you are in 'real life'. Go away.

avatar
41 Posted by www.internalinvestigationlaw.com | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 6:27 PM

None of you little 1L trolls even know who Gallion is (or should I say was pretending to be?)

Sad that that was by far the funniest set of threads in abovethelaw's history... all downhill from there.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 6:51 PM

peanut girl summered here

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 7:19 PM

Firstity First - First of all, your use of "first" is not a pun. Second, posting the memoirs of your first FIRST experience is pathetic and boring.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 8:48 PM

STUPID, STUPID, STUPID

Anon OUT!

avatar
45 Posted by Al Gore | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 8:54 PM

What am I missing here: Law firms don't produce any products, so how does the concept of a sustainability officer apply to a law firm? In most companies that have adopted this position, the person is charged with figuring out ways to produce or distribute products in a more environmentally sensitive way. How does this apply to a law firm -- I guess that's why it only takes up to 25% of one person's time. Really seems like a desperate attempt by a TT3 firm to suck up to GE and other companies leading the climate change charge. I'm sure this will make the rain flow.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 9:30 PM

"so how does the concept of a sustainability officer apply to a law firm"

Probably part of her job is (or should be) to answer that question.

Everybody already knows about double-sided printing, energy-efficiency strategies like lighting timers, and recycling. So maybe her job there is just working on enforcement and effectiveness, not really a big deal.

Later on, though, other opportunities might arise that will benefit from having somebody whose job it is to think about sustainability. If the offices are getting re-carpeted (a not entirely unusual occurrence in big buildings), she might look into what happens to that old carpet, and work with the building manager to get new carpet of a variety that doesn't need to be landfilled. If they're in the market bathroom renovations (of the non-third-tier variety), she gets to step in and suggest the ultra-low-water use toilets. When they buy computers, she asks whether they are RoHS compliant.

There's plenty of room for improvement at law firms.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 9:40 PM

Thanks, 9:30. Wow, it seems that Nixon really is a pioneer -- "ultra-low-water use toilets" and new carpet supervision by a law firm employee. And all this time I thought that is what the building owners take care of. I now want to work at Nixon and/or send that firm all my company's legal business. What a great place; everyone must be a winner there.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:04 PM

Yes, ultra-low-water-use toilets and all sorts of other non-sexy, expensive, and new things, which when they are adopted on a large scale, which they eventually will be, will contribute to great stuff like, you know, reduced aquifer depletion, less costly sewage treatment and (in New York at least) fewer combined sewer overflows, which is raw sewage in the rivers. Only an example, naturally, but one of many. Carpets are important too, and I notice you didn't say anything about RoHS compliance because I doubt you have any idea what it is.

If you think building managers would spend an extra dollar on things like that without pressure from the tenants, well... yeah ok.

Anyway good luck trying to get business from any company that has recently added anything green to their advertisements with an attitude like that.

avatar
49 Posted by anonymouse | Permalink Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:29 PM

I have friends that work at GreenOrder, the environmental consulting firm. In fact, one of the three partners is an HLS alum...and not the least arrogant guy I've ever met.

Anyway, they do a long of environmental consulting for law firms. No doubt they had a hand in this or similar initiatives.

Still doesn't change the thousands of pages I have printed in my years in law, but...now that stuff is more electronic, I do save a lot of paper.

Post Your Comment