Add RSS RSS

Pakistan's Supreme Court, Disrespected and Dissolved
(Despite Having a Theme Song)

Pakistan Flag.jpgSeveral of you have requested a post about recent events in Pakistan. So here you go.

Truth be told, what's going on over there -- namely, a wholesale assault on civil society and the rule of law -- isn't typical ATL fodder. It's deadly serious stuff, so it doesn't fall under the entertainment prong of ATL's mission. And it has nothing to do with "NY to 190," so it doesn't qualify under this site's greed promotion function.

But the Pakistani protests are not completely devoid of more lighthearted aspects. Jezebel offers this take:

Is it too obvious that our initial reaction to all those shots of lawyers in protest of military rule in Pakistan was, "Umm that's sort of hot!" a thought that led immediately to the query, "But are they as hot as those monks protesting military rule in Burma a month back?" Of course it is! And would it be kind of TMZ of us to run a thoroughly meaningless poll wondering what you think about this pressing issue? Very much so!

You can vote in the poll over here.

And there's more. From a reader:

The Pakistan Supreme Court has an official "50th Anniversary Theme Song" from last year, entitled "And Justice For All." It even has a bonus video! It's dreadfully earnest, and is rather ironic given the circumstances.

The new version will be called "And Justice For All -- Unless the President Says Otherwise."

You can check out the video here (wmv file). Even though the Pakistani Supreme Court's website has already been updated -- to show Abdul Hameed Dogar as the "new" chief justice, and to scrub all references to Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry and the other ousted jurists -- the video is still available. So enjoy it now, before it gets taken down.

Finally, in a gesture towards real journalism, we present the house arrest order against prominent Pakistani lawyer Asma Jahangir, as well as an email from her.

Check out these items, after the jump.

First, here's some context, from our tipster:

Asma Jehangir is well-known internationally, was written about at length in a recent New Yorker piece authored by William Dalrymple... So you can find plenty online regarding her....

Oh another detail: civil society people who were meeting at the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan in Lahore were arrested two days ago... The police were originally after the lawyers at the meeting, but ended up arresting school principals, NGO-workers, and even some politically keen housewives. While the lawyers are still in prison, the other activists were released, but not before being required to sign affidavits stating that they will refrain from further activism against Musharraf, the imposition of martial law and the government in general.

Here's the house arrest order (annotations ours). We like how the government says it's "pleased to direct" Jahangir's house arrest. Congratulations, Ms. Jahangir: you're the lucky winner of liberty deprivation!

Asma Jahangir house arrest.jpg

And here is Jahangir's email:

Subject: FROM ASMA JAHANGIR
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 10:56:39 +0500

Dear Friends,

The situation in the country is uncertain. There is a strong crackdown on the press and lawyers. Majority of the judges of the Supreme Court and four High Courts have not taken oath. The Chief Justice is under house arrest (unofficially). The President of the Supreme Court Bar (Aitzaz Ahsan) and 2 former presidents, Mr. Muneer Malik and Tariq Mahmood have been imprisoned for one month under the Preventive Detention laws. The President of the Lahore High Court Mr. Ahsan Bhoon and former bar leader Mr. Ali Ahmed Kurd have also been arrested. The police is looking or 6 other lawyers, including President of Peshawar and Karachi bar. The President of Lahore bar is also in hiding.

There are other scores political leaders who have also been arrested. Yesterday I was house arrested for 90 days. I am sending my detention order.

Ironically the President (who has lost his marbles) said that he had to clamp down on the press and the judiciary to curb terrorism. Those he has arrested are progressive, secular minded people while the terrorists are offered negotiations and ceasefires.

Lawyers and civil society will challenge the government and the scene is likely to get uglier. We want friends of Pakistan to urge the US administration to stop all support of the instable dictator, as his lust for power is bringing the country close to a worse form of civil strife.

It is not time for the international community to insist on preventive measures, otherwise cleaning up the mess may take decades. There are already several hundred IDPs and the space for civil society has hopelessly shrunk.

We believe that Musharaf has to be taken out of the equation and a government of national reconciliation put in place. It must be backed by the military. Short of this there are no realistic solutions, although there are no guarantees that this may work.

Asma Jahangir

Are Pakistan's Lawyers As Hot As Burma's Monks? [Jezebel]
"And Justice for All": 50th Anniversary Theme Song [Pakistan Supreme Court]

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 1:09 PM

Does anyone have any idea how close we came here, in the U.S. to having this happen after Gore lost his 2000 bid to have the Supreme Court elect him President?

I imagine most Democrats (at least the Nutroot Democrats) were thinking exactly as Musharraf clearly was/is. The only thing that kept the Dems from doing a Musharraf was lack of organization.

avatar
2 Posted by Anonymous is wrong | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 1:21 PM

-- 1:09 -- ppl were certainly pissed, but we respect the rule of law in this country (...or, at least Democrats generally do -- as opposed to the current crop of Republicans, with their treatment of the Constitution as toilet paper)

-- great Pakistan these song, btw -- very Nixon-Peabody-ish ;-)

avatar
3 Posted by Please Vote Now! | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 1:26 PM

***VOTE FOR LAT***

http://2007.weblogawards.org/polls/best-law-blog-1.php

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 1:37 PM

The difference between countries where people are truely free and countries where they are oppressed is having a free and independent judiciary including the lawyers. China and Cuba both have constitutions which grant human rights comparable to the U.S., but they do not have free and independent lawyers.

This fact was apparently lost on our former A.G.. Hopefully the Judge gets it.

However, what do I give a flying F*** what is going on over there as long as they are keeping the terrorists in check.

avatar
5 Posted by EVERYONES A WINNER | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 1:40 PM

EVERYONES A WINNER IN PAKISTAN!!

avatar
6 Posted by B-Law NY | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 1:41 PM

NY to 190
NY to 190

avatar
7 Posted by Anon. | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 1:43 PM

Wasn't "And Justice for All" a Metallica album? The Pakistani Supreme Court must be cooler than we thought. I wonder if they play "Enter Sandman" instead of saying "all rise."

avatar
8 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 1:46 PM

Islamabad to 190!!!

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 1:50 PM

Yawn! More bonus and/or salary raise talk!

avatar
10 Posted by LatFan | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 1:57 PM

LAT needs 300 votes. Let's give them to him! LAT to 300 more votes!!!

http://2007.weblogawards.org/polls/best-law-blog-1.php

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 1:59 PM

"I imagine most Democrats (at least the Nutroot Democrats) were thinking exactly as Musharraf clearly was/is. The only thing that kept the Dems from doing a Musharraf was lack of organization."

Um, you mean as Bush has done, suspending the US constitution by sanctioning sham military tribunals, torture, and attorney general firings.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 2:04 PM

1:43, you beat me to it. i heard that the national police are developing a theme song named after another Metallica album, "Ride the Lightning."

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 2:05 PM

And this country possesses nuclear weapons. Awesome.

I think I'm more scared by Pakistan than N. Korea.

avatar
14 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 2:09 PM

yeah Musharaff has to stay in power....he at least tries to fight al-qaeda since they are trying to kill him. otherwise pakistan becomes a giant terrorist/nuclear problem for us.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 2:09 PM

1:09 = FedSoc.

despite being unhappy about the outcome, i believe the 2000 situation was one of our country's finest moments...we were able to deal with a hotly disputed, highly divisive election outcome in a (relatively) civilized way, snarky bumper stickers and email jokes notwithstanding. the fact that violence wasn't involved (or even considered) puts us in stark contrast to a lot of nations, past or present.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 2:09 PM

this blog is really going down hill. used to be i could come here to read about associate compensation at a small group of big law firms in new york. now it's just full of meaningless crap.

avatar
17 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 2:12 PM

Somehow I think that if Bush did the same thing, all the Republican lawyers would cheer him on.

I mean, seriously--Mukasey: "Well, if congress passes yet another law expressly saying waterboarding is torture, then it would be illegal." So I guess thumbscrews are okay until they are expressly defined as torture.

avatar
18 Posted by Karachi to 190 Rupees! | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 2:19 PM

Can we get an open post on who was/is clerking for the Pakistani SC and what their educational history is?

I bet they all have parents who clerked as well.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 2:24 PM

2:09: So true. Why should I, a lawyer, care about legitimate threats to the rule of law abroad?

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 2:41 PM

Does anybody know which U.S. based PR/lobbying firm produced that song and video?

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 2:43 PM

I think we're due for a LEWW of Islamabad's most prestigious newlyweds.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 3:11 PM

Do you think those are biglaw associates on the streets in Pakistan, or are the biglaw associates still billing away in their office towers?

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 4:15 PM

2:24, I'm pretty sure 2:09 was being sarcastic...

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 5:49 PM

Just heard that about half of White & Case's Lahore office was arrested.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 5:50 PM

Just heard that about half of White & Case's Lahore office was arrested.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 6:49 PM

Islamabad to 1!

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 7:44 PM

did she seriously say "lost his marbles"??

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 8:08 PM

Why are they singing "justice for Iraq" in the video?

Why are they singing in English?

avatar
29 Posted by Fed Soc | Permalink Wednesday, November 7, 2007 9:13 PM

2:09: Thanks for the shout out; I believe this is the first time someone refers to me on a thread in which I have not yet posted.

Given all the leftists like Martin Lewis in the Huffington Posts who have argued that General Pace should arrest President Bush, one would have thought that 1:09's argument would not be that farfetched. Fortunately for democracy, Democrats would not attempt to pull a Musharraf-like coup in America because they know that they lack the support of the military (not surprisingly, given their contempt for our men and women in uniform). If military personnel were primarily liberal Democrats, you can bet that leftists would talk about removing Republicans from office by force. Then again, Lewis shows that many leftists are talking about this already.

avatar
30 Posted by Iwantthesemuthaf**ckinnukesawayfromthismuthaf**kinkashmir | Permalink Thursday, November 8, 2007 12:53 AM

1:37: Except that they're NOT keeping the terrorists in check. They're taking all the money we've given them to do that and using it to lock up all the lawyers and shut down the press. Meanwhile the terrorists are pretty much doing whatever they want up in the northern mountains. Pretty sad state of affairs all around.

Post Your Comment