Add RSS RSS

Associate Bonus Watch: Chadbourne & Parke

associate bonus watch 2007 law firm Above the Law blog.jpgYesterday at around 5:30 p.m., just as the New York office was getting ready to head off to the firm holiday party, Chadbourne & Parke issued its bonus memorandum. The upshot is that Chadbourne is paying year-end and special bonuses to "eligible" associates in New York, Los Angeles, Washington, and Houston (yes, Houston -- wow).

The bonus table is your standard table, with the most senior associates getting $115,000 in bonuses ($65,000 year-end and $50,000 special). But it's not a lockstep match due to the "eligibility" requirement. It's not clear what the eligibility criteria are, but here's the relevant language from the memo:

As in the past, eligibility to receive a full or partial year-end bonus will be performance based, with the quality of performance as well as billable or quality non-billable hours expectations each taken into account. Eligibility for a partial or full special bonus will be based on meeting or exceeding all of the Firm's expectations.

It seems that Chadbourne is going with the Fried Frank model. Some people will get full special bonuses, some will get partial special bonuses, and some might get no special bonus at all. In addition, it appears that some CP associates might not even get a full year-end bonus, based on the memo raising the possibility of getting a "partial year-end bonus."

In sum, it pays to be an eligible young associate.

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by Justin Timberlake | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 11:33 AM

JT misses JT's days over at 30 Rock.

avatar
2 Posted by whaaaa? | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 11:39 AM

Special bonus in HOUSTON? Jimminy crickets. That makes me want to go jump in Lake Michigan.

avatar
3 Posted by Michigan | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 11:57 AM

GO BLUE!

avatar
4 Posted by Johnny Bon Jovi | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 12:00 PM

There is only one associate in Houston, and he is a second or third year. Not too much of a financial stretch for the firm to pay that one guy a few grand to keep him happy.

avatar
5 Posted by Babs | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 12:03 PM

Memories
Like the corners of my mind
Misty watercolor memories
Of the way we were
Scattered thread posts
Of the FIRSTS we left behind
FIRSTS we gave to one another
For the way we were

Can it be that it was all so simple then
Or has LAT rewritten every line
If we had the chance to do it all again
Tell me - would we? could we?

Memories
May be beautiful and yet
Whats too painful to remember
We simply choose to forget

So it is the FIRST posts
We will remember
Whenever we remember
The way we were

So it is the FIRST posts
We will remember
Whenever we remember
The way we were

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 12:21 PM

NY list of shame update?

avatar
7 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 12:23 PM

What's the point of having one assoicate in Houston?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 12:26 PM

to serve the 2 partners in Houston

avatar
9 Posted by Morning Sickness | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 12:29 PM

Ah, but note that they're paying the special bonus in L.A.!

A shot across the bow to the CA firms and other firms with offices in CA - be cheap with your associates at your peril.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 1:21 PM

Charlotte is notably not included

avatar
11 Posted by Confused | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 1:41 PM

1:21: What is Charlotte?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 1:46 PM

1:21: "Charlotte is notably not included"

As are Chicago, Dallas and Omaha. All for the good (and obvious) reason that CP doesn't have an office in any of those cities.

I want to know if the Polish associates are getting special bonuses. Krakow to 190k!

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 1:48 PM

If you choose to work in Charlotte, your bonus should be paid in pork barbeque.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 1:58 PM

hogan's ghetto holiday party is tonight. are we going to hear about bonuses? that is the only reason why i'm going...that and to drink up my bonus. damn are they cheap.

avatar
15 Posted by houston and LA | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 2:09 PM

According to NALP, Chadbourne has 4 lawyers (3 associates) in Houston. Doesn't really seem to warrant a "wow" to pay bonuses to 3 people in Houston. In fact, two other firms are paying bonsues in Houston and have much bigger offices: Skadden (23) and Weil (46).

Also, Chadbourne has 6 lawyers (2 associates) in LA. Not really a shot across any bow to pay 2 people a bonus. What probably affects the market more are firms with bigger offices in LA paying the bonuses: Quinn (199), Sidley (166), Skadden (134), Milbank (74), Proskauer (65) etc.

avatar
16 Posted by houston and LA | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 2:15 PM

According to NALP, Chadbourne has 4 lawyers (3 associates) in Houston. Doesn't really seem to warrant a "wow" to pay bonuses to 3 people in Houston. In fact, two other firms are paying bonsues in Houston and have much bigger offices: Skadden (23) and Weil (46).

Also, Chadbourne has 6 lawyers (2 associates) in LA. Not really a shot across any bow to pay 2 people a bonus. What probably affects the market more are firms with bigger offices in LA paying the bonuses: Quinn (199), Sidley (166), Skadden (134), Milbank (74), Proskauer (65) etc.

avatar
17 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 2:26 PM

2:09,

Your figures are dated. Chadbourne has about 10 associates in LA, 1 in Houston, and 20 in DC.

Not huge total numbers, but illustrative nevertheless of the odd phenomenon that is developing where NY based firms with D.C., LA etc. outposts are paying more to associates in those outposts than the big fish in those cities.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 4:33 PM

2:26: "the odd phenomenon that is developing where NY based firms with D.C., LA etc. outposts are paying more to associates in those outposts than the big fish in those cities"

Not "odd" if you have any knowledge of what biglaw paid circa 1998 (and earlier). That was the norm. Indeed, SF firms paid about 30% less than NYC firms and generally paid smaller bonuses, too. This oddity could be viewed as a return to mean.

avatar
19 Posted by ex C&P associate | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 5:17 PM

the more interesting thing to note is that unless things have really picked up (especially in litigation) since i left most '06 and '05 associates won't make their hours and will at most get a "token" bonus of $5,000-10,000 total. its the scam all the non-lock step firms play to say they still give "market" bonuses

avatar
20 Posted by hungryhungryhippo | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 5:29 PM

LAT- Heard through the grapevine that WLRK has paid bonuses. Use your sources so that we all can know how appropriately jealous we should be.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 13, 2007 9:47 PM

What about Schulte?

Post Your Comment