Add RSS RSS

The Big Get Bigger: Another Seat for the Ninth

The judicial fiefdom of Chief Judge Alex Kozinski is about to expand. From today’s Recorder (via How Appealing):

An extra seat for the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals cleared Congress on Tuesday and is headed to President Bush’s desk.

The U.S. Senate unanimously passed the Court Security Improvement Act on Monday night, and the House of Representatives approved it on a voice vote Tuesday. Buried in that bill is language that removes one seat from the D.C. Circuit and moves it to the 9th.

Makes sense to us. Any court that takes the summer off, as the D.C. Circuit essentially does, isn’t exactly overwhelmed. Meanwhile, the Ninth Circuit is by far the nation’s largest and busiest federal appeals court. It’s so huge that it has been the subject of repeated attempts at a split (so far unsuccessful, perhaps because of the Ninth Circuit Curse).

As Dan Levine’s article notes, “the seat won’t materialize until Jan. 21, 2009 — the day after President Bush leaves office.” We have no doubt that President Hillary Clinton will be able to fill it with a distinguished jurist.

Indeed, President Clinton may be able to reshape the Ninth Circuit, in the same that President Carter reshaped it — in a way that still endures today, as reflected in the court’s strong leftward tilt. Many of the liberal lions who are eligible for senior status but have declined to take it, such as Judges Harry Pregerson and Stephen Reinhardt, may finally be willing to do so, once they know that the court’s future is in President Clinton’s capable hands.

Congress OKs Extra Seat for 9th Circuit [The Recorder via How Appealing]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:38 PM

You mean, President Obama, right?

No one is voting for that bitter old lady.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:44 PM

How tough would it be to break up the 9th COA? I mean, it's a monster compared to the 7th Circuit, and MT and ID should have some independence from CA fed. courts. 9th should just be CA, OR, WA, HA, and AK. Though the 'law' in the other states might be tough to figure out...

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:44 PM

Too bad it's a seat moving from one court to the other and not an actual judge. Because that'd be neat, and it would get the lawprofs really excited.

I nominate Lat for the Ninth Circuit.

avatar
4 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:45 PM

dumb question...but does this mean someone is booted from the dc circ and if so, who?

avatar
5 Posted by John McClain | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:45 PM

Yipee Kaa Ye...

Guys in my high school used to get nominated to the 9th circuit all the time, 'twas no big deal...

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:48 PM

12:45, just speculating, but I would guess that there will be an extra seat for as long as the current DC Circuit judges serve. Once the next DC Cir. judge retires, that seat will not be filled.

Just a guess...

avatar
7 Posted by Liberal | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:51 PM

We're also going to keep blocking Dubya's nominees and claim all those unfilled seats on the Fourth Circuit for the Democrats. The days of Federalist Society dominance are numbered, Lat.

avatar
8 Posted by Ron Paul 2008 | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:56 PM

President Paul would select only the most originalist of originalists.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:57 PM

12:48 is right. Article 3 prevents Congress from removing or de-funding any sitting D.C. Circuit judges; it just means that the next one to take senior status won't be replaced.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:00 PM

12:45, the D.C. Circuit currently has at least one unfilled seat. Hasn't been filled for a long time.

avatar
11 Posted by Bad at Math | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:06 PM

The DC Circuit takes the summer off??? I have a solution to the judicial pay issues. Any Circuit that takes the summer off has to forfeit their pay during that period. We use that money to increase pay for the other Circuit judges. Damn I am brilliant.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:17 PM

President Hillary Clinton? You've sold out, Lat.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:24 PM

1:17 and others like him/her:

It's reverse psychology, people!

avatar
14 Posted by lat at nlgja party | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:24 PM

http://www.metroweekly.com/scene/index.php?k=953&fa=16

Why does Lat go to parties like this but refuse to come out in his blog? His quasi-out shtick is getting old.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:25 PM

Clinton doesn't stand a chance at even getting the Dem Nom

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:27 PM

Actually, the D.C. Circuit currently has two open seats, although Keisler has been nominated for one of the them. The 12th slot hasn't been used in a long time.

avatar
17 Posted by I Hate the Guy Who Hates Billy Merck | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:46 PM

1:25: I'm not a Hillary fan, but that statement is patently ridiculous. Last I looked, she was still the Dem frontrunner; I'd call that "a chance."

avatar
18 Posted by I Hate the Guy Who Hates the Guy Who Hates Billy Merck | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:51 PM

cf. irrational hatred

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:58 PM

1:24 -
OMG, you mean Lat finally came out and admitted that he is a "journalist"? ;-)

Seriously, how has he "refused" to "come out in his blog"? By not posting a big self-revelatory statement about his sexual orientation? A statement which would be greeted with a chorus of "yawn," "dumbest post ever," "what no bonus info today???," and "why do you keep using 'we' and talking about 'our' sexual orientation." Or at least that is what the reaction would eventually be, after 3 or 4 people posted "first," several trolls had a tedious debate about ninjas and pirates, and someone claiming to be a frat stud commented that people in his high school did something-or-other all the time and it was no big deal.

avatar
20 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:03 PM

1:58 -
good point, but i think the thing getting our collective goat is that Lat is gay AND conservative. that just boggles the collective mind.

avatar
21 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:07 PM

WTF is up with the pro hillary slant? How do you really feel?

avatar
22 Posted by Loyola 2L | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:09 PM

I'd tell everyone I was gay, if I was, but no one would care. Especially not federal judges or BigLaw.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:15 PM

What's the big deal? Lat is not exactly closted. He's out to his 800+ friends on Facebook.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:16 PM

2:07---reverse. psychology.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:19 PM

Yet another reason not to vote for Hillary...oh, and she's also a communist lesbian

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:42 PM

She doesn't have a hope in hell. The idiot Democrats might make her their candidate, but she has got ZERO electability nationally. You'll see.

avatar
27 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:42 PM

Reinhardt won't take senior status if Hillary is elected. He sees Clinton [I] as a wasted opportunity to nominate liberals who are as liberal as the Republican nominees are conservative. See http://howappealing.law.com/20q/2004_02_01_20q-appellateblog_archive.html#107569802077271073 (question 5).

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 3:20 PM

Leftward tilt? You are so out of it, Lat. The place has changed since you clerked for DFO.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 3:32 PM

Hillary may be a bitter old hag, but her husband is a rock star. Bill by Proxy is more electable than you think.

avatar
30 Posted by OH NO | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 3:48 PM

Just what we need- yet another seat on the liberal activist circuit that is the 9th.

avatar
31 Posted by Anonymous 9th Circuit | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 4:31 PM

I agree with 02:42. Reinhardt will keep on until, sadly, he cannot work anymore.

avatar
32 Posted by prosecutor | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 5:05 PM

Judge Trott's seat still has not be filled, and he took senior status almost three years ago. Should the seat go to Idaho or Californina?

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, December 20, 2007 7:32 PM

"leftward tilt"

You mean Constitution ignoring, socialist tilt.

Post Your Comment