Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Pay Raise Watch: A Little More on Seyfarth Shaw

Seyfarth Shaw LLP logo AboveTheLaw Above the Law legal blog.jpgA quick update on yesterday's post about Seyfarth Shaw. A source there tells us:

Here are the "official" numbers for Seyfarth NYC and "Others," excluding Atlanta (no idea where they are -- presumably lower). Great for the mid/upper classes, but no so great for 1st-2nd years. Some grumbling also from income partners since they don't get paid a whole lot more than a senior associate and have to deal with all the administrative headaches associated with income partner status.

For those of you who are interested, the salary ranges appear after the jump.

SEYFARTH SHAW -- ASSOCIATE SALARY RANGES

Seyfarth NYC (class of / salary)
07 - 160
06 - 165
05 - 180-185
04 - 185-210
03 - 205-230
02 - 225-250
01 - 230-265
00 - 235-275
99 (or earlier) - case by case basis

Seyfarth Other Offices (BOS/DC/CHI/LA/SF/HOU/SAC?)
07 - 145
06 - 150
05 - 165-185
04 - 175-210
03 - 185-230
02 - 195-250
01 - 205-255
00 - 215-255
99 (or earlier) - case by case basis.

Earlier: Nationwide Pay Raise Watch: The Latest on Seyfarth Shaw

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 22, 2008 4:30 PM

Third!

avatar
2 Posted by Anon | Permalink Friday, February 22, 2008 4:56 PM

I assume the tipster was joking when he said "great for mid/upper classes," right?

avatar
3 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 22, 2008 5:18 PM

this is somewhat great if you practice labor and employment law.. better salary than the boutiques

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 22, 2008 5:30 PM

(fourth!)

hard fact of life: l&e will never be as profitable as m&a; it will never be able to command the same level of compensation.

p.s. i can avoid caps too!

avatar
5 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 22, 2008 5:47 PM

though if you practice L&E in a large general practice firm you'll make the same base salary, and possibly get the same bonus, as other associates... you only get screwed in L&E if you work in a large boutique or at a LE focused firm like seyfarth

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 22, 2008 6:40 PM

And correct me if I'm wrong, but if you do L&E, your life is a little less insane, right?

avatar
7 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 22, 2008 7:13 PM

It depends. L&E at a place like Paul Hastings or Proskaur is probably really intense. But at other places, yeah, it's probably generally more inhumane, but it's still a law firm and you have to bill hours and lots of people bill over 2,200 hours at some places.

avatar
8 Posted by Anon | Permalink Friday, February 22, 2008 8:56 PM

Akin Gump D.C. is cheap. Third year, 2,300 hours, $25,000 bonus.

avatar
9 Posted by Seyfarth Associate | Permalink Friday, February 22, 2008 9:42 PM

These charts are not 100% accurate -- there are more than two lists. NY is the highest (as listed). Boston, DC, and LA are slightly less. Chicago, San Fran, Sacramento are the second list above. Houston and Atlanta are lower.

avatar
10 Posted by PHJW | Permalink Saturday, February 23, 2008 10:12 AM

L&E lawyers at PHJW enjoy the same laid back lifestyle as L&E at other big firms. If such as thing as prestige exists in that practice group then I would imagine that you would enjoy that as well.

- S&C

avatar
11 Posted by anon | Permalink Saturday, February 23, 2008 10:49 AM


Definitely less hectic - most L/E associates struggle to make 2000 hrs...not from lack of effort but just the nature of the practice. Although seyfarth is not nearly as heavily L/E driven as it once was, I definitely think they struggle to keep up with this compensation race. This may be the last big raise for a while.

Re: 9:42 -- I agree that Houston and Atlanta are lower but I have confirmed that Chicago is on the same scale as DC/BOS/LA/SF. Can't speak to Sac though.

avatar
12 Posted by anon | Permalink Saturday, February 23, 2008 1:08 PM

10:49 -- You are wrong. Chicago is not the same scale as Boston. Boston is higher than the above list and higher than Chicago

avatar
13 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Saturday, February 23, 2008 2:35 PM

Why is it so hard for L & E associates to hit their hours? What is it about the nature of the practice?

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 23, 2008 3:23 PM

You can't generalize about L&E hours like the posters above. If you're in an L&E practice that is not key to the business - i.e., it's there as a service to clients of the firm who sometimes need L&E work - then it can be feast or famine. If you're at a place that gets high quality L&E work and does it well - e.g., Paul Hastings, Morgan Lewis, Jones Day - then the work schedules are as demanding as any firm's trial practice.

avatar
15 Posted by anon | Permalink Saturday, February 23, 2008 4:23 PM

The L&E associates at Seyfarth never seem to have a problem making their hours.

avatar
16 Posted by ANON | Permalink Saturday, February 23, 2008 4:48 PM

Jones Day = high quality L/E work??? Not quite. PHJW, MLB, and SS are probably the top 3 in the country. Jones Day's reputation in the L/E legal community has gone down considerably in recent years. Still better than boutique firms like LM and JL but certainly not an elite L/E practice.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 23, 2008 6:05 PM

4:48: What about Proskauer?

avatar
18 Posted by DC List of ShaMe | Permalink Saturday, February 23, 2008 8:05 PM

Holland & Knight is off the list. Venable is off the list. Not sure else is left other than McGuire Woods ....

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 23, 2008 11:23 PM

L and E at my Biglaw firm is terrible. It is very hard for associates to make hours and many leave. Even though the firm keeps it as a service group, clients are no longer willing to pay big firm rates for L and E matters. If you are a law school student, I would definitely avoid doing L and E at a big law firm.

avatar
20 Posted by Litoralis | Permalink Sunday, February 24, 2008 3:02 AM

160 to 165? that really is pathetic with this kind of inflation

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, February 24, 2008 9:46 AM

"Jones Day = high quality L/E work??? Not quite. PHJW, MLB, and SS are probably the top 3 in the country. Jones Day's reputation in the L/E legal community has gone down considerably in recent years. Still better than boutique firms like LM and JL but certainly not an elite L/E practice."

Uh... Jones Day was just named the L&E practice in the country:

"Jones Day has been named the nation's best Labor & Employment practice by The American Lawyer as part of the magazine's prestigious Litigation Department of the Year competition."

Just sayin'.

avatar
22 Posted by anon | Permalink Sunday, February 24, 2008 10:23 AM

One big ERISA settlement for GM and suddenly they are the nation's best? There L/E practice only makes up about 6% of their revenue...probably in large party to a handful of big clients.

Where are they in Vault? Chambers?

avatar
23 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Sunday, February 24, 2008 10:26 AM

JD is #7 for labor and employment in the 2007 Vault rankings.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, February 24, 2008 11:57 AM

I'm yesterday's 3:23.

Wasn't trying to give an all-inclusive list - just the AmLaw top-ranked L&E practices in the last few years. The real point of the post is that there are L&E practices that stand on their own, and there are L&E service practices that merely exist to support clients who have come to their firm for other purposes.

Though I do agree with 10:23 that it was strange that AmLaw highlighted the GM deal so much in its decision. It's not as if JD invented the VEBA.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, February 24, 2008 11:59 AM

3:23 again. Also, JD, MLB and PHWJ are the only three band one L&E practices in Chambers. http://www.chambersandpartners.com/usa/resultseditorial.aspx?cid=618&pid=1114&solbar=1&grouptype=1

avatar
26 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Sunday, February 24, 2008 3:08 PM

At $145k, I can still buy a BMW even with my $170k in loans. Can't wait!

avatar
27 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Sunday, February 24, 2008 9:39 PM

What do people like about being an L & E lawyer?

avatar
28 Posted by anon | Permalink Sunday, February 24, 2008 9:44 PM

9:39 -- the facts are much more interesting than other commercial litigation. You have real people, not just contracts.

avatar
29 Posted by curtis | Permalink Sunday, March 2, 2008 2:06 PM

think twice about staying at any firm with non equity partners, often times you make less than senior associates. Also, the reality is that L&E firms can't pay associates at the high end of the scale set forth above. It is short sighted - the future is bleak if L&E firms want to keep pace with the M&A firms salary wise. If you want to make a lot of money - go somewhere else.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 15, 2008 12:17 AM

Its a little late, but I wanted to point out that I believe that the above salary numbers are higher than the actual salary bumps...I beliive the numbers posted were pre-approval and that the final approved salaries were about 5-10+k lower than listed.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:52 AM

L+E is a commodity practice that generally doesnt attract the best and brightest. Hence, a firm like SS, whose identity is based on L+E has a built a culture of mediocrity that pervades all of its practice areas.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 24, 2008 4:48 AM

Seyfarth wants to expand its legal footprint beyond L&E. In reality, it has a small-time mentality, as it engages in stealth layoffs and reneges on promises made regarding pay and/or bonuses.

Seyfarth is worthless. This is coming from an associate of these turd brains.

Post Your Comment