Add RSS RSS

What's Going Down at Dechert?

Dechert LLP logo Dechert Price Rhoads Above the Law blog.jpgWe've been hearing vague rumblings of something about to go down over at Dechert LLP. Said rumblings are reminiscent of what we heard in the days and hours leading up to Cadwalader's Thursday Morning Massacre. Also note this comment on today's Morning Docket:

Not all Dechert associates have three days to enter their time. Some will need to enter it before they leave the building today.

We hear that certain groups at Dechert are super-slow, and morale in some quarters is super-low. These are, of course, often harbingers of lawyer layoffs.

We've put in an inquiry to the firm, but they haven't gotten back to us yet. We'll let you know if and when they do. In the meantime, feel free to dish in the comments, or email us. Thanks.

Update (4:40 PM): As reported by the Legal Intelligencer, Dechert just laid off 13 associates. We have a new post up on the subject over here.

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:20 AM

wow. We are all fucked.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:23 AM

Shit, I have friends there. Hope they don't get the axe.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:29 AM

The firm is closed. There will be a going out of business sale this Sunday @ 11.

avatar
4 Posted by It's About Time | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:30 AM

Finally! I'm glad that you are all over this Lat. Previous comments on ATL regarding Dechert's internal problems are true. The firm is doing everything that they can to dump associates. Trumped up bad reviews reminiscent of OMM and stealth layoffs. Morale has never been so low. Partners are frantically trying to drum up business. There is just NO work.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:32 AM

good luck to all the Dechert associates

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:32 AM

Trouble, oh we got trouble,
Right here in River City!
With a capital "T"
That rhymes with "P"
And that stands for Pool,
That stands for pool.
We've surely got trouble!
Right here in River City,
Right here!
Gotta figger out a way
To keep the young ones moral after school!
Trouble, trouble, trouble, trouble, trouble...

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:34 AM

Same exact thing going on at Milbank. Depression coming folks...

avatar
8 Posted by It was fate | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:35 AM

Dechert is an anagram of retched, which, granted, is missing a "w" but still...

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:36 AM

Working for another BigLaw firm in the same building, I heard (on the elevator) one Dechert Associate telling another that Friday would be her last day and that she'd be going back to Cleary. When asked why, she just said, "things are changing." Maybe a coincidence.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:38 AM

Dechert = TTT

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:39 AM

SH1T....is this for real...I need to get my time in...

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:41 AM

Which offices?

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:43 AM

On the bright side, PPP for the firm went up a lot again -- Way to go team!!

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:44 AM

Dechert had handled discover for the Vioxx cases. Now that a settlement is pending, bloodletting is not surprising. Hughes Hubbard is probably doing the same thing.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:45 AM

This is going on at other firms folks. The economy is MUCH worse than people expected. Only the top firms will be able to survive in this market. Everyone else is fucked.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:45 AM

at Milbank and busier than ever; haven't seen any evidence of slowdown

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:47 AM

time to spend my last hour filling out the vault survey.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:47 AM

11:45 - got that right. I know of some stuff going down at other firms right now...

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:49 AM

Some Dechert partners are also looking to jump ship. I overheard some people talking about it at a local Dechert haunt by the name of Channel 4 (C4).

avatar
20 Posted by I call BS | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:57 AM

I am not at Dechert, although I interviewed there for a long time for a senior job before going elsewhere.

Their PEP (not PPP) came in at US$4m this year, which is incredibly high by World Standards. However, they have probably been hit by the downturn in structured finance/private equity work and settlement of some litigation, but they are so high they have a long way to fall before they're in trouble.

Will they sack some under utilised associates? Possibly. Will lots of other firms do this? Probably. Are some of the writers on this blog underperforming associates worried about their own jobs. Absolutely.

Decherts is a smart, well run firm. Good hard working associates have little to worry about. Underperformers should probably fear for their jobs, because the booming economy will no longer cover for you.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:57 AM

i used to work at dechert. I know nothing about what is going on there right now. but i do know that much of the firm's strategy over the last few years as been to focus on super-profitable practices. These included securitizing mortgage backed securities and defending product and medical device liability. Well, the MBS market is dead, vioxx settled, and the SC's recent decision in the medical device liability case means that sector will be shriveling up soon too. Thus, I would expect some difficult times for Dechert up ahead . . . albeit after a phenomenal run up to now.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 11:58 AM

Real firms drop the hammer before the holidays.

avatar
23 Posted by Transactional Nostradamus | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:00 PM

Puzzled by reference to a slowdown at Milbank. . . generally markets are slower and this is being experienced by all BigLaw firms. In transactional departments other than pure CLO and CDO, it is more a return to a normal pace after years of huge hours. No danger of layoffs that I see. . . CTF down people.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:01 PM

11:44 - that's exactly right. When Dechert lost over $120 million in business overnight they were reeling. Dechert did not even know that settlement talks had taken place. The firm found out about it when it hit the news wire.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:03 PM

The only cash cow that Dechert had was Vioxx. I can't believe that they didn't have a Plan B. Goes to show you that the firm is poorly managed.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:04 PM

11:57 -- Are you drunk? Dechert's profit per equity partner is not, has never been, and probably never will be $4M

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:06 PM

11:57 - No MARKETING TROLLS WELCOMED!! Figure out how to get your associates work and stop posting. No amount of damage control will save this firm. Learn how to get business and then allocate it accordingly.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:07 PM

Well, it *is* a Friday

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:07 PM

Two associates just fired at my Dechert office...this is for real

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:08 PM

The god damn plane has crashed into the mountain!

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:09 PM

11:57 - Don't lie about the profits. Dechert does a poor enough job grossly inflating their profits. Dechert will never be Weil, Cravath, or Wachtell.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:13 PM

11:57 - You are such a marketing tool. The underperforming associates are in this boat because the firm failed to give them work. Try giving your people work and then talk about who is not getting the job done.

avatar
33 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:16 PM

Lat, What's going on at Paul Weiss? Seems a LOT of people are looking to leave ASAP.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:16 PM

Dechert's DC office has been in shambles since August of last year.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:16 PM

This is in NYC, I assume? Any DC rumblings?

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:21 PM

11:57 -- thanks for the laugh.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:21 PM

big diverse national firms are kicking ass right now. same upside, lower risk, thats what diversification is all about.

tell me I work at a TTT all you want, at least I'll be working while youre getting laid off.

and im not talking about dechert.

avatar
38 Posted by Dechert to $2.35m | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:21 PM

See this for Dechert PEP increase:

http://www.legalweek.com/Articles/1094867/Dechert+joins+double-digit+club+for+'07+results.html

PS - 12.13 = seriously @ risk associate, but good thing he/she knows it

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:21 PM

DECHERT SUCKS ASS.....

3 months pay and cobra for 6 months, guess I get to go on vacation now...thanks a bunch

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:23 PM

12:09=Weil troll.

avatar
41 Posted by You think you got problems | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:25 PM

12.21 - that's much better than Mayer Brown gave some associates the week before Christmas. At least you probably got your bonus last year.

avatar
42 Posted by What's a troll? | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:27 PM

What's a troll?

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:28 PM

Dechert at $2.35 is not exactly $4M. I smell marketing troll for 11:57.

avatar
44 Posted by 11:57 | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:30 PM

My mistake, I meant US$2m, not US$4m (and it's US$2.35m).

That's still better than almost all firms and otherwise I stand by the rest of the posting.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:34 PM

12:21 - what's your point? So what that Dechert PPP went up. So did every other AMLAW 25 firm. Yet Dechert is still tightly pressed and they are cutting throats. Get over yourself dumb ass.

Prisoners what the key, fat people want to be skinny, and Dechert wants to dump associates. Wake up and smell the shit because it flows down hill.

avatar
46 Posted by 4-degree is a smack | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:36 PM

Why don't they just make expand Cobra as our national healthcare plan... is there anything better than being a laid-off lawyer on Cobra (health) sitting on stoop drinking Cobra (malt liquor). Those will be the lazy days of summer...

Dechert is Doomed

P.S. Won't all bankruptcy firms be laughing to bank (the ones not collapsed) in recession/depression

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:40 PM

BINGHAM!

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:43 PM

The bottom line is that the partners will always get paid first. They are not going to dip into their potential profits just to hang onto a few associates.

avatar
49 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:44 PM

Does this apply to IP? Seems that every IP group has no shortage of work and hasn't (yet) been affected by the economic downturn...

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:45 PM

Hey Lat, can we get an update on last week's 'What's going on at Thacher Proffitt' post?

avatar
51 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:45 PM

Does this apply to IP? Seems that every IP group has no shortage of work and hasn't (yet) been affected by the economic downturn...

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:50 PM

Today is payday at Dechert. It's possible that the reason people are missing from their office is because they were let go.

avatar
53 Posted by Bored with lazy whining associates | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:51 PM

12.34 - all firms have risen, but not as much as Dechert has.

Why is it that

a. poor performers spend so much time on blogs, and

b. always whine the loudest when they're the first to get the boot?

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:56 PM

12:50, Monday is payday at Dechert.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 12:58 PM

12:51 AKA 12:21 & 11:57 - You are trying so hard to be the lone voice of reason that favors Dechert. It's really quite pathetic.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:00 PM

Can we get some real info here please? don't leave the world hanging Lat....

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:03 PM

12:56 - Why are so many people missing from their office then?

avatar
58 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:07 PM

12 structured finance/securitization lawyers are being let go. That's a big surprise. At least they didn't slash at the first sign of trouble, like Cadwalader did.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:19 PM

which offices?

avatar
60 Posted by Clever little f@cker | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:20 PM

12:58

Actually, I am a partner at another, much larger firm which is much more diversified (albeit less profitable on average)

I think Dechert is a great firm... but I am also not unhappy that overpaid untalented/underperforming associates are starting to get a dose of reality after years of slacking off, milking files, doing crap work and getting overpaid for it. What's truly pathetic is the lazy arse attitude of people like you who feel they are entitled to a living for free. Get over yourself.

There are plenty of hard working talented associates and, in the unlikely even they get fired, there's plenty of other firms (like mine) looking for versatile talented lawyers.

Only the really shit lawyers need worry because (almost) everyone is valuable, even in the current market.

Are you one of the worried lawyers?

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:23 PM

the first sign of trouble was last august

avatar
62 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:25 PM

IP? Anyone?

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:27 PM

can anyone elaborate on the one random comment about paul weiss?

avatar
64 Posted by what happened in August? | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:29 PM

1.23 - what happened last August?

12.44/12.45/1.25 - apparently the whole IP department is being fired. Does that answer your question?

avatar
65 Posted by Anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:32 PM

Plenty of guys at my highschool made $2.35m per year. It was no big deal.

avatar
66 Posted by Anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:32 PM

Re the person asking about PW, people are looking to leave because the firm is too busy. The litigation department is beyond swamped and most people are regularly billing 16+ hour days. It is anything but slow.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:38 PM

1:20 - If you love Dechert so much, then why don't you pick-up your book of business and come on over to Dechert. Oops, what? You have no business. Why are you posting? Don't you have work to do? I know some "service" partners who are overpaid untalented/underperforming and they love getting paid. If you work at a firm larger than Dechert, I'm sure you milking the files. It's like the pot calling the tea kettle black.

avatar
68 Posted by You moron | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:44 PM

1:38

No, I saw the downturn coming and elected to go to a larger more diversified firm (you may not have got that from my last post) where partners are paid in part for the business they get associates to do. Actually, I am quite enjoying the slightly quieter times brought on by the economic downturn (and the 3 year guarantee I negotiated). We also have a good bunch of associates here, who actually think they're supposed to work and don't sit around whining about their entitlements, so it's a great place to work for partners and associates.

No wonder you're shit scared for you job, you moron.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:48 PM

1:20 -- will be de-equitized within 2 years and will be worse off than the mid-level/junior associates are right now. To think that "almost everyone" is valuable sheds a blind eye to the over-saturation of the market and simple principles of supply and demand. You saw a downturn coming, so you went to a larger firm where conflict issues make it even more difficult to generate new business -- smart.

avatar
70 Posted by Wearing the Brass Ring | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:49 PM

Do you hear that? It is the sound of me pointing and laughing at all of the greedy associates who were scoffing at the last round of firm raises and crying out for 190K. Some of us told you then that firms could simply not keep up with the ridiculous market salary war. Your jobs are now in jeopardy thanks to the greed combined with the bad economy. Told you so.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:49 PM

Glad I didn't go to that TTT. Plus the screener was a douchebag.

avatar
72 Posted by Yeah right | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:54 PM

1:48

Quite a few firms (including us) are actually hiring good people right now. Oops.. forgot you're not one of the good ones. Let's trade stories in 2 years and see how it all ends up. What's you're email (probably should give me your personal email, because I am sure your work email will change before then).?

avatar
73 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:56 PM

What offices were the Dechert people let go from?

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:58 PM

Same question as 1:56. If someone has some real info on offices / practice groups, please share with the rest of us.

avatar
75 Posted by You | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:59 PM

1:56 - whichever office the very bitter Mr 1.48 works in. Which one is it, 1.48?

avatar
76 Posted by This Is What You Want, This Is What You Get | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 1:59 PM

Dammit. These layoffs are all because of NAFTA! Vote for Obama this year and everyone will be employed at Big Law salaries forever and ever and ever.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:07 PM

11:57 - Thanks for the input, Bart!

Bottom line - Dechert is trying to bootstrap itself into national prominence by aggressively and blindly chasing profits above all else.

They are doing that by focusing on the practices that are (or were -- oops!) the most profitable, and by not paying market and not making partners at the rate they should.

I don't care what the PPP is, they'll always be TTT.

avatar
78 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:08 PM

Firm wide cuts. Charlotte office lost three.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:12 PM

How many associates were in Charlotte? Couldn't have been many. Percentage-wise, this cut likely was pretty high.

avatar
80 Posted by Just settle for an offer of counsel | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:16 PM

2:07 = sub-standard lawyer who is bitter at being passed over (even for a salaried partnership, which doesn't effect the hallowed PEP)

And welcome back from the land of fairies and pixies, by the way. A law firm chasing profits? Oh my God, that is shameful...

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:16 PM

Just heard that complete groups will take massive hits. Products/Mass Torts and FRE.

avatar
82 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:18 PM

Milbank is up next; same thing going on over here...expect the ATL post within the next week or so.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:18 PM

Charlotte lost all of it's second year lawyers and one mid-level lawyer. All were called "economy-based" firings instead of performance.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:20 PM

When firms lay people off, do they generally let go mid-levels or junior associates?

avatar
85 Posted by Hmmm | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:20 PM

FRE includes real estate, real estate finance and structured finance

They've been a huge sucess and managed to get a lot of great partners due to PEP, so they'll be very keen to defend the PEP numbers.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:23 PM

More than structured finance/securitization lawyers are getting the boot. Layoffs are firm wide and across all practice groups.

avatar
87 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:23 PM

Charlotte only had 19 associates prior to the cut. Those fired were in the finance and real estate sector and were not the most recent hires.

avatar
88 Posted by Anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:25 PM

2.20... they normally let the rubbish ones go first, which is why 1.48 is so worried. Very few firms are so short sighted that they would dump good people in areas they wish to keep working in. You only cut good people as a last resort.

Getting fired in Charlotte would really suck as it's a small market down there, so there's no where to hide and a relocation is the only option.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:27 PM

Mid-levels and senior associates are always the first to go.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:27 PM

I guarantee 1:48 is not worried.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:28 PM

did anyone in the California offices get cut?

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:30 PM

I love the new guy! Not only did he create a "partner" persona for himself which involves negotiating three year deals, but he went one step further and made himself British.

Jolly good show, ol' chap.

avatar
93 Posted by LIFO or FIFO? | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:31 PM

If they're firing longer serving associates (as per 2.23), then it sounds like a clear out of dead wood, of which I am sure there is plenty after a boom in the FRE areas followed by the bust in those same areas. Shocking how quickly they and other firms like CWT have pulled the pin as good will is hard to re-build. Neither firm must expect a rebound (or need to go into the market and hire) any time soon. Goes to show the danger in a narrow field of practice.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:34 PM

1:54,

You're = You are

Obviously you were not one of the good people who were hired.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:36 PM

I have a friend summering in the Charlotte office--should they be worried?

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:38 PM

Or 1.55 doesn't take this blog half as seriously as 2.34 (aka 1.48) does (probably because he/she has job security, unlike 2.34/1.48).

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:40 PM

If firms tend to cut mid-levels and senior associates first, shouldn't juniors and summer associates be somewhat ok?

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:40 PM

1:48 must have struck a chord with the fake contract partner.

avatar
99 Posted by City of Charlotte | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:42 PM

My economy is financed through an option ARM, should you be worried?

avatar
100 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:43 PM

Or 1.54 doesn't take this blog half as seriously as 2.34 (aka 1.48) does (probably because he/she has job security, unlike 2.34/1.48).

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:44 PM

2:16 - wrong, 2:07 is a partner at a V15 who left Dechert as an associate because I disagreed with their dishonesty in dealing with their associates - you troll.

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:46 PM

2:31 - Ditto! These groups made the firm so much money 3 to 4 years in a row. Now after a few slow months they want to start dumping bodies. Poor management. There is no loyalty. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. TTT only look for TTS = Third Tier Students. No top student would dream of choosing Dechert.

avatar
103 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:47 PM

Why is the new Dude English?

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:48 PM

My friends at Milbank are telling me they are extremely worried. Work is almost non-existent at the firm.

Expect Lat to cover this next week...

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:55 PM

2:47,

11:57: reference to "World Standards" "utilised"

1:20: "arse"

1:44: "quite enjoying"

2:25: "rubbish"

avatar
106 Posted by Analysis | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:55 PM

2.48 and all the other Milbank bashers (and that's assuming there's more than one) must have one mighty big axe (judging by the way they've been grinding it).

Have any of the Dechert rumours on this blog actually been verified?As we all know, 1 person (and let's face it, there are some people here who are not friends of Dechert) could simply be sitting here making stuff up.

Lat - where is the verification that you promised?

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:55 PM

Dechert is so slow that associates can take 3 hour group lunches and not receive one missed call or blackberry alert.

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:56 PM

what should summers at Dechert think? Get an offer and then jump ship and do 3L OCI?

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:58 PM

Good luck to the laid off associates.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 2:58 PM

summers at Dechert probably aren't too good at thinking in the first place, otherwise they'd be at a decent firm.

avatar
111 Posted by Anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:01 PM

2.55 - well spotted (Dude... you've clearly not got enough work to do), but I doubt English people are the only people who use UK spellings.

avatar
112 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:04 PM

Dechert CLT is a sh!thole...no class. One of the two partners there is unconditionally a sleaze-bag who plays favorites and screws associates (literally).

avatar
113 Posted by A partner ... | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:07 PM

3.04 - what's wrong with that? Never had a bit on the side in the office? Why don't you leave if you are so morally outraged? Or where you let go and are looking for some payback?

avatar
114 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:09 PM

It looks like some people in the Dechert Charlotte office work in another practice group - were they hit too?

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:10 PM

3:07...I jumped ship last year moron

avatar
116 Posted by Anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:14 PM

3.10/3.04 = let go from Dechert CLT today

avatar
117 Posted by Def. faux British | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:16 PM

I agree with 2:55. I wonder if this is the same douche who posted on the bar exam study thread about his boozing, fiance dumping, and womanizing. I bet he is.

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:17 PM

Morale at Dechert has been an issue for a very long time. Partners play hard to get. They rarely return calls or emails. Most days you can't find them in the office. The admin people are ineffective. They can make no real decisions. They're basically gate keepers. They push the line of bullshit that the firm is selling. They aren't around to really advocate for the associates. They want to protect the firm and secure their own jobs. There is absolutely no associate development. It's every man for themselves. The quality of work is low lung. Most senior paralegals with 10 years of experience can do the same work. It's really quite telling.

avatar
119 Posted by Bank Sucks | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:17 PM

milbank = TTT

avatar
120 Posted by Oh Boy | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:18 PM

What moron said this: "Dechert will never be Weil, Cravath, or Wachtell"

you mean just like weil will never be cravath, wachtel, simpson ot skadden? Sweet lord.

avatar
121 Posted by DFB | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:18 PM

Sorry, that would be "fiancee" dumping.

avatar
122 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:18 PM

I know plenty of people in the dechert CLT office, and they hate it, the big problem is, especially if you want to stay in CLT, where else are you going to go? No one else is hiring. If you want a job, you either have to stay in your shithole, or move. And a lot of people don't want to relocate.

avatar
123 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:20 PM

I'm sure it's no consolation to the latest biglaw casualties, but do any of you realize the massive layoffs going on at the big banks? We're talking thousands of dudes leaving the Fin. Dist. (to the extent that rents are actually falling). The banks are much more brutal in terms of performance-related firings (bottom 5-15% get laid off even in good years) and their lack of patience before axing. The IBers get mo' money than us, but in this market, job security is what you want, and lawyers have that, even if many are getting the boot for economic reasons.

avatar
124 Posted by Anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:21 PM

What firms are diversified enough to take some hits from the economy?

avatar
125 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:23 PM

To 3:04: are these literal screwings heterosexual, bisexual or homosexual?

avatar
126 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:25 PM

Sex in Dechert's workplace is the least of their problems. They need work.

avatar
127 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:27 PM

Maybe the dechert associates could start billing the partners for sex. I mean, a billable hour is a billable hour, right?

avatar
128 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:31 PM

I assume there has to be an email of some sort that has been circulated - anyone care to share it?

avatar
129 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:33 PM

I work at Dechert. No emails have been circulated. Our associates were let go around noon and we just had an informal meeting to discuss the situation. 13 total have been let go in the FRE group.

avatar
130 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:35 PM

3:33 - Where were the 13?

avatar
131 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:39 PM

3:01,

No, I'm actually swamped right now, but sometimes you can only focus for so many hours in a row. Besides, if I didn't have work, there's no way in hell that I'd be here after 3 on a Friday.

I'm also in litigation so there's no real worry about a slow down. The gov is always looking to hassle innocent corporations.

avatar
132 Posted by Bob Slydell | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:40 PM

We find it's always better to fire people on a Friday. Studies have statistically shown that there's less chance of an incident if you do it at the end of the week.

avatar
133 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:43 PM

Dechert = TTT

avatar
134 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:45 PM

We need some real info here. It takes too long to read through all this garbage. Who has real info?

avatar
135 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:51 PM

So, Dechert only has 18 people left in their Charlotte office. With BofA and Wachovia in trouble, what's the over/under on how long before they close the doors?

avatar
136 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:57 PM

So 24 people were let go today at Dechert? Across offices and groups?

avatar
137 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 3:58 PM

Are BofA and Wachovia in trouble?

avatar
138 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 4:00 PM

3:51--BofA and Wachovia are in trouble, but they'll bounce back, it may not be as soon as we all want, but they will bounce back and Charlotte law firms will be busy again.

avatar
139 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 4:03 PM

I have a friend at Wachovia. He told me that the NY managing partner took some loans out for the firm. Dechert is no liquid with all the money they allegedly have?

avatar
140 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 4:03 PM

I have a friend at Wachovia. He told me that the NY managing partner took some loans out for the firm. Dechert is not liquid with all the money they allegedly have?

avatar
141 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 4:05 PM

3:57, Where are you getting that number from?

avatar
142 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 4:15 PM

Dechert Charlotte only has 15 lawyers now. The 3 that were fired are still up on the website. Morale is beyond low in the office. Two of the associates who were let go did not deserve it at all. They kept incompetent and unlicensed first year associates and fired good lawyers? Makes no sense.

avatar
143 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 4:20 PM

should be a great summer at the CLT office for summer associates . . . Yeah!!!

avatar
144 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 4:24 PM

I think the person (just one) talking about Milbank is an associate who recently (past 6 months) got the boot for performance reasons. Stop imagining it was the economy or the amount of work (and there's lots) at Milbank that was the cause . . . and stop trying to convince others.

avatar
145 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 29, 2008 4:42 PM

Note Lat's update above, just added:

"Update (4:40 PM): As reported by the Legal Intelligencer, Dechert just laid off 13 associates. We'll be doing a new post on this shortly, but we thought we'd note it here as well."