Judge of the Day: J. Wayne Griego
New Mexico is on a roll. It’s a relatively small state, at least in terms of population (#36), but it brings us two consecutive Judges of the Day. Our most recent Judge of the Day — or, technically, Ex-Judge of the Day — was John Brennan of Albuquerque, accused of choking his young girlfriend, while clad in nothing but a mock turtleneck and gray underwear. Today a tipster writes:
What is it about Judges in the Land of Enchantment? When they’re not high on coke or beating muggers (or their domestic partners), they are fixing tickets for family and friends!
From the Albuquerque Journal (subscription):
A Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court judge who fixed two dozen traffic tickets for family members, friends and co-workers was removed from the bench Wednesday by the state Supreme Court.The state’s highest court chose a harsher punishment than the Judicial Standards Commission, which recommended that Judge J. Wayne Griego be suspended without pay for 90 days and reprimanded for ticket-fixing.
It does seem a trifle harsh. Apparently the justices were troubled by the commission’s finding that Griego was “not completely forthcoming in his testimony.” But removal is not a punishment meted out frequently:
The court last ordered a judge removed in late 2006, when Doña Ana County Magistrate Carlos Garza was banned from the bench after the commission said he had tested positive for cocaine.
Judge Griego Is Removed From Bench [Albuquerque Journal (subscription)]




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
"Relatively small state"?
Try fifth in area.
Small in other respects, sure: per capita income, education, electoral votes, etc. But not area.
12:49 - For something like this, the relevant metric would be population and size of legal community.
I am guessing that New Mexico is not #5 in terms of the absolute number of lawyers who call it home.
http://www.sptimes.com/2008/03/13/Hillsborough/New_York_stripper_say.shtml
Now you're being scooped on Judge of the Day by How Appealing.
"a trifle harsh"?
Suppose a federal district judge "fixed two dozen [criminal cases] for family members, friends and co-workers." Wouldn't the calls for that judge's removal be unanimous? Just because a judge deals with less important matters--such as parking tickets--doesn't mean they shouldn't be removed for using their position to help their familiars.
And a judge fixing cases is way worse than a judge doing a little coke.
Agree with 1:55.
Breaking a law based on social norms isn't as debasing as violating the core duties of such an esteemed position. We don't expect judges to be perfect people, but we expect them to strive for perfection in their jobs at least.
i
A trifle harsh? It amazes me how my colleagues in the bar are so tolerant of judicial behavioral pathology and misconduct. Fine if your counsel and know this guy on a first-name basis. But, would you want him judging you? Would you care to be on his sh*t-list, as counsel?