Add RSS RSS

Unhappy About the Law School Rankings of U.S. News? Let ‘Em Know!

US News World Report small cover 2009 law school rankings ratings Above the Law blog.jpgJust a quick reminder about an interesting event, previously mentioned in these pages, which is taking place in a few hours. The ABA Journal, which just profiled U.S. News “rankings czar” Bob Morse, is hosting a live chat with him this afternoon. From Edward Adams of the ABA Journal:

Morse will be taking questions from the public on ABAJournal.com on Friday, April 11, from 3 to 4 p.m. ET. We hope you and your readers will participate.

More from the Journal:

Robert Morse, the man who created the law school rankings for U.S. News, offers an olive branch to law school deans who have long complained about the effect of the rankings on legal education. “Deans are welcome to call me or come by my office in Washington,” Morse says. “I want to work with them to improve the rankings.”

Some deans and former deans think they should engage the magazine, rather than just complain about it. “I think rankings need to be changed, and the only way that will happen is if law school deans sit down with Bob Morse for honest discussion,” says Nancy Rapoport, who resigned as dean of the University of Houston Law Center after her school dropped almost 20 points in the rankings. “I would attend a meeting like that without hesitation.”

So unhappy law school deans, here’s your chance. You can already submit “questions” — defined in academia as rambling screeds, concluded with “and what do you think of all this?” — by clicking here. Or just visit the ABA Journal’s home page at 3 PM Eastern time.

Additional links about the U.S. News rankings not mentioned in our earlier coverage, after the jump.

For a useful (if you’re a law school dean) or amusing (if you’re not) Chicago Tribune op-ed by Professor Greg Stein, “Note from the dean: Send after U.S. News rankings are published,” click here.

For the average U.S. News & World Report overall ranking, from 1996-2009, for the Top 30 law schools, click here.

Finally, a tipster who is not a fan of the rankings passes along the email below: “Compounding the reliability issues of U.S. News rankings, check out this email to select law school deans….”

——- Original Message ——-
From: Bob Morse
To: [Law school deans at Mercer, Syracuse, Buffalo, Louisville, and Stetson]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 9:54 AM
Subject: Notice from U.S. News about the new law school ranking

Dear law school dean

Due to a printing error, the 2009 edition of the America’s Best Graduate Schools guidebook incorrectly repeats the names of the five schools that tied for 100 in the top law school ranking— Mercer University, Stetson University, Syracuse University, the University at Buffalo—SUNY, and the University of Louisville—in the list of Third Tier law schools.

These law schools do appear where they belong on the Top 100 list, but we unfortunately were unable to remove them from the Third Tier list for the print version of the guidebook that will arrive on newsstands this week.

We apologize for this error and have taken the following steps to correct it:

1. A correction to the guidebook is being run in the April 7-April 14 issue of U.S.News & World Report magazine, the same issue which features the America’s Best Graduate Schools rankings. The complete Top 100 law schools ranking will appear in that issue (without the Third Tier group).

2. The complete law school ranking (including the Third and Fourth Tier lists) is correct as appears online at www.usnews.com.

3. A corrected PDF version of the full law rankings also is available at www.usnews.com.

Once again we apologize for the error.

If you have questions you can contact:

Robert J. Morse
Director of Data Research
U.S. News & World Report

Note from the dean: Send after U.S. News rankings are published [Chicago Tribune]
Average U.S. News Ranking, 1996-2009 [TaxProf Blog]

Earlier: The U.S. News Rankings: More Wailing and Gnashing of Teeth
The U.S. News Rankings: Law Schools Lose Their S**t React
Please Do Not Wet Yourself With Excitement: The 2009 U.S. News Law School Rankings

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 11:24 AM

My law school is ranked FIRST!

2 Posted by Guileful Gil | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 11:25 AM

Oh yea, right, like the t14 grad in the $5000 suit cares about the rankings released by US News, where the employees don't even make that in a month. COME ON!!

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 11:26 AM

I am actually second!!!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 11:29 AM

Every law school is a unique and special snowflake. Some snowflakes fall in the sewer.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 11:38 AM

I would like to know why both of NYU's reputation ranks in the rankings have not gone up in the past 10 years. Given that NYU is a much better school now than it was in the 1960's or 70's, you would think that as academics and practitioners get younger their score would rise. Instead, a couple of times it has gone down and it has never been at the level of Chicago despite the GPA and LSAT scores of the entering class at NYU consistently being higher than Chicago's.

avatar
6 Posted by NYU 3L | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 11:38 AM

I got my offer rescinded today from a V10 firm. The letter said that, while they were impressed with me, they had given me the offer when NYU was #4 in the rankings. Due to changed circumstances, they said, namely moving to #5, they could no longer justify hiring me. Sigh.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 11:43 AM

Leiter better take advantage of this to put up or shut up.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 11:44 AM

Why not write to the ABA...or better yet cut and paste a horn book definition of FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT and ask why they are building more law schools while recent grads from good schools cannot find work and many who are employed are unhappy and continue only because they are saddled with debt. Some people want to be lawyers...thats great...but so many do it just for the hell of it leading to things like USNWR ridiculous rankings. HINT why not see how lawyers from schools react to the "real world"...I know several brilliant Harvard and Yale lawyers...they are all smarter and more insightful than I could ever hope to be...where did I meet them...at law school because none of them could cut it as attorneys or face the liberal reality of making $50k less in public service as opposed to a teaching position.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 11:45 AM

Taxprof has nothing on this: http://www.ilrg.com/rankings/law/

It's sortable, fools!

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 11:47 AM

11:44 certainly fits the "rambling screed" requirement of writing to the ABA.

11 Posted by Michael Clayton | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 12:06 PM

When you are in the the trunk of a nondescript sedan with your arms and legs tied because you "know too much" about Company X, do you think the guy with no neck driving you to the river cares where your law school was ranked?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 12:07 PM

My question to Mr. Morse:

"Did John Yoo, or anyone employing John Yoo, justify the torture of US News' employees to secure Boalt's ascension in the rankings?"

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 12:07 PM

All this whining about the rankings is stupid. Unless USNWR wants to invent a new math system that can put 30 schools in the top 5 and 300 in the top ten, somebody is going to be unhappy about the rankings.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 12:30 PM

To 11:38 - because every other school is "much better now than it was in the 60's or 70's." [sic] Think much?

To 11:43 - Leiter already has "put up." See http://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/ and scroll down to the first story on March 31, 2008.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 12:31 PM

I think the rankings would be much more helpful if they exhibited more localized information. For example, continue ranking the tier 1 schools nationally and then rank other schools by their relevant jurisdictions. This would give a more realistic view of a schools presence in local markets while not eliminating the national analysis.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 12:39 PM

I wouldn't blame the rankings so much as the law schools themselves. In their websites or their recruiting materials, the lower regarded schools still aren't upfront about the fact that a lot of their graduates are never going to find decent jobs, ever, end of story. Yeah, they can be solos making $30,000 a year while paying back $100,000 in student loans. With federal loans easily available, and schools needing to feed their moloch like machine, the saturation of the profession will continue, to its sad detriment.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 12:44 PM

I propose a new system for ranking law schools: according to frequency of white guys with asian girls. That would have helped me decide more than the meaningless U.S. News rankings.

- King of WGWAG

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 12:59 PM

Stetson is clearly tier 2, not tier 3. US News needs to be taken to the ringer on that screw up.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 1:02 PM

WGWAG never gets old.

# 4 thing I learned from watching porn--asian men do not exist.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 1:10 PM

Stetson troll -

It doesn't matter if Stetson is #100 or #120.

TTT = TTT

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 1:18 PM

1:02 - Then where do asian girls come from?

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 1:25 PM

Is someone asking where Stetson is ranked? Here's a better question: where is Stetson?

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 1:26 PM

further proof of how arbitrary the rankings are

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 1:31 PM

www.consusrankings.com

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 1:43 PM

Whoever didn't attend ND because it went from 22 to 28 is an idiot.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 1:46 PM

Why does everyone hate Stetson so much? What did Stetson ever do to you?

They are ranked #1 in advocacy and #6 in legal writing, also known as the two most important things lawyers do. How is it even possible to have a school so esteemed for teaching the most practical lawyering skills ranked 100?

I guess having a bunch of professors who have never seen the real world teach a bunch of entitled douches about "theory" and other bullshit is what garners the best results in these rankings.

Maybe that is why so many people have issues with Stetson, they get spanked around courtrooms and boardrooms by Stetson grads. Your clients must hate that.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 1:48 PM

When the name of your law school is better associated with a Cowboy hat or a Walgreens cologne than a law school = TTT

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 1:50 PM

"Maybe that is why so many people have issues with Stetson, they get spanked around courtrooms and boardrooms by Stetson grads. Your clients must hate that."
OMG this happens, like, every day to me!

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 1:53 PM

Nobody hates Stetson - you have to be relevant to be hated. Nobody gives a rat's ass about Stetson. It's just another anonymous TTT.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 2:06 PM

Stetson law grads make the best paralegals. So they have that going for them.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 2:11 PM

1:46,

Good schools take for granted that their students can speak and write. It also has something to do with the difference in education for students who actually have a realistic possibility of crafting laws and regulations - they kinda need to understand the *theory*.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 2:13 PM

but everyone hates louisville. TTT if there ever was one

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 2:26 PM

Lat, can you please create a law students sub-board or something like that on ATL? I'm sure your sophisticated readers would appreciate any effort to divert the XOXO readers to a different board.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 2:41 PM

i attended stetson last year as a first year. wisely, i transferred to U of F. i was amazed though at the general arrogance and pompousness of the student body and administration there.

half of the students there thought that they were going to be millionaires just by graduating law school, despite the fact that they spent more time worrying about their flag football games than studying for contracts.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 3:07 PM

What's a "U of F?"

I you spend more time studying for contracts than you do with fun/interesting things, then you need to get out more. Are you that nerd who proposed to his girlfriend via patent application? Nerd!!

36 Posted by BenMatlock | Permalink Friday, April 11, 2008 5:40 PM

I go to Texas and I like Leiter's enthusiasm for his blogging, but let's be honest -- the guy will find a way to rank anything so that UT is in the top 12.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:14 PM

I'm gonna put it out there that I CURRENTLY attend Stetson and will tell you it's not that great of a place. The Stetson troll above is probably one of the admins at the school trying to save the school's rep. on every law school discussion site on the web. As someone who attends this law school I think my opinion should be taken to heart. Choosing Stetson is honestly the worst decision I ever made so if you are thinking about attending DON'T. Oh and to give a bit more validity to my statement (Stetson troll is probably watching/ready to rebute my comment) I am well above the top half of the class (can't give away too many details) so I'm not bitter or anything, I just think people need to cut the bullshit, especially Stetson, and put the facts out there. Please if you are considering attending here, RUN don't walk away from that consideration.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:14 PM

I'm gonna put it out there that I CURRENTLY attend Stetson and will tell you it's not that great of a place. The Stetson troll above is probably one of the admins at the school trying to save the school's rep. on every law school discussion site on the web. As someone who attends this law school I think my opinion should be taken to heart. Choosing Stetson is honestly the worst decision I ever made so if you are thinking about attending DON'T. Oh and to give a bit more validity to my statement (Stetson troll is probably watching/ready to rebute my comment) I am well above the top half of the class (can't give away too many details) so I'm not bitter or anything, I just think people need to cut the bullshit, especially Stetson, and put the facts out there. Please if you are considering attending here, RUN don't walk away from that consideration.

Post Your Comment