Legal Eagle Wedding Watch 3/23 - 4/6: Summa Kind of Wonderful
We don’t want to ruin any surprises, but we’ve got some high-quality material for you this week at Legal Eagle Wedding Watch. There may even be a sparkly credential or two that we haven’t seen in this space in a while. (Cough — Rhodes — cough.)
Behold, our outstanding finalists:
1.) Keira Driansky and David Simon2.) Maya Nath and Benjamin Curtis
More about our featured couples, after the jump.
1. Keira Driansky and David Simon
(Buy them an ice bucket.)
The Case:
- Prestige makes an emphatic return to LEWW this week with this über-elite pairing. Keira, a Marshall scholar, and David, a Rhodes scholar, mated in that teeming, incestuous petri dish that is the Oxford American grad scene. She was summa at Yale; he was summa at the University of Minnesota.
- They’re both at Harvard now, where’s she’s completing an MBA and he’s getting a JD.
The Case Against:
- Nothing. We wish we could be annoyed by their perfection, but they look totally nice and cute. We predict that David will clerk for a mid-range feeder — say Garland or Boudin — and then, sure as the sparks fly upward, join the Elect. (Kennedy. Definitely Kennedy.)
2.
Maya Nath and Benjamin Curtis
(Buy them a vacuum cleaner.)
The Case:
- No Oxford action, but solid credentials. Maya was cum laude at Columbia and has a JD from NYU. Benjamin graduated from Pace.
- Maya has worked at Akin Gump and Jenner & Block; now she’s at Snell & Wilmer in Denver.
The Case Against:
- This is a bit of an odd couple, politically. Benjamin — Sergeant Curtis to you wusses — is part of an airborne infantry unit that recently returned from Iraq. Maya represents several Guantánamo Bay detainees pro bono. “I catch and put them away and she lets them out,” Sergeant Curtis said. He had reservations about Maya’s work, but he was realistic: “You don’t want to draw a line in the sand — there will never be a Day 2.” “And those liberal do-gooder types usually put out,” he did not add.

3. Alexa Davidson and Marc Suskin
(Buy them a mandolin.)
The Case:
- Double JDs for this couple, but weirdly they’re both held by the groom. Marc, who was cum laude at Yale, has law degrees from Columbia and the Sorbonne. Alexa was magna at George Washington University and has a master’s in “modern art, connoisseurship and the history of the art market” from Christie’s, the auction house (which apparently offers degrees).
- Alexa is gallery director at Lawrence Stegrad Fine Arts in New York. Marc is an associate at Latham & Watkins, specializing in international arbitration.
- Their wedding website is well-executed without being pretentious. Thumbs-up.
The Case Against:
- Fantastic eyebrow placement for this attractive pair, but unfortunately it comes at the price of an awkward heads-velcroed-together pose.

4. Francesca Harper and Eric Cohen
The Case:
- Another unlikely couple: Broadway dancer and choreographer meets BigLaw associate. Francesca and Eric met at a party, which led to e-mail, two dozen roses, and a “chemical moment” (hormones, one assumes) on their first date. Then, on Valentine’s Day:
“Magically, when we left the bar we just started kissing on the street,” she said. “We were on the corner, and I think it was snowing, and we had the flowers in our hands and people were applauding us. That was our first kiss.”
That’s hot.
- Their cool multi-cultural ceremony included glass-breaking and broom-jumping.
The Case Against:
- They’re the Vows column, so there’s no info on their educational credentials. All we know about Eric is that he used to be at Kramer Levin and now has an independent practice. Francesca sings, acts, and creates original works for the stage.
- A big chunk of their write-up is basically a big downer about Eric’s fear of commitment and the consequent dumping of his ass by Francesca. As a general rule, the phrases “they broke up” and “couples’ counselor” are going to cost you some points in this column.
The Verdict:
Not a close one. The Rhodes, the Marshall, HLS, all those beautiful summas — you inspire us, Team Driansky-Simon! Congratulations.




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
Drianski looks like he is 46 not 26.
Didn't we used to get to vote?
Why do people put themselves out there like this? How overly presumptuous of them to think other people actually give a fuck.
simon not on law review?
Why do people post comments on blogs? How overly presumptuous of them to think other people actually give a fuck.
too many jews getting married in non-jewish ceremonies. a suskind getting married by a minister of the church of spiritual humanism? sigh.
Why do people read articles and post comments about people who put themselves out like this? Clearly those people actually do give a fuck.
Why do we predict that Simon will clerk for a mid-range feeder judge? We have no info on his grades, law review status vel non, or anything else other than the fact that he goes to HLS. That's not enough, I'm afraid.
Is it just me, or do all these girl's smiles look pretty........forced, to put it kindly.
woops make that Simon looks 46 not 26
WTF is "international arbitration?" Do these people refuse to do domestic arbitrations, or do they stick the word "international" in there solely to make the practice sound more sophisticated?
Hey Marc Suskin, why the long face?
What do you mean there is no case against couple #1 -- he went to the University of Minnesota for undergrad!! Knocks a little prestige luster off the union.
Of course they still win though, it was kind of a stacked deck with the other fugly couples.
AHAHAHAHAHA! No. 3: biggest dorks ever! On so many different levels...
It really depends on the degree from Oxford on the Rhodes. Hard science--- good job. Philosophy-- great. Int'l politics or anthropology? Probably not.
For pure law power, I'd actually go with number two. Number one is tainted with an MBA.
Couple three only has 3 attendants on each side. Isn't that kind of embarrassing? No friends? Although the Maid of Honor looks like she might have a nice rack (picture is cropped just short of cleavage).
Some people focus on quality rather than quantity. Clearly, you aren't one of them.
Couple # 3 met on the internet. Unless you are a middle-aged divorcee or are 350 lbs, there is simply no excuse for that.
4:38 - I am assume you are referring to my comment about the attendants. I am also assuming you don't have many friends. If you don't have 4 or more people that need to be in your wedding party, you are a social retard. I had 10, could have had many more, but wanted to keep it reasonable. In 25 years or more of life, I hope everyone can make more than 2 friends. I am sorry you have let me down.
I like the trigger puller and hot indian lawyer couple. Hot.
4:35/4:47 - there are many reasons some people have smaller wedding parties. Stop being so judgemental and needy. 10 people in a wedding party makes you as socially insecure as 2 or 3.
Why do we care what their parents do for a living? These poeple are such prestige whores. If you appear in the Times wedding page you should also have to appear in a special Times divorce section.
4:57 - agreed, heard many of these get divorced after a few years
NYU law with an Army guy. That is unique.
I bet her parents disowned her for not marrying a neurosurgeon.
HAHAHA (#3)
I looked up Church of Spiritual Humanism on wikipedia - no results -- a google search shows: http://www.spiritualhumanism.org/
That's sorta funny.
Looking at thie bios makes me feel very inadequate and unaccomplished!!
Is this the Eric Cohen in the story?
ERIC NEIL COHEN
ERIC N. COHEN & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
276 5TH AVE RM 805
NEW YORK, NY 10001-4509
United States
One site suggests that he went to Cardozo.
How many of these people will be married in 10 years? Not many. People seem to think it is like the romance in the film Atonement.....it's not. If they are not divorced, one of them will have cheated. It's not the movies.
ugliest. people. ever.
truly heinous.
So, having a friend become ordained to marry you rather than using a religious officiant or city employee who you don't know is laughable? Hmm...
If and when I get married this will be the conversation I have with my parents.
"Thanks for sacrificing so much for me. I am not having am expensive wedding, so please take the money you would have spent on that and go on a nice vacation."
4:24 - The primary reason for arbitration is because two parties are from different countries and fear bias in courts of the other party's residence (akin to the motivation behind diversity jurisdiction). Hence, the overwhelming majority of major commercial arbitration is international.
There are plenty of excuses for meeting on the internet-- especially if you work a lot with a bunch of equally nerdy people of your own gender...
Explain how Garland and Boudin are "mid-range" feeders. For a site dedicated, among other things, to fawning over supreme court clerks and the feeder judges who feed them, this seems pretty bad.
5:50 guest poster: You're nuts! Keira happens to be well grounded, prodigy smart (i.e. graduated summa in math at Yale), stylish, and drop-dead gorgeous to boot! She's kind, caring, considerate, and a finance powerhouse. Simon is a really solid guy. He's got an inspiring bootstraps story, a huge heart, and a bright future in politics and foreign policy. What this couple has is magical, and they are very lucky to have found each other.
Simon is cool peoples. Plus prestige for a Truman as an undergrad.
6:49 guest poster - you are clearly either Keira, Simon or one of their parents. Get over yourself... and them - they're nice, but not as fabulous as you're trying to make them.
I sat behind Keira in freshman year econ. She's one smart, hot chick. Simon's a lucky guy.
Dude, it's totally Benjamin and Maya. They were robbed.
I think two law degrees earned by one person gives #3 the edge. From what I've heard, French law school is no picnic!
Not to mention he works for ATL's recently appointed "coolest firm".
I consider David and Keira good friends, and I'm surprised by some of the comments on here.
I guess everyone has a few enemies, and some comments appear to have been made by people who don't know them personally. They are both wonderful people with big hearts, and are very modest despite their prodigious achievements. Let me say that again: they're very down-to-earth and modest. They didn't enter themselves in this little contest (that was Lat), and they didn't even want their announcement in the NYT in the first place (their parents pushed for it). They're a very cute couple and are an inspiration together and as individuals. Of course they're also super smart, etc. but you knew that.
So, lay off. I have never known nicer or more genuine people.
Molly Ringwald is still an actress?
Good to see that Driansky-Simon is probably the most impressive couple so far this year (when LEWW has been forced to feature mostly unimpressive couples to tame the constant attacks that LEWW is too "elitist"). I hope that Laurie will continue to feature the best couples going forward, as she did back in 2007.
2:08 a.m.: You must not read LEWW very often. Every time a couple has impressive credentials, they get hate comments from losers.
LEWW Fan
Lat didn't write this post -- it was Laurie Lin, and she definitely exposed her lack of knowledge on the clerkship front in this post.
Simon is not on Harvard Law Review -- the NYT write up says he's in his 3L year, and his name is not among the board of editors (google it yourself). And there is *no way* that Boudin or Garland are "mid-range feeders." That is ridiculous.
According to ATL's own tabs of the OT 2008 clerks, ALL FOUR of Garland's current clerks are going to One First Street (three to the best Justice, JPS). Boudin also will have 4 clerks at the Court -- 2 2006 grads and 2 2007 grads.
No way are those "mid-range" numbers.
Whoa. Settle down there, 9:55. It's hardly a misstatement worth getting your undies in a wad over.
Go Keira + David!
Dude. Keira is the HBS birthday girl! Didn't realize how freakin smart the girl is. That's hott.
This is a hard one because Maya and Marc were in the same summer associate class at Akin Gump. Maya loses points because her eyebrow is not aligned with her husband's. Marc loses points for speaking in a ridiculous French accent.
TIE.
I was in that summer associate class too. Both Maya and Marc are nice, but Marc doesn't speak with a French accent, he's American but speaks fluent French.
Marc wins.
Lots of luck to Maya. As an enlisted Army wife, she'll need it, big-time. Hope she's not planning to move in with him on-post. Army housing for enlisted folks and their spouses is crap - check out the recent Ft. Bragg fiasco on CNN.
Number three's dog is adorable. They win.