Add RSS RSS

Recession Spells Rescission: It's Getting Nasty Out There

rescission screwed rescind take back job offer Above the Law blog.jpgOkay, not literally; they're almost-but-not-quite anagrams. But it's certainly the case that economic woes are leading employers to retract job offers, left and right.

So rescission is no longer just an equitable remedy; it's a hot new trend in the world of employment. Over the weekend, this report appeared in the New York Times:

Thousands of people are losing their jobs on Wall Street — some before their first day of work.

They polished résumés; they sweated interviews; they landed dream jobs. But now a small group of college and business school students are discovering that their careers at Bear Stearns ended before they began. JPMorgan Chase, which bought the beleaguered investment bank last month, rescinded many of their job offers.

Yashoda Khandkar, a senior at the University of Pennsylvania, is among 250 Bear hires who now find themselves unemployed in one of the worst financial job markets in years.

“The worst part about the entire situation is that it’s a really hard market for us to look for other jobs,” Ms. Khandkar said. “We probably can’t get as good of jobs as we would have had.”

Compared to the rescinded offers on Wall Street, what we're seeing in law firm land looks like small potatoes. This makes sense. If finance offers richer rewards than Biglaw during good times, Biglaw should offer reduced risk during bad.

But could it be the case that we don't know the full extent of rescinded job offers in the legal world? From a tipster:

Why aren’t you doing anything about law firms rescinding offers to 2L summer associates?

[Firm X] apparently rescinded 15-20 offers in Chicago. [Firm Y] rescinded 15 offers in their DC office. Apparently Charlotte is getting hammered...

Please look into this, and if it's true, hammer these firms and protect the rest of us!

We are following up with the firms mentioned by our tipster, and if we can confirm the rumors, we will report them in these pages. In the meantime, if you have definite knowledge of a firm rescinding offers of summer or full-time employment -- e.g., your own offer was rescinded -- please email us (subject line: "Rescinded Job Offer"). We will investigate and report back. Thanks.

Update: A commenter points out this helpful article on the NALP website, Rescinded Offers: Mitigating the Effects of Rescinded Offers ("adapted from an article published in the August 2001 NALP Bulletin").

Bear Stearns’s New Hires Become Job Seekers [New York Times]
Law Firms Curtail Associate Programs As Economy Slows [Wall Street Journal]

Comments
avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 2:36 PM

I can definitively report that I've had a nightmare about this happening to me.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 2:41 PM

I am getting so excited for the UPenn State trolls to comment!!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 2:54 PM

Hey - I wonder if that girl was in Wharden or just the regular college in Happy Valley.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 2:56 PM

"We probably can’t get as good of jobs as we would have had"

Penn State doesn't offer courses in grammar, it seems.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 2:57 PM

On an unrelated note, why the hell does my firm want me to give them my 3L grades?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:04 PM

"We probably can't get as good of jobs as we would have had."

Not with grammar as good as that, you can't have jobs as good. I mean, I understand that people speak informally, but if you're being quoted as being out of work and looking, you could at least try to phrase your one comment coherently.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:04 PM

The lateral hire market sucks too, despite what the cold-calling recruiters say.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:05 PM

2:57 = pwned

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:07 PM

2:56 - get over it, Strunk.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:08 PM

2:57, that's standard procedure to make sure you did not suddenly develop a heroin habit in your 3rd year. Unless you stopped showing up to exams, you are probably OK.

Either that, or they are looking for a pretext to can you.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:18 PM

http://www.nalp.org/content/index.php?pid=25

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:21 PM

So it's the transactional people and those in smaller markets that need to worry, right? People sitting on offers to join V10 lit depts in NYC are safe, right?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:22 PM

Whatever. The IBs pulled this same move for those of us graduating in 2001: either asking people to take "delayed starts" (and then firing them) or bringing people in (and then culling the herd through training). Besides, I'm not sure why anyone should weep for a few disappointed Ivy League kids when layoffs are now coming in the 10Ks.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:28 PM

2:57 = pwnt.

Go to class nub.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:31 PM

For future reference, it's "Wharton"

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:36 PM

wharden?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:36 PM

What is "Wharton", do you mean the Penn State business school?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:36 PM

3:31, everyone knows it's called either the Warden Institute or PSU Warden.

Get a clue, ass.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:38 PM

What does it mean if your firm asks you to take a drug test?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:42 PM

I think it's actually UPENN State. The all-caps spelling is important.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:47 PM

boo hoo

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 3:49 PM

Poor baby Ibankers.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:00 PM

Not sure if its true - but I've heard TPW has rescinded some 3L offers. Guess I'm not surprised.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:01 PM

Can't wait for football season! UPenn will kick ass this year- Go Lions!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:02 PM

Sonnenschein's problems aren't isolated to Charlotte. They've also shortened the summer program from 12 to 10 weeks in New York.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:02 PM

DOOOOOOOOM!!!!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:08 PM

What is the sanction if a firm fails to follow the NALP rescission guidelines?

http://www.nalp.org/content/index.php?pid=25

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:08 PM

Anybody know what firms this is supposed to refer to? Or is someone starting nasty rumors.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:24 PM

All of us at Wachtell, Cravath, S&C, and STB give a little cheer for job, salary, and bonus security!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:25 PM

Apparently the Chicago firm is Mayer.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:26 PM

3:21 - call your firm and ask.

3:38 - It means they want to know if you're worth going to any parties with, especially in Vegas.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:29 PM

4:25 - not true

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:29 PM

If your firm offers you money not to sue them, don't take it. Rescinding offers needs to be as expensive for them as it is for you. And given the fact that you're unemployed because of them, it's not like you have anything better to do with your time.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:29 PM

Are Latham 3Ls safe?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:30 PM

4:25 - correct

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:33 PM

The class of 2001 is getting the most screwed out of all of this. They had to deal with a recession when they were hired and now they must deal with another when they are up for partner.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:36 PM

4:24 = STB troll.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:37 PM

4:29 - not especially.

Latham second-year

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:44 PM

4:25, 4:30 - The Chicago firm is NOT Mayer.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:48 PM

i smell class actions...

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:48 PM

I'm pretty sure this is a nasty rumor (at least with respect to Chicago) ... I haven't heard about any rescissions among the big firms.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:51 PM

A little lesson for the confused:

::Private School::
-University of Pennsylvania = UPENN...not "UPenn State"
-Wharton is the business school at UPenn.
-i think the Quakers are their mascot

::Public School::
-Pennsylvania State University = PSU...something totally different, especially on an academic level (and not to mention tuition).
-nittany lions is the mascot, joe paterno is the old dude (!)

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:54 PM

A little lesson for 4:51,

I know you mean well, but don't bother preaching to the posters of ATL. Their actions are intentional--not the result of confusion.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:57 PM

So is it Mayer or not? Can we get some authority behind either side's claim, or both just echoing the rumor mill?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 4:58 PM

4:51 so which school, UPenn or Upenn St has two campuses for their law school?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:01 PM

elaborate mr. latham second year

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:02 PM

To 4:54: I'm not new to ATL, thanks.

To 4:58: Penn State is affiliated with the Dickinson School of Law now, and they have one campus in State College, Pa and one in Carlisle, Pa (and ever since PSU got a hold of Dickinson they have plummeted in the rankings...but we all know how heavily that has been reported on in ATL)

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:02 PM

Lat: Hm, I need to generate some hits today.

*Writes up fear-monger post about risk of everyone losing their jobs and links to an article about college students having offers rescinded from the financial institution most deeply effected by the current economic downturn.*

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:03 PM

I'm going to assume Latham 3Ls are safe, given that Latham didn't rescind offers in the 90s or in 2002. Plus, they're a well managed, highly profitable firm. This firm didn't get where it is by rescinding offers.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:04 PM

5:20 - word

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:04 PM

A little lesson for 4:51:

YOU JUST GOT REVERSEPWN3D BIGWILLIESTYLE!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:07 PM

504 needs to take his annoying ass back to xoxo

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:09 PM

am I to understand that UPENN DOES NOT have a good football team? I thought they historically have produced a myriad of pro players... As for U Penn State, its business school must be first rate; THE DONALD attended there.. That guy shits money....

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:10 PM

Unless my offer gets rescinded, I'm glad the finance sector's getting screwed. NYC rent went down 7% last year. It can only keep falling given the ailing financial sector, and that means things will be cheaper when I get to NY.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:16 PM

5:09 = TOTAL IDIOT!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:21 PM

5:10, do you have any support for the 7% drop? i live here and i'm pretty sure that's bullshit.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:21 PM

Is this another post about Heller?

Seriously, Lat, get a grip.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:28 PM

Mayer in Chicago is just a rumor, I believe.

My guess would be if there's any truth in this it's a small firm. No major firm would risk it, would kill their future recruiting. They'd rather suck it up for the summer and find a pretext to no-offer people.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 5:42 PM

3:21/4:29,

I guess you didn't get enough oohs and ahs the first time. Don't be so insecure. We're all really impressed.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 6:11 PM

If Obama gets elected it probably doesn't make any difference whether offers get rescinded. With all his proposed tax hikes, biglaw take home pay will soon equal what you'd get if you were on welfare and in default on your student loans.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 6:21 PM

Any firm that is rescinding 15-20 offers in its Chicago office is not a "small" firm. That's as many as a Schiff Hardin *makes.*

Posted by chicken little | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 6:32 PM

Rescission! The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 7:53 PM

"Latham didn't rescind offers in the 90s or in 2002"

Yep, but they did lay off a bunch of associates in the early 90s. Back when a big summer class was half teh size tehy are today. No one is really safe.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 8:39 PM

True 753, but wouldn't they lay people off before they rescinded offers? It seems like firms take a much bigger hit to their reps if they rescind offers than they do if they lay people off. Plus incoming associates can easily be placed in any dept where there's work, plus they're cheaper.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, April 21, 2008 9:28 PM

Gang Wars: Bangin' in Little Rock!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 22, 2008 4:43 PM

4:08 - If I remember contracts correctly, it is rescission of the rescission. But b/c the hiree is at will, she is subject to termination.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, April 22, 2008 4:51 PM

So we should all stick it out at law firms till the recession is over, then jump to wall street to get rich.

Post Your Comment