Professor Laurence Tribe at NYU Commencement: ‘Thank mom and dad for doing it.’
Word about Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe’s rather odd commencement address at New York University is spreading rapidly throughout the blogosphere. It’s already been picked up by Gawker and Instapundit. Here’s an eyewitness account from an NYU alum:
Larry Tribe just gave a seriously weird commencement address at NYU — especially the end, where he turns an amalgam of cosmologist / 60s love child, and tells all the grads to thank their mom and dad for screwing instead of watching TV, and thereby conceiving them….Not to be too tough on Tribe, but I think the basic theme of the speech was that he’s really, really smart and well read, and knows how to turn creative, even strange, phrases. (I thought we already knew that.)
How did Tribe get picked? Some speculation from our source:
I really think the only reason Tribe was honored, and got to speak, is that he was a key mentor to John Sexton, the president of NYU. Tribe probably recommended Sexton to be the NYU law dean, and then the NYU president, so this looks like payback.Tribe has accomplished enough to have gotten the degree on his own merits, and I don’t begrudge him it, but I’m sure the audience would have loved to have his co-recipient, Michael J. Fox, speak instead of Tribe — Fox is vastly better known, and liked. On this point, see here.
Posted below is the “thank mom and dad for bonking” clip. A more detailed write-up from our tipster, after the jump.
AN NYU ALUM’S ACCOUNT OF PROFESSOR LAURENCE TRIBE’S NYU GRADUATION SPEECH
The speech is collected in three videos available here. The second video repeats the last 7 seconds of the first video. The 7 seconds involve the wartime atrocities apparently committed by the Japanese on Tribe and his mom (apparently related to his “fate/randomness” theme). More about that here. (For a guy who said he had to cancel classes this semester because of a benign brain tumor, Tribe’s not doing too bad, traveling to China and speaking at NYU, and what-not.)
Most of the speech seemed reasonable to me, but several places in the second video struck me as weird, and quite unlike other commencement speeches I’ve seen. As an NYU alum, I’m somewhat embarrassed that NYU would host such a speech, and that the speech wasn’t more carefully vetted (perhaps it would have been difficult for John Sexton, Tribe’s former law school RA, to do such vetting).
At 2:50 in the second video, Tribe gives us a two-minute summary of the anthropic principle, particularly concerning how close we came to there being NO WATER, or NO ATOMS, or NO STARS, or NO LIFE. Frightening! At 4:35, he concludes that in comparison, Goldilocks was “child’s play” (whatever that means).
At 5:00 is where Tribe tells everyone to thank mom and dad “for doing it” (at 2:45 of the first video he did a shout out to his mom, but not to dad; I’m not sure if it was for having “done it” with his dad — is his dad that ugly?). Hard to believe? Tribe’s words: “Think about it, if your father and mother had watched yesterday’s equivalent of ‘The Wire,’ instead of making love at just the right moment, you would not exist. So thank mom and dad for doing it!”
At 5:30, Tribe spends about a minute reading a poem by Wislawa Szymborska called Could Have, without mentioning it’s about the Holocaust, so it’s puzzling to follow.
At 6:30, he concludes that “in the end the love you take is equal to the love you make.” Isn’t this the sort of thing you’d expect from a high school student graduation speaker?
But that’s not enough of a conclusion — at 6:45 Tribe spends half a minute on a tortured use of the “ask not … but what …” locution to exhort his listeners. (Did Tribe had to pay royalties to Ted Sorenson for that?)
As his final, final — honest! — conclusion, at 7:15 Tribe says that one of his favorite sayings is, “the only things you can take with you are the things you have given away” (ever heard that? I haven’t. Couldn’t even find it with Google), and Tribe gives a “parting thought: may all of you give of yourselves — give ‘till it hurts, give all you can, while you can, to make the planet we have inherited a bit greener, the lot of humanity a bit lighter, the light of the world a bit lighter.”
Though Tribe gave the speech in Yankee Stadium, I doubt it will rank up there with Lou Gehrig’s “Luckiest Man Alive” speech, which Tribe invokes at 1:15 of the 2nd video. But it’s interesting at any rate. I guess my take-away point is that we’re lucky Tribe’s mom and dad did it the particular night in question, instead of watching TV, and we’re lucky the Japanese didn’t kill Tribe during World War II (hence his use of “Could Have” about the Holocaust, get it?), which is why we’re lucky enough to be able to enjoy Tribe’s speech on YouTube. Maybe Tribe is the REAL “Luckiest Man Alive” — or at least the “Luckiest Lawyer Alive” — for being permitted to give such a speech in Yankee Stadium. But maybe I’m reading too much into Tribe speech — maybe it means nothing at all.
Thanks For Boning, Ma And Pop! [Gawker]
LARRY TRIBE: Thanks for boning, ma and pa. [Instapundit]
Correction: NYU is Lamer Than Predicted [Googly-Eyes.com]
“Thanks for Boning!” — Larry Tribe at NYU, 5/14/2008 [YouTube]
Collected Laurence Tribe clips [YouTube]




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
first!
Larry to SCOTUS!
Sonia Sotomayor to SCOTUS!
"But surely causation must end somewhere. 'But for a nail, a kingdom was lost is a commentary on fate' not the statement of a major cause of action against the Blacksmith"...or dad.
Nino
What a bigot! How can he be so callous toward those who were born because of in vitro fertilization or artificial insemination?
-Ovary Bell
uh, i was expecting more. zzzzzzz
boring crap
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Tribe's comment at 6:30 is, of course, a quote from the Beatles "The End," and it rather nicely ties into the remark that has everybody's panties in a bunch.
Crappy speaker, crappy school.
About par
way to kill the mood larry- I don't want to think about my parents doing it thank you very much...
Jerry Springer to 2009 NYU Commencement Speaker!
Puff, puff, give - Larry - puff, puff, give. You're f*#&ing up the rotation.
still, better than having Jerry Springer do your commencement.
Northwestern to #99 in rankings! P.o.s. school.
The speech sounds like pretty standard stuff - with the typical quirky twist one expects from the "mirror, mirror on the wall" crowd. What sort of weird nerve did it hit in you Lat? Your reaction is stranger than the speech.
12:03 - That's not Lat's account - it is what some random NYU alum sent in.
i was there and its sad but true: NY Giant Michael Strahan gave a much better speech.
he's trying to be cool and funny, like many old retards that i meet, and he fails spectacturaly. That said he could probs make any stupid joke and they would laugh their heads off. NYU's placement is great. They are all laughing on their way to the bank. If he would give the speech in 6 months down the corporate law road, however, he probably would get egged. I love NY!
12:05 - Lat describes the speech as "rather odd," and then gives full play to the tipster's description, much greater play than usual for tipster emails. It seems fair to say that Lat endorses the account to some extent.
It is nice to see that same liberal bias exists in the few years since I left NYU. Does anyone believe that a law professor who had views like Judge Bork would be the Commencement speaker? So why should someone as liberal as Laurence Tribe be invited to be the speaker? He did not even go to NYU. Get someone prominent who went to NYU like Koch or Giuliani or even Lamar Alexander. This is absurd.
If you listen to the whole speech, it's not odd at all. It's about serendipity and responsibility. I truly don't get any of the criticisms. The joke about mom and dad is refreshing; the quotation of the Symborzka (sp?) poem is clearly stated as such; and the "love you take" line, as he says, is from the Beatles. Finally, the "ask not" riff fits perfectly with the rest of the speech--don't focus on the odds against your being here, but rather on what you can do with what you've been given. In the end, the speech is all about how lucky we are to be where we are (especially if you're lucky enough to be graduating from as good a school as NYU), and how we have a responsibility to do something with that. I think the criticisms are unfair and misplaced.
--Former Tribe student
12:22:
---Former Tribe suck-up
fixed that for you.
Go Tribe. Hark upon the Gale.
-Big Nick
If I'm not mistaken, the comment at 12:22 p.m. isn't a "Former Tribe student," but Tribe himself. Who else but Tribe would get into this sort of detail to defend the key points of his speech?
12:14-- Because Tribe is right and Bork is wrong.
""Think about it, if your father and mother had watched yesterday's equivalent of 'The Wire,' instead of making love at just the right moment, you would not exist. So thank mom and dad for doing it!""
Okay, that's creepy as hell.
"he's trying to be cool and funny, like many old retards that i meet, and he fails spectacturaly."
God help me, this made me laugh. So true! It's like "Yeah, that Scalia - he's HILARIOUS." No, he's not. He's really not. A for effort, though.
Former Tribe student here. First, I'm not Tribe, who I sincerely doubt reads this blog, much less comments on it. Second, since my comment is anonymous, it can't really be seen as sucking up, now can it, 12:26? Dummy. I'm just someone who took his class, liked him, and thinks the speech is better than it's portrayed as being. So I figured I'd say that. Oooh, sincerity! Scary and weird!
Tribe RAs to the Interwebs to defend their master!
12:34 here.
Hey, 12:22 "Former Tribe student," maybe you're NOT Tribe, but if you're not, you're the first one I've heard of who's tried to defend one of his goofy speeches.
Just in the last few years Tribe's given at least several as goofy as this one, yet I've never seen anyone "go to bat" for him, so to speak. So I stand by my supposition that you're quite likely Tribe himself.
Maybe I'll hunt around on the internets to find, and post on YouTube, some of the other goofy speeches, so we can see what your defense of them, if any, is. Whether or not you're actually Tribe, it should make for an interesting exchange.
--"12:34 to Yuma"
One more thing, "Former Tribe student" (if that's what you are). Yes your comment can be seen as sucking up, despite your anonymous posting of it.
Sure, you're anonymous on this blog, but you're not anonymous to yourself, right? That means the first thing you did after posting the comment, assuming that you're not actually Larry Tribe, is e-mail Tribe and let him know about the wonderful comment you posted defending him. That can really be seen as sucking up, now can't it?
--"12:34 to Yuma"
12:34 to Yuma: This argument means that much to you? So much so that you want to start a whole debate about Tribe's various speeches? Yikes. Get a life, dude. And real sorry you didn't get into Harvard....
what's so totally ridiculous about this, is that right before he makes a non-pc statement, he feels compelled to qualify it with a completely pc statement, i.e. the one regarding intelligent design.
"Former Tribe student" -- you're the one who decided to stir up a hornet's nest with an anonymous (to everyone but you and Tribe) detailed defense of Tribe's NYU speech.
Perhaps you've now checked with Tribe (assuming against all indications that you're not him) and discovered that an unearthing and analysis of his other recent speeches isn't something he's especially eager to see done -- hence your dismissive "get a life" riposte?
--"12:34 to Yuma"
I don't get this at all.
test
vwnemco-xz4420c-tw6q00ab-0 http://urlser.com/?5Nnno#1
health insurance|health insurance quotes|individual health insurance|health insurance|low cost health insurance|group health insurance|health insurance|health insurance quotes|individual health insurance|health insurance|low cost health insurance
[url=http://urlser.com/?qbKvI#3]health insurance|health insurance quotes|individual health insurance|health insurance|low cost health insurance|group health insurance|health insurance|health insurance quotes|individual health insurance|health insurance|low cost health insurance[/url]
[url]http://online-casino-gambling-mo.lookera.net#4[/url]
[http://urlser.com/?xFj4E#5 insurance|progressive insurance|allstate insurance|insurance|automobile insurance|renters insurance|insurance|insurance online|insurance rates|insurance|progressive insurance|allstate insurance|insurance|automobile insurance|renters insurance]
"insurance quotes|auto insurance quotes|free online auto insurance quotes|insurance quotes|life insurance quotes|insurance quotes|insurance quotes|allstate insurance|insurance quote|insurance quotes|renters insurance|online insurance quotes":http://urlser.com/?DYEVZ#6
[LINK http://roulette-mo.lookera.net#7]roulette|online roulette game|play roulette|roulette|online roulette|online roulette game|roulette|casino roulette[/LINK]
zkdyvlx-yx4ca61-tw6q00ab-0 http://urlser.com/?m6c0v#1
cheap auto insurance|really cheap auto insurance|auto insurance quotes|cheap auto insurance|cheap car insurance|car insurance|cheap auto insurance|auto insurance quotes|cheap auto insurance|cheap auto insurance|cheap car insurance
[url=http://urlser.com/?xFj4E#3]insurance|progressive insurance|allstate insurance|insurance|automobile insurance|renters insurance|insurance|insurance online|insurance rates|insurance|progressive insurance|allstate insurance|insurance|automobile insurance|renters insurance[/url]
[url]http://online-casino-gambling-mo.lookera.net#4[/url]
[http://urlser.com/?boo2X#5 life insurance|whole life insurance|whole life insurance policy|life insurance|online life insurance|life insurance leads|life insurance|whole life insurance policy|whole life insurance quotes|life insurance]
"car insurance|car insurance quotes|auto insurance quotes|car insurance|free online auto insurance quotes|cheap car insurance|car insurance|car insurance|car insurance quotes|car insurance|cheap auto insurance|free online auto insurance quotes":http://urlser.com/?e64r6#6
[LINK http://urlser.com/?IQpnn#7]car insurance quotes|free car insurance quotes online|instant car insurance quotes|car insurance quotes|cheap car insurance|car insurance|car insurance quotes|auto insurance quotes|cheap auto insurance|car insurance quotes|cheap car insurance[/LINK]
nodcwqu-216a1bw-tw6q00ab-0 http://free-poker-mo.lookera.net#1
gambling|online casino gambling|internet casino gambling|gambling|casino games|online casino|gambling|casino|casinos|gambling|casino games|free casino games|gambling|online gambling|best online casino|gambling|free casino
[url=http://urlser.com/?DYEVZ#3]insurance quotes|auto insurance quotes|free online auto insurance quotes|insurance quotes|life insurance quotes|insurance quotes|insurance quotes|allstate insurance|insurance quote|insurance quotes|renters insurance|online insurance quotes[/url]
[url]http://black-jack-mo.lookera.net#4[/url]
[http://urlser.com/?nm4rK#5 cheap auto insurance|really cheap auto insurance|auto insurance quotes|cheap auto insurance|cheap car insurance|car insurance|cheap auto insurance|auto insurance quotes|cheap auto insurance|cheap auto insurance|cheap car insurance]
"car insurance quotes|free car insurance quotes online|instant car insurance quotes|car insurance quotes|cheap car insurance|car insurance|car insurance quotes|auto insurance quotes|cheap auto insurance|car insurance quotes|cheap car insurance":http://urlser.com/?IQpnn#6
[LINK http://roulette-mo.lookera.net#7]roulette|online roulette game|play roulette|roulette|online roulette|online roulette game|roulette|casino roulette[/LINK]
test
Former Tribe student makes more sense than Johnny Yuma. Also seems to have a little more emotional control. I guess he's right, you didn't get into Harvard, did you Johnny? Some slights never die.
Sounds like "Johnny Yuma" has left the building. Seemed off-base anyway about there being other supposedly "goofy" speeches; Tribe's a highly respected academic, and attacks on his speeches most likely reflect a conservative bias.
"12:34 to Yuma," aka "Johnny Yuma," I guess, here.
I've pulled together several recent videos of Larry Tribe from the web (which took some effort on a couple of them, because Tribe or Tribe supporters, apparently embarrassed by attacks on his speeches, had them taken off the original archive sites) which support my statement -- challenged by "Former Tribe student" -- that Tribe recently has given other speeches at least as goofy as his "sex talk" at Yankee Stadium for NYU's commencement.
As time permits, I'll upload them to a YouTube channel I've set up for this purpose, at: http://www.youtube.com/user/1234toyuma.
For starters, I've uploaded the speech Tribe gave at the American Constitution Society convention on June 18, 2004. It was supposed to be a speech introducing Justice Breyer, who was the keynoter, and near the start Tribe promised he'd be talking "just for a couple of minutes," but he ended up droning on for 17 MINUTES!. Justice Breyer didn't speak for much longer.
I submit it's just goofy to spend nearly as much time "introducing" a speaker as the speaker spends on the speech being introduced. Of course, Tribe spent much of the time talking not about Justice Breyer, but about himself, evidently in an effort to upstage Justice Breyer.
Tribe's speech was so interminable that a tipster to David Lat, aka "Article III Groupie" (whose observations were reported in an 8/6/2004 post titled "Caffinated Justice") reported that "Justice Breyer 'probably had to go buy himself a venti frappuccino as a pick-me-up, after Larry Tribe's long, rambling, and self-referential "introduction" of his keynote!'" See here: http://underneaththeirrobes.blogs.com/main/2004/08/judicial_sighta.html.
There are various goofy aspects of the speech which I won't get into (at least for now), and will instead allow viewers to discover and enjoy on their own.
I should mention, however, that in January, 2006, Tribe was attacked for his involvement with resume fraud in connection with this speech -- for allowing himself to be introduced by his former law school RA, Peter Rubin, as having obtained tenure at Harvard at the amazingly early age of 28 (as early as Alan Dershowitz and Larry Summers, who both achieved tenure at 28), when in fact he received tenure at a relatively routine age (at least during that time period), age 30. Apparently this wasn't any sort of isolated mistake, as Tribe (according to a Google search done by a critic) had himself introduced at several other conferences as tenured at age 28. See here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1554446/posts
I did various Google searches, but couldn't find any indications of any effort by Tribe to address these charges, either by somehow explaining them away, or by apologizing for the misrepresentations (apparently repeated ones, made at several conferences).
"Former Tribe student": I'd be greatly interested in your reactions. Perhaps you could ask Tribe why he's never responded to the criticisms of his resume fraud (if that's the case), and why the American Constitution Society scrubbed its website of the video of Tribe's speech which was formerly hosted there, even though the website has many other videos from that time period (including the speech by Justice Breyer, who spoke just after Tribe). With your touching affection for your old professor (assuming, against all indications, that you're not actually Larry Tribe posing as a former student), I'm sure you'll want to assist Tribe with addressing such matters.
--Johnny Yuma
Dude, seriously, I know it must have upset you getting turned down by Harvard Law, but focusing a microscope on videos of one of its top professors doesn't seem like a very constructive reaction.
Why not focus on your own career -- use the setback to motivate you to higher achievement? If you focus on your own work, and not on nitpicking the work of others, maybe one day you'll be the one invited to give a commencement speech.
Honestly,
Everyone took this way too seriously. As a (now) NYU alumnus who was there, everyone thought it was a pretty good speech in the beginning (the Yankee Stadium stuff was great) that rambled on too long at the end. No one was pissed, and yeah, Michael J. Fox probably would have been cooler, but oh well, he was better than most people expected from "random Harvard Law professor."
Trust me, we didn't take graduation that seriously. If anyone posts a video of Sexton's speech, he had to stop at some point due to a series of "waves" rippling through Yankee Stadium. Not to mention the kid who jumped on the field and tried to steal home.
Under the coverage of the Jerry Springer speech I posted 5/17, at 9:40 a.m., wondering if someone had a transcript or video of Springer's speech, to make it possible to compare his overall effectiveness as a speaker to Tribe's. See here: http://abovethelaw.com/2008/05/an_early_review_of_jerry_sprin.php#comment-597406
I've now found a transcript online, here: http://www.timessquaregossip.com/2008/05/jerry-springer-returns-to-law-college.html
Apparently, Times Square Gossip got the transcript from Springer or someone in his camp. It's all caps, and contains various dashes to signal verbal pauses for the speech. I've converted it to lower case, and have paragraphed and punctuated it in a manner more suitable for reading. It appears below.
What I'm struck by is that Springer dealt with two of Tribe's main themes -- his family's brush with the Holocaust, and how lucky the graduates are to be in their position, or even to be alive -- and that Springer was so much more effective than Tribe. That is, a Northwestern law grad who hosts a "silly" talk show (his words) vastly outclassed a Harvard law grad who's a top professor at Harvard Law School. Go figure.
TRANSCRIPT OF JERRY SPRINGER COMMENCEMENT SPEECH (PREPARED REMARKS)
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, MAY 16, 2008
40 years ago this week, I sat where you now do: degree in hand, the prestige of this great law school on my resume and, perhaps immodestly, a real sense of achievement in my heart – but no sense of what my future would be, or if in fact, there would even be one.
Please understand. I was not alone in my uncertainty. For this was 1968, and America was unraveling. Our cities were burning. Vietnam was beckoning. 1A was no longer a grade, but rather a sentence – a draft classification to a war that groped for justification, and found none.
Martin Luther King had just been assassinated. Bobby Kennedy was about to be. And within 2 months and 2 miles from here, Chicago would explode around the dysfunction of the Democratic convention.
To be honest, contracts, torts and civil procedure seemed of little relevance. Because in the world outside Lincoln Hall, nothing seemed civil at all. I remember thinking at the time that our sheltered existence at law school, however prestigious, seemed totally detached from the chaos that consumed the world outside.
There were 190 of us in my graduating class and, believe it or not, only 2 of the 190 were women. Of the 188 men, only one was African-American. As a class, we were too white – too male and too privileged. And though it certainly took too long to change, what comfort it is today to look out at all of you and see the racial, gender and ethnic diversity that really is America.
But as happy as I am to look out and see all of your faces, I understand there are a number of you who aren’t too happy to see mine. To the students who invited me, thank you. I am honored. To the students who object to my presence, well, you’ve got a point. I too would’ve chosen someone else. But once asked, I don’t know, it would’ve been kind of arrogant, or at least unappreciative, for me to have said “no.”
So, here I am. But in an attempt to soften the pain, let me stipulate to the facts. You are right. I am an imperfect being (on my talk show, more colorful language might be employed), and I feel hardly qualified to tell you what to do with your lives.
The truth be told, though I’ve been lucky enough to enjoy a comfortable measure of success in my various careers, let’s be honest. I’ve been virtually everything you can’t respect: a lawyer, a mayor, a major market news anchor and a talk show host. Pray for me. if I get to heaven, we’re all going.
No, I don’t feel at all qualified to tell you what to do with your lives. Because I’ve noticed as I’ve gotten older, the wisdom of Winston Churchill’s words, that I’m not nearly as certain about anything, as I used to be about everything. But if I’m admittedly not up to the task of advising you what to do, maybe I can at least share some life observations that you might find useful.
Let’s assume that your prime discomfort with me is based on the ethics of what I do for a living.
Well, that’s a fair question, worthy of a serious response, because on this your graduation day I can tell you with some confidence, that you too will likely deal with these very same ethical considerations, no matter what path your career takes.
Surely, in every one of my chosen professions there were ethical “red flags” rising virtually every day. When I was Cincinnati’s mayor, there were 2 or 3 issues I really wanted to focus on. But how much would I compromise on other legislation just to get the votes I needed on my priorities? And how much pandering would I do to the voters, rationalizing all the while, that if I didn’t get re-elected I wouldn’t be able to get anything done?
Then for 10 years I became a journalist, perhaps the most ethically challenging profession of all. You see, I knew that 90% of what’s in the paper or on the television news, we don’t really need to know. Oh, we may want to know it, or we might find the story interesting, but we don’t really need to know. And yet, even though reporting the story isn’t necessary, how often do we go with a story anyway, because it will make a great headline, sell papers or drive up ratings – even if we know it might embarrass or hurt the business or career or family or reputation of the person we’re reporting on? That is a daily ethical question that I can tell you, having been in the newsroom, is almost always ignored.
And then of course, in my profession now as a host of a crazy talk show. Well, at least with this, I can rationalize that the show is only open to those who really, and I mean really want to be on – and they get to choose the subject matter, what is revealed, and what must not be revealed. But even with this, I grapple with ethical questions, not to mention the business consideration, that a so-called “cleaner” show would certainly be more profitable, ala “Oprah” and “Ellen” and “Dr. Phil.”
Then, of course, what about the career most of you will be choosing? That of an attorney. Think of the ethical issues you will have to deal with.
Will you work for a corporate client who perhaps is polluting – will you walk into your senior partner’s office after having been asked to prepare a memorandum in support of this client’s case and say, “I’m sorry, I’ll have to leave and find another place to work,” and then explain to your family why there won’t be a pay check coming in this month, despite the need to pay your child’s tuition?
Will you work for an insurance company that would prefer to find a way not to pay a claim, or to pay less than is warranted?
How about a client who seeks personal injury damages when you kind of know it wasn’t that bad?
Will you help a client find a way to pay less taxes, even though you’re taking advantage of an unintended loophole?
In defending a client in a criminal case – believing the truth lies elsewhere, will you nevertheless follow the wisdom of that great Texas trial attorney, Percy Foreman, “my clients want freedom, not justice!”
Look, I’m not suggesting that these moral dilemmas don’t have answers – and my guess is you’ve come up with a few, even as I’ve been talking – but what I am saying, is that whatever profession you choose, whatever it is you plan to do with this law school diploma, the ethical questions will never stop.
Indeed, it’s the frustration we feel from our first class here at Northwestern, when we are exposed, perhaps for the first time, to the Socratic method of teaching by our intimidating professors – always questions, never really answers.
Welcome to life. Indeed, do not think for a moment that my balancing act on the pinnacle of your protest is the exception. Unavoidably, you will all join me on this witness stand of conscience – trying your best to figure it out, never perfectly, but hopefully, always sincerely.
It is perhaps inevitable that we are inclined to always be judging others. But let me share this observation. I am not superior to the people on my show, and you are not superior to the people you will represent. That is not an insult. It is merely an understanding derived from a life spent on the front lines of human interaction, be it in the arena of politics, law, journalism, or in the spotlight of the media. We are all alike. Some of us just dress better, or have more money – or perhaps we were born into better circumstances of parental upbringing, health, brains and luck.
On this great day, when we honor your achievement – which is considerable by any standard – we might also say thank you to God in full recognition that whatever we achieve in life is 99% a gift. After all, not one person in this hall had anything to do with the decision to be born, to whom we’d be born, in what era, in what country, with what health, with what mind. Indeed, if the brightest most successful person living in America today – no matter who you think that person is – if he or she had been born in Darfur, the chances are, he or she would be dead by the age of 5.
No, life is a gift, as is living in America. And I know that from personal experience. You see, I am not the first lawyer in my family. My dad’s brother was. His practice was cut short, as was his life – in Auschwitz. My grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, they met their end as well – Chelmo, Thereisenstadt, camp after camp. Hitler turning my family tree into a single vine – mom and dad, by the grace of God, surviving, enabling them to bring my sister and me ultimately to America.
Four tickets on the Queen Mary, January 1949, sailing into the New York harbor. In silence, all the ship’s passengers gathered on the top deck of this grand oceanliner as we passed by the majesty of the Statue of Liberty. My mom told me in later years (I was only 5 at the time) shivering in the cold, that I had asked her: “What are we looking at? What does the statue mean?” in the German she spoke, she replied: “Ein tach allas.” “One day, everything!”
She was right. In one generation, here in America, my family went from near total annihilation to this ridiculously privileged life I live today because of my silly show.
Indeed, in America, all things are possible. So on this day, as we celebrate and honor your achievement, may it be for you – as it was for me – “ein tach allas,” one day, everything. Thank you for having me.
Hi, I'm "NYUAlum," who was the first to post the videos of Tribe's speech. I've now posted segments of basically the entire commencement ceremony, and have labeled most of them, so people who attended and their families can easily find parts of interest to them.
Literally a few minutes ago, by popular request, I added some "bonus" videos of the Willie Lopez streak -- very little of that was caught on the official commencement video. See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6QGfWSEPNc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiT-aMIQk9A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nnl1TG65b0
I agree with the 5/17 comment that as a whole the ceremony was okay. Still various parts of it, not just the weird stuff Tribe said in the main speech, aren't what one would expect of a major university like NYU. For example:
1. At the very start, the provost completely screwed up in reading the script. He started reading the part which called for a moment of silence for the victims of the recent Asian natural disasters; the announcer was supposed to read that. Lame. Watch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZvmRqgQnOs
2. The welcoming remarks by Martin Lipton, chair of the trustees, were pathetic and without content. Why should he get to talk just because he's a rich hotshot lawyer? Watch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zX1iYVcvIZ0
3. In a gaffe which made the New York Post the next day, NYU John Sexton MISPRONOUNCED THE NAME OF THE RECIPIENT OF A TOP HONOR, Michael Strahan of the New York Giants. That is, at the end of extolling how awesome and famous Strahan is, Sexton goofed on his name. Worse, Sexton has tried to cover it up. Watch the start of the video in which Strahan is introduced; the sound was muted to cover the mistake. Just listen at about 1:03 of this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkPNGD7_vRI
You can hear the mistake, however, at the very start of where Sexton introduces Strahan, here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxy1aLHW5SI
By the way, is it just me, or was Strahan's speech maybe 10 times better than Tribe's?
Bottom line: doesn't NYU deserve a president who knows how to pronounce the name of someone who's receiving a major honor?
4. The Mel Ochoa speech, clocking in at 10 minutes, was of course interminable and almost as embarrassing as Tribe's speech. See here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o60sQtzT6vI
Why, exactly, was this guy picked out of the 1000s of graduate students who could have given a speech?
5. I'm still trying to figure out why the CEO of PepsiCo got an honorary degree -- other than the fact that she's a double minority head of a Fortune 500 company and, I guess, someone to hit up for future contributions. See here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eYoLQCAQY8
By contrast, the other honorees, even Larry Tribe despite his awful speech, seemed worthy of receiving this academic honor.
6. Probably the low point of the entire ceremony was John Sexton's own speech, which dragged on for almost 20 minutes. See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvTib8OIVbw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8vZlHgqH8c
As someone here has commented, around 2:30 of the 2nd video you'll notice Sexton has to stop. The crowd's gotten so bored, and so tuned out, that it's doing multiple "waves." Rather than take the demonstrations in good humor or, better yet, take a hint and wind down the speech, Sexton scolds the crowd and asks people to do their waves silently, and then drones on for another 5 minutes.
What a buffoon! Check out this video, TAKEN IN THE CROWD DURING SEXTON'S RIDICULOUS SPEECH, in which a student says there's diarrhea literally coming out of Sexton's mouth: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_OQgIKVOJk
As with the Tribe speech, where you can see people in the background of the official video shot chatting away, no one -- literally NO ONE -- was paying attention to anything Sexton was saying. Why, then, did he bother? To hear himself talk?
7. My "bonus" videos of the Willie Lopez "streak" are above. The official video is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vwl68cM9kvQ
What's ridiculous about the whole event is the reaction of the security people depicted on the video -- you'd think they'd just seen the head of state assassinated, not some silly kid run around the bases. Totally embarrassing was the fact that instead of just waiting at home plate to arrest the kid once he reached it, in a polite and professional way (I'm sure Lopez wouldn't have resisted), they decided to TACKLE LOPEZ and prevent him from reaching home plate. Of course, that decision just hugely magnified the drama of the video, and the publicity for Lopez, spreading publicity for NYU's inability to control the arena far wider than it would have spread if the security people had exercised some prudence. All they'd have had to do was "escort" Lopez off the field, once he'd reached home base.
Again, much of the ceremony was awesome. But the parts sketched above, I submit, in addition to the fiasco which was the Tribe speech, reflect very poorly on NYU, particularly its president, John Sexton.