Add RSS RSS

Adventures in Lawyer Advertising: Tom Goldstein Wants To Be Your Lawyer

Veteran Supreme Court litigator Thomas Goldstein, who founded Goldstein & Howe (and SCOTUSblog) before taking the helm of Akin Gump’s Supreme Court practice, has a lot to crow about. He’s one of the country’s most celebrated appellate advocates, with 18 SCOTUS arguments under his belt.

But he hasn’t let success go to his head. Instead, he’s prepared this funny, charming, and self-effacing video advertisement. Check it out (via SCOTUSblog):

Tom Goldstein: Hire me for your Supreme Court case [YouTube]
Tom Goldstein Wants To Be Your Lawyer [SCOTUSblog]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by ChuckNorris | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:15 PM

First to say WTF?

avatar
2 Posted by ChuckNorris | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:19 PM

First to say that this guy is special, just like his writs of certiorari.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:23 PM

tom goldstein is so obnoxious...this is why the REAL supreme court bar doesn't take him seriously

he's trying to seem funny and self-effacing when he's really engaging in the most blatant exercise of self-promotion and ha-look-at-me-i'm-so-awesome-now

he's trying to pretend to be humorous when in fact he's just using it as a chance to recite his resume and to let people know how good he is, just like he did in his "iphone commercial"

he might have 18 supreme court cases under his belt, but he will never be known for tact, subtlety, or good taste

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:24 PM

tom goldstein is so obnoxious...this is why the REAL supreme court bar doesn't take him seriously

he's trying to seem funny and self-effacing when he's really engaging in the most blatant exercise of self-promotion and ha-look-at-me-i'm-so-awesome-now

he's trying to pretend to be humorous when in fact he's just using it as a chance to recite his resume and to let people know how good he is, just like he did in his "iphone commercial"

he might have 18 supreme court cases under his belt, but he will never be known for tact, subtlety, or good taste

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:25 PM

tom goldstein is so obnoxious...this is why the REAL supreme court bar doesn't take him seriously

he's trying to seem funny and self-effacing when he's really engaging in the most blatant exercise of self-promotion and ha-look-at-me-i'm-so-awesome-now

he's trying to pretend to be humorous when in fact he's just using it as a chance to recite his resume and to let people know how good he is, just like he did in his "iphone commercial"

he might have 18 supreme court cases under his belt, but he will never be known for tact, subtlety, or good taste

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:25 PM

tom goldstein is so obnoxious...this is why the REAL supreme court bar doesn't take him seriously

he's trying to seem funny and self-effacing when he's really engaging in the most blatant exercise of self-promotion and ha-look-at-me-i'm-so-awesome-now

he's trying to pretend to be humorous when in fact he's just using it as a chance to recite his resume and to let people know how good he is, just like he did in his "iphone commercial"

he might have 18 supreme court cases under his belt, but he will never be known for tact, subtlety, or good taste

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:27 PM

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:37 PM

Is Tom Goldstein so obnoxious?

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:39 PM

YUP!

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:42 PM

amazing to me how much firms are willing to indulge their supreme court practices. my understanding is that appellate groups are, by and large, loss leaders for biglaw.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:42 PM

3:23, 3:24, 3:25 -- you really need to get those DT's taken care of.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:42 PM

i think it's pretty funny, even though he seems full of himself.

also...why can't anybody pronounce "certiorari"? It's not hard to say. I went to the supreme court recently and heard the tour guide say "cersharee." Kind of blows my mind.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:47 PM

CARE-tee-o-rah-ree.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:50 PM

i think it's pretty funny, even though he seems full of himself.

also...why can't anybody pronounce "certiorari"? It's not hard to say. I went to the supreme court recently and heard the tour guide say "cersharee." Kind of blows my mind.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 3:56 PM

3:47 - I suppose you pronounce "prima facie" PRI-mah fa-KEE-a. Latin nerd.

sir-she-a-ror-ree

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 4:08 PM

oh come on this, is funny.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 4:08 PM

the bobbling head at the end is a nice touch.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 4:13 PM

3:23, 3:24, and 3:25 (twice!) is so obnoxious - this is why the REAL ATL readership doesn't take him/her seriously

he/she might have posted the same crap 4 times in a row, but s/he will never be known for tact, subtlety, good taste, or an ability to post comments

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 4:18 PM

"C" in Latin are pronounced as "K", since the Romans already have an "S" for that sound...

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 4:25 PM

3:42: RE "cersharee"

Dat's jussa local BAL-more/Warshington accent comin-out, hahn.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 4:30 PM

good point 3:56

4:18: many of us are aware of that, but in English we don't always faithfully replicate the pronunciation of other languages: you don't hear us saying Paris as "par-ee" do you?

Nor do you hear people saying PRI-mah fa-KEE-a for "prima facie." And why 3:56 correctly renders cert. as sir-she-a-ror-ree

tho maybe i would replace "ror" with "rar" or "roar"

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 4:32 PM

here is 4:30 again

M-W.com gives the pronunciation like this:

Pronunciation:
\ˌsər-sh(ē-)ə-ˈrer-ē, -ˈrär-ē, -ˈra-rē\

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 4:35 PM

Pretty funny, actually.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 4:41 PM

I'm surprised that the Roger Lou of America's University, Washington College of Law (best in America) hasn't posted here, since Mr. Goldstein is an alumnus of America's University, Washington College of Law (best in America). I know because I am, too.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 5:11 PM

I'm surprised that the Roger Lou of America's University, Washington College of Law (best in America) hasn't posted here, since Mr. Goldstein is an alumnus of America's University, Washington College of Law (best in America). I know because I am, too.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 5:14 PM

Tom Goldstein is a dork.

He is the TTT of Supreme Court bar members. Can you imagine Walter Delinger, Seth Waxman, Ted Olson, Carter Phillips, or Paul Clement doing a video like this?

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 5:15 PM

Tom Goldstein is a dork.

He is the TTT of Supreme Court bar members. Can you imagine Walter Delinger, Seth Waxman, Ted Olson, Carter Phillips, or Paul Clement doing a video like this?

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 5:23 PM

The Goldstein bashers are the TTT of ATL commenters.

Can you imagine FRAT STUD or the MagnaHofstra guy committing so many multiple posts?

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 5:24 PM

Not everyone, but many of the people I've heard criticize him came off as though there were some sour grapes. For where he came from and what he started from, I'm pretty impressed, and unless you anonymous guests ARE Ted Olson or Carter Phillips, you should be too.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 5:24 PM

Not everyone, but many of the people I've heard criticize him came off as though there were some sour grapes. For where he came from and what he started from, I'm pretty impressed, and unless you anonymous guests ARE Ted Olson or Carter Phillips, you should be too.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 5:26 PM

5:14 - No. But that's because Goldstein is younger and more hip than those guys.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 5:28 PM

Also, Ted Olson is a TTT among human beings.

Seriously, that man is heinous.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 5:51 PM

where is roger lou

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 5:53 PM

You'd think a Supreme Court lawyer with as much experience as Tom Goldstein would know that it's Coram, not Corim.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 6:04 PM

5:26 -- Paul Clement is younger. None of them, Goldstein included, are hip at all.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 6:06 PM

Carter Phillips here, 6:04 -- I take offense; I like to get my groove on every day.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 6:48 PM

Dearest friends of Tom Goldberg,

Hello. I am the Roger Lou often who has having been requested that I making my appearance on this thread. And since I no am dead, although angry woman who calling herself Mrs. Lou says otherwise, then I am posting. Thank you very much.

Tom Golden is what we call at America's University, Washington College of Law, a "TTT/GULC"
(it stands for the toilet bowl called Georgetown Law). He is average and not the real expert of the ceriorari bar. He never was a "law clerk" to a judge of the America's Supreme Court, he works for law firm named after Forrest Gump (bad movie), and not even was he able to get accepted to America's University (best is U.S. of A.). Essentially, therefore, Tom Bernstein not anyone who the Roger Lou would hire when he wants to taking his case to Judge Judy of the People's Supreme Court.

With respect,
诶比西

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 6:52 PM

It's kinda funny and it's a fucking PARODY of TV lawyer ads for God sakes.

All y'all haters working TTTraffic court STFU till you've actually argued and won at SCOTUS.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 6:55 PM

Actually, I have argued before the Court and I can attest that the general consensus is a bit unfavorable towards Tom Goldstein.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 8:27 PM

Agree w/5:24 - Goldstein is an impressive guy.

Re: 6:55's comment, I think some of this may be "player-hating" from people who went to supposedly better law schools but have fewer SCOTUS arguments, less $$$, etc.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 8:54 PM

i don't think people are denying that goldstein has accumulated an impressive record - the critics' point is simply that he's pretty gauche about it all.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, May 17, 2008 9:28 AM

Was that a grownup talking to his laptop?

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, May 17, 2008 2:55 PM

Phillips is the real deal. Word on Olsen, though, he that is doesn't have it. He's gotten by on his political connections and name, but is typically underprepared and not well respected by the justices.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, May 17, 2008 5:40 PM

This blog is going downhill fast...just not what it used to be!
And, the ad is HYSTERICAL! Get over yourselves already.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, May 17, 2008 5:41 PM

This blog is going downhill fast...just not what it used to be!
And, the ad is HYSTERICAL! Get over yourselves already.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, May 17, 2008 5:41 PM

This blog is going downhill fast...just not what it used to be!
And, the ad is HYSTERICAL! Get over yourselves already.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, May 17, 2008 5:44 PM

LAT--why is every comment posting multiple times? When one hits "Post Comment", the system doesn't take you to a new screen to indicate the comment went through, nor does it give a "comment submitted" message.

BTW--This new format sucks!!!

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, May 18, 2008 8:52 AM

The smart one's post once!

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, May 18, 2008 4:01 PM

roger lou to solicitor general!!!

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, May 19, 2008 9:51 AM

@8:52 - "The smart one's" what? The word "one's" is possessive.
Or did you mean "The smart ones post once"?

If you are going to call yourself smart, you should learn to use an apostrophe correctly.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, May 19, 2008 3:28 PM

This is a man who gets his S.C. cases by being pushy, not by being distinguished. He tries to solicit for SC cases from the atty who argued the case at the lower level. There is an unwritten rule that this is not to be done. This man is unprofessional.

He also appears to have no values or no direction. He'll take any SC case he can get, regardless if it's representing individuals, industry, etc.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, April 22, 2009 9:07 PM

The most common way of pronouncing certiorari is "ser-shah-rair-eye". Follow this link for an explanation. http://sobek.colorado.edu/~mciverj/WP_Certiorari_120301.html

Post Your Comment