Legal Eagle Wedding Watch 4/13- 4/27: Blank Slate

Is anyone else sick of LEWW’s logo? We’ve grown weary of the weird paper-doll figures holding hands — they just don’t say “celebration” to us.
So we’re asking our readers to help us pick a new visual for Legal Eagle Wedding Watch. Some of you had gripes about ATL’s new design — here’s your chance to put your stamp on a small corner of the site. Your submission can be a photo (an artistic detail shot from your own wedding, perhaps?) or a graphic of your own design. An allusion to the law would be a plus, but the most important thing is that the image convey the theme of impressive people getting married. (And, of course, it must not be an image that’s copyrighted by someone else.)
Send us your entries (please e-mail them here and not to ATL’s tips line). We’ll pick our favorite and give you a big shout-out and heaps of gratitude for perking up this space.
And now, on to this week’s finalists:
1.) Suzanne deVries and Adam Decker2.) Kristy Hong, Jonas Blank III
More about these candidates, after the jump.
1.) Suzanne deVries and Adam Decker
(Buy them a sausage stuffer.)
The Case:
- This pair met as law students at Columbia, where the bride was a Harlan Fiske Stone scholar (meaning she probably got into HLS). She was magna at Dartmouth; he went to Duke.
- Both are currently associates at New York law firms, the bride at Cleary Gottlieb and the groom at White & Case.
- Suzanne has lawyering in her blood. Her father, the late Henry deVries, was a law professor at Columbia and a partner at Baker & McKenzie.
The Case Against:
- Nothing, except a nagging sense that Suzanne might have settled. But we hear all the cool girls are settling these days.
2.) Kristy Hong, Jonas Blank III
(Buy them a placemat.)
The Case:
- Another same-law-school couple, this time from HLS. The bride did her undergrad at MIT; the groom went to Duke.
- Many of you will recognize Jonas as the 2003 Skadden summer associate who notoriously — and mistakenly, of course — sent the firm’s entire underwriting department an e-mail in which he announced that he was “busy doing jack shit” and occupying himself by “typing e-mails and bullshitting with people.” Moments later Jonas’s name was blazing like a comet across Biglaw. His jaw-dropping blunder earned a write-up in the New Yorker and a page on snopes.com (which includes Jonas’s apology) (also see coverage by ATL and Skadden Insider). LEWW is delighted to shine the spotlight on Jonas once again, this time in happier circumstances.
- Despite his monumental gaffe, Jonas received an offer from Skadden. (Note to 2Ls: That was a happier era for summer associates. You’re living in leaner times.) He was an associate there until March 2007, and he’s now flourishing at Richards Kibbe & Orbe, where he may be the most famous associate (but not the hottest — that title goes to the groom in couple #2 here).
- Kristy practices employment and compliance law at Warner Music Group in New York.
The Case Against:
- Their website touts a “honeyfund” for their wedding guests to pony up for the honeymoon. LEWW need hardly say that we consider this to be in dubious taste.
3.) Elena Klau and Chad Silverman
(Buy them a teapot.)
The Case:
- We’ve previously documented our big school-crush on Dartmouth grads; we believe it’s the elite university least likely to tool-ify its graduates. So we love that Elena and Chad met at Dartmouth and even got engaged on a hill overlooking the campus (read the entire proposal story here).
- Chad has a JD from Columbia and is an associate at Skadden. Elena is studying for a doctorate in political science at George Washington and has a day job that is frankly too boring to write about here.
The Case Against:
- Their picture isn’t really doing it for us; but the one on their website is much hotter, particularly of Elena. Damn that NYT eyebrow rule!
4.) Natalie MacLean, Russell Leino
(Buy them a lasagna turner.)
The Case:
- A federal clerkship! Unfortunately, it’s a lowly District Court judge (Thomas P. Griesa of S.D.N.Y). Natalie has a JD from Columbia. She and Russell met as Harvard undergrads.
- Russell is an analyst at Giuliani Partners and an auxiliary police officer with the NYPD. This reminds us of a guy in our college dorm, who was a volunteer fireman so he could have a special light. He was totally into those lights; they were like porn for him (What you want! What you need!). Is this common?
The Case Against:
- OMG, what is going on with the picture on their website? They both look plastered, and Russ appears to be defecating on something as Natalie humps his leg. Not Harvard’s proudest hour.
- They have a video. Our readers know that we generally think these videos are an abomination, although theirs is one of the least awful ones we’ve viewed.
The Verdict:
The Legend of Jonas Blank is a tale of ruin, redemption, and ultimately rebirth, offering solace and hope to every wretched soul who’s ever been brutalized by the “reply all” button. From cautionary tale to LEWW’s Groom of the Week — you’ve salvaged your career and your soul, and for that we toast you, Jonas Blank. (Congratulations to Kristy too, of course!)




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
Is that Stiffler?
This week is extremely unimpressive for such lofty credentials. Shouldn't Jenna Bush be an honorary nominee - it is graduation season and people hand out honorary JDs like they are going out of style.
Did Kristy graduate in the same year as Jonas? I don't remember her.
That honeyfund may be the tackiest thing I've ever heard of. Way to stay slimy, Jonas. Boy, people do not change. Period.
That blond dude in the first picture is scary.
I'd like to be an auxiliary police officer just so I have an excuse to carry a gun.
Who is writing this? For couple #1, being a Stone scholar just means having a GPA slightly above a B+ for a year. Not particularly prestigious or difficult to get.
Also, no need to dis SDNY clerkships. Natalie is probably the most prestigious of all eight of the people in this LEWW.
Being a Harlan Fiske Stone scholar simply means you achieved a certain grade point average that academic year. It has nothing to do with your pre-admission credentials. The Hamilton Scholarship at CLS is what you get when you also got into HLS or YLS.
Seriously, you picked the couple with the "honeyfund"??
Your judgment more than jumped the shark here -- it jumped half a dozen sharks here, followed by an attempt to surf the English channel and boogeyboard up the Thames.
So district court clerkships are lowly now? I'd love to hear ATL tell that in court to a district court judge.
ATL to disbarrment!
I hope Jonas Blank didn't send any stray e-mails to his new in-laws.
Are you kidding me, 11:16? Cravath pisses on applicants that have district court clerkships.
From reading this article, I would have thought Jonas was marrying himself. It is easy to miss the part about the bride with no picture and one brief sentence about her at the end. And you chose him, I mean this couple to win??? Hilarious.
Asking people to pay for your honeymoon? When you make $$$$? Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with people? Yeah, let me donate to Jonas' honeymoon instead of helping kids with cancer.
Jonas = ASSHOLE.
11:16 - The point of LEWW is that it is a parody of elitism and credentials-obsession. In this parodic world view, even S.D.N.Y. clerkships are looked down upon, as inferior to circuit and Supreme Court clerkships.
Remember, it's a parody. Tongue in cheek. Not to be taken so seriously.
That Honeyfund is just wrong. Love ya LEWW, but you need to kick it up a couple of notches.
Dartmouth as "the elite university least likely to tool-ify its graduates"? You obviously haven't been paying attention: http://gawker.com/tag/dartmouth/
As has been noted, "what asswipe defends witchcraft burnings?"
These people are all sad and empty.
11:16 = GULC tool bag with no sense of humor.
Jonas Blank got married? This is HUGE for ATL!
Where's the animated siren? The all-caps headline?
If LEWW is a parody, it sure does a good job of being so lame and irrelevant that it could be a parody but in fact being a relatively earnest effort reminiscent of many of the kinds of values and interests held by the douches we all work with.
** DISTRICT COURT / COA DEBATE ***
if you are gonna clerk in the TTT district court in manhattan, and you plan to next apply to work at a top law firm (e.g., cravath, wachtell, davis polk, or sutherland), then you better have a good reason for not taking a job with one of the 500 pearl street-based 2d cir. judges (e.g., sotomayer, katzmann, sack, livingston, and a few seniors). the only reason i can think of to work at the TTT-level district court is that you were rejected by a circuit court judge. its no biggie, there will be jobs for district court clerks too... perhaps getting me my latte from starbucks.
11:49,
I was offered 3 clerkships -- state appeals court (NJ), fed magistrate (EDNY), and fed bankruptcy (SDNY) -- any thoughts on which is the best way into "big law"
(a) NJ appeals court
(b) EDNY mag.
(c) SDNY bankruptcy
Thanks!
Dear Sleepless with 3 Clerkship Offers.
11:49 here. I would go with option (d), "none of the above." If all you can do is get an icky state court clerkship or a job with an article I judge, then you may as well accept a position as a contract attorney b/c your legal career is destined for failure.
I wish you the best of luck in your legal career.
Thank you, ATL, for introducing me to the concept of the "honeyfund," which has got to be the tackiest, cheesiest thing ever dreamed up by the Matrimonial-Retailer Industrial Complex. And leave it to a couple of Manhattan lawyers to belly up to the trough.
11:49 = not so subtle Sutherland troll.
If you want to do bankruptcy, then take that clerkship. If you want a broader legal practice, then take the EDNY magistrate clerkship.
11:49, there are plenty of people who work at Cravath, DPW etc. with no clerkships at all. Wachtell is its own story, but how many of us have a shot at Wachtell in the first place? (My year at NYU they hired one grad.)
And for what it's worth, I personally know at least a couple of people who turned down flyover state circuit clerkships for the SDNY. If you want to be a litigator, by which I mean see the inside of a courtroom or other tribunal, you could easily learn more in any district court; and if you want to do commercial law, you'll see more of it in the SDNY than just about any other court in the country.
Also, before anyone starts poisoning the well: I do transactional work in London, never clerked, and have no horse in this race. Just saying is all.
11:55, if you'd like to hang out in downtown Brooklyn dealing with stupid ass discovery disputes and wacky pro se litigants, then by all means "clerk" for an EDNY magistrate.
11:55. I agree with 11:58-- don't take either job, unless it is your goal to work at a TTT firm like Sutherland.
The blond dude at the top looks just like one of the Hasons. Weird.
Auxillary Police Officers in NYC don't carry guns. They do carry a nightstick, though.
Me rikey Cravath very much.
11:55.
Why did you apply to these sub-par clerkships in the first place? I suggest that you immediately decline each offer, and submit apps to SDNY district court, and Second Circuit judges. If you can manage to get a SDNY bankruptcy court clerkship, you can't be as TTTish as some of these other posters imply. NJ appeals court does nothing for you (unless you want to practice in NJ), and EDNY magistrate carries many stigma (counldn't get an EDNY district court clerkship, couldn't get a SDNY district or magistrate clerkship, etc.). RUN AWAY FROM YOUR OFFERS or take the SDNY bankrpt. ct. job and pretend that you are interested in that area of the law.
FYI, I believe Natalie was on law review at Columbia. Way better than some silly Stone Scholar designation.
11:55, don't listen to the haters. Those are perfectly respectable clerkships.
Both posters at 12:02 have good advice.
Can the new logo be gender neutral? Right now it only includes a man and a woman.
if she was on clr she was probably a kent scholar.
What's with the hatred of the Honeyfund? How is there any difference with asking for gifts from a wedding registry and asking for contributions for a honeymoon trip?
Have you not seen Williams & Sonoma/Bloomingdales/Bed, Bath & Beyond registries? They are just as blatant in terms of telling people what to give as a gift. You don't even need to ever see the item - just put in your credit card details.
Are you against wedding gifts?
Geez, ATL commenters are bitchy...
Poor Jonas - one mistyped email and everything he ever does will be covered on this site, and draw the ire of crazy jealous people who didn't go to HLS or didn't work at Skadden or couldn't afford a nice honeymoon, or ... simply had too much time in their day.
12:31 -- No gender neutral. Civil unions are not tolerated here.
Anyone criticizing the honeymoon gift thing clearly has never organized/paid for a wedding. The whole experience is a money grab by hotels/caterers/florists/photographers/etc., and if I could have had someone contribute to my honeymoon instead of giving me a fourth flower vase for my small NY apartment, that would have been great.
Wow, yesterday's solidarity with the PH's associate was a short-lived experience in niceness on this site/these comment boards.
LEWW used to nice/cute/interesting, now it's just mean. Taking a happy thing like a wedding announcement and making it an excuse to rip on people you don't know is shameful.
11:55 AM,
Where did you go to law school? (a) Thomas A. Cooley; (b) Loyola; or (c) American's Washington College of Law? These are the only three schools (and "a" and "c" lost their ABA accredidation) that regularly feed clerks to intermediate state court judges and article 1 appointees.
Accept an EDNY mag. ct. "clerkship" and you are destined to a life of 1st level doc review as a contract attorney (or as a staff attorney, if you're really lucky).
1:02. Very good point. Now shut your trap!
Why any lawyer submits an announcement to the Times anymore is a mystery to me.
1:04 -- Thomas Cooley has ABA accred., not AU though.
12:53: "people who ... couldn't afford a nice honeymoon"
you mean Jonas?
"Poor Jonas - one mistyped email and everything he ever does will be covered on this site, and draw the ire of crazy jealous people who didn't go to HLS or didn't work at Skadden or couldn't afford a nice honeymoon"
Poor Jonas seems like he can't afford a nice honeymoon either. And his infamous error was one of judgment and character, not a "mistype." And I worked with him, so I'm probably more qualified than you on the subject.
"Poor Jonas - one mistyped email and everything he ever does will be covered on this site, and draw the ire of crazy jealous people who didn't go to HLS or didn't work at Skadden or couldn't afford a nice honeymoon"
Poor Jonas seems like he can't afford a nice honeymoon either. And his infamous error was one of judgment and character, not a "mistype." And I worked with him, so I'm probably more qualified than you on the subject.
CLERKING v. CONTRACT ATTORNEY
is working as a "contract attorney" / "staff attorney" really as low-level as being a clerk to a magistrate judge?
1:16(4). Yes. After four years of undergrad and three years of law school, you should hang yourself if all you are offered is a clerkship with an Article I "judge." I would rather be a paralegal at Paul Hastings or
1:16(4). Yes. After four years of undergrad and three years of law school, you should hang yourself if all you are offered is a clerkship with an Article I "judge." I would rather be a paralegal at Paul Hastings or an infected secretary at SAB than working on pro se habeas corpus petitions and social security appeals.
1:16. Tough call. If forced, I would probably accept a position as a clerk to a S.D.N.Y. or E.D.N.Y. magistrate judge before a position as a contract or a staff attorney. After those two districts, you pretty much are looking to law firms like a middle-of-the-road grad from a 2nd or 3rd-tier law school... and trust me, no "big firm" in a major market is looking for that. You always will be asked "why didn't you clerk for a district court judge" and, in each situation, everyone will know its because you were unable to land a district court clerkship in that same district. When I clerked on the COA though, one of my co-clerks had worked for a mag. judge ("prestigous" district), before moving up to a district judge, and then to my COA judge. Lesson is... hard work and there is hope, even for a mag. judge clerk.
Hilarious that a blogger who gives the wide world an opportunity to snoop into a gift registry intended for a couple's friends and family would consider a honeyfund to be in "dubious taste"...
1.16(2) - I know Jonas from law school, and didn't really like him that much at the time (and haven't seen him much since), but I wouldn't wish this sort of treatment on anyone.
Wow, the "Jonas can't afford a nice honeymoon" comments are horrible. What, just because he (and presumably his wife) chose this honeyfund thing over tangible gifts?!?
Don't lots of couples ask "to choose their own gifts" these days? I've given cash as a gift at the last five weddings I've been to.
i would rather be known as a clerk for a magistrate judge, than be this jonas character.
Don't listen to the haters. You learn a lot during a clerkship with a magistrate judge. I agree with the 12:02 advice re: specialization of law vs broader practice. Another thing to note is that if you really want to break into biglaw, you can leverage your mag. clerkship to a district court clerkship, which will help your prospects immensely. Just a question of whether you want to spend that extra year at low pay.
Do listen to the haters and not to 1:49 PM!
If you clerk for a magistrate judge, you will henceforth be known as a retard. If you clerk for a NJ appeals judge, you will henceforth be known as a more retarded retard (for not clerking for the magistrate). If you clerk for the bankruptcy judge, you are slightly less retarded and may even land a good counter-cyclical job doing... you guessed it, bankruptcy !!!
I would rather die than not work at Fried Franks.
I would rather die than be 2:03.
anyone knocking on a clerkship in any court is some status-obsessed nincompoop who doesn't know his paralegal from his secretary.
Hey I'm 2:03 and I don't like people saying they rather die than be me. I'm not so bad. Its Fried Frank thats the real enemy, not me, your buddy, 2:03.
2:14. I know both my paralegal and my secretary. I think each clerked for magistrates in the Eastern District of New York. We would not hire such sloths as associates.
How many damn grads does Columbia put out and why are they all getting married at once?!
To 1:05pm -
Now now. It's still ok to post your wedding announcement in the Times. One can escape ridicule considering that LEWW doesn't catch every ivy/honored lawyer couple that's in the paper. In fact, in the last year they've even missed grads from schools with alums they "want to pour chocolate over and eat with a spoon."
2:20--
When the revolution comes, you'll be the first one left unemployed.
Here's a question for you: Does LEWW's Laurie Linn have an axe to grind with Jonas Blank for some reason? They overlapped at Duke by the looks of their web bios, so perhaps they knew each other...
Could there be a secret in her past? Could there have been a liaison (or a failed one) that she regrets (or has never gotten over)? Is she jealous of his lovely HLS bride and exciting Manhattan lifestyle (while she toils for a no-name D.C. firm and lives in Virginia)? Does it bother her that Jonas got his own New Yorker profile, while all she can tell people at dinner parties is that she knows David Lat? Was her own honeymoon less glamorous than Hawaii and Australia? Does she wish she didn't have so many poorly-chosen wedding gifts in her suburban home? What motivates her to trawl through wedding registries for things to make fun of?
Anyone out there from Duke with any info?
I actually think Laurie was pretty easy on Jonas Blank, considering his spectacular past. I would describe her write-up as "gently mocking." It could have been a lot worse.
The commenters, on the other hand...
I've had a couple of interactions with Jonas during his Skadden days, and my impression is that he's even more in love with himself than the average HLS grad.
And let's not forget that he presumably chose to put his wedding announcement in the paper. He had to know ATL would be all over it.
"Jonas got his own New Yorker profile" -- whutt?? So did Eliot Spitzer's hooker. Profile does not equal complimentary story.
law clerks to magistrate judges get fired from TTT firms for having herpes
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
I hereby RECOMMEND that guys with herpes from my high school accept jobs from Paul Hastings and Sutherland Asbill & Brennen.
I further RECOMMEND that the district court declare that "it was no big deal."
IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.
_______/s/__________________
U.S. Magistrate Judge FRAT STUD
Eastern District of New York
Congrats, FRAT STUD, on your appointment to the bench.
Sincerely,
Fart Stud
If you look closely, the current logo has two women holding hands, and two men holding hands . . . and then a woman and a man holding hands with what appears to be a gender-neutral child.
It is hereby
ORDERED, that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Frat Stud dated May 8, 2008 is adopted in its entirety; and it is further
ORDERED, that guys with herpes from Magistrate Judge Frat Stud's high school accept jobs from Paul Hastings and Sutherland Asbill & Brennen; and it is further
ORDERED, that it was no big deal; and it is further
ORDERED, that Jonas's "honeyfund" shall bear the costs of this proceeding.
SO ORDERED.
May 8, 2008
Brooklyn, NY
______/s/________
U.S.D.J.
Jonas seems like one of those people who's okay looking with clothes on, but lumpy and pasty naked. On that basis alone, he should not have won.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
*** Summary Order ****
For the reasons set forth in Judge 4:05 PM's order, explaining that "guys with herpes from Magistrate Judge Frat Stud's high school accept jobs from Paul Hastings and Sutherland Asbill & Brennen" and "that 'it was no big deal,'" it is hereby ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed that the order of the District Court is AFFIRMED in its entirety.
Dated this 8th Day of May in
New York, New York.
COA Clerk > DC Clerk > Associate > Staff Atty > Paralegal > Runner > Contract Atty > Herpes > Jonas
Natalie is such a wonderful, fun, awesome person that she deserves to win hands down.
Cravath loves district clerks because district clerks get to the point and are less inclined to make a treatise out of everything.
Take the Bank SDNY clerkship
Contrary to the postings on this site, there is no "stigma" associated with clerking for a bankruptcy judge, a magistrate, or a state appellate judge. In fact, I know a feeder circuit judge who thinks some magistrates are better than article III judges because they actually have to apply to be a judge (can't just use political connects).
At any rate, although you may not get a huge bump for clerking for an Article I judge, you certainly won't be viewed in a negative light for having done so. The reality is, if you were qualified to work at DPW before you did the clerkship, you'll be qualified to work there afterwards. But if you weren't qualified to begin with, the Article I clerkship may not give you the boost you need to get the job.
4:38.. let me revise.
SCOTUS Clerk > COA Clerk > DC Clerk > Partner > Associate > Staff Atty > Magistrate Judge > Paralegal > Magistrate Judge's Clerk > Runner > Herpes > SAB Associate > Herpes > Lunch Lady > Homeless Man > Crack Whore > Contract Atty
4:50. Is it really more prestigious to be a "homeless man" or a "crack whore" (or both) than a "contract attorney"? Can't you think of any less prestigous jobs than being a contract attorney?
4:50. Is it really more prestigious to be a "homeless man" or a "crack whore" (or both) than a "contract attorney"? Can't you think of any less prestigous jobs than being a contract attorney?
Hey, lunch lady should be in there between paralegal and magistrate judge.
And where's Roy Pearson in all of this?
roy pearson is a district ALJ, so he definitely is qualified to be a federal magistrate judge (or at least a m.j.'s retarded clerk). i also think he could be a crack whore or, obviously, a contract attorney. i doubt SAB would hire him, though, so he probably falls on the prestige scale somewhere b/w "SAB associate" and "Herpes."
the spin stops here.
4:56. Nothing comes to mind.
Do you guys like Foley & Lardner?
Why all the hating against magistrate judges? I clerked for a district judge in SDNY and found the magistrate judges to be quite good. SDNY perfected a recipe for success, too - Article III judges delegate to the Article I judges much pretrial discovery, habeas corpus, social security appeals, and pro se nonesense. The magistrates tend to serve a very useful function -- as do their clerks -- of handling this mundane stuff so that the district judges can spend their time handling the much more pressing matters. A good magistrate judge (and, by extension, a good clerk to a good magistrate judge) can be very valuable in a very busy district.
I get the additions and substitutions, but everyone left Jonas off the list. This is the LEWW with Jonas marrying himself as the winner.
I would change to insert after Cockpunch > Jonas, before Homeless Man in 4:50's comment.
worse jobs than a contract attorney...
-- Judge Halverson's lover (if on bottom)
-- Sex slave
-- Guy on Atlantic City's boardwalk who will drink his own piss for $10.00 (its really funny to see him do it)
Aside from these three jobs, there are no other jobs that are worse or less prestigious than being a contract attorney (crack whore is close to being tied).
5:11, pretty sure SDNY didn't "perfect a recipe for success," most federal magistrates everywhere do the exact same thing.
LOL at 4:05 who wins post of the day.
Dear Mr. Lat,
Can you please have a "best of ATL" like craigslist has a "best of" section? Some of the comments deserve recognition and to be saved for posterity. We could even vote on the best of the week/day/whatever!
Thanks,
A now-laughing ATL Reader
Is a staff attorney more prestigious than a contract attorney?
I vote for the WGWAG couple. Wait - there are two. Isn't this definitive evidence of what WGWAG means?
herpes.
herpes.
if you ever accept a job as a clerk to a magistrate "judge" or as a contract attorney, kill yourself.
5:11, yes, a good magistrate judges (and by extension, his or her clerk), can be a very valuable asset. My secretary, contract attorneys, and catering manager are also very valuable assets.
I also would not want their jobs.
9:48. You are an ass-diver.
I've also had the pleasure of working with Jonas. Total douche.
The Wedding Watch icon reminds me of scientology or some other cult.
As a grad of MIT and HLS, Kristy Hong is evidence that academic intelligence does not necessarily jive with life intelligence. How could she marry such a douchebag?
Why is this guy a douchebag again? Because he included the wrong people on an email?
Also, a few of you people clearly don't understand that the honeyfund is intended to be an alternative to the other gift options. Its not some alternative to "giving money to kids with cancer" as one idiot has suggested.
Seriously though, I don't even know Jonas Blank but I'm unconvinced of his douchebaggery with the stories thus far.
I was pretty good friends with Jonas in law school, and no doubt that means I'm biased, but in my opinion Jonas is a lovely person and not self-obsessed in the least. Congrats to him.
Who would marry a chick from MIT? She has to be ugly.