Add RSS RSS

Non-Sequiturs: 05.16.08

* C'mon, Cindy -- give up those tax returns! [TaxProf Blog]

* "Blogging as a Feminist Legal Method"? Shinyung, holla. [University of Pennsylvania Law School (PDF)]

* Why would you risk a lawsuit by naming your bed-and-breakfast "The Legend of French Lick"? Well, it sounds kinda hot. [Snark Hunting]

* What's next for Yahoo? [Dealbreaker]

* Does copyright law burden free speech? If so, what should be done about it? [Volokh Conspiracy]

Comments
avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 7:25 PM

First to call Cindy McCain hot. (And probably the only)

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 7:31 PM

although its useles now, good luck to all the California Bar takers about to find out their results in 1.5 hours!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, May 16, 2008 8:44 PM

First to say the first poster is sick in the head.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, May 17, 2008 12:10 PM

I missed the calls from this blog for Hillary to release her tax returns back when she was stalling for months about it.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, May 17, 2008 1:07 PM

I could see "tight" (in several different ways) for Cindy McCain, but "hot"? That's sick.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, May 17, 2008 7:40 PM

Of course copyright burdens free speech....but that's sort of okay since the copyright act's authority is the constitution

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, May 19, 2008 10:47 AM

"From cattle ranchers to diamond merchants to third-wave feminists... groups of people opt out of the legal system-- and instead use personalized and informal methods of rights assertion-- as a means of overcoming the ineffectiveness of state-sponsored laws,' writes Stein."

Well... duh. This is supposed to be insightful? The expense and inefficiency of litigation have always made it the option of last resort when informal means of conflict resolution have failed; the blogosphere is simply the latest manifestation of that phenomenon. How much of an academic's job involves learning big words to obscure blindingly obvious propositions?

Post Your Comment