Add RSS RSS

Monday Morning Quarterback: Paul Pierce, Kobe Bryant, and the Pending White Sox Collapse

Paul Pierce Paul Anthony Pierce Boston Celtics.JPGLawyers love to debate. So we're kicking off a new feature here at Above the Law called Monday Morning Quarterback. Each Monday, I will make three bold claims related to sports. You can agree, disagree, or discuss, in the comments. Think of it as a weekly open thread about specified sports subjects.

This week's claims:

1. Paul Pierce Is One Of The Toughest Players In The NBA. Some say that Paul Pierce was faking his sprained knee in Game 1 of the NBA finals, but the truth is he is amongst the toughest players in the NBA. In the 2000-01 season, Pierce played in all 82 regular-season games, despite that September having been stabbed 11 times in his face, neck and back. If Pierce can play with stab wounds, why doubt that he can play on a bad knee?

2. Kobe = The Worst NBA MVP Choice Ever. Chris Paul (Hornets) and Lebron James (Cavs) both accomplished more with less this season than did Kobe. Despite playing alongside stars Pau Gasol and Lamar Odom, Bryant made less than 46% of his shots from the field. Meanwhile Paul and James, without the same kind of supporting cast, both shot over 48%. Paul and James are more efficient players than Kobe, and make better use of their teammates. Either would have been a more deserving choice for MVP.

3. The Chicago White Sox Will Not Win the AL Central. Of all the baseball teams currently in first place, the Chicago White Sox (36-26, 5 1/2 game lead in AL Central) are the most likely to collapse. Their manager Ozzie Guillen is a loose cannon, and their ace starter Jose Contreras has yet to perform consistently for an entire season. Although the Detroit Tigers (26-36, 4th in AL Central) are currently 10 games out of first place, starting pitcher Dontrelle Willis just returned from the DL, and reliever Joel Zumaya should be back next week. Both players' return will help the Tigers to surge back atop the AL Central.

So that's my opening brief. File your respondent's brief, or amicus brief, in the comments.

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:05 AM

wtf does this have to do with law?

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:07 AM

What about Big Brown's failure to win the Triple Crown?

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:07 AM

I was with you all the way until you said the Tigers would be atop the AL Central. That's ignorant. You conveniently left out that Bonderman is now out for the season. The Indians have the best shot at winning the division if they can sort out their bats. But, given the uncertainty that has stricken the best division in baseball, I wouldn't be surprised to see the Royals make a run. Ugh.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:09 AM

10:05 - Law is boring. Let's talk about sports instead.

Kobe sucks!!!

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:09 AM

Go back to law and stay away from sports.

Paul Pierce is a damn tough player; I agree.

But Kobe Bryant is hands down the best player in the NBA. Chris Paul is an amazing player and leader, and rightfully finished 2nd in the MVP voting. But Lebron James is bum who has no leadership ability and makes too many bad decisions on the court to be considered alongside the aforementioned. Yes, Lebron is physically gifted and a talented ball player. But he is not a leader. And he does not have half the basketball IQ of a Kobe Bryant, Chris Paul, etc.

So.. in short... go back to law. Man, this website has truly taken a dive.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:10 AM

Big Brown's failure to win the Triple Crown is not a bold claim, so much as it is fact. Saying that Rick Dutrow will relapse to his alcholism and live in a barn again. That's a claim, albeit not all that bold. See ya, Rick!

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:11 AM

If you don't remember, Kobe Bryant led the Lakers to the best record in the talent soaked Western Conference. He was the highest scorer in the league and his ability to hit big game shots when it mattered proved he was the most dominant player in the NBA, which equals MVP.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:12 AM

Again, WTF does this have to do w/ the law???

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:14 AM

Ok, I agree with you on all three, but #2 is hardly a 'bold claim.' Everyone is saying how CP3 and LBJ were more deserving. A 'bold claim' would be to say how Kobe IS deserving of the MVP. (I'd love to hear that one.)

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:15 AM

congrats on posting w/o clipart!

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:18 AM

I hear Deadspin's SCOTUS coverage is amazing.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:19 AM

The White Sox may not win the AL Central, but Detroit? Bonderman is out for the year.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:21 AM

Doesn't Peter King have a column entitled "Monday Morning Quarterback" on CNNSI?
Also, Greg Easterbrook has a column entitled "Tuesday Morning Quarterback" on ESPN.

So stop ripping off column names.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:21 AM

I predict this "new feature" will last a month, tops.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:23 AM

CP3 = MVP
And nothing short of divine intervention will make the Tigers win the AL Central. Great ballpark, but the team don't got it this year.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:25 AM

terrible idea for a new feature...please reconsider

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:25 AM

Who cares? This is a legal blog, not a sports blog. I don't want to read this crap. If you want to have it, take it off the main blog and put it over on the message board section.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:26 AM

This MMQ nonsense must cease. If I wanted to read someone's retarded musings about sports, I'd visit ESPN.com.

Stick to what you do best. This ain't it.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:27 AM

lets get rid of this new feature. if i wanted to argue with some idiot about sports, i would go to any bar in america.

or go to a sports website

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:27 AM

Maybe you could start a new blog for sports, and leave this blog for the legal topics.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:30 AM

Has ATL jumped the shark?

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:31 AM

Agree. You provide a good service, which is legal gossip. I expect a Monday morning post with something law-related, and hopefully juicy. Not sports. Take it away.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:31 AM

I'll take the "My Cousin Vinny" approach.

"Everything that guy just said is bullshit"
(sits down)

I rest my case.

24 Posted by HofstraMagna | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:32 AM

Would anyone be interested in joining my campaign to get Wayne Chrebet elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame?

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:32 AM

Yeah, sports is not what I come to ATL for. It doesn't take me any effort to scroll past it and ignore it, but I'd be bummed if I thought the effort spent on it was stopping ATL from posting law firm gossip.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:33 AM

Newsflash: this is a legal blog. Stick to what you do and leave the sports for sports blogs.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:35 AM

Kobe is better than Michael Jordan.
BTW, Texas sucks.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:37 AM

Lat, come on. This is terrible. It's been said many times over the course of the last six months or so, but you're really slipping here. What is this guy doing writing about the White Sox on a legal gossip blog?

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:37 AM

Why don't you start a sport blog? I don't want to read this on this blog; it just clutters things up.

Lat's requirement that it be somewhat legal related isn't that difficult to meet.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:38 AM

ATL has taken serious turn for the worse. Keep your short-sighted opinions to yourself.

This is not the editorial page for the Clueless Sports Fan.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:39 AM

WTF - maybe we should turn to ESPN for our legal news. Let's keep the lawblog focused on the law!

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:40 AM

I'd rather have SEN's entries on grammar.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:44 AM

Umm...is this still a legal blog?

If Latman and Kash so hurtin' for blog posts, that they have to resort to this?

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:45 AM

Who cares about the southsiders...

The real question is, is this the year for the Cubbies?

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:47 AM

yes, 10:30, ATL just jumped the shark......

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:48 AM

i come here for law stuff, NOT sports. if i want to read about sports, i'll go to espn.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:49 AM

Agreed - I think we should stick to law here.

That being said, Paul Pierce is not tough. Anyone who has mildly sprained a knee knows that it hurts for 20 minutes then you get over it.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:49 AM

LaBronda James, aka Queen James, is the most overrated player in the history of the NBA. He's a product of media hype. He is the biggest crybaby in the league; gGets calls he doesn't deserve; travels half of the time he drives to the basket; and has an awful jump shot. Physically he is a freak. But that does not make him a great basketball player. See, e.g., Shaq.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:55 AM

Paul Pierce probably just got a cortisone shot and was good to go. True, playing the season after he was stabbed was tough, but Game 1 of the Finals this year--not tough.

Kobe is a legitimate choice for MVP. If he turns it on and the Lakers win 4 straight, would your views be any different?

If you think Dontrelle Willis is going to have a positive impact on the Tigers this season, you are sadly mistaken. People still remember when he was good, but that was like 5 years ago. Last year he was 10-15 with a 5.71 ERA.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:59 AM

The White Sox have had the best pitching in baseball, and it goes a lot deeper than Jose Contreras. If they don't win the division (unlikely), it will be Cleveland, not Detroit, that catches them.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:00 AM

Every place sucks except for NYC!

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:00 AM

Every place sucks except for NYC!

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:01 AM

Kobe Bryant sucks! I cannot wait for the Celtics to win the championship!

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:04 AM

Anyone who thinks Lebron James is over hyped needs to seriously get their heads examined.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:06 AM

No thank you. I like sports as much as the next woman (Paul Pierce rocks! - Beat LA), but seriously, I come here for the law and to ESPN for sports. Let's stick to the topic - legal gossip.

If you've got a sports-related legal issue then, by all means, please post, otherwise let's stick to the theme of the blog - the law.

BEAT LA! BEAT LA! BEAT LA!

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:07 AM

"That being said, Paul Pierce is not tough. Anyone who has mildly sprained a knee knows that it hurts for 20 minutes then you get over it."

Uh, PP got over it then hit a couple of big threes. How exactly do you conclude he's not tough?

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:08 AM

or in the alternative... you can SCROLL PAST the articles you Dont want to read.

Signed,
Obvious

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:10 AM

11:04, as long as he can drive to the whole and elevate, and of course, get calls from the refs, LeBronda is unstoppable. But his game is far from complete.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:10 AM

Guys in my high school used to get stabbed 11 times and then play 82 games. It was no big deal.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:15 AM

wtf is this shit? why dont you have celebrity gossip on here next? then some stock tips. then have a column on weather.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:21 AM

Edelman, you suggest that CP or Lebron should have won MVP. Fine. But how do you conclude Kobe is the worst MVP choice ever?

Nowitzki, Karl Malone (1997) and Dave Cowens are definitely on the short list. Kobe Bryant is not.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:26 AM

Who is this Edelman? Does he know this is a legal blog?

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:31 AM

I think this is a great idea for a Monday Morning column.

PP is nowhere near the toughest player in the NBA. He most certainly comes off as a cry-baby after lacking the stones to even try to make it off the court on his own power - only to come back in the game 5 minutes later. He cracked under the pain of a temporary sprain and should never be mentioned as a "tough" player. Look up Tyler Hansborough if you want tough.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:36 AM

Actually Kobe shot 50% this year...

Lebron James is way overrated...he has no jumpshot. If he's not shooting well, Cavs lose. His whole game depends on his ability to get to the basket. He doesn't really make his teammates better. If he was something less that a man-child/beast, he would be a scrub.

Chris Paul is about one Big-Mac away from being Charles Barkley's illegitimate son...someone needs to do a DNA test. Anyhow, I don't know much about the Hornets, but I did watch him at Wake Forest, and I wasn't that impressed.

I thought Kobe Bryant shot 50% from the field this year.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:38 AM

Um, we don't come to this site for fucking sports talk. We come to hear about legal shit. Stop being a whore.

*note proper use of "we" above.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:40 AM

When can we get the latest news on Big Brown.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:41 AM

11:31, are you serious? We'll see how tough Hansbrough is once he finally gets his cup of coffee in the NBA. Pushing around the weak collection of big men in the ACC last year doesn't make him tough.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:43 AM

11:41, agreed. Hansbrough benefitted from getting all the calls in the ACC, which hurt him, and UNC, in the NCAA tournament. I'll never forget when tough boy "Psycho T" almost started crying on the court when the kid from Duke bopped him in the nose a couple years ago. Hansbrough better enjoy his last year at UNC, because he will fade off into NBA scrub oblivion once he enters The League.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:46 AM

11:41
True, Hansborough has not been proven. But at least he doesn't fall in a heap each time he feels minor pain.

The latest news on Big Brown is no news. There were no abnormalities in his physical, he simply didn't have it. A few people are beginning to refer to his perfomance in the Bellmont as the "Big Brown Stain".

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:46 AM

1. Contreras isn't the White Sox's ace. Javy Vasquez took over that spot sometime early last season. Contreras is a lot closer to the Sox's #5 than their #1, which is no offense to him as their staff has been pretty darn good recently.

2. The Tigers are so so done. Their bats will probably come around at some point, but with the hole they've dug and the injuries to their already suspect pitching... stick a fork in em. The Twins on the other hand...

You gotta love NYCers and their lack of knowledge of anything sports related that's west of the Hudson

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:48 AM

this is retarded... do lawyers seriously have no better place to talk about sports than on a legal tabloid?? WTF

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:49 AM

Cravath is the Lebron James of the legal world.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:49 AM

Sports are about as relevant to my work as a lawyer as most of the stuff on this blog, so why not this? (You do what you can to revamp a lagging business model.)

Contreras is not the ChiSox's "ace". That would be Javy Vazquez. The Sox will win the ALCentral because (a) they are the rare modern era professional sports team whose superstars get along with each other; (b) the Twins and Royals blow; (c) the Indians lack cohesiveness (and Pronk lost his vitamins); and (d) the Tigers lack cohesiveness.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:51 AM

11:48 - Some people like talking about sports with other educated people; not simply those losers who sit around in the underwear and blog from their parents basement.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:53 AM

"Kobe Bryant is hands down the best player in the NBA.....Lebron James is bum who has no leadership ability and makes too many bad decisions on the court to be considered alongside the aforementioned"

You are fucking clueless. Start watching basketball. By the time this series is over, the Celtics will be NBA champions and will remember that the Cavs (i.e. Lebron plus nobody) came within one shot of eliminating them while the Lakers (i.e. Kobe plus a great supporting cast) did not come as close.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 11:54 AM

Take a look at Dontrelle Willis' numbers. The Tigers are better with him on the DL.

I have no problem with you writing about sports, but you should know something about sports before you do.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 12:03 PM

"Cease and Desist," proclaims Peter King, who currently writes a column titled Monday Morning Quarterback -- http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/06/08/offseason/index.html?eref=T1

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 12:16 PM

the "Contreras is the White Sox ace" thing must be based on the premise that "he's an ex-Yankee, so he must be better than those guys I've never heard of".

Idiot.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 12:22 PM

12:03, you're about 90 mins late. I already pointed this out.
See 10:21 above.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 12:27 PM

Categories of sports law douches:
1) Ex-jocks with actual athletic credentials (DIII athletes and above in real sports) that went to law school cause a career in athletics didn't pan out. These guys aren't really douches per se, but you'll often get the overcompetititve asshole that would use a lawyer's league basketball game to impress a hiring partner.

2) Arm chair warriors that decide that their calling in life was to be a "sports lawyer" or agent. These guys were marginal athletes in high school, at best. They became the starter on your law school basketball team just because they organized the league and picked the teams. As purists, they think they got something to add to the "game" from a business perspective. But, they're just tools that get eaten alive by the other guys who's just in it for the money. These guys usually end up in insurance defense, personal injury, or real estate closings. They're sports claim to fame will be volunteering as a little league coach or handling the closing of some ex-NFL'ers second wife.

3. Weenies whose grandfathers are those incoherent messes at the baseball games. You know the ones that wear 500 buttons with pictures of their favorite baseball players from the pre-negro league eras. These kids are the ones that start the "sports law clubs" at your law school to discuss cutting edge issues. They start these clubs because most normal sports fans don't give a shit about what they have to say about paul pierce, kobe, the white sox, etc. And usually when they bring up sports, it's in the most inappropriate forums - ie when you're at a nightclub scoping out the skanks (he's just tagging along), on legal gossip blogs, etc.

Guess where this edelman guy fits in.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 12:32 PM

12:27 = Div III athlete not-so-subtly stroking his own ego by including himself among the "ex-jocks with athletic credentials"

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 12:40 PM

This website is going down the crapper...

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 12:55 PM

If you can't converse about these things, good luck with getting a job/getting a promotion/not looking like a sillynanny at a cocktail party. And Lord help you if you ever ask how many points a grand slam is worth in baseball.

And that is the unifying theme. Class dismissed.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 1:01 PM

Explain to me why a person's desire to discuss legal topics on a legal blog means that they will fail to seem cool at a cocktail party when sports is discussed? Do you think people come to this website to learn how to engage in small talk at firm events? If so, Lat should put weather reports on this thing so that we can be prepared to talk about the warm weekend coming up. Don't be a douche. If you want to read a bunch of Celtic and Laker fans going off on eachother, go to ESPN.com. I guarantee none of those blogs are talking about new associate layoffs at Dechert. Moron.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 1:03 PM

javy vazquez is the #1 starter for the white sox.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 1:08 PM

I love the legal hook here - "lawyer's love to argue." That means abovethelaw is now a blog about - everything? Any topic on which argument is possible? That strikes me as uber-lame.

This isn't even good sports chatter. If I want to hear/talk about Paul Pierce I'll go to truehoop. I don't care what you think about sports - I'd rather hear from someone with inside info. Henry Abbot, who runs TrueHoop, has access to players, coaches, etc. You have Sportscenter.

Lastly, I agree with the commentator that objected to the name. Its either a rip-off or its a totally generic term. Either way, its lame.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 1:16 PM

Stick to law...you sound like a total D-BAG talking about sports.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 1:49 PM

12:16: Javy Vasquez is an ex-Yankee too. Idiot.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 1:51 PM

I honestly thought this post was some sort of ironic statement about the dwindling state of discourse in the legal gossip community. . . I'm shuttering as I realize it was played 100% straight.

You know when a guy who doesn't know anything about sports talks about sports, and it's really awkward? Yeah, this is like that.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 1:51 PM

This blog is making my Cravath hurt again. Damn it.

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 1:52 PM

D3 is the special olympics of the NCAA

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 1:53 PM

I wonder why this was greenlighted as an audition for the new writer? Shouldn't such things be kept in-house to prevent substandard posts?

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 2:21 PM

Not an IP lawyer, but isn't there a possibility of copyright violation here in ripping off the title of Peter King's column?

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 2:42 PM

Paul Pierce CP3 and LBJ

Chicago White Sox > Detroit Tigers

END OF FUCKING DISCUSSION!

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 2:47 PM

Marc, we are totally on the same page. Paul Pierce = great, tough, MVP, etc. Tiger = about to make a comeback.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 3:37 PM

Share the passion. Show the swagger.

The White Sox are the one breath of fresh air in my otherwise boring, sedate law firm life. But despite my fanhood, they clearly have weaknesses. Their saving grace is the lack of competition in their division. The Tigers?! Come on. I agree with those who said the Indians are the only possible challenge, but I don't see them as a serious threat. The Tigers are clearly due for some improvement, but I don't see them coming in better than 3rd in the division.

So, were you just trying to bait White Sox fans here (which is dumb -- there are hardly any in biglaw, because the Cubs are the team of the Chicago establishment), or are you really that clueless about baseball? Maybe next time you should stick to what you know.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 5:22 PM

Lamar Odom a star? give me a break. Paul has almost as much around him as Kobe, and didn't have to integrate a key player and lose another key player mid-season. Lebron's team has less talent, but they also didn't have a very good season as a whole. Kobe was the best player in the NBA this season on the best team in the better conference. No-brainer for MVP.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 6:49 PM

Dontrelle willis? Clearly you haven'twatched baseball in at least 2 years the guy sucks. Oh by the way, Jeremy Bonderman is out for the season and if you haven't noticed Gary Sheffield is down for the count. The Tiger are an overrated hot mess. Just sayin'

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 7:24 PM

Kobe can jump over Aston Martins.

Kobe FTW.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 7:48 PM

Guys at my high school used to add annoying, completely unrelated content to their websites all the time. It was no big deal.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 8:00 PM

Wow, you need to get your head out of the law books and watch a game on ESPN once in awhile.

By the way, your boy Dontrelle let up 8 runs in less than 2 innings......I smell World Series ring......

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 9:45 PM

This has EVERYTHING to do with the law.

Kobey Bryant = rapist.

Paul Pierce = stab victim.

Chicago White Sox: criminal that they are a first place team right now.

All of you who can't just shut the fuck up and gloss over the sports article if you don't want to read it: should be stabbed in the face instead of paul pierce.

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:12 PM

FYI Peter King on Sports Illustrated has a column named Monday Morning Quarterback.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 9, 2008 10:58 PM

This is dumb. Stop. Stop the sports.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:55 AM

Marc Edelman is a dumbest turd ever to grace the pages of ATL. His assertion that Kobe is the worst regular season MVP choice ever, even though Kobe is the best player in the NBA on the team with the best regular season record in the West, is proof enough. Lebron was nice this season, but the way the MVP voting works now is that your team has to win. Otherwise, Kobe would've been MVP the past 3 seasons over Dirk in 2007, Nash in 2006, and Nash in 2005. Edelman knows jack sh*t about basketball.

Edelman makes Billy Merck seem like a genius. He makes SEN seem like Joan of Arc, Madame Curie and Frida Kahlo all wrapped up into one.

Edelman, stick to your forte: masturbation.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:19 AM

9:45 PM wrote:

"Kobey Bryant = rapist."

Um, no.

Check the facts. And your spelling.

The girl went to Kobe's hotel room knowingly and willingly to have sex with him. She gave him head and he did her doggie-style and she loved it. It was only when he wanted to come on her face (in Kobe's words in the police transcript, "That's my thing") that she freaked. And he didn't even come on her face. He finished into a sock on his own after she left.

Doesn't sound like rape to me.

Especially when, later on, they discover the sperm DNA of like 3 different guys -- none of whom were named Kobe Bryant -- in her panties from that night. And then she shows up unmarried and pregnant to court with yet another guy's kid. Real chaste, innocent princess there.

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:05 AM

Oh, why not, let's make it a comment clusterf*ck, shall we?

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:57 AM

o.j. was innocent

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:39 PM

Fyi, after getting shelled for 8 runs in his first start back, it appears that Dontrelle Willis will be helping Detroit "surge back atop the AL Central" from Class-A Lakeland of the Florida State League. Care to update your "bold claims"?

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:31 AM

June 10th 1:08

You forgot the ******* umlaut. Get it together or you will never make partner. I promise. Zarathustra

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:35 AM

The last comment was directed at June 9 rather than June 10. I'm watching you Thrasymachus. You sophists--i mean attorneys are all the same.

Post Your Comment