Musical Chairs: Aaron Charney to Clifford Chance!
Back in February 2007, shortly after young gay lawyer Aaron Charney sued his former firm of Sullivan & Cromwell, alleging anti-gay discrimination and retaliation, the WSJ Law Blog asked: “Are Aaron Charney’s Big Law-Firm Days Over?”
Based on the experts it spoke to, the WSJ concluded that “it’ll be tough for Charney, though not impossible, to find work at another big firm.” In the comments to the WSJ post, readers were less optimistic. One described Charney as “toast” — a sentiment apparently shared by many ATL readers we heard from, who found laughable the notion that Aaron Charney might someday return to Biglaw.
If you were one of those who doubted that Aaron Charney could return to a large law firm, it’s time for you to eat one of these. Next month, Charney will be joining Clifford Chance, in the Magic Circle firm’s New York office.
We reached out to both Aaron Charney and Clifford Chance for confirmation and comment. Charney did not get back to us, but the firm did. From firm spokesperson Mike Kachel:
I can confirm that Aaron Charney, a talented lawyer, will join our New York office in early September from Sullivan & Cromwell as a fifth-year associate. Aaron’s presence will further strengthen our M&A practice and we’re delighted he’s joining us.
The firm is clearly pleased to have Charney on the team. But does everyone at Clifford Chance feel the same way? The CC source who tipped us off to the news alluded to some grumbling among the rank-and-file about Charney’s hiring (but didn’t specify why people wouldn’t want to have Charney as a colleague). As for why the firm wanted to hire Charney, this tipster suggested that Clifford Chance may want to improve its standing in the gay community, after settling a sexual orientation lawsuit brought by a gay partner in London last year.
Regardless of the naysayers’ views, this does seem like a felicitous pairing. Aaron Charney gets to return to the world of corporate law and deal work, which he clearly loves. Clifford Chance gets to beef up its New York M&A practice — and enhance its diversity record, too. Congratulations to both Charney and Clifford Chance!
P.S. Clifford Chance wasn’t the only firm that flirted with Charney. As we mentioned back in May, he also interviewed with Kramer Levin.
P.P.S. Whatever happened to Charney pal Gera Grinberg? Might Clifford Chance have room for him too?
Are Aaron Charney’s Big Law-Firm Days Over? [WSJ Law Blog]
Earlier: A Brokeback Lawfirm for the Other Side of the Pond




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
FIRST again. I'll never get tired of this.
gay. 1st.
A. Who cares?
B. Does the M&A in "Aaron's presence will further strengthen our M&A practice" mean Man Ass! Totally gay!
Good for him. Proves that standing up to a nasty firm doesn't have to be career suicide. Bravo.
Very happy my firm passed when we got the resume.
So...can we leave this guy alone now?
Probably - unless he sues Clifford Chance too!
Anyway, 10:47 is right, good for ABC (and for CC).
I gotta feeling that Aaron likes the limelight, so I don't think we've heard the last of him.
#8, what gives you that feeling? Lat's infatuation with this story doesn't mean that Charney likes the attention.
Aaron Charney's a douche.
Is this a Life Partner track position? How many years?
In what universe does adding a mid-level associate 'strengthen' a practice in any newsworthy way?
Maybe in Des Moines or something.
I'm disturbed by the apparent homophobia in these comments.
Most firms are racist, bigoted, and anti-Semitic. Some firms just hide it better than others.
Clifford Chance to gay!
Clifford Chance to gay!
Congrat's to Aaron Charney and Clifford Chance!
Congrat's to Aaron Charney and Clifford Chance!
Charney is fairly cute. I'd give him like an 8.4.
CC is a hell of a step down from S&C.
if he had been a different person and had sued for race discrimination or sexual harassment there'd be no way any other firm would have taken on a trouble maker like that
good for him
what about his colleague?
Charney needs to make his eyebrow shaving a little less obvious. I bet he gets some ridiculous mid-forehead five o'clock shadow.
ITDA with 20. CC is an international firm. S&C is the old Wall Street that's falling apart.
23, nobody shaves eyebrows. That's what tweezers are for.
Funny, I don't hear anyone admitting they were wrong about Charney's future. One thing is clear, a firm made up of the automatically negative posters on this blog (whatever the story), would be a TTT.
Congrats Clifford for choosing to chance it on Charney.
Let us remember a few facts about Charney's case, shall we?
A confidential, privileged memorandum was stolen from the office of the partner sitting next to Charney's office. That information was leaked by Charney to the Wall Street Journal. Charney's explanation is that an anonymous source had this information delivered to his private residence, and he has no idea where it came from.
That Charney is still a member of the Bar after this is outrageous. That he can find employment at a law firm (although admittedly not a very good one) is incomprehensible.
Fed Soc
Did anyone not expect Aaron to win the Next Food Network Star?
Hey #28 - I'm betting you are in violation of some kind of confidentiality agreement. maybe go back in your holw now b/f you get your employer or yourself into trouble.
25 - Nobody except Charney, which was the point.
#9 -- It's just a hunch, although I don't have time to go through the huge "record" of Charney/S&C coverage to provide you with a specific "citation." I could be wrong, but time will tell. #8
29 - the fix was so in for him. That's why they brought back 3 finalists even though Aaron bombed last week. Probably the right choice though - Lisa knows more about food but she's irritating to watch. Who cooks in those clothes?!?
33 - I agree about the Flapper (Lisa) being irritating. And how does she see what she's doing? She squints so damn much. I think the BBQ guy would have been most entertaining to watch, but his show concept, while different, was stupid.
#30 - the info posted by #28 is all in the public domain.
Yo #35... why would you even care? lmao at you
#3, 5, 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 20, 28: Hi there, Mr. DiBlasi -- do you have a couple minutes? Max Mosely's on line one.
thanks number 4
Fool me once shame on you . . . .
I will not feel the least bit sorry for this clown if he gets mistreated again. When you step into big law, you are stepping into a disgusting fraternity culture. It's excusable that it happened to him once, but you would think that anybody with half a brain would work at another type of frim other than big law once he was treated that way.
Just wait until one of the partners shows Charney'
Good for Clifford Chance... glad to see some shops are not fundamentally evil
all biglaw is evil ... Cliffords is "lesser evil" for this move tho
29 - I was pretty surprised. Aaron is just so uncomfortable to watch, like when he did that "I have an eating disorder" bit. Lisa, while super-anal, might be okay to watch if edited down.
To all the commentators who've posted such negative things about AC over the past months -- how does the crow taste?
Accord No. 4.
And the grumbling probably comes because apparently CC has done some layoffs (perhaps performance based, I don't know)--people likely upset that current CC attorneys were let go to make room to hire Charney (and possibly others).
A few years ago, there were rumors floating around about Clifford Chance's own sexual harassment scandals, of the male partners' dropping hotel room keys into female associates laps variety.
So Clifford the Big Red Dog actually has his own law firm? Interesting, I never would have guessed it.
#28 - wasn't that "privileged, confidential" memorandum basically about S&C using its client's own "privileged, confidential" information (I think it was internal Goldman Sachs' employee reviews) for its own purposes, which GS was none too happy about?
Leaking a confidential firm memorandum is wrong - but so is misappropriating your client's confidential info. There was more than enough blame to go around on both sides, which was probably why S&C settled when they couldn't dismiss the complaint - too much opportunity for further embarrassment.
Seriously... one will always wonder what ugliness we cuold have learned about old S&C had the matter not been settled.