Add RSS RSS

Associate Life Survey: Real Summer Associate Assignments?

funny-pictures-happy-fluffy-orange-cat.jpgWe received about 700 responses to last week’s ATL / Lateral Link survey, on whether summer associates are getting enough real work.

Not surprisingly, there’s a bit of a disconnect between summer associate perceptions and those of practicing attorneys. A whopping 91% of summer associates thought that they were getting real work this summer. But only 57% of practicing attorneys agreed. Among more senior attorneys (Class of 2002 or senior), that number dropped to 43%. One summer associate had a modest, nuanced view:

While there is no question that much of what I do could be done more quickly by a real associate, it appears as if what I do actually has some value. Of course, I may be overestimating that value.

Give that guy an offer.

Read more, after the jump.

Most of the summer assignments involve legal research and memo writing, some of which is described by supervising associates as “research memos I don’t want to do” or “projects that have been on my to-do list for months”, but some of which falls into the category of “legal research assignments for real cases that needs to be done” or “memos on issues central to litigation.” A fair number of summer associates in litigation practices are also writing sections of briefs, motions in limine, or jury instructions, while some lucky summer associates in transactional practices are getting to do due diligence and closing schedules. One poor associate suggested what sounds like a pretty typical pro bono assignment, researching the general fiduciary obligations of a 501(c)(3)’s board of directors, but found that “none of the summers have wanted it thus far, which kind of screws me over.”

In line with the photo above, 61% of summer associates actually don’t think their firms should give them more real work. An even higher percentage of practicing attorneys agree. Only 38% of midlevel associates (Class of 2003 to 2005) think that summer associates should get more real assignments. Among more junior associates, however, that number drops to 25%, possibly because older associates are giving the summers “first year associate assignments.” Senior attorneys are even more skeptical, with only 22% wanting to give the summer associates more real work.

Generally speaking, the attorneys who think summer associates should get more real work recommend giving the summers more assignments that “you would give to a first-year,” with some calling for document review and due diligence — the Scylla and Charybdis of the junior associate experience — but most recommending more writing assignments, including “actual client documents or briefs - instead of the ubiquitous ‘research memo’ that will never be read by anyone.” On the transactional side, respondents suggested closing documents, schedules to agreements, and “basic training in dealing with typical corporate documents” like merger agreements.

Summer associates, in turn, call for “anything other than 50-state surveys” or “anything that’s not totally abstract background reserach [sic] that might someday but probably never get used”, with several calling for the same kind of work that first-year associates get — with some even asking for document review and due diligence. Interestingly, while pro bono work has historically been seen as a great training opportunity for junior associates and a great source of writing assignments for summers, a few law students beg to differ. As one summer associate laments:

I’ve had enough pro bono. I have no idea what one of our practice groups that I’m interested in actually does because I can’t get work from them.

Or, as another less-than-charitable commenter put it:

At least something related to my practice area. Pro bono is not part of my practice area.

Fair complaint, or unseasonably Grinchy?


Justin Bernold is a Director at Lateral Link, the sponsor of this Associate Life Survey.

Comments

Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!

Post Your Comment