Add RSS RSS

Breaking: Earthquake Hits California on Day 1 of the Bar Exam!

earthquake California bar exam.jpgBecause the bar exam isn’t scary enough without the occasional act of God. This just in, from tipsters:

“Earthquake just hit LA and the epicenter was just next to Ontario, CA, where the CA bar exam is being administered!”

“I hope you are going to open a thread about those poor people taking the CA bar exam when the earthquake hit today. I’m curious to know how things were handled and if there were proctor freak outs!”

Read more, after the jump.

Additional accounts:

“Earthquake in LA on day 1 of the CA Bar! USGS maps show that it was somewhat close to Ontario, though many people taking in Century City area as well. Only a 5.8 which isn’t too bad - but did feel it all the way in North County, San Diego. Hopefully nobody ran out of the exam/building - wouldn’t want a repeat of the 90s.”

“5.8 quake during end of first session of ca bar. In the century city hotel, chandeliers swaying. Yikes! It’s always something fun.”

Developing…. More to come. If you have into to contribute, please do so in the comments.

Update: More from an affected individual:

When the chandeliers began shaking, some test takers squealed / screamed. The announcer told everyone to remain calm and stay seated. Some people kept typing. I was rebooting to leave anyway. Proctor then shouted: “Don’t worry, this happens in California. If you’re not from here: welcome. And there will be aftershocks.”

Further Update: For the record, and as noted in the comments below, the earthquake was subsequently downgraded to a 5.4.

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:24 PM

My milkshake brings all the boys to the yard....

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:28 PM

God finally strikes back at Loyola.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:29 PM

I knew I shouldn't have had that breakfast burrito!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:29 PM

Is L2L taking the exam?

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:32 PM

Just a fat proctor falling down.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:32 PM

"Do I look like I care what people think?"
-- Hancock

Is it possible that Hancock caused it? What do the ATL commentators think?

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:33 PM

On lunch break at century city site. Some pieces of the chandeliers on the ballroom fell. Some people freaked out, others kept typing. Some got under their desks. Most (myself included) sat and stared. Proctors just said to stay calm.

They did not stop the test or give us extra time even through we all lost about 5 minutes (except the crazy gunners who kept typing).

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:34 PM

The earthquake reached downtown San Diego as well. Lots of bar takers probably felt it. Hopefully they will use their break time in between the morning and afternoon sessions to comment about it here.

THAT WAS A TRICK! If you do that, you are stupid. You should be eating lunch and intimidating other bar takers by talking loudly about non-existant "professional responsilibility" cross-over questions. It's the right thing to do. And let's face it, it's fun.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:41 PM

Dowtown San Diego. Not taking bar exam.

Riding in elevator when it hit. Scary.

My office is roughly 250 feet from Bar exam test taking center downtown. They felt it fer sher dude and it had some POP!

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:43 PM

I was actually on the phone with someone and the line went dead. When I called back 5 min. later he said, "Oh yeah, sorry we just had an earthquake. What were we talking about again?"

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:43 PM

Yeah, that just sucks, I'm sure everyone's fine physically but that had to fray a few already tense nerves. 5.8 is nothing to sneeze at.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:44 PM

It was only a 5.8! Get over it sissies.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:44 PM

Posting to a blog during the bar exam, No. 7? I can't help but question your focus and commitment. You're doomed to fail.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:45 PM

8 = Funniest comment all day.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:47 PM

Maybe California will do mainstream America a favor and finally slip into the ocean. I know it's not quite adjacent, but please take Seattle as well. OK THX

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:48 PM

13 - an f'ing earthquake just hit and s/he's on lunch break. it's competely reasonable to post on ATL in those circumstances.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:48 PM

Judge Halverson is in town taking surf lessons.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:48 PM

what a perfect excuse for cali bar taker failures

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:52 PM

Since when is the Cal. bar administered in Canada?

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:52 PM

17 - great!

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:53 PM

5.4 Magnitude. Weak.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:53 PM

Earthquakes only occur near TTTs.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:56 PM

Guys in my high school used to cause earthquakes during exams all the time, it was no big deal. Afterwards, they'd say "See you at the party, Richter."

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:56 PM


Gosh, if only the clever people who made “A Lawyer Walks into a Bar” (documentary about 6 Cali bar takers spliced w/much witty commentary about our legal system) had filmed this year’s bar takers… It would have made an even more amusing film.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:56 PM

Judge Halverson just sat down on toilet after an all you can eat bean burrito buffet.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:56 PM

I'm already annoyed with bar-failing whiners blaming this quake on their inability to barf out the Rule of Perp.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:04 PM

There were no reported injuries. God needs to try harder.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:09 PM

We had a fire alarm go off for about 30 minutes during our very first law school exam. These types of things are a good way to cull those who crack easily under pressure.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:14 PM

It was a scary one... felt it pretty strong here in Century City/Los Angeles. Struck towards the end of the third question on the morning part of the bar exam. Most people actually stopped typing for a minute, and weren't sure what to do, but the earthquake was reasonably short (maybe 10 seconds or so). The bar exam is in the basement of Hyatt hotel - there is no way to get out even if you tried. It took a good 20 minutes to leave after the morning session was over. One of the elevators stopped working too (we were told that it needs to be reprogrammed). Overall, not a big deal and thankfully it was towards the end when most folks were done with their bar exam answers anyway.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:15 PM

CA Bar examinee: "I didn't pass because I am not smart enough."

Law firm partner: "Tough, you're out of a job."

CA Bar examinee: "I didn't pass because I partied too much and blew it off."

Law firm partner: "Tough, you're out of a job."

CA Bar examinee: "I didn't pass because I lost 5 minutes on the essays due to an earthquake."

Law firm partner: "Tough, you're out of a job."

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:19 PM

Yay, California!

(Waiting for it to hit SF.)

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:22 PM

February 2009 CA Bar exam essay number 1:

(1 hour, recommended)

Discuss any potential liability exposure the state bar examiner incurs for the following sequence of events:

Earthquake shakes examination site; no time provided to make up for interruption.

Consider any ethical and moral duties and how they are implicated.

(When completed, turn to Essay 2.)

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:25 PM

19 -- Ontario is a city in California as well...

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:33 PM

Ducking under your desk because of a little trembler during the CA bar.
Goood idea? Goood idea?

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:35 PM

31- Why do you want an earthquake to hit SF? Because you failed the bar twice, and you were sent packing back to Alabama?

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:43 PM

Guys at my high school used to take bar exams during natural disasters all the time, it was no big deal.

Anyway this earthquake = TTT of an earthquake.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:45 PM

K, new to this bulletin board thing. "TTT"?

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:45 PM

K, new to this bulletin board thing. "TTT"?

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:45 PM

K, new to this bulletin board thing. "TTT"?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:45 PM

K, new to this bulletin board thing. "TTT"?

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:48 PM

33, no, Ontario is a town in Canada near Montreal. It is nowhere near California.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:58 PM

Umm all this while while I was living in Ontario, I thought it was a province near Montreal. Thanks for setting me straight 41.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:00 PM

Ontario is also a city in California. It's the largest location for the bar exam in southern California.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:00 PM

wow you mean there could be two cities in two different countries both named Ontario?! that's just too much.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:00 PM

41: are you seriously that ignorant?

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:01 PM

37-40, welcome.

"TTT" = Third Tier Toilet, originally referrin to law schools in the third tier, now (over-)used as ridicule for anything the poster believes to be of poor quality, commanding no respect, or otherwise bad.

"After submitting a comment it may take several minutes to appear. Please only submit your comment once." = After submitting a comment it may take several minutes to appear. Please only submit your comment once. Illiteracy is TTT.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:04 PM

The year I took the CA bar, someone died (at a different site). Two people gave CPR to the afflicted and then were denied extra time to finish. The one guy died and the other two failed.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:05 PM

The year I took the CA bar, someone died (at a different site). Two people gave CPR to the afflicted and then were denied extra time to finish. The one guy died and the other two failed.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:07 PM

54, run to the bookstore- but do so QUICKLY. The new Random House dictionary came out and the word "gullible" was erroneously omitted. Buy a copy- it will undoubtedly become a collector's item.

Best Wishes,
41

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:09 PM

41....Ontario, Canada is not a "town," it is a province. If you're going to make wise-ass comments at least get the facts straight.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:11 PM

TTT = TTT adjective. I feel so TTT when I use it. I spend half of my TTT life reading this TTT board because my TTT firm gives me TTT work and my billables are at a TTT level. I'll probably get canned because of this TTT recession, but that's OK because I'll take my TTT severance, sit on my TTT ass on my TTT couch and watch TTT daytime television.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:17 PM

TTT = TTT adjective. I feel so TTT when I use it. I spend half of my TTT life reading this TTT board because my TTT firm gives me TTT work and my billables are at a TTT level. I'll probably get canned because of this TTT recession, but that's OK because I'll take my TTT severance, sit on my TTT ass on my TTT couch and watch TTT daytime television.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:17 PM

28 - it's the Rule AGAINST Perpetuities, not the Rule OF Perpetuities.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:35 PM

MD bar added 3 minutes this morning to correct a stupid inconsequential typo in one of the questions

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:38 PM

No, 35, I don't *want* it to it SF, I just fear (know) that it inevitably will.

Love,
31 (who lives and works in SF)

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:48 PM

Which is harder: California or New York?

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 6:00 PM

I'm working as a summer associate at the Century City office of Simpson, Thacher, & Bartlett. The conference room shook for a little bit and all the Ivy League kids freaked out, while the UCLA and USC kids just looked at each other and shrugged.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 6:09 PM

41 - Ontario is a PROVINCE in Canada, not a City. Ass.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 6:47 PM

Umm. I'm pretty sure everyone knows that Ontario is a city in the Toronto province of Canada.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 6:56 PM

Anyone take NY?

What'd you think of the secured transaction question?

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 7:03 PM

I'm not taking the Bar in Vegas (took it in Feb 2008 & passed!) but we felt the earthquake a bit in the downtown area near the courthouses.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 7:27 PM

The secured transaction question was a total breeze. anyone that thought otherwise is in deep trouble.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 7:32 PM

To the idiots who are trying to "educate" 41: Please don't become litigators. Opposing counsel will mess with your head like there is no tomorrow.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 7:39 PM

59: No! Ontario is a city in the Canada province of the nation of Toronto.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 8:18 PM

"Which is harder: California or New York?"

California, if for no other reason than it takes an extra day, although all those same people who never shut up about how NY is the center of the universe also never shut up about how hard the bar exam is. We California lawyers just smile and count ourselves fortunate that tools like that usually stay in NY.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:05 PM

Ontario location is in a huge convention center hall with at least 2-3K in one room on their laptops. About half the people got under the table, some with their laptops. The other half just kept typing. Proctor claims to have given us 2 more minutes but not according to my clock.

Ontario is about 10 miles from the epicenter of the quake, in Chino Hills.

Wasn't too bad, overall

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:30 PM

anyone care to discuss that long ass PT1?

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:38 PM

PT1 was a nice race horse which I suspect will mostly depend on organization and clarity of writing as the elements and facts are laid out pretty clearly for you.

I had to rush a bit of my defense analysis, but I think I did okay.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:01 PM

I was taking it at the Ontario site. At first, everyone thought it was just a truck or something. I had my earplugs on, so it was hard to discern at first, but it's not like the Convention Center moves that easily with the simple passing by of a truck. Then the ceiling started to shake and, no joke, pieces of the ceiling started falling down, and dust began to fall on desks. One of the security camera got dislodged and was hanging by a cable. At this point, people were under their tables and most of the non-California ppl were freaked out. Our proctor, though, stayed eerily calm and, when it was over, everyone went back to typing. I don't think we lost more than, say 5 minutes to it, but boy, was it scary!

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:08 PM

I had to rush through the end of PT1. It was sloppy, but I think I got it all in there. At worse, it was a fail, but not a catastrophic fail, which I was concerned about.

Why do I have such a hard time with the performance tests?

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:09 PM

I have taken and passed the NY, California and New Jersey bar exams. NY tests more topics so is arguably harder to study for than California, but the California exam is harder.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:21 PM

You Ontario d-bags better not have gotten two more minutes.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:29 PM

I was in the Century City location with the big chandelier and the only people I saw go under the desk were the ones sitting directly under the 50 ft x 20 ft chandelier since pieces were falling from the chandelier onto their table. I wonder if they would have been more upset if the glass woud have hit them or hit and destroyed their computers.

And as for 29, it happened about two and half hours into the test and I assure you that most people were not done with their tests at this point. Not that it matters since it wasn't a big quake and most people just went back to typing.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:39 PM

California bar taker, here. My computer crashed and i had to write out half of essay 2 and part of essay 3. When writing essay 3, after writing on page 1 i accidently wrote on the last page (page 12) then made a note of that on page 2, and continued writing the essay on page 2,3,4, and so on.

My question is, do they type up the hand written essays? And if so, what will be done about my essay, since it was written out of order (will it be typed up 1,12,2,3,4,etc or 1,2,3,4....12). If anyone knows the answer to this, please post.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:39 PM

Agree with 73, it happened halfway during the third essay. It shook for about ten seconds. A chandelier piece fell next to me. I stared around unsure of what to do but kept on typing without ducking under the table like other people. The proctor actually cheated us out of four minutes (regardless of the quake) in the morning. She denied it, but several of us started out watches at 12:05 to give us a five spare minutes at the end, and we had to stop at 3:00. Oh well...

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:25 PM

74 - Don't worry about it. I'm sure they don't have the time or the manpower to type up people's essays. I bet they give to the graders as-is which means they can follow your notes.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:45 PM

I was in Ontario. I was actually shocked by how calm people were. I think people are so scared of failing that earthquake did not cause nearly as much of a reaction as I would expect.

I saw a couple people jump under the table. I looked up and realized that stuff really could start falling from the ceilings. If it kept building, it could have been really scary.

There were many earthquake virgins, so I can't believe nobody ran out the doors and tried to run outside.

It was very strange to have 1500 people jump under tables and then get right back to typing away.

I think it broke the tension of the first day, especially after our absurd Con Law question.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:13 AM

hey 34, i totally cracked up at your comment. i will never forget two lines from barbri study-- "goooood ideeea?" "AND!!!!!" good times.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:30 AM

Hey 7...if you lost 5 minutes to the earthquake then you're an idiot that wouldn't pass the bar even if they did give make up time.

We're talking about 10 seconds of moderate shaking. Why in the world would you need 5 minutes to recover? Did you need a hug? Did you get one?

As for those of us that kept typing being "gunners," it's completely asinine that you think using every moment available to pass arguably the hardest bar in the nation should be mocked.

I feel safe predicting that when you fail the bar, and based on your post I'm confident you will, you'll go around blaming the earthquake and the lack of make-up time, while failing to recognize that it's your own lack of focus that's to blame.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:34 AM

rofl @ 34

NEVER!

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:40 AM

I was in San Diego, it was just a rumble that went up the length of the really long convention center, for like 10 seconds. Everyone just laughed, like "i'll die in a quake before i run out of the room and fail the exam."

Like 5 minutes later someone from the Convention Center security office announced "you have just experienced an earthquake. please return to your regular activities." everyone laughed again.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 3:17 AM

one of the rooms in Ontario got 5 extra minutes according to people in there. The proctor apparently decided that on his own.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 1, 2008 12:02 AM

I was taking the test in Anaheim, second-closest location, and it screwed my whole test day afterwards. Only finished half the peformance test because it was about . . . FALSE IMPRISONMENT. !!!?!?!? Oh, the irony. And I was handwriting my exam so the last one I wrote is written in chicken scratch as I sat there freaking out and not allowed to leave a basement with cement lighting. It's not about the five minutes, it's the fact that they evacuated Disneyland but didn't give a s___ about people taking the bar...not only did we not get extra time, but while geologists didn't know if it was a pre-shock or not, the proctor clearly felt qualified to make the decision not to evacuate. I am so disgusted by this profession. This is how they introduce people to the profession? And they want a statement of moral character from ME?????

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 1, 2008 2:30 AM

I took the exam in Century City and was seated under that big central chandelier. I didn't give a second thought to immediately ducking under our table. Broken neck or an extra couple minutes on the bar exam? It was a no-brainer. Good thing we did duck because pieces of the chandelier fell on our table. For those who didn't, I hope they continue to have the psychic ability to distinguish between earthquakes that "deserve" a protective response. Good luck with that.

avatar
85 Posted by Reasonable Prudent Person | Permalink Friday, August 1, 2008 2:44 AM

For those of us taking it in Ontario, I must say that, even though the earthquake was bad, and driving and staying in Ontario was worse, it still beats having CA Civ Pro and Evidence on the bar, or as a crossover. I think it's a pretty good trade off.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 1, 2008 5:16 AM

I was in Ontario. I understand that the shaker only lasted 15 seconds or so. Thats not what bothered me, it was the fact that my hands kept shaking or the ceiling debris that landed a foot in front of me. Its the continuing thought in my head about what if the next tile lands on my head. The pressure is hard enough without the drama. I think its absurd to grade then end of my exam equally compared to someone in Sacramento who did not have to endure the experience without considering the effects of such a situations. Im not asking for a guarantee past. Im not even demanding more points. I just want the Bar to look into it and make a fair decision about how to deal with this.

Post Your Comment