ATL Idol: The Head-to-Head Round (Part 1)
Welcome to the first half of what we’re calling the “head-to-head” round of ATL Idol, the reality-TV-style talent search for Above the Law’s new editor. The second half will published later this afternoon.
To refresh your recollection, here’s how this round will work:
We’ll publish the contestants’ different takes on the same story (actually, a pair of comparable stories — the contestants can choose). The head-to-head round is designed to show how the bloggers all tackle the same or similar stories, to eliminate any advantage one might derive from an extra-juicy set of facts.
This is also the round that will be reviewed by ATL’s panel of celebrity judges: Ann Althouse, Tom Goldstein, and Dahlia Lithwick.
Check out the first half of the head-to-head round, in which ALEX and EXLEY write about the same story, after the jump.
Here are the takes of ALEX and EXLEY on the same story, marked with each contestant’s avatar (at the top of each submission). We gave them these two links:
http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/07/shepherd_to_apologize_after_la.htmlhttp://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/07/shepherd_ordered_to_halfway_ho.html
And a length limit of 400 words. Here’s what they came up with (presentation order determined by coin flip):
LAWYER OF THE DAY: CELL MATES 4EVER
By EXLEY
Kash recently wrote a post about two Michigan law students who thought it was a good idea to include the law school list-serv in their fight over the custody of a cell phone.
How immature.

As lawyer (Loyola ‘96) and Louisiana state senator Derrick Shepherd (pictured above) demonstrated this week, the grown-up way to get a cell phone from a woman just might be to:
1. Cause the woman to call 911 in the middle of the night reporting that you just broke into her home, punched her in the stomach, stole $100 and her cell phone.
2. Phone in hand, return to your mansion which is like, totally not your primary residence since it is six miles outside of your Senate district.
3. Get two ladies into a room with you. Um, why not have one give you a lap dance.
4. When police come to your home to arrest you, try to sneak out the back door. Don’t forget to bring the ladies.
5. Stay frosty when the police catch you escaping, when they find the cell phone in your unprimary residence, and even when you get sent to a halfway house for a couple of hours.
6. Have your people spread the word to all media covering the event that you will issue a public apology. Um, on second thought scratch that. After all, once you apologize, you can’t take it back.
7. Instead, set-up a meeting with the woman whose phone she says you took. Have her drop all charges and blame herself for being a jealous lover.
Ta-da! You might have been under a federal indictment for money laundering, you might have violated your bond, heck you might have even passed yourself off as a district attorney during your law school internship.
But as long as you follow these seven steps, you will emerge from the debacle without going to jail or totally embarrassing yourself on some TTT (whatever that means) law school list-serv.
Lapdance photo by mylittleheart.
LAWYER OF THE DAY: DERRICK SHEPHERD
By ALEX
Lawyer and Louisiana State Senator Derrick Shepherd was indicted last April in connection with a scheme to launder $2 million for a construction bond business. He was out on bond and awaiting trial in October when he managed to get himself arrested again last weekend:
Shepherd spent Saturday night at the Jefferson Parish Correctional Facility after ex-girlfriend Thaise Ashford, 29, filed a police report about him barging into her house early that morning and starting a fight in which she was punched in the stomach.
He punched her in the stomach? Hey, Sen. Shepherd, try that on a lady who can defend herself.
Sen. Shepherd claims he was protecting his mother and sister. Unclear why his “defense of others” required stealing Ms. Ashford’s Blackberry Pearl and $100 cash.
Wait, hold on. None of that’s true.
Ms. Ashford recanted her story yesterday afternoon at the bond revocation hearing that was initiated after Sen. Shepherd’s weekend arrest. Apparently, there was no break in or punch in the stomach. Oh, and Sen. Shepherd only had Ms. Ashford’s Blackberry because the couple had exchanged phones to check each other’s calls. See? Totally healthy relationship. No bond revocation.
I guess he dodged that one; doubtful whether his lovers’ quarrel with the feds is going to end so amicably. Given Sen. Shepherd’s talent for misunderstandings, maybe it’s time to get a fake passport and a pair of running shoes.






Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
Ooh, first!
first, both are good, exley's is a little long and ever-hyperlinked but has mroe juicy details
exley blows
I don't think ExLax has the raw writing skills needed for this job.
Alex wins this round.
alex 1, exley 0.
Exley wins this round.
Hmmm...I like the length of Alex's story better, but I think Exley's was a bit funnier.
TTT means third tier toilet, exley ought to know.
Alex has the better presentation, and sets up the story better. Exley wastes too many words on non-salient details (don't spend a whole bullet/number on the lap dance part - you can mention that with two words and get full effect from a link). Neither write up really captures all of the facts as reported in the news article. Isnt the interesting part that he went back on apologizing? Or can reasonable people differ about what's interesting here?
Alex wins here. He's got more of the ATL style.
alex 1, exley 0.
Exley wins this round.
ATL has reached an all time low. At what point did Lat decide that his readers cared enough about ATL to find an extended job interview even modestly interesting? Lat, stop blogging about your blog and get back to reporting news/gossip.
Hmmm...I like the length of Alex's story better, but I think Exley's was a bit funnier.
Alex > Exley
No mention of Clay Davis? Very weak.
I don't think this story is interesting enough to spend time going through over a dozen links to find out what happened. Alex > Exley.
Exley wins!
...
Syke *hands "You Lose" medal to Exley*
Exley. He almost rises to the level of Bess Levin snark.
Wait a minute.... can't you just steal her away from Dealbreaker?
Alex wins for style. Needs more juicy details.
I vote Alex. Exley is trying to hard... and failing even still
I vote Alex. Exley is trying to hard... and failing even still
Alex covered the main points so that you knew what he was talking about. Exley's story missed major details that would have made it much better. And Exley over-hyperlinked. But I that he was a bit funnier.
Alex > Exley.
1:39(3)--check out how many comments these ATL Idol posts are getting. You're in the minority
Both are pretty good.
Exley seemed to choose a good narrative framework, but it wore thin. 7 numbered steps is a much, and by the end I was forgetting the thread of what the 7 steps were supposed to accomplish. But he he had some nice juicy details, an amusingly ironic use of the overworked TTT expression, and nice gratuitous lapdance picture.
Alex's post is well-written and humorous. It is easy to read, gets right to the point, and has a nice gratuitous link to everyone's favorite plus-size judge. It doesn't have quite as much juicy detail.
I think they are both good, but I would give the nod on this one to Exley.
These are both bad. Exley forgot to explain the story and Alex just wrote a book report and inserted a quip or two. I'm beginning to think Alex has to work really hard to feign a sense of humor.
Not promising. Both deserve to be canned.
Definitely Exley.
Exley tried to hard. I go with Alex.
Hey Exley, this is a blog not a shopping list. Alex wins. Exley is pure TTT.
I agree with 19. Alex's is better written but leaves out some good details that Exley included. Advantage: Alex.
Wow. Both of these really stink. Next, PLEASE.
Exley wins
Exley wins
Both are good. Exley is a little funnier but also too long. Alex starts out kind of weak but has a strong finish. I'm going with Exley on this one, only because he included more of the scandalous details (and this is, after all a legal tabloid).
Exley wins
Exley funnier and better on those salacious details, but missing basic writing skills.
Exley, more like Axeme. Have a safe trip home.
Alex; his is tighter and explains more at the outset. Exley's was good but a bit scattershot.
That lady has big boobies
Wow. Both of these really stink. Next, PLEASE.
Alex's was better written, but Exley's included more interesting detail. I'm guessing it would be easier for Alex to incorporate more detail than it would be for Exley to quickly improve his (/her?) writing.
Alex wins by a slim margin.
ALEX SUCKS. SO BLAND. SO LAME.
Wow. Both of these are really poor quality. Next, PLEASE.
Is this contest over yet? I am so bored.
Both are complete garbage. I give Alex (whom I have previously dogged) the nod, but it's like picking between giving a rimjob to a diseased tranny and letting the cast of queer as folk gang bang you...
Alex wins this round.
Definitely Exley, the only ATL Idol contestent with an iota of the snark/wit which is the only reason I read this blog over WSJ etc.
Exley's was better
They both have potential.
Exley wins. Alex = TTT, even if "Exley tried to hard." And, #23 is a tard.
If Alex wins I will not read this piece of shite any more. WSJ Law Blog is so much better anyway.
Wow. Both of these are really poor quality. Next, PLEASE.
Alex! The first one was unreadable, I had no idea what it was talking about!!! Although, Exley's style was amusing, it was just too hard to follow...
Alex. Alex. Alex. Exley blows.
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Alex's story came off far more professional than Exley's.
So yeah, Alex is my homeboy.
1:39: at least you care enough to post about it...
This whole contest is like the Special Olympics: even if you win, you're still retarded. Do I really have to chose between these clowns?
This whole contest is like the Special Olympics: even if you win, you're still retarded. Do I really have to choose between these clowns?
Alex > Sliced Bread
Exley wins.
whoa, how did 54 do that? Anybody else have his "oooooo" go all the way off the screen on the right?
Anyway, I think they were both good. Almost unfiar that they went head to head. Like the cubs and brewers beating each other up in the central right now, while STL has a chance to gain ground.
I actually laughed out loud at a couple of the lines in Exley's, though, so I have to give the round to him/her.
Alex explained the basic story more clearly and simply, but Exley was funnier. They should co-blog -- call them AlEx or Exlex perhaps -- and their combined strengths would make them really good.
Forget these two, and hire 58
ALEXLEY WINS!!!!!!!!
Alex! Exley's format was good, but poorly executed. Alex's straightforward approach worked well.
Blag both were boring... bring on Sophist, Marin and F&D
Alex wins.
Alex > Exley
yikes...who's up next, lat?
Alex wins this round. I incorporate by reference as if fully reprodcued herein the comments made by 22.
2:14 - Hope Winters is next with a thrilling story about how she knew this guy at another firm who accidently forwarded an NSFW email to the firm listserv. How scandalous!
http://www.thecafewha.com/skeletor.jpg
Alex is clearly the better writer. But his sense of humor leaves much to be desired. He may be an amusing fellow in real life, but there's real life amusing and then there is blog funny. He does not come across as blog funny.
Exley's post showed more promise in terms of humor. But way too much hyperlinking. Lat should ban hyperlinking and make people stand on their own merit.
In a close one I'll reluctantly go with Alex. I just don't think Exley is up to running the show.
Marin is still the favorite.
Alex wins. I actually understood what was going on after reading his post.
"Set-up" as a verb, Exley? Format was good, though.
71/2:17 - to be continued of course
Alex has the better tone for this blog. Great use of Hon. Halverson.
Can we vote Hope Winters off? Even LA Law was better than her.
Yaaaawn. Bring the funny people
Alex wins.
Exley, more like Axeme. Have a safe trip home.
Liked Exley's format, but Alex was more true to ATL style, and I liked the confidence of his brevity. Man, these comments are so brutal. This is like American Idol with a theater full of that mean english guy.
Alex wins
I prefer Alex's. I agree with others that Exley's was funnier, but too difficult to follow.
However, did Alex go outside the general instructions by doing independent research and finding the girlfriend's withdrawl of her testimony? That wasn't one of the original links provided. If so (and assuming Lat's rules were ambiguous enough that there is no violation here), more points to him.
it's close, but Exley.
Alex was SO MUCH BETTER.
We are trying to bill here. No time for all those hyperlinks. Alex wins!
We are trying to bill here. No time for all those hyperlinks. Alex wins!
Exley for sure. his post was funny and easy to read. i got a little bored with Alex's post.
Alex's link to Judge Halverson = instant win.
Compared to the Hope Winters blood-bath, these comments are TTT (with exception to 54, I laughed so loud the judge almost caught me). Where is the invective? The Churchillian vituperation? I am afraid that these anonymous hacks have irreparably harmed the posting quality of the entire ATL community. Lat, we need a break from this drivel. I propose making Friday the guest-writer buffet of horrors. Doing this all week will kill the comments section.
Exley = Excellent! Alex = Average.
I don't get how any of you think that Alex is the better writer. If I hadn't read Exeley's article first, Alex's would have been impossible to follow. He jumps from one thought to the next without explanation or transition. The worst part was, "Sen. Shepherd claims he was protecting his mother and sister. Unclear why his "defense of others" required stealing Ms. Ashford's Blackberry Pearl and $100 cash." Wait, he stole a blackberry and $100 . . . I must've missed that part of the story. "Wait, hold on." I didn't miss anything afterall. Alex didn't include that information in his introduction to the story. I would've been really confused and completely unable to follow this stream of consciousness crap if I hadn't read Exley first.
How come these 2 are so much worse than the other 3?
Clearly Alex wins this round.
Exley has better details, but the boobs picture settles it. How could Exley leave them out???
Exley gave me a better picture of what went down, but Alex's presentation was much more ATL. This round goes to Alex.
Exley takes this one. Funnier and more juicy details. I could give a rat's ass about over-linking. THIS IS A BLOG. Hyperlinking is what bloggers do, and Exley still incorporated enough narrative so as not to rely on links alone.
Alex was too un-snarky for LotD and ATL, but gets a plus for posting the lady's name and pic.
Exley's had more info (= good) but alex's is written better (= necessary).
Exley has good wit but poor delivery. Alex has good delivery but not much wit. This was a toss-up.
For those who like Exley's format, you should check out Sophist. Same idea, but it actually works and is funnier. Clearly, Sophist > Exley.
Sophist's list isn't nearly as good as Exley's.
Alex produced a polished summary of a funny article. Exley summarized a funny article with some wit.
Polish is easier to acquire than wit. I vote Exley.
Stay frosty Exley. Stay on top.
Exley
Exley is funnier but Alex is a better writer.
Exley
I want to make a comment about the substance of the post.
This man has been elected by citizens of his community.
This is why I don't vote.
Skadouche - Exley
Alex is the obvious front runner in this head-to-head. Succint and coordinated reporting with shots of sarcastic commentary make for a sharp, snappy blog. Way to redeem yourself Alex!
Agree with 101. I like both of these articles better than the other 3 head-to-head articles.
This was very poor seeding, Lat. The two worst remaining contestants (Alex and Exley) get to face each other while the top two (Marin and F&D) are stuck against each other in the varsity bracket? Way to guarantee a next round berth for a poor contestant.
@100 - needing to use "clearly" = TTT, or did you skip that class back in 1L year?
Alex 1, Exley 0
111: i totally agree! all three of the other posts are better than these 2.
Alex gets my vote. I couldn't even tell what the story was about after just reading Exley's.
alex has subtle wit and excellent delivery. exley has obvious/overreaching wit and fair delivery. alex wins.
Alex definitely wins. Exley's post had no narrative and was way too long. Tell the story. Snark a little. Don't subject us to lists.
Alex wins. Way tighter. Should have found a way to get more of the details in, though.
These are the two best writers in the contest. Don't get me wrong, all five of them suck ass and any one of them will be the death of this site, but of the five these two are the best.
Thank you 119! I have no idea where this Marin-Sophist fascination comes from. This contest is coming down to Alex and Exley.
I was an Exley fan pre-this post but man he/she did absolutely terrible. Alex in a landslide. It is clearer, more concise, and the lead paragraphs aren't terrible.
Alex. But Marin trumps all in this round.
92, my thoughts exactly. Exley wins this round.
Agree with 92 and 123. Exley's article is way easier to follow that Alex's. The list worked because each "step" provides a humorous and absurd piece of the story. Sophist -- take notes from Exley, then try again.
Alex, hands down
Where the hell are the judges already?
Exley
Alex got my vote with the Halverson link. Well-played.
exley wins
These are both terrible--both contestants should be shot in the face for wasting my time and their own writing this garbage.
Exley wins this one. Alex has no juice or spunk. Reads like a boring Wall Street Journal Law Blog post.
Alex was great! Clear, concise, and funny.
Exley was ambitious, but failed utterly. Not easy to follow, so after a few lines, I gave up. Exley, step up or step out.
first one was better