Add RSS RSS

Jonathan Lee Riches Wants in on Gitmo Litigation
(And Enron litigation, and Duke litigation…)

Jonathan Lee Riches Jonathan Riches Jon Lee Riches Jon Riches Above the Law blog.jpgEveryone’s favorite wacky pro se litigant, federal prisoner Jonathan Lee Riches, is at it again. He recently filed a motion to intervene (PDF) in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, claiming that he has “a common interest with Hamdan” because he’s being tortured and starved by Donald Rumsfeld. In support, Riches cites the fact that he weighs only 121 pounds, despite being 5’10”. Maybe he should become a male model after completing his sentence?

Considering that Riches files a new lawsuit every week, keeping track of his litigation adventures can be a challenge. If you’d like to stay on top of his burgeoning legal career, do what we did, and join his Facebook fan club.

A screencap of Riches’s Hamdan motion, plus links to some of his other filings — a motion to intervene in a case against Enron, which he claims is violating his Eighth Amendment rights, and a lawsuit against Duke basketball coach Mike Krzyzewski, whom he blames for his hard mattress and resulting back pain — after the jump.

Riches’s Hamdan filing appears below. We contacted Professor Neal Katyal, counsel to Hamdan, to see if he had any reaction to Riches’s motion. Professor Katyal had no comment.

Hamdan Rumsfeld Jonathan Lee Riches motion to intervene.jpg

Jonathan Lee Riches’s Motion To Intervene as Plaintiff: Hamdan v. Rumsfeld [PDF]
Jonathan Lee Riches’s Motion To Intervene as Plaintiff: Newby v. Enron Corp. [PDF]
Complaint: Riches v. Krzyzewski [PDF]
Sue-pergroup: the Jonathan Lee Riches © fanclub [Facebook]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:26 PM

SWEET

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:32 PM

Love the handwritten motion on lined paper. Who is this guy, seriously?

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:34 PM

Like so many great artists, Riches' earliest work is his best work. His lawsuit against Michael Vick for dog theft is classic:

http://www.abovethelaw.com/2007/07/lawsuit_of_the_day_vicks_a_def.php

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:44 PM

Go JLR!

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:44 PM

Go JLR!

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:03 PM

read the coach K lawsuit if you haven't yet -- it's only 5 lines long. it's pretty good.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:07 PM

What I would like to know is how federal prisioners have internet access. (3 free squares a day, no pesky phone calls, no deadlines, no worries + tennis + internet access + unlimited pro se lawsuits? Fed custody is looking mighly attractive.)

Second, does the DCA tolerate Riches for his amusement value?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:07 PM

He'll fit in well at AU or Fordham once he's done his time.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:09 PM

ever visit a federal prison? I have. No worries is hardly accurate. Piled with 3-5 other men in a cell the size of a generous walk-in closet is the tip of the iceberg

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:10 PM

Seriously, why hasn't Duke gotten this guy a friggin pillow and a blanket yet?!?!!??

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:11 PM

Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:09 PM:

Specifically, what worries does the typical Club Fed inmate have?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:15 PM

He could be a male model - he has the right bone structure.

He could also get a job as a comedy writer.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:18 PM

3:11 --

With the dramatic increase in federal drug statutes and resulting increase in federal drug felony convictions, you can start with prison gangs and related activity.

Regards,
3:09

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:21 PM

I'm disappointed that the great JLR no longer refers to himself as "Jonathan Lee Riches©"

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:25 PM

Club Fed? Dude, you have clearly never been to jail in any capacity.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:26 PM

Club Fed? Dude, you have clearly never been to jail in any capacity but especially as a 5'10 121 pound white kid.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:29 PM

I don't understand, what does the Duke have to do with his back ache and cold?

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:31 PM

Maybe 121-pound Jonathan Lee Riches can share some of his dieting tips with Judge Halverson.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:31 PM

Maybe 121-pound Jonathan Lee Riches can share some of his dieting tips with Judge Halverson.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:31 PM

The Coach K lawsuit is the best: "I have no pillow and mattress in solitary. My neck hurts and [Coach K] won't help with my back pain."

But all he wants is $13.7 million. Anyone know why he picked Coach K?

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:51 PM

"I seek $13.7 million and a blanket 'cause I'm freezing." LOL

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:06 PM

Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:25 PM:

"Dude, you have clearly never been to jail in any capacity."

Well. yes I have.

In 1983, I (as a criminal defense attorney in a small wine country town) was pulled over, quickly surrounded by cops (all of whom I had cross-examined) and arrested for DUI.

I spent 6 hours in custody. (The charges were later dismissed, and the DMV ordered on a mandamus petition to reinstate my driving privilege, based on testimony by the bartender (before the stop that I drank only club soda and was not intoxicated) and the corrections officer who booked me (no smell of alcohol, speech fine, eyes clear--after a superior court judge found the cops testilied.)

In my capacity as a (former) criminal lawyer I have probably spent a cumulative 1000 hours visiting felony clients in just about every jail and joint in N. California, including the Napa County Jail (from which I had 3 clients separately escape in a 10 day period, and a 4th female armeed robbery client kick through a partition to access the men's side of the jail, where she had her "fill" of 6 guys in a tank the night before her transfer to Fontana), the Solano Count jail facilities in Vallejo and Fairfield, the CC County jail in Martinez, the Oakland down town jail, Santa Rita’s notorious Grey Stone facility (now closed), and “joints” like Tracy, San Quentin, Folsom, and others.

I have had the pleasure of trying to interview an in custody client during a lock down, cajoling my way into the security cell (because I knew both of the black vs. white protagonists and promised to quell the situation-which I did) and have the urine they had thrown at each other leech through my loafers, resulting in whet socks and feet.

So, I ask you again, what is “worrisome” about a Club Fed?

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:09 PM

Seriously, how can you not love this guy. He's funnier than most of the writers for SNL now.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:26 PM

4:06 = JLR.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:30 PM

it really depends on the kind of Fed prison you're in.

white-collar resort = no worries.
federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison = worries (should be self-explanatory)

and honestly 4:06, the fact that there exist really bad state prisons is irrelevant to the experience of life in a federal prison.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:38 PM

I was simply responding to the claim that I have never visited a lock-up in any capacity, and my original point WAS directed at so called “Club Fed” facilities.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 5:08 PM

According to a Justia ,Federal District Court Filings Search, Riches has filed over 1,800 pro se lawsuits.

See this link:

http://dockets.justia.com/search?q=JONATHAN+LEE+RICHES

Now THAT is awesome.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 5:13 PM

4:06 here again --

After re-reading these comments, I took the past 1/2 hour to research conditions in federal prisons (admittedly limited to Google news searches). While I'm fairly well informed about state "joints," I guess I did speak too soon about federal custody: it's no piece of cake. I just got worked up over JLR and posted rashly. Sorry.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 5:32 PM

4:06 --

We were simply talking past each other. Given the unenviable choice of federal or state custody, sign me up for federal for sure, and I'm sure you would agree.

-3:09

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 5:46 PM

Wow - semi-civilized polite and factually supported and researched conversation - what has happened here???

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 5:59 PM

5:46 -- I think I might know. Someone POSING as 4:06 wrote the conciliatory comment. I think I know the real 4:06 (those facts sound eerily familiar), and he would never take that same tack. I'm pretty sure The Real 4:06 would furiously debate a toddler on whether or not Mrs. Butterworth can actually talk.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 10, 2008 6:19 PM

July 10, 2008 5:13 PM was NOT me.

However, the claim that I "would furiously debate a toddler on whether or not Mrs. Butterworth can actually talk" is of course an exaggeration to make a point.

Yes, 3:09 we were simply talking past each other, and I would agree.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 11, 2008 4:28 AM

hey 2:32-- he might be clarence gideon reborn. that petition? also handwritten on lined paper.

http://cache.viewimages.com/xc/3093939.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=552D90A84D8CF980895D3F4A06AE9DA0A55A1E4F32AD3138

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 11, 2008 4:29 AM

i would debate a four year old that mrs butterworth can talk. and id win.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 11, 2008 10:17 AM

Is he trying to make a bid for the loony bin? Or time off for annoyingly amusing behavior?

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 11, 2008 11:09 AM

Guys in my high school used to file absurd pro se complaints all the time, it's no big deal

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 11, 2008 11:09 AM

Guys in my high school used to file absurd pro se complaints all the time, it's no big deal

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 11, 2008 12:00 PM

I used to extern for the pro se department at the district court and I'm a little disappointed I never came across this guy :(

Did get plenty of other awesome, handwritten briefs though

39 Posted by nicolle | Permalink Friday, July 11, 2008 6:24 PM

glad to see more JLR© on here; he really is my favourite pro se litigant ever.

...and thanks for linking to my facebook group! :D

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, July 13, 2008 12:18 PM

interesting you mention male modeling...in several of his lawsuits, he actually refers to being a male model for mainline models in king of prussia, pennsylvania [no, i'm not making this up!], and attaches "modeling pictures" in the lawsuits to show how he used to look before prison starved him.

Post Your Comment