Add RSS RSS

The Meaningful Minutiae of Firm Life in the Summertime: Open Thread

avatar Exley ATL Idol.jpg[Ed. note: This post is by EXLEY, one of the finalists in ATL Idol, the "reality blogging" competition that will determine ATL's next editor. It is marked with Exley's avatar (at right).]

As anyone remotely familiar with the law knows, the devil is in the details. Similarly, it's the little things that can sometimes make or break a long day at the office. A mouse with a trackball that refuses to roll in a particular direction, for example, or harsh bathroom lighting that gives everyone's reflection a sickly, ghoulish, glow can really mess a girl up. And a half-nod of recognition from a usually impassive lobby security guard can make a dude feel like the office is his second crib.

The dog days of summer present their own set of potential pet peeves.

summer fashion.jpgThe major complaint we've heard from female associates is that offices are too damn cold in the summer. Of course, offices are probably the same temperature year-round, but the coolness is more tolerable in the non-summer seasons when people wear warmer clothes. When it is as high as 90 degrees outside, however, it is impossible to commute to work in wool slacks and a sweater set without suffering heat stroke and/or being fingered as a crazy person (especially if wearing a pair of ostentatious cross trainers). Physical and mental health issues aside, it just feels good to be able to change it up sartorially once in a while.

Unfortunately, those who indulge in summer apparel sometimes need to store additional layers of clothing at work or snuggle under company-issued fleece at their desks. And forget about drinking an ice coffee or Jamba Juice inside! You'll need a parka and a hunting cap to be able to do that.

Is your law firm unbearably cold or hot this summer, and have you been able to do anything about it? We've heard suspicions that the thermostats in individual offices at Skadden's New York office don't really do anything at all, and that the office is kept cold "for the computers." Sounds ominous.

Any theories on why offices spend so much money blasting the AC in the summer and possibly lowering employee morale? (Perhaps it's a way to awaken associates from the depths of summer associate food coma, or to indirectly discourage skimpy clothing.)

Summer attire can also chafe against firm dress code policies. Despite the perennial push for "city shorts" by what seems like every single women's apparel retailer, are there any firms out there that actually allow employees to wear shorts to work?

Of course, even the uncontroversial short-sleeve dress shirt can raise issues if it reveals a tattoo, or three. A partner with such a predicament writes:

I'm a 50 year old lawyer in NY, a partner in a law firm. I have tattoos on my arms with images and the names of my two children and my wife.

Check out what happens when he rolls up his sleeves, and share your own summertime firm life experiences, after the jump.

Here's how the tattooed law firm partner deals with his tats:

Of course, I wear long sleeves with many clients, and in court. But I have had clients come to visit me, or something, and see them. Uniformly, the reactions have been positive. Sometimes I tell people, I use the tattoos to scare or shake people up in depositions (nothing like taking off your suit jacket, rolling up your sleeves, and saying, "Now, would you like to reconsider the answer you just gave?" ). I had one client stop by the other day, two guys, actually, and I had a short sleeve shirt on. They were stunned. They proceeded to show me their tattoos, which were also for family members. We had a good laugh and realized we had something else in common.

Have you shown any clients or colleagues your tattoos?

Does the later sunset make you feel guilty if you leave when it's not even dark outside yet?

Do you try to eat lunch outside, to absorb some vitamin D and goggle the flimsily dressed corporate eye-candy?

Please share your thoughts on these and other summertime firm life minutiae, in the open thread.

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:03 PM

First to say - you are the weakest link....GOODBYE

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:04 PM

Too long to read. Does not get the ALT thing.

Kash Hill remains the best choice to edit this blog.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:04 PM

You're only as good as your last post, and this one is BAD. I hear Hope Winters is hiring.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:04 PM

useless post.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:05 PM

Dawg, I already read the NYT today.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:06 PM

Write in Kash. She got it from day-one. Do we believe in merit, or not?

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:06 PM

I guess this wasnt too bad.... mildly amusing for a slow afternoon...

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:06 PM

I guess this wasnt too bad.... mildly amusing for a slow afternoon...

9 Posted by t14lawDOTblogspot | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:07 PM

- Law firms use AC and that makes the office cold.
- Do you show people your tattoos?

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:07 PM

yeah, too long for the topic

I hear Akin DC has individual thermos that work...

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:07 PM

Long, rambling, no form or structure. What the hell was this article about, anyways?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:08 PM

I have a tattoo of Tom Selleck's mustache on my upper lip.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:08 PM

Ummm is this recycled from every morning talk show ever?

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:09 PM

really really weak. exley, you disappoint. rambles all over place just to get to a "share your thoughts" ending? ugh.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:09 PM

Seriously, only one of the auditions today was actually about current events... I hate to say it but Sophist gets my vote

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:09 PM

It's ICED coffee, not "ice coffee," dimwit.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:09 PM

I enjoyed this post, especially your "tipster." Use of the jump was a bit clunky though.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:10 PM

Short-sleeve dress shirts are only "uncontroversial" if you are in door-to-door sales.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:11 PM

Snooze fest

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:11 PM

Not your strongest showing, Exley.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:12 PM

Well, I was wrong about the 5-liner. Instead, we were given an incoherent mess and told to discuss....what, exactly?

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:12 PM

Great post...for a fashion blog. Isn't this ATL?

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:12 PM

Between this and the post about the airport billboard I think Exley is just dialing it in at this point.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:12 PM

first paragraph was good, went downhill from there

sophist is best so far

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:14 PM

Didn't work for me, Dawg. Little pitchy.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:14 PM

awful. just awful. like a puppy who sh*t on the floor instead of the grass. awful.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:15 PM

Was this supposed to be the substantive post?

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:16 PM

these topics were both stolen from todays NY media (shorts as appropriate business attire in todays NY Times and air conditioning too high on todays Brian Lehrer show on WNYC).

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:16 PM

these topics were both stolen from todays NY media (shorts as appropriate business attire in todays NY Times and air conditioning too high on todays Brian Lehrer show on WNYC).

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:16 PM

Guys in my high school scared the crap out of people by rolling up their sleeves and showing their tattoos all the time. It was no big deal.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:16 PM

And a half-nod of recognition from a usually impassive lobby security guard can make a dude feel like the office is his second crib.

WTF is she babbling about? Someone please kill her.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:16 PM

4:15--is that pronounced SUBstantive or subSTANtive?

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:17 PM

Verbose.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:18 PM

Please re-submit to tips@fashionista.com.

Thank you for playing.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:18 PM

I like you, Exley. I would have liked this story better if it had included the NY Times article from style on the use of shorts, considering how awesome Thomas McEntee looks in his short suit. I would like to see THAT at a Biglaw firm.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/fashion/31shorts.html?_r=1&ref=style&oref=slogin

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:19 PM

What the hell was this?

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:19 PM

this wasn't about ANYTHING! The whole point is just to ask us to share interesting tidbits about our summer routines? Doesn't seem necessary to give such a long intro if you're just gonna ask us to do the work for you. We aren't gunning for EIC, you are, so start acting like it and give us some substance.

After much better posts from F&D and Sophist today, there is no way this is gonna go over well with the ATL readership.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:20 PM

Exley is a terrible, terrible writer. I mean beyond bad. He doesn't get it at all.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:20 PM

Exley is a terrible, terrible writer. I mean beyond bad. He doesn't get it at all.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:20 PM

As someone who has had to buy thickly padded bras to survive summer in a law firm, I know why it's so damn cold.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:21 PM

40, tell us more...

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:23 PM

Oh, for fuck sake 35. How do you expect to intimidate anyone if you wear short suit pants, let alone short linen suit pants?

Shorts on a vacation are one thing, shorts with a blazer for office attire is ridiculous.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:25 PM

Yawn. You suck.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:25 PM

ew 41.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:25 PM

ew 41.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:26 PM

Write in Kash Hill.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:27 PM

I have read better articles in the Touro Law Review.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:29 PM

Meandering

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:30 PM

What, no comments about Akin Gump withdrawing from Taipei and Silicon Valley and transferring the attorneys there to Alston & Bird?

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:30 PM

Exley to...editor of Fashionista.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:32 PM

way to take a hard line on the uselessness of dres codes.

we're attorneys, not models.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:33 PM

44-45 = David Lat. Or some other gay dude.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:34 PM

Suit shorts??? If my lawyer came in wearing those, I'd most likely fire him on the spot.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:34 PM

Yikes, it seems like Exley was too tired to put real effort into this post. I've got news, if you have to do this everyday it doesn't get easier, and the comments don't get nicer...

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:35 PM

"The major complaint we've heard from female associates . . . "

Like real attorneys care about this.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:35 PM

I was rooting for you, but this is awful. GOODbye

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:36 PM

GOGGLE? i think you mean OGLE you moron.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:36 PM

41 = TTT

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:37 PM

Ok, this one sucked pretty bad. I was a big Exley fan to start based on the bios, but these two posts have not been impressive. I am now dropping him in the rankings.

For those keeping score, the current rankings are:

1. Sophist
2. Alex
3. Anyone else
4. Exley
5. Marin
6. F&D

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:37 PM

Comprehensive rankings:
Sophist
Marin
Alex
F&D
Exley

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:37 PM

lol @ 47

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:37 PM

"A mouse with a trackball that refuses to roll in a particular direction."

Yeah, or like when the tractor-feed paper holes won't match the printer....

Jesus, Exley, do you use a Commodore?

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:40 PM

just another reason why women dont belong in biglaw, or why they dont last. its friggin 90 out there and when factoring in the humidity, forget about it. thank god for ac and no its never too cold.

also in quinn emanuel shorts and flip-flops (which i personally hate) are the norm and accepted.

finally not a bad post, but kash is still right after lat. kash has that blogging talent (short to the point, knowing when to put the jump, when to have along blog etc.) naturally

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:41 PM

Lammetiy lame lame lame.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:41 PM

Jumped the shark.

Ever hear that phrase? This applies to this thread and Exley.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:41 PM

What's wrong with suit shorts on men? They're all the rage across the pond. Where do you think JCrew got that trend from? Very sharp, professional yet sporty.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:45 PM

There's a reason sports coats was invented.

It hides moobs on the typically overfat U.S. attorneys in NYC.

Shorts just shows the flab down there as well.

No.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:45 PM

Exley: thank YOU for bringing this up. I'm a woman working in big law (tall building big law, sheesh Alex, give up that silly phrase), and hate my summertime chills.

1. Exley
2. Alex
3. Sophist
5. Marin
6. F&D

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:45 PM

Exley: thank YOU for bringing this up. I'm a woman working in big law (tall building big law, sheesh Alex, give up that silly phrase), and hate my summertime chills.

1. Exley
2. Alex
3. Sophist
5. Marin
6. F&D

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:46 PM

Exley: thank YOU for bringing this up. I'm a woman working in big law (tall building big law, sheesh Alex, give up that silly phrase), and hate my summertime chills.

1. Exley
2. Alex
3. Sophist
5. Marin
6. F&D

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:46 PM

What's wrong with suit shorts on men? They're all the rage across the pond. Where do you think JCrew got that trend from? Very sharp, professional yet sporty.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:47 PM

I could barely make it past this totally cringe-inducing line: "a half-nod of recognition from a usually impassive lobby security guard can make a dude feel like the office is his second crib."

But I persevered. Only to fall asleep before reaching the end. I think this is even worse than Alex's post given that line quoted above.

OFFICIAL Rankings:

1. Kash
2. Marin
3. Sophist
4. F&D
5. Alex
6. Exley

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:47 PM

No, 66, they're not "professional" unless you're a park ranger, a UPS guy or a pro golfer.

They're just "sporty," period. Reminds me of those 'tards who think that they're "dressed up" if their t-shirts have the tommy hilfiger logo.

74 Posted by Pacific Reporter | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:48 PM

Not a fan of this post.
I agree with 2 - Kash should become the new ATL editor.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:49 PM

This post is lame as all hell. Also, as a guy, I find it incredibly annoying and offensive when women like to shove their lack-of-a-standard-dress-code in the face of adults who wear, y'know, a suit and tie to work every day. If you enjoy the freedom to wear something sleeveless, don't rub it in by whining about how cold it in in the office. Some of us have to wear an undershirt (so we don't sweat through on our way to work) and a tie and jacket.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:49 PM

This post is lame as all hell. Also, as a guy, I find it incredibly annoying and offensive when women like to shove their lack-of-a-standard-dress-code in the face of adults who wear, y'know, a suit and tie to work every day. If you enjoy the freedom to wear something sleeveless, don't rub it in by whining about how cold it in in the office. Some of us have to wear an undershirt (so we don't sweat through on our way to work) and a tie and jacket.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:49 PM

ogle, not "goggle."

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:49 PM

1. HofstraMagna
2. Kash

....

56. Alex

....

327. Exley
328. Sophist
329. Marin
330. F&D

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:50 PM

Blatant appeal to gay vote.

[HINT; Marin, as a classic F.H., already has that demographic locked.]

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:50 PM

"Goggle"??!??! wtf?

Requirement #1 for being a professional blogger: Literacy.

Exley=FAIL

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:50 PM

Women who are cold at work should wear more clothes. The guys have to wear suits (with long sleeve dress shirts, undershirts, ties, etc.) all summer long and don't have the option of wearing lighter, cooler summer clothing. There is nothing guys can do to cool off when some woman wants to set the thermostat way up. Put on some more clothes.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:51 PM

partners at my high school used to bond with their clients by showing them their cock rings all the time. it was no big deal.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:51 PM

that was bad.

Exley to CWT

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:52 PM

1. HofstraMagna
2. Kash

....

56. Alex

....

327. Exley
328. Sophist
329. Marin
330. F&D

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:53 PM

Dialing it in? More like phoning it in.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:54 PM

Current Rankings

1. Sophist
2. Alex
.
.
.
993. Marin
994. Exley
.
.
.
11,345,678. F&D

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:55 PM

i agree that this was a stupid post. but for the record, i'm a woman and have to wear a suit every day and it is still too cold in the office.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:55 PM

"We've heard suspicions that the thermostats in individual offices at Skadden's New York office don't really do anything at all, and that the office is kept cold "for the computers." Sounds ominous."

That's...not really the appropriate use of ominous.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:56 PM

71:

“What's wrong with suit shorts on men?”

Nothing, at a Long Island, Fire island, or LA garden party, fashion shoot, or while escorting Marin (until she finds her dog loving hetro-NJB).

At a corporate or law office: No way.


PS: Write in Kash Hill for ATL editor.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:57 PM

73: Shorts are not allowed on the PGA Tour.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:58 PM

So, this post was basically the indoor equivalent of an awkward one-sided conversation:

"Err, so, how's the weather there . . . ?"

92 Posted by Ari Covair | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:58 PM

Sorry to inform: there's no such thing as a short-sleeved dress shirt.

93 Posted by David Brent | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:58 PM

Played topic, contrived tone, disjointed writing; shall I go on? Exley sounds like a neophyte.

I believe his time is up.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:59 PM

I think the topics were great! I am ALWAYS cold at work during the summer - with my blanket nearby. And it is really irritating trying to dress appropriately. Good work, Exley!

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:59 PM

75/76/81 are you a law student? Lawyers (outside of the deep south) do not wear suits to work unless they are taking a deposition or appearing in court.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:02 PM

This post sucks! BTW - the A/C is cranked up because men wear long sleeve shirts, ties and jackets. As men control the legal profession, the women must suffer in their short sleeve shirts and skirts. Men also like to see a little nipple action, so they keep it cold on purpose. YAY for NIPS

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:03 PM

95, are you an idiot? Many, if not most, BigLaw firms require suits be worn to work. They don't have business casual dress codes.

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:08 PM

Exley, you're a great writer, but you should write a "legal" post next time...

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:09 PM

Great title.

avatar
100 Posted by slamtastic | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:10 PM

J. L. Riches for editor!!

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:12 PM

Great post -- my fellow interns and I lament about how cold our office is all day. You can literally feel a thaw once you walk outside. I actually like this post, which is rare on ATL. Keep it up!

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:14 PM

TfLDNR.

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:17 PM

Why are you bitches whining about length? Can't lawyers read an extra paragraph or two when deciding the next ATL EIC?

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:18 PM

Exley's plan to appeal to the female readership of ATL meets with failure because he didn't realize that 90% of ATL's readers are male.

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:19 PM

I LOVED your post! And I don't know how 104 got that figure. Does Lat even know what the male/female ratio is??

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:21 PM

105 = part of the other 10%

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:26 PM

Don't you realize Exley is a clitigator herself?

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:27 PM

Too long Exley, but you're punchy. You and Sophist stand above the rest in writing talent.

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:28 PM

Man, out of all of the posts by all of the contestants up to this point, the only one that was any good was Sophist's post today about Scrabulous. All others have sucked big time. This blog is going down in flames when David leaves.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:32 PM

97, in California no attorney where's a suit unless in court or in deposition (though not even necessarily at a depo; I do, but I know others who don't). When I previously worked for a firm in NYC, the rule was the same. My understanding is the same as 95's -- i.e., that only in the deep south (the most idiotic of all places to wear a wool suit in summer) do firms still require suits.

avatar
111 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:33 PM

97, in California no attorney wears a suit unless in court or in deposition (though not even necessarily at a depo; I do, but I know others who don't). When I previously worked for a firm in NYC, the rule was the same. My understanding is the same as 95's -- i.e., that only in the deep south (the most idiotic of all places to wear a wool suit in summer) do firms still require suits.

avatar
112 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:36 PM

Overwritten and not very interesting. I vote against.

avatar
113 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:37 PM


I've never much cared for hearing the women I work with complain about how it's too cold inside.

Now I know that i don't much care for reading about it, either.

avatar
114 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:51 PM

I asked our firm admin folks if we could raise the thermostat that controls my office. Rocket science, I know.

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:52 PM

AAAAH! WOMAN TALKING WOMAN TALKING.

avatar
116 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:54 PM

When I think short-suit, I think Augustus Gloop.

As for wool suits in the deep south (110/111): Most in the deep south dress appropriately for the season (e.g. tropical weight wool, seersucker, poplin, linen, etc.).

avatar
117 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:57 PM

Surely she wasn't talking about short suits for men, was she?

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:58 PM

This post is unmeaningful minuta.

avatar
119 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:58 PM

110/111,

In 97's post he said "many, if not most, Biglaw shops require suits every day." That statement is most definitely true even if most California and New York firms don't require suits (although I bet that "many" California and New York firms do require suits).

avatar
120 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 6:04 PM

D- nozzle

avatar
121 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 6:10 PM

Kash Hill for ATL editor!

Lat: At least give us the option of writing Kash in on the last ballot.

Her posts are better than any of the "Idol" contestants and she was liked and respected by this tough crowd from day-one.

avatar
122 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 6:15 PM

Good writer, but too long and too features-y.

This was funny: "[T]he office is kept cold 'for the computers.' Sounds ominous."

But then "forget about drinking an ice coffee or Jamba Juice inside! "

Ugh!

So far, I still like Marin. Even after reading her blog.

avatar
123 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 6:23 PM

I am a man. I wear wool pants, a tee shirt, wool socks, and long-sleeved shirt everyday, like 90% of men in BIGLAW.

If women would just wear clothes that cover their arms and necks and wear closed-toe shoes, they would be fine.

This isn't rocket science or even thermodynamics. Christ.

avatar
124 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 7:00 PM

That was absolutely dreadful. It was as if I was at a karaoke bar, and someone was humming the same note, with no music playing, for five minutes.

/simon

p.s. here's a tip, before you post something, think to yourself, "who cares?" If the answer--like here-- is "no one," please do not post. What, you think people are going to bond over how their office is cold too? Don't be stupid.

avatar
125 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 7:01 PM

I like Kash just as much as everybody else, but can she really be EIC without having worked as a lawyer or even going to law school?

I'd be worried about the kind of information she'd be able to get because of this.

avatar
126 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 7:16 PM

125: Why?

None of the editors of major news papers are lawyers.

David Lat will retain management control over the blog, and still has his contacts.

The same confidentiality policy still allies to tips. And the tips will still to tips@abovethelaw.com.

The same thing initially occurred to me, but on reflection, I think she would be great.

avatar
127 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 7:54 PM

"(especially if wearing a pair of ostentatious cross trainers)"

Ostentatious = flashy. Ostentatious != ubiquitous. YOU FUCKING FAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

avatar
128 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 10:45 PM

Thank you for this post Exley -- summers piss me off!

avatar
129 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 10:46 PM

Thanks for the post Exley -- I FREEZE in the summers

avatar
130 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 11:00 PM

I HATE FEMALE FLIP FLOPPERS IN THE OFFICE. SORRY FOR THE CAPS. GOTO THE FKING BEACH, SOME PEOPLE ARE HERE TO WORK.

avatar
131 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 31, 2008 11:00 PM

I HATE FEMALE FLIP FLOPPERS IN THE OFFICE. SORRY FOR THE CAPS. GOTO THE FKING BEACH, SOME PEOPLE ARE HERE TO WORK.

avatar
132 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 1, 2008 9:11 AM

130/131 - and we hate double posters who have no patience to let their response go through...
Off to get more coffee... *flip flop flip flop*

avatar
133 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 1, 2008 9:57 AM

I wish I could wear short-sleave shirts without looking like an engineer!

avatar
134 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 1, 2008 10:09 AM


I agree that Kash is a good writer and has a good sense for what the readership here likes. So similar are their styles that I have to look at the byline to see which posts are from her and which are from Lat. So I think she would be a great candidate to take over as the boss of ATL.

But isn't she living and working in Hong Kong now? Perhaps her other commitments would preclude her from being the ATL editor. I hope she continues to contribute when a new editor is selected.

avatar
135 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 1, 2008 10:15 AM

Current ranking:

1. Marin
2. Sophist
.
.
45. Exley
.
.
3456856834765. F&D
898640958683475394. Alex

avatar
136 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 1, 2008 12:09 PM

Summation:

Many offices require suits all year round. The Daniel Patrick Moyhnihan Building is extremely cold during the summer, perhaps because we all expect to be in court everday, hence we wear suits.

I try to wear summerweight suits, but a year round wardrobe of suits is expensive for those of us not on biglaw salary.

There is some gender division in this. Women do have something of a problem, because many judges or offices prefer to see women wear skirt suits, and not pant suits, which means they will be cold in the office in the summer and cold outside in the winter. I personally think this is utter nonsense, and a holdover from thankfully outdated sexual mores, and that women should just wear pantsuits. You aren't here to look sexy; you are here to practice. And there is no way in hell I am wearing shorts into chambers, so do us both a favor and wear a pant suit.

avatar
137 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 1, 2008 12:35 PM

I actually find my office way to warm in the summer. It becomes hard to stay awake. Women need to stop whining and remember that the world doesn't revolve around their comfort. If they want to work in the man's world, they have live with a man's temperature.

avatar
138 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 1, 2008 12:54 PM

Bur skirt suits are so sexy!

avatar
139 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 1, 2008 1:18 PM

I like summer. One of our OCI criteria is to look for full breasted summer associates (female, of course). We crank the a/c down as low as it will go. Watch their perky little nipples in the cold. Base offers/no offers on how they respond, rather than substantive legal ability or interpersonal skills (unless they are at Skadden and have sex in the office, which is a great interpersonal skill).

After all, associates are fungible.

CWT Hiring Partner

avatar
140 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 5, 2008 9:08 PM

Quinn Emanuel Los Angeles - shorts, flip flops, jeans all year long....

avatar
141 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 5, 2008 9:08 PM

Quinn Emanuel Los Angeles - shorts, flip flops, jeans all year long....

Post Your Comment